JohnnyShearer2.0 Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 23 minutes ago, Sir Ralph said: 100% agree with your assessment of Starmer. Weak and inspiring. Not a real leader that our forces want to get behind. Some people might suggest that’s the profile of a British liberal man. Pretty certain that CB Fry was referencing GM. 2
Gloucester Saint Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago (edited) 31 minutes ago, Sir Ralph said: 100% agree with your assessment of Starmer. Weak and inspiring. Not a real leader that our forces want to get behind. Some people might suggest that’s the profile of a British liberal man. Not a Starmer or Labour man but that’s as bad as any of Soggy’s posts labelling everyone far right. You’re a cunt for generalising tens of millions of people with crackpot views. You’ve also joined John and your Thailand pervert alter ego on ignore so don’t bother responding. Edited 14 hours ago by Gloucester Saint 3 1
Sir Ralph Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 20 minutes ago, JohnnyShearer2.0 said: Pretty certain that CB Fry was referencing GM. Thanks, yes I was aware. CB Fry’s post was unnecessary, hence my twist on it. 1 2
Sir Ralph Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago (edited) 57 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said: Not a Starmer or Labour man but that’s as bad as any of Soggy’s posts labelling everyone far right. You’re a cunt for generalising tens of millions of people with crackpot views. You’ve also joined John and your Thailand pervert alter ego on ignore so don’t bother responding. I profusely apologise - I meant “progressive” liberal British man 😂 Edited 13 hours ago by Sir Ralph
tdmickey3 Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago 22 minutes ago, Sir Ralph said: Thanks, yes I was aware. CB Fry’s post was unnecessary, hence my twist on it. Of course you were... 🤡 1
Gloucester Saint Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago 17 minutes ago, tdmickey3 said: Of course you were... 🤡 Nic/Ralph’s mates aren’t faring too well in Dubai. Of course they’ll turn down the evacuation plane because it’s organised by a centre left government, paid for by us mugs. 2
Farmer Saint Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago 1 hour ago, Sir Ralph said: 100% agree with your assessment of Starmer. Weak and inspiring. Not a real leader that our forces want to get behind. Some people might suggest that’s the profile of a “progressive” British liberal man. He's talking about GM, not Starmer. Fucking hell, you piss off for a week and then fuck up as soon as you get back. 2 2
Farmer Saint Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago 19 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said: Nic/Ralph’s mates aren’t faring too well in Dubai. Of course they’ll turn down the evacuation plane because it’s organised by a centre left government, paid for by us mugs. Anyone that comes back on those planes should be liable for taxes not paid over the past 5 years. 3
Gloucester Saint Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Farmer Saint said: Anyone that comes back on those planes should be liable for taxes not paid over the past 5 years. Absolutely 💯 1
whelk Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago 5 minutes ago, Farmer Saint said: Anyone that comes back on those planes should be liable for taxes not paid over the past 5 years. Should put them in army barracks until we can clear them as net contributors to the UK economy. Non tax paying influencers funded by UAE spin team not welcome 2
AlexLaw76 Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago 55 minutes ago, Farmer Saint said: Anyone that comes back on those planes should be liable for taxes not paid over the past 5 years. Not even treated to a hotel or HMO
badgerx16 Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 18 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said: Not even treated to a hotel or HMO Only if they come on an RIB.
rallyboy Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago (edited) Why don't they just go to the country next door to them? Stop the planes, we just haven't got any room - unless they have lots of dogs, then we can take them. Edited 11 hours ago by rallyboy woof 1
sadoldgit Posted 11 hours ago Author Posted 11 hours ago 3 hours ago, Gloucester Saint said: Not a Starmer or Labour man but that’s as bad as any of Soggy’s posts labelling everyone far right. You’re a cunt for generalising tens of millions of people with crackpot views. You’ve also joined John and your Thailand pervert alter ego on ignore so don’t bother responding. Everyone far right? I only label those as far right who spout far right rhetoric or who support those who spout far right rhetoric.
Turkish Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 1 minute ago, sadoldgit said: Everyone far right? I only label those as far right who spout far right rhetoric or who support those who spout far right rhetoric. antisemitism is a foundational and persistent element of far-right, neo-Nazi, and white supremacist ideologies. While antisemitism exists across the political spectrum—including the far-left and within certain extremist movements—it is a core component of the far-right worldview Sound like we need to start giving you that label too.
sadoldgit Posted 11 hours ago Author Posted 11 hours ago (edited) 3 hours ago, Sir Ralph said: 100% agree with your assessment of Starmer. Weak and inspiring. Not a real leader that our forces want to get behind. Some people might suggest that’s the profile of a “progressive” British liberal man. Both “weak” and “inspiring?” Not sure how that works? Anyway, standing up to Trump is not being “weak.” Taking decisions which are unpopular is not being “weak.” It has been a long time since we have had a PM that looks like a grown up on the international scene. If you want “weak” people, take a look at Trump and Farage. Anyone who gives in to base instincts is not a strong person. Bullies are not strong. They are weak. The people you support are weak. You are weak. It takes strength to do the right thing. Something you know nothing about. Edited 11 hours ago by sadoldgit Typo
Guided Missile Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 3 hours ago, JohnnyShearer2.0 said: Pretty certain that CB Fry was referencing GM. Like I give a fuck...
Guided Missile Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago Meanwhile, Lammy refuses to rule out strikes on Iran Deputy Prime Minister says ‘all operational capability’ open to UK to defend country
badgerx16 Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 42 minutes ago, Guided Missile said: Ali Starmaini It was much funnier a couple of days ago with the Sam Allardyce pictures. You are just a sad excuse for a human being desperately trying to be relevant and hoping that somebody equally pathetic will agree with you. 3
Holmes_and_Watson Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 1 hour ago, sadoldgit said: Both “weak” and “inspiring?” Not sure how that works? Anyway, standing up to Trump is not being “weak.” Taking decisions which are unpopular is not being “weak.” It has been a long time since we have had a PM that looks like a grown up on the international scene. If you want “weak” people, take a look at Trump and Farage. Anyone who gives in to base instincts is not a strong person. Bullies are not strong. They are weak. The people you support are weak. You are weak. It takes strength to do the right thing. Something you know nothing about. It turned out that Starmer wanted to immediately let Trump use the bases. It was Ed Miliband, and 3 others in the cabinet, who told him they wouldn't support it. That's where the using of them for "defensive" purposes came from.
tdmickey3 Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago (edited) 55 minutes ago, Guided Missile said: Edited 9 hours ago by tdmickey3 1
Gloucester Saint Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 2 hours ago, sadoldgit said: Everyone far right? I only label those as far right who spout far right rhetoric or who support those who spout far right rhetoric. I was actually pointing out the contradiction that when you generalise about how right wing something/someone is, people jump all over it, so I don’t see why the likes of Ralph/Nic (like 🇹🇷 I suspect it’s the same poster) should get away with it either. 1
Gloucester Saint Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 1 hour ago, badgerx16 said: It was much funnier a couple of days ago with the Sam Allardyce pictures. You are just a sad excuse for a human being desperately trying to be relevant and hoping that somebody equally pathetic will agree with you. With a liver so scarred and destroyed it looks like Katie Hopkins’s face.
Gloucester Saint Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 1 hour ago, Holmes_and_Watson said: It turned out that Starmer wanted to immediately let Trump use the bases. It was Ed Miliband, and 3 others in the cabinet, who told him they wouldn't support it. That's where the using of them for "defensive" purposes came from. It was right though, and one of our finest Foreign Secretaries agrees (albeit he got the Tory Party leader gig way too early. I would literally run to the ballot box to vote for him these days, politician and man of substance) https://www.facebook.com/groups/tacticalvoting/posts/1862449064439613/
whelk Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 14 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said: With a liver so scarred and destroyed it looks like Katie Hopkins’s face. I think it would work better if you said like Katie Hopkins’s snatch 1 1
Gloucester Saint Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 1 minute ago, whelk said: I think it would work better if you said like Katie Hopkins’s snatch That’s what John’s breath probably smells like, with a background note of cheap, stale wine. 🍷 Lucky Lowford 😂
harvey Posted 8 minutes ago Posted 8 minutes ago According to (thick as shit) Lammy, Cyprus is a member of NATO.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now