Verbal

If you look closely at the first picture, you'll just make out the numbers attached to the fence. They match the house numbers - so that when the ball flies into someone's back garden, one of the players can pop round and ask for the ball back. Nice little job for Harry Kane.

Are there the signs of a strong striking partnership emerging between Walcott and Adams? Seems so from these last two games...

Text book Facebook echo chamber. Combined, as I say, with complete inoculation from the severe damage that withdrawal is actually causing. Your radicalisation is a small wonder to behold. This is probably the only place where your zealotry is challenged - and nothing on here will perpetrate through all that spoonfed sloganising you regurgitate from FB.

Read and be warned. This is what happens to you when you combine a gold-plated pension and Facebook.

Good grief. Never mind.

Nope. Read Daniel Kahneman's Thinking Fast and Slow. Standard qualitative and quantitive methods are examples of 'fast thinking', and are prone to errors and unconscious biases. 'Slow thinking' takes too much time to explain, ironically, but it's worth reading (he won a Nobel for these ideas). Bringing this back to Walcott, there's no intrinsic reason to give less weight to Turkish's analysis than to the 'statistical' approach. Quantitive doesn't trump qualitative.

Please, the two of you - not again. Get a miserable low-ceilinged room.

False binary. Enough 'anecdotes' can add up to evidence. And evidence isn't equal simply to statistics. That would be reductive. The English language gives us the words 'qualitative' and 'quantitive'. Both can add up to evidence, and one form doesn't necessarily have greater weight than the other.

How apt that a Brexit jihadist should use a bomb analogy.

Leave means leave apparently - with a collapsing cardboard box. What a metaphor for Brexiter wet dreams.

I know! In the words of Oscar Wilde: We are all in the gutter but he is circling the drain.

WTAF Brian? You done a post and there is literally no way to improve it.

This is the sum total of it. Using the phrase 'coloured people' is a classic bumbling boomer mistake that in itself doesn't add up to that much - though he hardly qualifies for a pass given his position. It's more that he's seemed recently to have managed to combine being devious and incompetent on an epic scale.

Not sure that Biden sources his info from Trumpist-conspiracist Facebook pages.

I love the way GM pretends he writes all this guff. Evidently he's rather plagiarise than acknowledge his limitations. As his hero would say: Sad.

Oh God, the anti-Nostradamus back with his predictions. You all know the rules by now - read and invert.

In other words, a repeat of what vice-president Gerald Ford did for Richard Nixon after his resignation in 1974. Quite plausible. But it won't get Trump off the hook because so many of his criminal-legal troubles are at state-level, and so beyond the reach of a presidential pardon, and so many of his civil-legal problems are to do with his cataclysmic finances, which are also beyond the scope of any escape hatch like this. Trump could still end up in prison and a bankrupt.

Fair enough, but to put it in context, Biden's near-four decades' worth of politics and policy history place him somewhere between Michael Heseltine and (on law and order) Margaret Thatcher. His current platform would have looked a little middle-of-the-road to Blairites. On the flip side, the term 'communist' has specific meaning - to be one, you have, at a a minimum, to believe in the common ownership of all the means of production, distribution and exchange. I think we can safely say, as a matter of fact, that Joe Biden is not advocating that - whatever 'rhetoric' we indulge in.

No, he's saying that it's absurd to characterise Biden's platform as 'socialist' or 'communist'. This isn't a difference of views but a difference of facts. Unless, that is, you can tell us which of Biden's proposals is 'socialist' or 'communist'.

Ach that's right. My first game was Spurs v Saints in Jan 1970 and I remember Chivers playing (and Davies scoring the winning goal). But of course Chivers was in white.

Chivers for Channon maybe?

That's not what you said though. You said: 'Without Ings we are fucked.'

One ad hominem sneer after another. That's all you have. Have you got anything to actually say? One other startling fact: many of the same companies that have just been warned by Johnson and Gove to do much more to prepare for no deal are from Thursday being closed for at least four weeks and - judging by this government's record - far longer. How's that going to work?

So there's more than a remote possibility that the UK will crash out of the EU while it's in a national lockdown for coronavirus. Good luck with that.

Odd post. Firstly, comparing him to Ings is baffling - which team plays with two identikit strikers? Second, his supposed 'tangled feet' can't disguise the fact that some of his goals have come from taking shots early. And why is the Man City goal 'strange', rather than quick witted? His assist rate complements Ings, his power complements Ings' guile, and his partnership with Ings stretches defenders. He's still learning, but the quality of his all-round game seems to be on a pleasing upward curve.