Jump to content

Saints Web Official US election  

106 members have voted

  1. 1. Who would you vote for?

    • Biden
      80
    • Trump
      26


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Donnie has had another SMART IDEA;

If a US citizen buys a US made car on finance, they will be allowed to deduct the interest payments from their income tax liability. How much of a car has to be manufactured in the US to qualify as "US made" has not been revealed.

Edited by badgerx16
  • Haha 2
Posted
12 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

Donnie has had another SMART IDEA;

If a US citizen buys a US made car on finance, they will be allowed to deduct the interest payments from their income tax liability. How much of a car has to be manufactured in the US to qualify as "US made" has not been revealed.

That's a non-starter because the tariffs are raising so much money that they are abolishing income tax. Remember?!

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, badgerx16 said:

Trump in an interview with NBC a coupls of days ago;

"Russia will have to give up all of Ukraine"

And probably changed position twice since. Nixon used to be contrary sometimes to convince Hanoi he was a madman and unpredictable where Trump is unpredictable and certainly a madman.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, skintsaint said:

 

SMARTEST GUY IN THE ROOM.

 

( Maybe GM could try explaining exactly how this style of economics works ).

Edited by badgerx16
  • Haha 1
Posted
9 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

SMARTEST GUY IN THE ROOM.

 

( Maybe GM could try explaining exactly how this style of economics works ).

I can't work out whether his primary problem is that he's delusional, stupid, or dishonest. He's certainly all of them though. 

In no other place than his head is a trade deficit losing money or being ripped off. 

  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, egg said:

I can't work out whether his primary problem is that he's delusional, stupid, or dishonest. He's certainly all of them though. 

In no other place than his head is a trade deficit losing money or being ripped off. 

As far as I know the only guy with multiple CASINO bankruptcies.

  • Like 2
Posted

For a man who prides himself on “the art of the deal” he doesn’t seem to have the slightest idea of how business and trade actually works.

  • Like 1
Posted
15 hours ago, Gloucester Saint said:

I guess in normal times a lot of English & European fans, myself included, would be interested in going to the USA for World Cup games.
Games in Canada and Mexico might be an option but trying to overcome the challenges of US Immigration and other decisions that $Trump makes along the way will surely put off a lot of people.
 

  • Like 1
Posted
27 minutes ago, spyinthesky said:

I guess in normal times a lot of English & European fans, myself included, would be interested in going to the USA for World Cup games.
Games in Canada and Mexico might be an option but trying to overcome the challenges of US Immigration and other decisions that $Trump makes along the way will surely put off a lot of people.
 

I was definitely planning to go but fuck that. Not because of immigration fears just don’t want to give any of my money to their economy 

  • Like 1
Posted

Personally I think a free trade deal with the US would be hugely beneficial to the UK.  We're a lower wage, cheaper country so would benefit in that sense and the noise about chlorinated chicken I think is a bit of red herring as that's not something the British public will actually buy into imo.

If KS manages to wipe off the majority of tariffs, surely he'll gain a few points 😂

  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, tdmickey3 said:

Well done Sir Kier and Rachel Reeves

I guess a trade deal may well be good for our country but sucking up to Trump does leave a nasty smell in the air.

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Jeremy Corbyn said:

Personally I think a free trade deal with the US would be hugely beneficial to the UK.  We're a lower wage, cheaper country so would benefit in that sense and the noise about chlorinated chicken I think is a bit of red herring as that's not something the British public will actually buy into imo.

If KS manages to wipe off the majority of tariffs, surely he'll gain a few points 😂

You would think he would get some credit, but given the negativity from some quarters about the India deal I wouldn’t hold your breath. God knows where the Brexiteers thought we were going to do trade deals with after leaving the EU?

The Tories had plenty of time to come up with these deals. Good to seem them finally happening.

Posted
1 minute ago, spyinthesky said:

I guess a trade deal may well be good for our country but sucking up to Trump does leave a nasty smell in the air.

Couldn’t agree more. It would be great to tell Trump where to stick his tariffs, but now that we are out of the EU we need to deal with these people.

Posted (edited)

Fucking pope taking the Trade Deal headlines.  Do the News channels understand their audience the vast majority who aren’t Catholic

Edited by whelk
Posted
5 minutes ago, whelk said:

Fucking pope talking the Trade Deal headlines.  Do the News channels understand their audience the vast majority who aren’t Catholic

Maybe Donny being Pope WAS part of the trade deal. Fair play to Starmer if he's managed to smooth that over with the Vatican.

Posted
1 minute ago, Lighthouse said:

Maybe Donny being Pope WAS part of the trade deal. Fair play to Starmer if he's managed to smooth that over with the Vatican.

It gets worse - it has bumped Pointless. FFS they are just filming people cheering for 45 minutes with nothing new other than there is white smoke

Posted
2 minutes ago, whelk said:

It gets worse - it has bumped Pointless. FFS they are just filming people cheering for 45 minutes with nothing new other than there is white smoke

I'm just amazed that on the day we had the trade deal, a new Pope, VE day, nuclear war kicking off in Kashmir and a cut in interest rates, they still managed to get this onto the BBC's main news page.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ckg4180np8do

Posted

So, genuine question and appreciate it's probably a complex answer but does this deal put us in a better position than we were say a year ago before the imposition of tariffs, or is it just mitigating the worst effects of the tariffs and still leave us in a worse position than we were before Trump?

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, revolution saint said:

So, genuine question and appreciate it's probably a complex answer but does this deal put us in a better position than we were say a year ago before the imposition of tariffs, or is it just mitigating the worst effects of the tariffs and still leave us in a worse position than we were before Trump?

Don’t know enough but glowing PR for UK from Trump. Makes me hate just a little bit less - I’m a sucker for a bit of flattery. 

Edited by whelk
Posted
7 minutes ago, whelk said:

Don’t know enough but glowing PR for UK from Trump. Makes me hate just a little bit less - I’m a sucker for a bit of flattery

You've got lovely tits mate. 

  • Haha 3
Posted
14 minutes ago, whelk said:

Don’t know enough but glowing PR for UK from Trump. Makes me hate just a little bit less - I’m a sucker for a bit of flattery. 

is it great PR if it comes from Trump?  I think Mark Carney can testify to the benefits of not being endorsed by Trump.

Posted
2 minutes ago, revolution saint said:

is it great PR if it comes from Trump?  I think Mark Carney can testify to the benefits of not being endorsed by Trump.

I think most can see Starmer isn’t a pro-Trump goon but a pragmatist

  • Like 3
Posted
13 minutes ago, egg said:

You've got lovely tits mate. 

Tell me more about my posts, like they really excite you

  • Haha 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, whelk said:

I think most can see Starmer isn’t a pro-Trump goon but a pragmatist

Yeah, that wasn't really my point, it was more on whether anyone takes what Trump says seriously.  Starmer has probably done a reasonable deal under the circumstances.

Posted
Just now, badgerx16 said:

Will Donnie take credit for a US Cardinal being elected Pope ?

Probably, and it's an interesting choice that's for sure. 

Posted
30 minutes ago, egg said:

Probably, and it's an interesting choice that's for sure. 

Not long after Vance visited the Vatican.

With the US government and the Vatican being historical paragons of virtue, there is only coincidence.

Back to radio for the bit where Infantino comes out and announces a World Cup host.

Posted
31 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

Perhaps Donald has added the Vatican to his wish list along with Canada, Greenland and the Panama Canal?

1/4 and counting. 

Posted
58 minutes ago, egg said:

Probably, and it's an interesting choice that's for sure. 

I am sure I read somewhere a report that a group of well heeled US Catholics had been over in Rome recently making representations to elect the first US Pope.
Could be a co-incidence?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...