aintforever Posted 15 April, 2020 Share Posted 15 April, 2020 If it hadn’t been reported then we would never have known about it. And nobody would have been infected. There has to be rules, otherwise nothing would change. The police have to enforce the rules otherwise they will just be ignored. It's not rocket science. From a selfish point of view, I could safely pop to a beach near me and spend the day sunbathing in a secluded spot with next to no risk of spreading anything. But if the police let me do it they would have to let everyone else and you end up with thousands of people out and about as usual. The police have no option but to make examples of people and they were 100% right to fine these selfish idiots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitey Grandad Posted 15 April, 2020 Share Posted 15 April, 2020 There has to be rules, otherwise nothing would change. The police have to enforce the rules otherwise they will just be ignored. It's not rocket science. From a selfish point of view, I could safely pop to a beach near me and spend the day sunbathing in a secluded spot with next to no risk of spreading anything. But if the police let me do it they would have to let everyone else and you end up with thousands of people out and about as usual. The police have no option but to make examples of people and they were 100% right to fine these selfish idiots. I'm not saying that we should all be allowed to do likewise, but whilst the police are out persecuting motorists there is plenty of other stuff going on that is far more virus-friendly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lighthouse Posted 15 April, 2020 Share Posted 15 April, 2020 I'm not saying that we should all be allowed to do likewise, but whilst the police are out persecuting motorists there is plenty of other stuff going on that is far more virus-friendly. Persecution implies punishment to people who have committed no wrong doing, which these people clearly had. It's a punishment, it's supposed to be a deterrent and not very nice, otherwise everyone can just do what they want and the Police will just say, "oh please don't do that." Again, your argument seems to revolve around there being other, worse things happening, which is never a defence for anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weston Super Saint Posted 15 April, 2020 Share Posted 15 April, 2020 Are you serious or on a wind up? It's pretty obvious. On a long trip you'll likely stop for fuel, a pee, food, a break etc. On a 2 mile trip you won't. The more we stop, the more we come into contact with others, doors, etc etc. Plus a 200 mile trip brings with it a much greater chance of a breakdown thus 3rd party contact, and/or an accident thus monopolising medical staff and hospital space. Will you not come in to contact with anyone or touch anything on a 2 mile trip? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weston Super Saint Posted 15 April, 2020 Share Posted 15 April, 2020 There has to be rules, otherwise nothing would change. The police have to enforce the rules otherwise they will just be ignored. It's not rocket science. From a selfish point of view, I could safely pop to a beach near me and spend the day sunbathing in a secluded spot with next to no risk of spreading anything. But if the police let me do it they would have to let everyone else and you end up with thousands of people out and about as usual. The police have no option but to make examples of people and they were 100% right to fine these selfish idiots. But the 'rules' / legislation state that the police should ask them to leave the place where they are and return home in the first instance. The police have therefore NOT followed the rules by going straight to issuing a fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
egg Posted 15 April, 2020 Share Posted 15 April, 2020 Will you not come in to contact with anyone or touch anything on a 2 mile trip? No. I'll make sure I've had a pee before hand and have sufficient fuel and food/fluid for such an arduous journey. The 200 mile journey on the other hand is a different matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badgerx16 Posted 15 April, 2020 Share Posted 15 April, 2020 But the 'rules' / legislation state that the police should ask them to leave the place where they are and return home in the first instance. The police have therefore NOT followed the rules by going straight to issuing a fine. No, the regulations make it a judgement call, and if it is felt necessary a fine for a 'first offence' may be ruled appropriate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lighthouse Posted 15 April, 2020 Share Posted 15 April, 2020 But the 'rules' / legislation state that the police should ask them to leave the place where they are and return home in the first instance. The police have therefore NOT followed the rules by going straight to issuing a fine. Cool, so I can completely ignore all public health instructions, hop in my car and drive down to Cornwall. There’s no reason not to, worst case scenario the Police will stop me and tell me to go home, so I’ve got nothing to lose by trying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whelk Posted 15 April, 2020 Author Share Posted 15 April, 2020 Cool, so I can completely ignore all public health instructions, hop in my car and drive down to Cornwall. There’s no reason not to, worst case scenario the Police will stop me and tell me to go home, so I’ve got nothing to lose by trying. I’ve heard it’s a smooth run down there at the moment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shurlock Posted 15 April, 2020 Share Posted 15 April, 2020 No, the regulations make it a judgement call, and if it is felt necessary a fine for a 'first offence' may be ruled appropriate. That's my understanding too - someone's getting their knickers in a twist and a bit confused Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weston Super Saint Posted 15 April, 2020 Share Posted 15 April, 2020 No, the regulations make it a judgement call, and if it is felt necessary a fine for a 'first offence' may be ruled appropriate. Regulations never make anything a judgement call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shurlock Posted 15 April, 2020 Share Posted 15 April, 2020 https://www.met.police.uk/advice/advice-and-information/c19/coronavirus-covid-19/the-new-police-powers/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badgerx16 Posted 15 April, 2020 Share Posted 15 April, 2020 Regulations never make anything a judgement call. Fixed penalty notices 10.—(1) An authorised person may issue a fixed penalty notice to anyone that the authorised person reasonably believes— (a)has committed an offence under these Regulations Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weston Super Saint Posted 15 April, 2020 Share Posted 15 April, 2020 Fixed penalty notices 10.—(1) An authorised person may issue a fixed penalty notice to anyone that the authorised person reasonably believes— (a)has committed an offence under these Regulations Selective quoting doesn't prove your point. I've already posted earlier in the thread the full regulation regarding people "away from home" and how they should be treated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
egg Posted 15 April, 2020 Share Posted 15 April, 2020 https://www.met.police.uk/advice/advice-and-information/c19/coronavirus-covid-19/the-new-police-powers/ Forget the police take on it, check the regulations. They are packed with ambiguity and discretion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weston Super Saint Posted 15 April, 2020 Share Posted 15 April, 2020 https://www.met.police.uk/advice/advice-and-information/c19/coronavirus-covid-19/the-new-police-powers/ Maybe you dozed off when this was discussed yesterday, but from your own link : New public health regulationsExternal Link have been put in place to strengthen the powers the police have to reduce the spread of the virus. Individuals will only be allowed to leave their home for the following very limited purposes: shopping for basic necessities, for example food and medicine, which must be as infrequent as possible going out for one form of exercise a day, for example a run, walk, or cycle - alone or with members of your household Technically the family considered themselves to be going for their one form of exercise a day, with members of their household. There is nothing in the legislation that limits the distance a person can travel to achieve this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shurlock Posted 15 April, 2020 Share Posted 15 April, 2020 Forget the police take on it, check the regulations. They are packed with ambiguity and discretion. Of course. As is law in general. The police has the discretion to decide what is appropriate in a given case - there is no absolutely nothing preventing it from issuing a £60 fine for a first offence which I have no issue with at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
egg Posted 15 April, 2020 Share Posted 15 April, 2020 Of course. As is law in general. The police has the discretion to decide what is appropriate in a given case - there is no absolutely nothing preventing it from issuing a £60 fine for a first offence which I have no issue with at all. Agreed on both fronts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shurlock Posted 15 April, 2020 Share Posted 15 April, 2020 (edited) Technically the family considered themselves to be going for their one form of exercise a day, with members of their household. There is nothing in the legislation that limits the distance a person can travel to achieve this. The government has already provided guidance on how to interpret exercising - people should stay local and use open spaces near to their home where possible and not travel unnecessarily for exercise. The police used its legal discretion, taking account of this guidance in a way that is perfectly appropriate and proportionate. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/coronavirus-guidance-on-access-to-green-spaces Edited 15 April, 2020 by shurlock Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
egg Posted 15 April, 2020 Share Posted 15 April, 2020 Maybe you dozed off when this was discussed yesterday, but from your own link : Technically the family considered themselves to be going for their one form of exercise a day, with members of their household. There is nothing in the legislation that limits the distance a person can travel to achieve this. There's nothing on the regs (save for Wales) which limits the exercise to one a day. S. 6(2)(b) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badgerx16 Posted 15 April, 2020 Share Posted 15 April, 2020 Selective quoting doesn't prove your point. I've already posted earlier in the thread the full regulation regarding people "away from home" and how they should be treated. So, a family driving up to the Lake District from Middlesex and intercepted by Lancashire Police at junction 34 of the M6 should get a warning, and only if they try the same trick again get the fine ? What if they decide that their second trip should be to the Yorkshire Dales, so it might be the South Yorkshire Police this time, who are unaware of the first incident so they just get another warning. As Egg states, and as we both have demonstrated by our quoting of the Law, the regulations are vague and in part ambiguous, but for numpties making ridiculous and entirely unnecessary extended pleasure trips I am fully behind the Police. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badgerx16 Posted 15 April, 2020 Share Posted 15 April, 2020 There's nothing on the regs (save for Wales) which limits the exercise to one a day. S. 6(2)(b) Go for a bike ride, then walk to the shops. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lighthouse Posted 15 April, 2020 Share Posted 15 April, 2020 (edited) If anyone still needs convincing what a small group of people traveling around from an infection hotspot can do... https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/embed/p089krkz/52299358 Edited 15 April, 2020 by Lighthouse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cat Posted 15 April, 2020 Share Posted 15 April, 2020 The way each force police this will be determined by advice from their Chief. I can only say that for Hampshire it's being very much done in an advisory way. I'm not aware of there being any particular problems relating to large gatherings or a disproportionate number of fines. In other news my brother in law's hospital was the one just covered by the programme on C4. They seem to have things under control there which is good to see. As long as people keep being sensible and carry on socially distancing the number of available beds will stay higher than demand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitey Grandad Posted 15 April, 2020 Share Posted 15 April, 2020 If anyone still needs convincing what a small group of people traveling around from an infection hotspot can do... https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/embed/p089krkz/52299358 That link seems to be about Germany. What am I supposed to see? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lighthouse Posted 15 April, 2020 Share Posted 15 April, 2020 That link seems to be about Germany. What am I supposed to see? Should be about a small Estonian community which is one of the densest Covid19 hotspots in the world, after a visit from an Italian volleyball team a couple of months ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whelk Posted 16 April, 2020 Author Share Posted 16 April, 2020 That link seems to be about Germany. What am I supposed to see? Presumably before social distancing so doesn’t really support your point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fan The Flames Posted 16 April, 2020 Share Posted 16 April, 2020 Can't believe someone on here is arguing that a driver 250 miles from home isnt acting irresponsibly enough to not warrant a fine, yet think's old people with their grand kids are being irresponsible. Someone is having a Weston. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Cat Posted 16 April, 2020 Share Posted 16 April, 2020 103 fines in Hampshire over a period of 17 days. So about 6 a day which isn't really very many in a county with a population of around 1.8 million. https://www.dailyecho.co.uk/news/18383163.amp/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitey Grandad Posted 16 April, 2020 Share Posted 16 April, 2020 Can't believe someone on here is arguing that a driver 250 miles from home isnt acting irresponsibly enough to not warrant a fine, yet think's old people with their grand kids are being irresponsible. Someone is having a Weston. As I read it the point was about the size of the penalty and not the culpability. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 16 April, 2020 Share Posted 16 April, 2020 As I read it the point was about the size of the penalty and not the culpability.Here's an idea. How about the people driving hundreds of miles simply stop doing it then the size of any punishment becomes a moot point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badgerx16 Posted 16 April, 2020 Share Posted 16 April, 2020 As I read it the point was about the size of the penalty and not the culpability. The Police force that turned them back should be able to contact their local force and have them confiscate their car. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitey Grandad Posted 16 April, 2020 Share Posted 16 April, 2020 The Police force that turned them back should be able to contact their local force and have them confiscate their car. Under what law? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitey Grandad Posted 16 April, 2020 Share Posted 16 April, 2020 Here's an idea. How about the people driving hundreds of miles simply stop doing it then the size of any punishment becomes a moot point. Not the point though, is it. The punishment must fit the crime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
egg Posted 16 April, 2020 Share Posted 16 April, 2020 (edited) Not the point though, is it. The punishment must fit the crime. It's absolutely the point. Don't travel, stay local when it's necessary for food/medicine /excersise, and don't visit friends / family is a pretty simple message. I have to say that you confuse me. You appear to advocate travel from hotspots in the UK but not from hotspots overseas. On one hand you understand the risk, but on the other seem oblivious to it. Make your mind up. Edited 16 April, 2020 by egg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lighthouse Posted 16 April, 2020 Share Posted 16 April, 2020 Not the point though, is it. The punishment must fit the crime. What punishment would fit deliberately putting lives in danger? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buctootim Posted 16 April, 2020 Share Posted 16 April, 2020 What punishment would fit deliberately putting lives in danger? How did he do that? You think there was a lesser risk if he stayed shopping and exercising in high density London? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 16 April, 2020 Share Posted 16 April, 2020 How did he do that? You think there was a lesser risk if he stayed shopping and exercising in high density London?It's pretty simple. We've been told not to travel hundreds of miles from our home to prevent the spread of the disease. If you travel hundreds of miles under those restrictions and without a proper reason then don't complain if you get fined. If you're dumb enough to do it despite the warnings then you deserve everything you get imo. I'll leave it to others to argue about how infectious one course of action is over another as it's not really relevant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lighthouse Posted 16 April, 2020 Share Posted 16 April, 2020 How did he do that? You think there was a lesser risk if he stayed shopping and exercising in high density London? Yes, it's been covered already in the last few pages why. Shopping is essential, exercise is certainly recommended, they are both different to making a purely recreational trip hundreds of miles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitey Grandad Posted 16 April, 2020 Share Posted 16 April, 2020 It's absolutely the point. Don't travel, stay local when it's necessary for food/medicine /excersise, and don't visit friends / family is a pretty simple message. I have to say that you confuse me. You appear to advocate travel from hotspots in the UK but not from hotspots overseas. On one hand you understand the risk, but on the other seem oblivious to it. Make your mind up. Yet you cannot see that there is a difference between domestic travellers and incomers from overseas. One is a known risk because the history is known, the other is an unknown risk. And I am not advocating travel from UK hotspots am I. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitey Grandad Posted 16 April, 2020 Share Posted 16 April, 2020 What punishment would fit deliberately putting lives in danger? Let’s not get too melodramatic. No lives were ‘put at danger’. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitey Grandad Posted 16 April, 2020 Share Posted 16 April, 2020 It's pretty simple. We've been told not to travel hundreds of miles from our home to prevent the spread of the disease. If you travel hundreds of miles under those restrictions and without a proper reason then don't complain if you get fined. If you're dumb enough to do it despite the warnings then you deserve everything you get imo. I'll leave it to others to argue about how infectious one course of action is over another as it's not really relevant. Of course it’s relevant. We must never, ever lose sight of the purpose of this mini-lockdown or else the regulations become and end in themselves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lighthouse Posted 16 April, 2020 Share Posted 16 April, 2020 Let’s not get too melodramatic. No lives were ‘put at danger’. So how have 135,000 people ended up in a wooden box? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 16 April, 2020 Share Posted 16 April, 2020 Let’s not get too melodramatic. No lives were ‘put at danger’.You got absolutely no idea if that's true. None at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 16 April, 2020 Share Posted 16 April, 2020 Of course it’s relevant. We must never, ever lose sight of the purpose of this mini-lockdown or else the regulations become and end in themselves.No it isn't at all. You've been told not to do something by the government in order to get the lockdown finished as quickly as possible. If you choose to ignore that then you should be fined and punished. It really is that simple because if everyone decided to drive 200 miles it's very likely that this would get a hell of a lot worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buctootim Posted 16 April, 2020 Share Posted 16 April, 2020 So how have 135,000 people ended up in a wooden box? Because they've forced to stay in high density cities rather than social distancing elsewhere? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
egg Posted 16 April, 2020 Share Posted 16 April, 2020 Yet you cannot see that there is a difference between domestic travellers and incomers from overseas. One is a known risk because the history is known, the other is an unknown risk. And I am not advocating travel from UK hotspots am I. Unless I misunderstand you, it appears to be your point that UK travel over distance is ok. If that isn't your point, then what is it? Your first point is nonsensical. Covid is rampant in the UK. Explain how someone who is showing no symptoms coming in from an overseas hotpot like Milan is any more or less of a danger than someone without symptoms travelling around the UK from a UK hotpot. The reality is that they are an equal risk, hence the attempt at locking down internal travel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shurlock Posted 16 April, 2020 Share Posted 16 April, 2020 You got absolutely no idea if that's true. None at all. Very true. This caught my attention from earlier. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/apr/13/walkers-lockdown-stay-at-home-after-woman-rescued-greater-manchester Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tamesaint Posted 16 April, 2020 Share Posted 16 April, 2020 No it isn't at all. You've been told not to do something by the government in order to get the lockdown finished as quickly as possible. If you choose to ignore that then you should be fined and punished. It really is that simple because if everyone decided to drive 200 miles it's very likely that this would get a hell of a lot worse. It isnt hard to understand. I think he is trolling now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lighthouse Posted 16 April, 2020 Share Posted 16 April, 2020 Because they've forced to stay in high density cities rather than social distancing elsewhere? Because they’ve come into contact, either directly or indirectly, with someone who had the virus. The more people travel around, the more easily it’s spread. Some travel and contact is unavoidable, travelling from Middlesex to the Lakes is completely unnecessary. If they lived in Lewisham or Croydon and they’d driven down the A3 to Ockham common for a walk, I could tolerate that. There’s no need to stop at any services, use any shops, you’re staying roughly in the same area and just trying to get some basic exercise. What this family did goes way beyond that an is completely unnecessary. If you don’t put a stop to this sort of thing, everywhere becomes an inner city ‘hotspot’. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now