Matthew Le God Posted Tuesday at 06:34 Posted Tuesday at 06:34 Just now, Willo of Whiteley said: Wrong thread No it isn't. Ipswich signing a new striker is very relevant to a game vs Ipswich. 1
saintant Posted Tuesday at 08:32 Posted Tuesday at 08:32 10 hours ago, Matthew Le God said: Just because he only had one save, doesn't mean they didn't come close on other occasions. They hit the crossbar, for example. Not even counted as a shot on target as you well know. Stats show we were the team that could and should have scored more goals.
Matthew Le God Posted Tuesday at 08:35 Posted Tuesday at 08:35 2 minutes ago, saintant said: Not even counted as a shot on target as you well know. Stats show we were the team that could and should have scored more goals. I didn't say it was on target... but it was an example of them coming close to scoring. Which was his point!
saintant Posted Tuesday at 08:37 Posted Tuesday at 08:37 Just now, Matthew Le God said: I didn't say it was on target... but it was an example of them coming close to scoring. Which was his point! But we came close to scoring on more occasions than them and were deserved winners. I keep hearing that Wrexham battered us but that's not how I saw it so will give us credit for being the better side. 2
AlexLaw76 Posted Tuesday at 20:24 Posted Tuesday at 20:24 (edited) I hope we get to see some of Will Still famous adaptability, as about 160 mins of the last 2 games have been utterly terrible. Gotten out of jail by nothing more than having better players. 3 at the back is shite, and we are clearly vulnerable with a long clearance on the counter. Our passing has been shite also, as we have been giving the ball away far too much. If we continue this mess, and/or start as slow as we have done, we could be in trouble against a much better side. Edited Tuesday at 20:25 by AlexLaw76 6
CampionSaint Posted Tuesday at 20:48 Posted Tuesday at 20:48 Well Ipswich are only drawing with Bromley. The cup is nothing if not unpredictable.
RedWillie Posted Tuesday at 21:08 Posted Tuesday at 21:08 (edited) 20 minutes ago, CampionSaint said: Well Ipswich are only drawing with Bromley. The cup is nothing if not unpredictable. Bromley just knocked them out ! Edited Tuesday at 21:08 by RedWillie 1 1
sockeye Posted Tuesday at 21:10 Posted Tuesday at 21:10 People have them pegged as champions but they haven't exactly set things alight from the jump. I reckon we can do them. 1
Saint86 Posted Tuesday at 21:11 Posted Tuesday at 21:11 1 minute ago, RedWillie said: Bromley just knocked them out ! Watched the pens on Sky, fair play to Bromley. Morale must be suffering at Ipswich coming off of last season. If we can somehow get a win out of them it may start a mini crisis at the start of the season.
saintant Posted Tuesday at 21:20 Posted Tuesday at 21:20 If we play five at the back they'll dominate in midfield and it'll be a very tough game. 1
Jack Posted Tuesday at 22:13 Posted Tuesday at 22:13 51 minutes ago, saintant said: If we play five at the back they'll dominate in midfield and it'll be a very tough game. Yeah, tonight was crying out for an extra man in midfield and winning more second balls, and playing higher up the pitch. Lots for Will to think about. Big pressure on Ipswich though after a rough start 1
LGTL Posted yesterday at 00:40 Posted yesterday at 00:40 Probably the toughest away game of the season up first, which is probably no bad thing as they’re still finding their feet. A much improved performance needed though and for fuck sake ditch 5 at the back and get another man in midfield. 2
SNSUN Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago (edited) Baz Sugawara THB Stephens Manning Charles Downes Fernandes Fraser Robinson Downs Could be a way to go. Hoping THB stays. Edited 21 hours ago by SNSUN
Whitey Grandad Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 23 hours ago, saintant said: Not even counted as a shot on target as you well know. Stats show we were the team that could and should have scored more goals. That just shows that the Stats are misleading. I'm surprised anybody takes any notice of them. 1
Mr X Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago We look very susceptible to counter attacks and our midfield doesn't look great.... Our whole season hinges on either we can keep Fernandez
Matthew Le God Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago Just now, Mr X said: our midfield doesn't look great A midfield of Downes, Charles and Fernandes/Rudoni is superb at this level
AlexLaw76 Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 1 minute ago, Matthew Le God said: A midfield of Downes, Charles and Fernandes/Rudoni is superb at this level Then why does it look shite? 1
Pamplemousse Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago Have Charles, Downes and Fernandes been on the pitch at the same time this season? 1
Matthew Le God Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 3 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said: Then why does it look shite? 🤔 They have not played as a trio this season yet. So how does it look 'shite'?
S-Clarke Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 4 minutes ago, Matthew Le God said: A midfield of Downes, Charles and Fernandes/Rudoni is superb at this level Not totally convinced that Downes works in our potentially high-press/high energy team. He seems like your typical crab footballer. Charles, Rudoni with Fernandes more advanced could work better. Rudoni has more energy about him, but less defensive discipline. If we scrap the 3 at the back, we could go with Charles, an-other, and Rudoni - with Eduard and Fernandes floating in those attacking zones.
Thereisonlyonemickychannon Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago Same as the Wrexham game please. Energy and never stop!
austsaint Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 6 minutes ago, S-Clarke said: Not totally convinced that Downes works in our potentially high-press/high energy team. He seems like your typical crab footballer. Charles, Rudoni with Fernandes more advanced could work better. Rudoni has more energy about him, but less defensive discipline. If we scrap the 3 at the back, we could go with Charles, an-other, and Rudoni - with Eduard and Fernandes floating in those attacking zones. Well as long as you’re not totally unconvinced by Downes. In the Championship he’s much, much better than your typical crab footballer. I’d call Smallbone more your recognisable crab midfielder - Downes can easily handle a holding or box-to-box role this campaign; particularly if we play 4-3-3 formation once the dust has settled on the transfer window.
Midfield_General Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago (edited) 3 hours ago, SNSUN said: Baz Sugawara THB Stephens Manning Charles Downes Fernandes Fraser Robinson Downs Could be a way to go. Hoping THB stays. Agree with that with the exception of Downs who has done absolutely nothing to warrant a starting place from what I've seen of him vs. Wrexham and last night. He's not only missed two absolute sitters but also looks weak as piss and has provided absolutely no physical presence whatsoever, which is worrying seeing as he was meant to be one we were bringing in to make us a bigger, stronger side. He has just been getting brushed off the ball and nothing has stuck to him so far. I hope he's just rusty and will settle down as he gets used to the league and the role he's asked to play, but early signs really have not been great and he clearly needs to be given time to get up to speed and maybe adjust to the physicality of the league. Bearing in mind that Armstrong simply cannot play CF and BBD is just shocking anywhere, that means that for the foreseeable we are still relying on either Archer or Stewart for a physical CF presence and goals. Which is a scary prospect over the course of a season. If Stewart is feeling better he needs to start on Sunday, and if we can find anyone to take BBD and/or Armstrong, we should ship them out just to get them off the books, and try and put their wages towards someone who can give us an option to hold the ball up and bully defenders, because we've got literally no-one who can do that as it stands. Keiffer Moore is a very limited player but they picked him up for £2m and he gave us all sorts of problems on Saturday. We need at least one option like that who lets us mix it up a bit when we need to change the approach. Edited 18 hours ago by Midfield_General 1
S-Clarke Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 9 minutes ago, austsaint said: Well as long as you’re not totally unconvinced by Downes. In the Championship he’s much, much better than your typical crab footballer. I’d call Smallbone more your recognisable crab midfielder - Downes can easily handle a holding or box-to-box role this campaign; particularly if we play 4-3-3 formation once the dust has settled on the transfer window. I guess part of my feeling towards Downes has been soured due to his mid-season strip last year, once his boyfriend left. I didn't feel that was a good look to be honest. I struggle to trust his commitment after that, that's why I wouldn't be against a sale.
Whitey Grandad Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 56 minutes ago, Matthew Le God said: A midfield of Downes, Charles and Fernandes/Rudoni is superb at this level But we don't play with a midfield.
gio1saints Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 1 minute ago, Whitey Grandad said: But we don't play with a midfield. @Whitey Grandad I would not get too wedded to any default shape that Still puts out. Unlike RM I do think he is very willing to adapt his team according to what players he has and who we are playing. When and if we get better FB and MF and even wingers we may well see different line ups 1
austsaint Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 16 minutes ago, S-Clarke said: I guess part of my feeling towards Downes has been soured due to his mid-season strip last year, once his boyfriend left. I didn't feel that was a good look to be honest. I struggle to trust his commitment after that, that's why I wouldn't be against a sale. I understand your thinking about commitment, based on his apparent standoff after Martin left. I get the feeling though that Downes is on board with Still and is good enough to (re) establish himself as one of the best central midfielders in the Championship.
saintant Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 1 hour ago, AlexLaw76 said: Then why does it look shite? Because we're playing 5 at the back which leaves a midfield of only 2 players who have too much work and get overrun. We saw this last night even against opposition as poor as Northampton. Downes, Fernandes and Charles would potentially be an excellent midfield 3 if we had them all playing there at the same time. When it's two from three they struggle to cope and therefore look poor. We need to switch formation to 4231 or similar to get more bodies in midfield where most of the action takes place. Playing a 5 at the back means you are reliant on a centre half (Edwards has tried) moving forward at times to help the midfield or the two wingbacks. For me it's a very difficult system to master and we are not very good at it. 2
Whitey Grandad Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 56 minutes ago, gio1saints said: @Whitey Grandad I would not get too wedded to any default shape that Still puts out. Unlike RM I do think he is very willing to adapt his team according to what players he has and who we are playing. When and if we get better FB and MF and even wingers we may well see different line ups I understand that and I am prepared to wait and see but in the first half against Wrexham we surrendered the initiative to them and this was from a team playing at home in front of a packed crowd. It's a negative attitude and one that I don't like. To do the same at Northampton was asking for trouble. Fortunately it worked out OK but it was needless. 3
gio1saints Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago I did find it surprising that he did not change the shape second half. Sometimes a win masks a problem and these two wins are certainly not fooling anyone. Just hope SR do get these extra players in ( and out) so Will has got a settled set of players to work with. But that won’t be realistically achievable until mid September - assuming the last day incomings who will need assimilation in early September. Just got to try not drop too many points until then- win whatever way we can with whatever players we got and worry about our style preferences later.. 1
Micky Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago Our 'strike force' worries me massively. My three grandchildren could cause more carnage. 3
OttawaSaint Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 7 minutes ago, Micky said: Our 'strike force' worries me massively. My three grandchildren could cause more carnage. Ditto. I certainly don't but that we will be ok because a few of them have had good goal scoring records in the Champ in the past. I used to have a nice head of hair... 1
OttawaSaint Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago I'm hoping Will Still will be as flexible as they say. I'm tired of Saint managers obsession with allowing us to be completely overrun in midfield. 4
SNSUN Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago Ipswich Town eh? So many unresearched facts. Legend has it back in 1858 a friendly Jamaican man went to an Ipswich alehouse, and when the barman asked whether he wanted a beer, the man responded "Nah, I want a Port man." Locals took this man under their wing, and eventually a road was named after him. The stadium was named Portman Road after this local hotspot, which is still frequented by the Jamaican-British fraternity. It is false news that Natalie Portman was named after Ipswich's ground despite popular belief. Ipswich have skirted around the Premier League once or twice in the last 30 years, but following a takeover but Ed Sheeran and John Wark, their fortunes have improved of late. Early reports were that the signing of Sammy Szmodics was only possible from the sales of Sheeran's 7th album. Rumour has it one of his future albums is to be called %, and he will use the funds from this to buy Ansu Fati. My mate once went clubbing in Ipswich, but he says the women in Norwich are far superior. This did not deter him from getting stink finger in the bogs with one of the locals. So there we are. Facts. On to the wheel. So far it has 1 win and 1 loss. 50 per cent. My wife's favourite rapper. Screen_Recording_20250813_201724_Samsung Internet.mp4 So there you have it. Absolutely annihilation by a trumped up Ipswich side. Embarrassment. But the window is still open so....
Whitey Grandad Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 46 minutes ago, SNSUN said: Ipswich Town eh? So many unresearched facts. Legend has it back in 1858 a friendly Jamaican man went to an Ipswich alehouse, and when the barman asked whether he wanted a beer, the man responded "Nah, I want a Port man." Locals took this man under their wing, and eventually a road was named after him. The stadium was named Portman Road after this local hotspot, which is still frequented by the Jamaican-British fraternity. It is false news that Natalie Portman was named after Ipswich's ground despite popular belief. Ipswich have skirted around the Premier League once or twice in the last 30 years, but following a takeover but Ed Sheeran and John Wark, their fortunes have improved of late. Early reports were that the signing of Sammy Szmodics was only possible from the sales of Sheeran's 7th album. Rumour has it one of his future albums is to be called %, and he will use the funds from this to buy Ansu Fati. My mate once went clubbing in Ipswich, but he says the women in Norwich are far superior. This did not deter him from getting stink finger in the bogs with one of the locals. So there we are. Facts. On to the wheel. So far it has 1 win and 1 loss. 50 per cent. My wife's favourite rapper. Screen_Recording_20250813_201724_Samsung Internet.mp4 9.08 MB · 0 downloads So there you have it. Absolutely annihilation by a trumped up Ipswich side. Embarrassment. But the window is still open so.... We lived near Harwich in the 1950s and early 1960s. My dad used to go and watch Ipswich home games. The manager was a certain Alf Ramsey.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now