Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
10 hours ago, Matthew Le God said:

Just because he only had one save, doesn't mean they didn't come close on other occasions. They hit the crossbar, for example.

Not even counted as a shot on target as you well know. Stats show we were the team that could and should have scored more goals.

Posted
2 minutes ago, saintant said:

Not even counted as a shot on target as you well know. Stats show we were the team that could and should have scored more goals.

I didn't say it was on target... but it was an example of them coming close to scoring. Which was his point!

Posted
Just now, Matthew Le God said:

I didn't say it was on target... but it was an example of them coming close to scoring. Which was his point!

But we came close to scoring on more occasions than them and were deserved winners. I keep hearing that Wrexham battered us but that's not how I saw it so will give us credit for being the better side.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

I hope we get to see some of Will Still famous adaptability, as about 160 mins of the last 2 games have been utterly terrible. Gotten out of jail by nothing more than having better players.

3 at the back is shite, and we are clearly vulnerable with a long clearance on the counter. Our passing has been shite also, as we have been giving the ball away far too much.

If we continue this mess, and/or start as slow as we have done, we could be in trouble against a much better side.

Edited by AlexLaw76
  • Like 6
Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, CampionSaint said:

Well Ipswich are only drawing with Bromley.  The cup is nothing if not unpredictable.

Bromley just knocked them out !

Edited by RedWillie
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, RedWillie said:

Bromley just knocked them out !

Watched the pens on Sky, fair play to Bromley.

Morale must be suffering at Ipswich coming off of last season. If we can somehow get a win out of them it may start a mini crisis at the start of the season.

Posted
51 minutes ago, saintant said:

If we play five at the back they'll dominate in midfield and it'll be a very tough game.

Yeah, tonight was crying out for an extra man in midfield and winning more second balls, and playing higher up the pitch. Lots for Will to think about. 
 

Big pressure on Ipswich though after a rough start 

  • Like 1
Posted

Probably the toughest away game of the season up first, which is probably no bad thing as they’re still finding their feet. A much improved performance needed though and for fuck sake ditch 5 at the back and get another man in midfield. 

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

Baz

Sugawara

THB

Stephens

Manning

Charles

Downes

Fernandes

Fraser

Robinson

Downs

Could be a way to go. Hoping THB stays.

Edited by SNSUN
Posted
23 hours ago, saintant said:

Not even counted as a shot on target as you well know. Stats show we were the team that could and should have scored more goals.

That just shows that the Stats are misleading. I'm surprised anybody takes any notice of them.

  • Haha 1
Posted

We look very susceptible to counter attacks and our midfield doesn't look great.... Our whole season hinges on either we can keep Fernandez 

Posted
1 minute ago, Matthew Le God said:

A midfield of Downes, Charles and Fernandes/Rudoni is superb at this level

Then why does it look shite?

  • Confused 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Matthew Le God said:

A midfield of Downes, Charles and Fernandes/Rudoni is superb at this level

Not totally convinced that Downes works in our potentially high-press/high energy team. He seems like your typical crab footballer.

Charles, Rudoni with Fernandes more advanced could work better. Rudoni has more energy about him, but less defensive discipline.

If we scrap the 3 at the back, we could go with Charles, an-other, and Rudoni - with Eduard and Fernandes floating in those attacking zones.

Posted
6 minutes ago, S-Clarke said:

Not totally convinced that Downes works in our potentially high-press/high energy team. He seems like your typical crab footballer.

Charles, Rudoni with Fernandes more advanced could work better. Rudoni has more energy about him, but less defensive discipline.

If we scrap the 3 at the back, we could go with Charles, an-other, and Rudoni - with Eduard and Fernandes floating in those attacking zones.

Well as long as you’re not totally unconvinced by Downes.   In the Championship he’s much, much better than your typical crab footballer.   I’d call Smallbone more your recognisable crab midfielder - Downes can easily handle a holding or box-to-box role this campaign; particularly if we play 4-3-3 formation once the dust has settled on the transfer window.

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, SNSUN said:

Baz

Sugawara

THB

Stephens

Manning

Charles

Downes

Fernandes

Fraser

Robinson

Downs

Could be a way to go. Hoping THB stays.

Agree with that with the exception of Downs who has done absolutely nothing to warrant a starting place from what I've seen of him vs. Wrexham and last night.

He's not only missed two absolute sitters but also looks weak as piss and has provided absolutely no physical presence whatsoever, which is worrying seeing as he was meant to be one we were bringing in to make us a bigger, stronger side. He has just been getting brushed off the ball and nothing has stuck to him so far. I hope he's just rusty and will settle down as he gets used to the league and the role he's asked to play, but early signs really have not been great and he clearly needs to be given time to get up to speed and maybe adjust to the physicality of the league. 

Bearing in mind that Armstrong simply cannot play CF and BBD is just shocking anywhere, that means that for the foreseeable we are still relying on either Archer or Stewart for a physical CF presence and goals. Which is a scary prospect over the course of a season. 

If Stewart is feeling better he needs to start on Sunday, and if we can find anyone to take BBD and/or Armstrong, we should ship them out just to get them off the books, and try and put their wages towards someone who can give us an option to hold the ball up and bully defenders, because we've got literally no-one who can do that as it stands. Keiffer Moore is a very limited player but they picked him up for £2m and he gave us all sorts of problems on Saturday. We need at least one option like that who lets us mix it up a bit when we need to change the approach.

Edited by Midfield_General
  • Like 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, austsaint said:

Well as long as you’re not totally unconvinced by Downes.   In the Championship he’s much, much better than your typical crab footballer.   I’d call Smallbone more your recognisable crab midfielder - Downes can easily handle a holding or box-to-box role this campaign; particularly if we play 4-3-3 formation once the dust has settled on the transfer window.

I guess part of my feeling towards Downes has been soured due to his mid-season strip last year, once his boyfriend left. I didn't feel that was a good look to be honest.

I struggle to trust his commitment after that, that's why I wouldn't be against a sale.

Posted
1 minute ago, Whitey Grandad said:

But we don't play with a midfield. 

@Whitey Grandad I would not get too wedded to any default shape that Still puts out. Unlike RM I do think he is very willing to adapt his team according to what players he has and who we are playing. 
When and if we get better FB and MF and even wingers we may well see different line ups 
 

  • Like 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, S-Clarke said:

I guess part of my feeling towards Downes has been soured due to his mid-season strip last year, once his boyfriend left. I didn't feel that was a good look to be honest.

I struggle to trust his commitment after that, that's why I wouldn't be against a sale.

I understand your thinking about commitment, based on his apparent standoff after Martin left.   I get the feeling though that Downes is on board with Still and is good enough to (re) establish himself as one of the best central midfielders in the Championship.

Posted
1 hour ago, AlexLaw76 said:

Then why does it look shite?

Because we're playing 5 at the back which leaves a midfield of only 2 players who have too much work and get overrun. We saw this last night even against opposition as poor as Northampton. Downes, Fernandes and Charles would potentially be an excellent midfield 3 if we had them all playing there at the same time. When it's two from three they struggle to cope and therefore look poor. We need to switch formation to 4231 or similar to get more bodies in midfield where most of the action takes place. Playing a 5 at the back means you are reliant on a centre half (Edwards has tried) moving forward at times to help the midfield or the two wingbacks. For me it's a very difficult system to master and we are not very good at it.

  • Like 2
Posted
56 minutes ago, gio1saints said:

@Whitey Grandad I would not get too wedded to any default shape that Still puts out. Unlike RM I do think he is very willing to adapt his team according to what players he has and who we are playing. 
When and if we get better FB and MF and even wingers we may well see different line ups 
 

I understand that and I am prepared to wait and see but in the first half against Wrexham we surrendered the initiative to them and this was from a team playing at home in front of a packed crowd. It's a negative attitude and one that I don't like.

To do the same at Northampton was asking for trouble. Fortunately it worked out OK but it was needless.

  • Like 3
Posted

I did find it surprising that he did not change the shape second half. Sometimes a win masks a problem and these two wins are certainly not fooling anyone.  Just hope SR do get these extra players in ( and out) so Will has got a settled set of players to work with. But that won’t be realistically achievable until mid September - assuming the last day incomings who will need assimilation in early September. Just got to try not drop too many points until then- win whatever way we can with whatever players we got and worry about our style preferences later..

  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Micky said:

Our 'strike force' worries me massively.  My three grandchildren could cause more carnage. 

Ditto.

I certainly don't but that we will be ok because a few of them have had good goal scoring records in the Champ in the past.

I used to have a nice head of hair...

  • Haha 1
Posted

Ipswich Town eh? So many unresearched facts. Legend has it back in 1858 a friendly Jamaican man went to an Ipswich alehouse, and when the barman asked whether he wanted a beer, the man responded "Nah, I want a Port man." Locals took this man under their wing, and eventually a road was named after him. The stadium was named Portman Road after this local hotspot, which is still frequented by the Jamaican-British fraternity. It is false news that Natalie Portman was named after Ipswich's ground despite popular belief.

Ipswich have skirted around the Premier League once or twice in the last 30 years, but following a takeover but Ed Sheeran and John Wark, their fortunes have improved of late. Early reports were that the signing of Sammy Szmodics was only possible from the sales of Sheeran's 7th album. Rumour has it one of his future albums is to be called %, and he will use the funds from this to buy Ansu Fati.

My mate once went clubbing in Ipswich, but he says the women in Norwich are far superior. This did not deter him from getting stink finger in the bogs with one of the locals. 

So there we are. Facts.

On to the wheel. So far it has 1 win and 1 loss. 50 per cent. My wife's favourite rapper.

 

So there you have it. Absolutely annihilation by a trumped up Ipswich side. Embarrassment. But the window is still open so....

Posted
46 minutes ago, SNSUN said:

Ipswich Town eh? So many unresearched facts. Legend has it back in 1858 a friendly Jamaican man went to an Ipswich alehouse, and when the barman asked whether he wanted a beer, the man responded "Nah, I want a Port man." Locals took this man under their wing, and eventually a road was named after him. The stadium was named Portman Road after this local hotspot, which is still frequented by the Jamaican-British fraternity. It is false news that Natalie Portman was named after Ipswich's ground despite popular belief.

Ipswich have skirted around the Premier League once or twice in the last 30 years, but following a takeover but Ed Sheeran and John Wark, their fortunes have improved of late. Early reports were that the signing of Sammy Szmodics was only possible from the sales of Sheeran's 7th album. Rumour has it one of his future albums is to be called %, and he will use the funds from this to buy Ansu Fati.

My mate once went clubbing in Ipswich, but he says the women in Norwich are far superior. This did not deter him from getting stink finger in the bogs with one of the locals. 

So there we are. Facts.

On to the wheel. So far it has 1 win and 1 loss. 50 per cent. My wife's favourite rapper.

 

So there you have it. Absolutely annihilation by a trumped up Ipswich side. Embarrassment. But the window is still open so....

We lived near Harwich in the 1950s and early 1960s. My dad used to go and watch Ipswich home games. The manager was a certain Alf Ramsey.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...