Saints 1-0 Sheff Utd - Match Thread

[Give it to Ron]

Wellington was my MOTM won loads of headers too . How different we looked with 2 stay at home full backs denying the space behind and easy to cross against 

Got forward well when possible without leaving us open 

Edited 4 hours ago by Give it to Ron

[Jack]

6 minutes ago, Chez said:

Blackmore has asked him about why he hasnt played 4 at the back and was told it was because he didnt have any fit full backs. He can't really go over that old ground can he?

Of course he can. He’s had fit full backs for a while now and decided to use Fellows as a wing back instead 

[LaptopSaint]

Re Bragg: Agreed - an academy kid who’s been forced to sing ‘wash your mouth out’ before every training session since he was eight is what we need on Sunday. ‘Ave it. 

Edited 4 hours ago by LaptopSaint

[Jack]

Just now, Give it to Ron said:

Wellington was my MOTM won loads of headers too . How different we looked with 2 stay at home full backs denying the space behind and easy to cross against 

100% and up against a bloke nearly a foot taller. Commitment, was great to see. Hope Manning was taking notes 

[Miltonaggro]

Biggest takeaway from me today was how different we looked first half with a centre forward on the pitch, Stewart is a good player. Also decent and constant communication between keeper and captain at centre half - a small but key improvement. 

[saintant]

6 minutes ago, Saint Pete said:

Sorry, can't agree with selling Armstrong, that's madness in my opinion. He's a proven goalscorer at this level and those are not that easy to find. Stewart looks decent and I agree with you that we certainly need one and preferably 2 central strikers on the squad that have physical presence. But as we know Stewart is very unreliable in terms of fitness. Yes, bring in another big man up front, I would hope and pray that's the plan now we have a free spot after Downs leaving on loan. But don't throw away the one player that has scored consistently at this level!! I think we should be playing him as well as Stewart/new striker in one of the wide supporting positions, not throwing away a scorer that pretty much every team in this division would want. 

Fair point but there have been reports that AA wants a move. I'm happy for us to keep him but we must sign or loan a big striker this window to help spread the load with Stewart. I wouldn't be adverse to having AA play just off Stewart as I think he'd profit from his hold up play and flick ons.

Maybe sell Archer instead.

Edited 4 hours ago by saintant

[LaptopSaint]

1 minute ago, saintant said:

Fair point but there have been reports that AA wants a move. I'm happy for us to keep him but we must sign or loan a big striker this window to help spread the load with Stewart. I wouldn't be adverse to having AA play just off Stewart as I think he'd profit from his hold up play and flick ons.

I’d like to see Archer just off Stewart- bad though he’s often been I still think there’s a player there looking for confidence 

[Midfield_General]

5 minutes ago, Miltonaggro said:

Biggest takeaway from me today was how different we looked first half with a centre forward on the pitch, Stewart is a good player. Also decent and constant communication between keeper and captain at centre half - a small but key improvement. 

Harwood-Bellis looked much more assured tonight. He looks so much more comfortable in a four. 

[LGTL]

I thought that was better. Wellington was excellent and it makes six a difference having Stewart. Two actual full backs at full back, Fellows and Scienza out wide, Azaz getting into pockets (should have done better on a couple of occasions) and an actual vocal point up top.

Slightly encouraging before Sunday. 

[Ex Lion Tamer]

10 minutes ago, Saint Pete said:

Sorry, can't agree with selling Armstrong, that's madness in my opinion. He's a proven goalscorer at this level and those are not that easy to find. Stewart looks decent and I agree with you that we certainly need one and preferably 2 central strikers on the squad that have physical presence. But as we know Stewart is very unreliable in terms of fitness. Yes, bring in another big man up front, I would hope and pray that's the plan now we have a free spot after Downs leaving on loan. But don't throw away the one player that has scored consistently at this level!! I think we should be playing him as well as Stewart/new striker in one of the wide supporting positions, not throwing away a scorer that pretty much every team in this division would want. 

We've known for ages that Armstrong isn't a centre forward but is very useful coming off the wing in this league. Let's get back to using him in that role.

[saintant]

Fellows is very tricky but we need him to start scoring some goals. He has the ability to get within shooting distance but always seems to just thrash at the ball. Needs to show a lot more composure and he'll start banging a few in. Get Le Tiss in to teach him how to strike the ball cleanly and accurately 🙂

[Mboto Gorge]

Good to see wilder still talks absolute bollocks after games they lose then. What an idiot. They should’ve  won 3-1 apparently 

Edited 3 hours ago by Mboto Gorge

[skintsaint]

8 minutes ago, Mboto Gorge said:

They should’ve  won 3-1 apparently 

https://www.skysports.com/football/video/11683/13497343/southampton-1-0-sheffield-united-championship-highlights

[die Mannyschaft]

Can't ask for more really as it was a big step up from last 7 games. All players had a crucial part at done point. A win, 3 points. A change promised by Tonda that delivered. Atmosphere much better even with lower gate. We now have hope going to Fratton.

[die Mannyschaft]

2 minutes ago, skintsaint said:

https://www.skysports.com/football/video/11683/13497343/southampton-1-0-sheffield-united-championship-highlights

If we could shoot then 5-1. 

[Mboto Gorge]

4 minutes ago, skintsaint said:

https://www.skysports.com/football/video/11683/13497343/southampton-1-0-sheffield-united-championship-highlights

Yes I watched it, we deserved to win. I’m talking about how laughable it is that Wilder is claiming Sheff Utd should’ve won 3-1

[HarvSFC]

Saturday and all other recent games have been dire. Tonight was much better. We attacked with pace and intent on multiple occasions and created good chances that the forwards missed. Rather than Wood and Manning killing our attacks dead before we've even moved up the pitch and stat padding our xG with multiple pot shots against a packed defence and without much hope.

Not much of the sideways and backwards shite for sideways and backwards sake tonight. We gave Sheffield United a game and we need to do the same on the weekend.

[Yozzman]

53 minutes ago, Chez said:

Blackmore has asked him about why he hasnt played 4 at the back and was told it was because he didnt have any fit full backs. He can't really go over that old ground can he?

For all the people that want 4 at the back Tonda hasn't had the fit fullbacks to do it until Jelert was available.  It would be suicide to have Fellows and Manning in a 4. Just look at the number of crosses coming in the last 20 minutes when Manning came on.

The most disappointing thing is there are not any U21s pushing for a  place, the bar is not very high.

[Yozzman]

49 minutes ago, Midfield_General said:

Harwood-Bellis looked much more assured tonight. He looks so much more comfortable in a four. 

Apart from when he almost gifted them an equaliser with Jelert.

[Jack]

3 minutes ago, Yozzman said:

For all the people that want 4 at the back Tonda hasn't had the fit fullbacks to do it until Jelert was available.  It would be suicide to have Fellows and Manning in a 4. Just look at the number of crosses coming in the last 20 minutes when Manning came on.

The most disappointing thing is there are not any U21s pushing for a  place, the bar is not very high.

Welington has been available to play ahead of Manning for ages, but not picked. Playing a capable CB out of position at RB would have been far more sensible than playing our best winger at RB and three CBs knocking it around between themselves then giving it away. 

[Osvaldorama]

It’s genuinely really, really, really infuriating that he did the absolute basic things most people have been crying out for and we looked like a different team. 
 

What a fucking waste of a season 

[Sir Ralph]

How can we all see that 4-2-3-1 would be better but it has taken our 'manger' many games and losses to realise this? Probably says a lot.

[Verbal]

2 minutes ago, Sir Ralph said:

How can we all see that 4-2-3-1 would be better but it has taken our 'manger' many games and losses to realise this? Probably says a lot.

Manger or minger? I'm not sure which of those two you were going for.

[Fabrice29]

On 04/01/2026 at 14:55, Fabrice29 said:

Anyway, this game, as always will be dictated by the keeper making saves, defenders defending the box well and strikers being ruthless. Not fancy graphics of formations. Fingers crossed.

 

2 hours ago, hypochondriac said:

We still weren't great but no coincidence we dropped some of the underperforming players and switched to four at the back and we get a clean sheet and look better. @egg @Lord Duckhunter @Fabrice29 still think we can't play 4 at the back effectively or that the formation has no influence on the performances and results?

I’ll stand by the above every single game. 👍

[Fabrice29]

On 20/01/2026 at 21:56, Turkish said:

There is no way on earth we can possibly lose tomorrow. An experienced manager doesn’t get results 

 

15 hours ago, Turkish said:

An experienced manger, I thought we were told By our resident expert it’s nothing to do with managers, experienced doesn’t get you results 

 

On 17/01/2026 at 22:05, Turkish said:

Sort of guy we could do with tbh. 

Saints inexperienced managers this season currently 2-0 up against the sort of experienced proper football man we could do with. Ciao! 

[woodsaint1]

4 4 fucking 2 and hey presto, we look much more solid and organised

Its mad that its taken this long and the amount of goals we've conceded for TE to realise that 3 CBs has not been working for us. That being said it would not surprise me if he reverts to that at the weekend 🤯

Seen it mentioned that the CBs looked more comfortable. No wonder when they've played 90% of their careers in a four with full backs who tuck in and offer cover. 3 CBs works for certain teams with certain players, but we dont have those players.

Lets get a win on Sunday now 💪🏼

[hypochondriac]

36 minutes ago, Fabrice29 said:

 

I’ll stand by the above every single game. 👍

Weird how we managed to do that better than every other game during this run when we changed the formation. Odd how that works.