eling-saint Posted 29 October, 2010 Share Posted 29 October, 2010 Anyone know how the revamp is going? I am sure I can see some new buildings from the Marchwood bypass which look like they are at Staplewood? However I recall a previous post stating that there was an issue with the builders? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Kraken Posted 29 October, 2010 Share Posted 29 October, 2010 If this mock up is in any way accurate then its unlikely you'd be able to see it from the bypass. And I'd have thought we'd have had a press release / OS announcement if work was actually under way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 29 October, 2010 Share Posted 29 October, 2010 Work has had a few set backs, it isn't going ahead at the moment but i think it may be re-commencing soon. There was issues with the builders at the time that didn't accept the terms put forward by Cortese, these terms were pretty reasonable but they couldn't come to an agreement. There are other issues that are directly effecting the build and they should be ironed out soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonnyboy Posted 29 October, 2010 Share Posted 29 October, 2010 ps - our billionaire has popped his clogs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 29 October, 2010 Share Posted 29 October, 2010 Work has had a few set backs, it isn't going ahead at the moment but i think it may be re-commencing soon. There was issues with the builders at the time that didn't accept the terms put forward by Cortese, these terms were pretty reasonable but they couldn't come to an agreement. There are other issues that are directly effecting the build and they should be ironed out soon. I see you are posting this as fact Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 29 October, 2010 Share Posted 29 October, 2010 I see you are posting this as fact Yes, as part of my job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 29 October, 2010 Share Posted 29 October, 2010 Yes, as part of my job. I'll believe what I've been told thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aintforever Posted 29 October, 2010 Share Posted 29 October, 2010 Work has had a few set backs, it isn't going ahead at the moment but i think it may be re-commencing soon. There was issues with the builders at the time that didn't accept the terms put forward by Cortese, these terms were pretty reasonable but they couldn't come to an agreement. There are other issues that are directly effecting the build and they should be ironed out soon. If the terms were reasonable why hasn't some other building company taken over - there are plenty of builders looking for work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 29 October, 2010 Share Posted 29 October, 2010 If the terms were reasonable why hasn't some other building company taken over - there are plenty of builders looking for work. Its not the builders holding it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 29 October, 2010 Share Posted 29 October, 2010 I'll believe what I've been told thanks Fine by me, i know this as 100% fact Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 29 October, 2010 Share Posted 29 October, 2010 Fine by me, i know this as 100% fact What were the terms that the builders rejected? Additionally, as 'reasonable terms' is an opinion, it cannot be 100% fact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 29 October, 2010 Share Posted 29 October, 2010 What were the terms that the builders rejected? Additionally, as 'reasonable terms' is an opinion, it cannot be 100% fact. They are pretty much standard terms within which most contractors carrying out a large job with a schedule and deadline would accept. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aintforever Posted 29 October, 2010 Share Posted 29 October, 2010 They are pretty much standard terms within which most contractors carrying out a large job with a schedule and deadline would accept. So is it just a case of waiting for funds then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 29 October, 2010 Share Posted 29 October, 2010 They are pretty much standard terms within which most contractors carrying out a large job with a schedule and deadline would accept. Well unless you are specific, we are just trusting your judgement. Why would they turn it down? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 29 October, 2010 Share Posted 29 October, 2010 So is it just a case of waiting for funds then? No its not really got anything to do with the contractors atm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 29 October, 2010 Share Posted 29 October, 2010 No its not really got anything to do with the contractors atm ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 29 October, 2010 Share Posted 29 October, 2010 Well unless you are specific, we are just trusting your judgement. Why would they turn it down? Well if you are privvy to the same information you tell me ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 30 October, 2010 Share Posted 30 October, 2010 Well if you are privvy to the same information you tell me ?? I'm not the one stating 'standard terms' (whatever they are) as fact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 30 October, 2010 Share Posted 30 October, 2010 I'm not the one stating 'standard terms' (whatever they are) as fact. Well you seem to believe there were other issues behind the whole saga, i would be interested to know your take on it. I KNOW of 100% reasons why the build cannot currently go ahead and i know of this as fact. Also through dealings i am aware that the contract broke down over terms which i believe are standard more or less but obviously didn't sit too well with one set or another. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Le God Posted 30 October, 2010 Share Posted 30 October, 2010 What harm can come of you telling us everything you know then Smirking_Saint? At the very least PM me with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 30 October, 2010 Share Posted 30 October, 2010 As well as that, it's extremely hypocritical. Sod off !! I literally have to constantly listen to your 'heard it from a mate, NC is the devil bull' And you have the cheek to call me hypocritical !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 30 October, 2010 Share Posted 30 October, 2010 Sod off !! I literally have to constantly listen to your 'heard it from a mate, NC is the devil bull' And you have the cheek to call me hypocritical !! In your own head mate. If you want to point out some examples of my hypocrisy then go ahead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 30 October, 2010 Share Posted 30 October, 2010 In your own head mate. If you want to point out some examples of my hypocrisy then go ahead. With the infractions flying around i am not getting into a slagging match. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 30 October, 2010 Share Posted 30 October, 2010 With the infractions flying around i am not getting into a slagging match. Running away then. Standard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 30 October, 2010 Share Posted 30 October, 2010 Running away then. Standard. As i said before, i am not getting into a slagging match, if you want to PM me then by all means. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint_clark Posted 30 October, 2010 Share Posted 30 October, 2010 Fair enough mate. Deleted my post, you've backed yourself up and provided a (fairly) good reason why you can't put the full details up here. No doubt the club follows these forums for "leaks". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Who? Posted 30 October, 2010 Share Posted 30 October, 2010 Seems like most the investment at the club has stopped. I do not think there is the same ambition as there was this time last year, and NC has gone very quiet (not saying this is a bad thing), and the 5 year plan seems never to be mentioned. I think that we will lose most of our top earners if we are not looking like going up when the windown opens in Jan. If not it will all be pinned onto promotion come May. I just have the feeling around the ground that this is it, promotion or bust! Well or they will sell up! IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dalek2003 Posted 30 October, 2010 Share Posted 30 October, 2010 Seems like most the investment at the club has stopped. I do not think there is the same ambition as there was this time last year, and NC has gone very quiet (not saying this is a bad thing), and the 5 year plan seems never to be mentioned. I think that we will lose most of our top earners if we are not looking like going up when the windown opens in Jan. If not it will all be pinned onto promotion come May. I just have the feeling around the ground that this is it, promotion or bust! Well or they will sell up! IMO. That is a very loaded statement indeed. Are you saying that the Liebherr's will pull out at the end of the season if we don't go up ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy_Porter Posted 30 October, 2010 Share Posted 30 October, 2010 That is a very loaded statement indeed. Are you saying that the Liebherr's will pull out at the end of the season if we don't go up ? Maybe they allready have? FWIW even with a business model based just on our football based income and nothing from the Liebherrs being put into the club we should have more than enough about us to get promoted within a couple of seasons if we can get a bit of stability off the pitch - keep Adkins for a while! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thedelldays Posted 30 October, 2010 Share Posted 30 October, 2010 maybe the inheritance law in the neutral zone (switzerland) is somewhat drawn out..??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 30 October, 2010 Share Posted 30 October, 2010 The development has nothing to do with funds either, or it wasn't. I always worry about the Liebherrs upping and moving on aswell but i think we are ok. We will spend in Jan IMO and keep our best players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crab Lungs Posted 30 October, 2010 Share Posted 30 October, 2010 Well you seem to believe there were other issues behind the whole saga, i would be interested to know your take on it. I KNOW of 100% reasons why the build cannot currently go ahead and i know of this as fact. Also through dealings i am aware that the contract broke down over terms which i believe are standard more or less but obviously didn't sit too well with one set or another. Oooooooooh, I love inside knowledge!!! Any chance of a PM, Smirking Saint? (please) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustMike Posted 30 October, 2010 Share Posted 30 October, 2010 Well unless you are specific, we are just trusting your judgement. Why would they turn it down? but you already said that you believe what you have been told, so why argue about it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dronskisaint Posted 30 October, 2010 Share Posted 30 October, 2010 The paranoia on here is unreal Why does a five year plan need constant references? Lots of building jobs start, stop & then start again for multiple practical, contractual, planning or even just change of needs reasons...why does this have to be an issue with anything else? I'm a Saints fan so am well used to expectations not being met as hoped/expected/promised....I've also had building work frustrated for all the reasons above...let's keep some perspective here guys! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doggface Posted 30 October, 2010 Share Posted 30 October, 2010 What I would say is that the communication from the club on this issue has been poor. Seems to be a common theme these days Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
landford.saint Posted 30 October, 2010 Share Posted 30 October, 2010 Seem to remember that when NC had tea with the fans, it was trotted back that the actual plans had been modified and the whole lot had gone back for planning approval. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doggface Posted 31 October, 2010 Share Posted 31 October, 2010 Heard today that work is likely to be completed within 18 months which would take us to the pre season 2012/13. Bit longer than I hoped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Le God Posted 31 October, 2010 Share Posted 31 October, 2010 Heard today From where? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint_clark Posted 1 November, 2010 Share Posted 1 November, 2010 Heard today that work is likely to be completed within 18 months which would take us to the pre season 2012/13. Bit longer than I hoped. Depends on the scale of the development really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benjii Posted 1 November, 2010 Share Posted 1 November, 2010 The paranoia on here is unreal Why does a five year plan need constant references? Lots of building jobs start, stop & then start again for multiple practical, contractual, planning or even just change of needs reasons...why does this have to be an issue with anything else? I'm a Saints fan so am well used to expectations not being met as hoped/expected/promised....I've also had building work frustrated for all the reasons above...let's keep some perspective here guys! I have added you to my list of sensible/intelligent forum members. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hughieslastminutegoal Posted 1 November, 2010 Share Posted 1 November, 2010 The paranoia on here is unreal Why does a five year plan need constant references? Lots of building jobs start, stop & then start again for multiple practical, contractual, planning or even just change of needs reasons...why does this have to be an issue with anything else? I'm a Saints fan so am well used to expectations not being met as hoped/expected/promised....I've also had building work frustrated for all the reasons above...let's keep some perspective here guys! Possibly becuase no one knows what it contains? I have a five year plan too. Can't really tell you what the milestones are, so I'll let others make them up, make assumptions. People keep saying things like "we are very professionally run, we have a five year plan...." assuming it has in it whatever is necessary to get 2 promotions. Smirking Saint's posts seem to boil down to "there were problems because of the builder.. there aren't problems with the builder now, other things are holding it up, but it isn't finance". So if we have planning consent, we now have the builder on-side, and we have the money, what on earth is the problem? Are the plans being changed? Were they not what we needed at the outset? Are the wrong kind of leaves falling in the trenches? What's the state secret over a bit of training ground rebuilding? Bring in John Pilger, guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spyinthesky Posted 1 November, 2010 Share Posted 1 November, 2010 Rumours are that the building contract was with 'Terry the Jerry' builder. However he experienced a couple of problems. First one was overrunning on a big executive house project on Hayling Island and then on some 'sporting' project on Portsea Island which went into administration. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hughieslastminutegoal Posted 1 November, 2010 Share Posted 1 November, 2010 Rumours are that the building contract was with 'Terry the Jerry' builder. However he experienced a couple of problems. First one was overrunning on a big executive house project on Hayling Island and then on some 'sporting' project on Portsea Island which went into administration. But Smirking Saint says the problem isn't now with the builder..... so the state secret is still safe.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doggface Posted 1 November, 2010 Share Posted 1 November, 2010 I have no idea why the delay, would be nice if the club told us as there was some fanfare when the plans were unveiled. The club are also installing 2 news grass/synthetic mix pitches which a few of the prem teams have installed this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benjii Posted 1 November, 2010 Share Posted 1 November, 2010 Did the club give an expected completion date when they announced the plans? Can't remember. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leftback Posted 1 November, 2010 Share Posted 1 November, 2010 Start date more like!!! Dont hold your breath,money all entwined in switzerland. The daughter venting her fury over years of nicolina sucking up to Marcus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thedelldays Posted 1 November, 2010 Share Posted 1 November, 2010 Start date more like!!! Dont hold your breath,money all entwined in switzerland. The daughter venting her fury over years of nicolina sucking up to Marcus. do you actually support saints..? if the money dries up...it dries up.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smirking_Saint Posted 1 November, 2010 Share Posted 1 November, 2010 Start date more like!!! Dont hold your breath,money all entwined in switzerland. The daughter venting her fury over years of nicolina sucking up to Marcus. FFS, go away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dockland Dave Posted 1 November, 2010 Share Posted 1 November, 2010 FFS, go away. Why? It is what a lot of us expected to happen. Saints were ML toy, I doubt his heirs have the same attachment to the club, and i suspect are not willing to run with NC costly plans. I don't think Leftbacks comments are a slur on NC. It amazes me how irate people get when they come across an opinion that they has probably been rolling around in the back of their own minds, but would prefer not to hear. Surely as a message board, and as long as those opinions are not offensive, people are quite within there rights to state whatever info they have heard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintscottofthenortham Posted 1 November, 2010 Share Posted 1 November, 2010 I think a few of you are forgetting that members of his family often came over with him to watch us. We have been told that things will not change due to Markus' death. FFS, stop finding things to nit pick over. Some are so negative it is far kin unbelievable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now