whelk Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 37 minutes ago, sadoldgit said: The licence fee is worth it for David Attenborough alone. When compared to so much of the dross out there it is still good value. The BBC is more of a part of the fabric of the UK than flags on lampposts. It is firmly embedded in the growth of modern day Britain. It’s a shame that the so called patriots don’t value it. Too busy getting their gammon fix on GB News I suppose. Attenborough is on Netflix
whelk Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 35 minutes ago, The Kraken said: Thats twice now, excellent work, it especially highlights your overall inability to look at situations as anything other than completely binary. 🤣 BBC gave Katy Hopkins her prominence. 2
sadoldgit Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 59 minutes ago, The Kraken said: Thats twice now, excellent work, it especially highlights your overall inability to look at situations as anything other than completely binary. 🤣 It’s a point of view. I have already said that change is needed so I don’t see how that is ‘binary?’
Patrick Bateman Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 7 hours ago, The Kraken said: I love what the Beeb has done and indeed some of what it still does (Monday quiz night last night was particularly difficult, mind). But, in this day and age of streaming and multiple subscriptions, a mandatory license fee to fund the BBC is really something of a disgrace. It’s such an outdated model and will become abused more and more. It’s a shame, but I do think that the payment model simply has to change. This. Those who like the "unique way the BBC is funded" are dinosaurs.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now