washsaint Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago A damning indictment of our recruitment the last few years: Stewart - so far off the pace it will take months to get up to speed and he has not looked clinical any time he has played Downs - speechless. Looks like he's never played before Armstrong - given a new contract when clearly not good enough for the top level. Been abysmal this season Archer - what an utterly abysmal signing this guy was BBD - why? And these are all still here playing. It's tragic that our most dangerous attacking threat is an 18 year old (Robinson) or CBs. Shambles of a club - and it does not seem to be getting better 11
Gloucester Saint Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago (edited) 9 minutes ago, washsaint said: A damning indictment of our recruitment the last few years: Stewart - so far off the pace it will take months to get up to speed and he has not looked clinical any time he has played Downs - speechless. Looks like he's never played before Armstrong - given a new contract when clearly not good enough for the top level. Been abysmal this season Archer - what an utterly abysmal signing this guy was BBD - why? And these are all still here playing. It's tragic that our most dangerous attacking threat is an 18 year old (Robinson) or CBs. Shambles of a club - and it does not seem to be getting better AA new contract was Martin’s doing, and we can see from Rangers what that looks like (again). Downs - to me, that has to be a dismissal of the scout who recommended him, or Spors if it was his doing. Might as well do a KLF and burn £8m on a Scottish island. Can’t hold up, can’t control a football, can’t run, can’t head it, and can’t kick it. As someone else observed, the players don’t want to pass to him either as he’s clearly no better in training. Needs to be told on Monday he’s being loaned out to League 1 or 2 to get some experience and Dragan will have bail Spors out on the wages. Plymouth and Cheltenham urgently need strikers for example and will take him on if he isn’t costing them much. AA has done it for us before but he’s not a striker through the middle. How many fucking times do managers need to be told this by the fans? You’re the professionals FFS. BBD - subsidised loan, confidence totally gone. Needs a new environment. Edited 5 hours ago by Gloucester Saint 2
sockeye Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago (edited) Anyone who puffs their chest about Martin continuously getting pelters on here needs to remember he was responsible for 3 of these, 2 of which that will take years to shift Edited 5 hours ago by sockeye 3
saintant Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 18 minutes ago, washsaint said: A damning indictment of our recruitment the last few years: Stewart - so far off the pace it will take months to get up to speed and he has not looked clinical any time he has played Downs - speechless. Looks like he's never played before Armstrong - given a new contract when clearly not good enough for the top level. Been abysmal this season Archer - what an utterly abysmal signing this guy was BBD - why? And these are all still here playing. It's tragic that our most dangerous attacking threat is an 18 year old (Robinson) or CBs. Shambles of a club - and it does not seem to be getting better Not one good enough to give us the power, drive, ability to unsettle defenders, focal point, strong tip of the spine and goals this season. Our recruitment team continue to pussyfoot around this and do absolutely nothing to resolve it. 3
LGTL Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago We don’t finish anywhere except mid table with that selection of utter bollocks, no matter how many stats MLG throws around. 3
Saint NL Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago The strikers can't cut it in the championship, but a year ago they were expected to keep us up in the PL 😂 Total shambles.
bugenhagen Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Same as has been for years. Who is our main man? The guy who bails us out when we need it, or puts away the early chances in the game when we are on top and kills it. Even when we win, we are usually not clear winners (maybe a couple of times two years ago?)
Andrew Watson Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago All 4 combined have supposedly cost between 45 and 50 million pounds and not one could hit a barn door from 6 yards. Get Josh Sargent in and get rid of as many of these jokers as possible.
S-Clarke Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago (edited) I've always been quite bemused by people who say our forward options are amongst the 'best in the league'. They're really not, they're hopeless. Individually they have had good seasons in the past, but collectively they do not work together. Armstrong, IMO, is done for us. We got that one season out of him where he bagged a bucket load, but he's not the same player now. Stewart is not someone to be relied on. I've said it from the outset. People keep calling him this proven Championship striker which baffles me, he isn't. He played 13 games with Sunderland at this level and hit a purple patch, that doesn't make him proven at this level. Downs is a 'project', probably in a position where we needed to avoid a project if we're honest. Archer is at his best with a powerful CF, but we're forced to play him wide due to our horrendous lack of options. I'd probably keep Acher around and obviously Downs, but the rest can do one as far as I'm concerned as they're not good enough. Edited 3 hours ago by S-Clarke 1
ally_uk Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago We didn't properly replace Ings, constantly cut corners trying to be clever, enough f##king about put £20 -25 million down on someone half capable......
S-Clarke Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago (edited) 2 minutes ago, ally_uk said: We didn't properly replace Ings, constantly cut corners trying to be clever, enough f##king about put £20 -25 million down on someone half capable...... That Ings sale always annoyed me. The club were internally patting themselves on the back for weeks and weeks by being proud of the fee they got from Villa for him. Yeah, it was a good fee and probably above his market value at that point - but we didn't reinvest the fee in a replacement, so what's the point of being excited by getting £30-35m if it's not reinvested. The club tried to be clever and put down 12-15m on Adam Armstrong to try to replace him. Edited 3 hours ago by S-Clarke 2
LGTL Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 4 minutes ago, ally_uk said: We didn't properly replace Ings, constantly cut corners trying to be clever, enough f##king about put £20 -25 million down on someone half capable...... Who is, coincidentally, sat on his arse doing nothing right now. And still comfortably better than any option we have.
Gloucester Saint Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 1 minute ago, S-Clarke said: That Ings sale always annoyed me. The club were internally patting themselves on the back for weeks and weeks by being proud of the fee they got from Villa for him. Yeah, it was a good fee and probably above his market value at that point - but we didn't reinvest the fee in a replacement, so what's the point of being excited by getting £30-35m if it's not reinvested. It’s the same for Dibling, was for Lavia and will be for Fernandes too. Can’t wait until SR and the last vestiges of the Semmens era are wholesale gone out of the club and happy to drop down the leagues again to achieve that. The club having a heart and soul, even a pulse, is worth more than anything,
Saint_clark Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago All I'll say is, with all these crosses into the box...tall Paul would probably have scored every game so far.
Baird of the land Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago It’s amusing we sold our top scorer from last season and we replaced him with a project player. Smacks of complete arrogance.
S-Clarke Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 5 minutes ago, Baird of the land said: It’s amusing we sold our top scorer from last season and we replaced him with a project player. Smacks of complete arrogance. If you're referring to Onuachu, that's stretching it a bit. He only got 4 goals. We hardly scored any goals last year. 1
Gloucester Saint Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 8 minutes ago, Baird of the land said: It’s amusing we sold our top scorer from last season and we replaced him with a project player. Smacks of complete arrogance. Onachu didn’t want to play in the Championship and wasn’t a Still player at all. Although not sure who would be today? Big wages. But, yes 💯 agree on Downs, seemed a very odd signing in the context of only needing players who would be natural starters this season in ability. Ditto Quarshie although his recovery pace is at least one point of difference.
AlexLaw76 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Just now, Gloucester Saint said: Onachu didn’t want to play in the Championship and wasn’t a Still player at all. Although not sure who would be today? Big wages. But, yes 💯 agree on Downs, seemed a very odd signing in the context of only needing players who would be natural starters this season in ability. Ditto Quarshie although his recovery pace is at least one point of difference. Kyogo would have been a starter for us. These players are there 1
Badger Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 2 hours ago, LGTL said: We don’t finish anywhere except mid table with that selection of utter bollocks, no matter how many stats MLG throws around. Archer - 18 goals in 40 championship games. Or so I read, and read it again, and again just to make sure. That was once upon a time though. Dreadful player in the EPL. So far no better in the Championship
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now