Doctoroncall Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Not sure if posted, the FA have increased the minimum punishment on aggravated breach: The FA is to increase the minimum punishment for discriminatory behaviour to 10 matches, in an attempt to counteract behaviour it says “continues to be a challenge across the game”. The changes will come into force at the start of the new season and will apply to players and other football participants who are found guilty of an “aggravated breach” of the FA’s disciplinary rules on improper conduct, effectively actions that included discriminatory behaviour against any protected characteristics. Currently the minimum suspension for such a breach is six matches. Charges against Tonda weren’t aggravated but wonder on the timing of this release of changes to the punishments.
sadoldgit Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 2 hours ago, Lighthouse said: We employed a level of subterfuge, albeit in a laughably bad manner, in order to gain inside information on their entire game plan and formations. It’s like playing blackjack, looking at everyone else’s cards and trying to claim you’re not cheating and the ‘benefit is marginal’. It is nothing like cheating at cards as well you know. If you look at someone’s cards the benefit is enormous. Looking at a training session, as we have discovered ourselves, does not guarantee that you win the match.
Lighthouse Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 hour ago, OnceaSaintalwaysaSaint said: Literally every friend I have who are season ticket holders at other clubs think we've been hard done by. Everyone. They all say the whole thing is a nonsense and we've been sh*t on. It wasn't cheating. It was scouting. On another tack. When I said to my son, what employer would keep an employee that has lost the club potentially £200 million, his argument is we were nowhere near the play offs when he became manager. I've never thought of it like this. As I’ve said before, if this exact same scenario had played out with Pompey ‘scouting’ one of our training sessions before beating us in the playoffs, I’m sure this forum would be unanimous in agreeing that it’s no big deal and wishing those chaps down the road all the very best of luck in the Premier League. No amount of friends feeling things are going to wash away the fact that we deliberately broke the rules to gain an advantage before a crucial playoff game, knowing full well it wasn’t acceptable after the Bielsa saga seven years ago. 3
TheSoundman Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 14 minutes ago, sadoldgit said: It is nothing like cheating at cards as well you know. If you look at someone’s cards the benefit is enormous. Looking at a training session, as we have discovered ourselves, does not guarantee that you win the match. It's interesting that in this case it's the 'intent' that seems to count, rather than the result, which is actually quite unusual. If you drink and drive then get pulled over you might get banned, but if you hit someone and kill them, you'll probably end up in prison. The intent is the same, the outcome is down to (mis)fortune, but that's what you'll be judged on. The same could be said on the pitch when the defender tries to pull back a forward when he's through on goal. If the forward shakes free and has a shot, the defender gets away with it, but if the forward goes down, it's probably a red. The intent was the same though. I know I'm rambling, but we gained no advantage from this stupidity, and yet we're being crucified as a club. It's not often you get judged on intent alone... Edited 56 minutes ago by TheSoundman
Weston Super Saint Posted 49 minutes ago Posted 49 minutes ago 26 minutes ago, Doctoroncall said: Not sure if posted, the FA have increased the minimum punishment on aggravated breach: The FA is to increase the minimum punishment for discriminatory behaviour to 10 matches, in an attempt to counteract behaviour it says “continues to be a challenge across the game”. The changes will come into force at the start of the new season and will apply to players and other football participants who are found guilty of an “aggravated breach” of the FA’s disciplinary rules on improper conduct, effectively actions that included discriminatory behaviour against any protected characteristics. Currently the minimum suspension for such a breach is six matches. Charges against Tonda weren’t aggravated but wonder on the timing of this release of changes to the punishments. Sounds like they will only affect offences committed this season, so won't apply to Tonda for last season...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now