Scummer

Yeah, improving so much that the aggregate score of their last 4 premier league matches is 17-2.

We scored as a result of a Lambert handball a couple of weeks ago so I don't think we should be getting too self-righteous about this.

I'm sure I read that Ba got £2.5m of that for himself as well........

Surely you sh!t in the woods, no?

Can you blame him? He could die if one of those shots hits him in the head.

Where's the picture gone in post #9 ?

Yeah and I think that's what the guy meant when he said current stands are unsuitable. For safe standing you need lots of quite shallow steps. We have fewer, steeper steps in most all seater stadiums. It's the type of thing that might be feasible if we were redeveloping the ground anyway, but otherwise the cost would be prohibitive.

Think that rumour related to Lee Bradbury.

He's in our 25 man squad. He was on a 3 month loan, which has now expired. Therefore by default he's back in the squad now. I'd be very surprised if we saw him playing for the first team again.

Didn't keep us up.......

Sash kit would have old more if it wasn't for the fact that they'd sold out by about September and didn't get any more stock for months, by which time the kit was nearing the end of its life. Still wish I'd been able to get hold of a sash shirt.

I think you're able to vote for a first and second choice, but you don't have to. You can just choose one candidate.

This years money?

Fair enough. But as the purpose of security is to give the lender something to recover against in the event of a default, it would seem logical for that security to be against something which post-dates the expected loan term? Instead of the word 'proof', would you accept 'very strong indication'?

As far as I can tell, no that's not what we're doing. When you get promoted you get a lot of money. However you don't get a lump-sum cheque on the day the fixture list comes out, it gets drip fed over time. However, in part due to the transfer window, you may need to spend cash before you've been paid it. A loan would help in this situation. We've secured the loan against next years money, that's not the same as paying it back out of next years money. My mortgage is secured against my house, doesn't mean I intend to sell my house to repay the mortgage. As I've said before, the loan being secured against future revenue is actually proof that the intention is to pay it back before then. What use to a bank is security if by the time they'd be forced to call it in you'd have already spent it?

One thing I found interesting when they were talking about this on 5Live this morning. They seemed to be saying he used the N word, and that if it's true that should be the end of his career. So it's a 4 game ban for a player and a lifetime ban for a ref?

Jimmy Savile necrophilia stories have been going round for years. He allegedly used to be left alone in the morgue at one of the hospitals he was associated with.

I don't think we've had any problems gelling. We've been playing good football most of the time. The majority of the goals we've conceded have been due to individual errors, largely from players who've been here a while.

3. Stick with Adkins, don't go down, get stronger next year. We aren't even in the relegation zone FFS, having played nearly all the top teams already.

Because the point of security is to give the lender certainty that they'll get their money if we don't make the repayments. You couldn't secure it against this season's payments, as by the time we defaulted we'd have already spent them. So in fact, I'd say the fact that it is secured against next season's payments is actually a very good indicator that the plan is to pay it off before then.

Apart from it being the first programme mentioned in the first post?

Doesn't that rule say you can't more it more than eight times anyway, not that it has to be worn a minimum of eight times? And are their specific rules concerning short and sock clashes, or is it just up to the ref? I can just about buy that two teams wearing the same colour socks could be issue, but am struggling to think of an instance where clashing shorts could cause any confusion.

Yeah saw it on twitter yesterday. Congtats Adam.

Whatever anyone says, something has obviously happened over the past few years to put people off going to cup games. We used to buck the trend of declining attendances, especially in the league cup. I remember many a thread showing how we had far better attendances than a lot of other 'big' clubs, and mocking the sub-10k crowds the likes of Bolton and Blackburn were getting. Personally, despite having a season ticket, I very rarely go to cup matches these days. If we get a good draw in the next round I might go, but then again I might not. In my view, the decline in cup gates coincided with us starting to play weakened teams. We didn't used to do this, in fact I'd probably trace it back to Redknapp who started to devalue the cups for Saints

Where's the best place to see these pictures then?