Scummer

3. Stick with Adkins, don't go down, get stronger next year. We aren't even in the relegation zone FFS, having played nearly all the top teams already.

Because the point of security is to give the lender certainty that they'll get their money if we don't make the repayments. You couldn't secure it against this season's payments, as by the time we defaulted we'd have already spent them. So in fact, I'd say the fact that it is secured against next season's payments is actually a very good indicator that the plan is to pay it off before then.

Apart from it being the first programme mentioned in the first post?

Doesn't that rule say you can't more it more than eight times anyway, not that it has to be worn a minimum of eight times? And are their specific rules concerning short and sock clashes, or is it just up to the ref? I can just about buy that two teams wearing the same colour socks could be issue, but am struggling to think of an instance where clashing shorts could cause any confusion.

Yeah saw it on twitter yesterday. Congtats Adam.

Whatever anyone says, something has obviously happened over the past few years to put people off going to cup games. We used to buck the trend of declining attendances, especially in the league cup. I remember many a thread showing how we had far better attendances than a lot of other 'big' clubs, and mocking the sub-10k crowds the likes of Bolton and Blackburn were getting. Personally, despite having a season ticket, I very rarely go to cup matches these days. If we get a good draw in the next round I might go, but then again I might not. In my view, the decline in cup gates coincided with us starting to play weakened teams. We didn't used to do this, in fact I'd probably trace it back to Redknapp who started to devalue the cups for Saints

Where's the best place to see these pictures then?

Looking around the stadium on matchday, we seem to have sold loads. So someone must like it.

Think he played centre mid for them at the weekend.

Another two words - Paul Scholes

If only you had the sash kit

We have to register our 25 man squad list with the League a the close of the window, so if he doesn't sign today he won't be on that list. Therefore we could sign him after today but we won't be able to play him.

Interesting speech here which talks about the Apple hypocrisy mentioned above: http://www.ted.com/talks/kirby_ferguson_embrace_the_remix.html

I'd actually say that's quite fair. If they've said tickets go on sale at 9, you shouldn't have to be logging on at stupid o'clock in the morning to get in the queue. It's not really any different to other systems which wouldn't actually let you log on until 9, except this way manages the load on their servers so that they don't lock up when everyone tries to go through the logon procedure at the same time.

I stuck Billy Sharp in mine. Cheap and I reckon he'll come off the bench to score a few late goals.

I loved Appys quotes in The News last night. On the one hand saying how proud he was of the kids who played at Plymouth, but in the next breath stating that by Saturday he hoped to have signed enough players better than them that one or two might make the bench if they were lucky.

I've still got a mug with it on.

Surely there are lots of things that children are told they aren't allowed to do but adults can? Drinking, smoking, ironing, opening the front door, mowing the lawn, etc. I don't see why a child would see it as such a contradiction when seen alongside a lot of other rules they are taught to adhere to but adults partake in. Oh yeah, my kids aren't allowed to **** the babysitter either.

What about shouting at children? Do people see that as wrong? In my experience kids find being shouted at pretty scary, probably more so than a smack on the bum.

It's a brand new event, the record will go pretty much every time they race.

I'm sure it doesn't help that the people who actually own/run the site hardly ever seem to be on here themselves these days. If they've lost interest themselves it can't help the standards of moderation.

I'm sure it doesn't help that the people who actually own/run the site hardly ever seem to be on here themselves these days. If they've lost interest themselves it can't help the standards of moderation.

I'd say Chaplow is far more likely to leave than Hammond.

It's not. A meal deal is normally a sandwich, a drink, and EITHER a bar of chocolate OR a bag of crisps. As to why people eat crisps, surely the answer is simple. They taste nice. There are also plenty of other more 'sophisticated' food items which also aren't particularly good for you, but people don't seem to criticise them.

I hope you realise what a patronising and up your own arse comment that was.