Jump to content

Olympic Openinf ceremony


bristolsaint29

Recommended Posts

I think its a far better option that thousands of people randomly dancing in random coloured costumes which appears to be blueprint for all other opening ceremonies. I am optimistic that it is one persons vision not something drawn up by committee. These things are always long and expensive, its what's expected, but hopefully this one will be both good and something different from previous ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think its a far better option that thousands of people randomly dancing in random coloured costumes which appears to be blueprint for all other opening ceremonies. I am optimistic that it is one persons vision not something drawn up by committee. These things are always long and expensive, its what's expected, but hopefully this one will be both good and something different from previous ones.

 

The opening ceremony is costing 27 million quid.

 

 

Part of the reasoning behind it was, how could they match or beat Bejing? And the answer was that they simply couldn't, so have gone for something completely different.

 

It will be stunning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The opening ceremony is costing 27 million quid.

 

 

Part of the reasoning behind it was, how could they match or beat Bejing? And the answer was that they simply couldn't, so have gone for something completely different.

 

It will be stunning.

 

In fairness I moaned about thye logo and it grew on me. It was actually very clever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The opening ceremony is costing 27 million quid.

 

 

Part of the reasoning behind it was, how could they match or beat Bejing? And the answer was that they simply couldn't, so have gone for something completely different.

 

It will be stunning.

 

I'd like to know who is making the money from it?

 

27 million pounds and ALL the performers are volunteers!

 

Somebody, somewhere is making a fortune off it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The great British public love nothing more than a good old moan about stuff so this will no doubt satisfy our collective craving for something to vent our spleen over...

 

Something Boyle is definitely aware off.

 

"You're bound to fail, that's built in. But you hope that on the journey, you hope people will find enough in it to feel that it is representative of us," said Boyle.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The people who moan about this and the Olympics in general are always going to moan about it. You will never win them over. I really hope they can pull off something incredible and uniquely 'British' (whatever that is?!). Everyone marvelled at Beijing, but people forget that mass rallies/demonstrations are fairly easy to do when you have the threat of execution hanging over everyone!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Other things:

 

1) the budget for the ceremonies was doubled by the current government and to some extent it was not a bad decision as you are selling the country to the billions watching and the value for money I suspect compares favourable to advertising tourism in the UK via normal routes.

 

2) I suspect given the price of the tickets (20.12 for the lowest but 2012 for the highest) that the ceremonies will be self financing.

Edited by pedg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Should have done an amazing sound and light show on iconic London landmarks. This kind of thing:

 

 

 

They might still do that. But to be honest that kind of thing is not that amazing - Sky did loads of that just for their coverage of the 2010 Election results.

 

It's basically modern day fireworks. A bit of wooooo but not really groundbreaking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not just put a small stage in the middle of the stadium, get the Queen and Phil on it.

Get them to say "welcome to the olympics" they go away and then within 10 minutes

the events can start.

 

At the end same stage but get rthem to say "thanks for coming it's past my bed time so bugger off"

 

There millions saved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They might still do that. But to be honest that kind of thing is not that amazing - Sky did loads of that just for their coverage of the 2010 Election results.

 

It's basically modern day fireworks. A bit of wooooo but not really groundbreaking.

It might not be ground breaking but its a lot more contemporary and relevant than maypole dancing in a pastiche rural idyll set. As one of the comments on the Sky site said - "27Million quid on a tellytubby set???"
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It might not be ground breaking but its a lot more contemporary and relevant than maypole dancing in a pastiche rural idyll set. As one of the comments on the Sky site said - "27Million quid on a tellytubby set???"

 

 

 

If wheeling out a now pretty bog standard bit of technology already used to flog mobile phones in cities all over the world is contemporary and relevent god help us.

 

At least this is nicely counter intuitive and disruptive. And obviously that set is not the entire ceremony, more to come I'm sure. Won't stop the sneering but fu c k them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's certainly different and I'm sure the animals will do their own thing what with the noise and flashing lights, unless they're planning to feed them tranqualisers! I feel one part is missing - on one side there should be a digger ready to tear up part of the countryside for the new social housing development.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think many people commenting on how the set looks (i.e. the teletubby comments) are not taking on board the fact that the set will change over the course of the ceremony to reflect a more urban society. What we have seen pictures of is just how it will look at the start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-18421211

 

London Olympics 'to come in £500m under budget'

 

The Olympic stadium will host the opening ceremony next month

Sports minister Hugh Robertson says the London Olympics are set to come in under its £9.3bn budget with about £500m of the contingency funding left.

 

He told the BBC the exact figure would be announced to Parliament later.

 

But Mr Robertson said that "all being well we should be able to hand half a billion pounds back to the Treasury".

Edited by trousers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-18421211

 

London Olympics 'to come in £500m under budget'

 

13 June 2012 Last updated at 08:32

The Olympic stadium will host the opening ceremony next month

Sports minister Hugh Robertson says the London Olympics are set to come in under its £9.3bn budget with about £500m of the contingency funding left.

 

He told the BBC the exact figure would be announced to Parliament later.

 

But Mr Robertson said that "all being well we should be able to hand half a billion pounds back to the Treasury".

 

Surely that reads that the budget was actually £7.3Bn, but they set aside a £2Bn contingency as costs inevitably increase to exceed available funding, so it isn't 'under budget', it's 'over estimate'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely that reads that the budget was actually £7.3Bn, but they set aside a £2Bn contingency as costs inevitably increase to exceed available funding, so it isn't 'under budget', it's 'over estimate'.

 

Yeah, but a labour government would have spent the extra £500k because it was there to be spent whereas the natural inclination of the Tories is to save it... ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...