Jump to content

Solving the Immigration Problem

Guided Missile

By Guided Missile
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

AlexLaw76

AlexLaw76

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Wiggles31 said:

There are some areas you would think aren’t up for debate. 

There is someone in effect 'commanding the vessel'. These are numerous laws (national and international) being broken knowingly getting underway like that.

I am sure those on the vessel are appropriately sanctioned. 😝

egg

egg

Posted
Posted
39 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

There is someone in effect 'commanding the vessel'. These are numerous laws (national and international) being broken knowingly getting underway like that.

I am sure those on the vessel are appropriately sanctioned. 😝

Eh? What does this have to do with lifeboat operators being willing to assist a boat where the lives of these on board are endangered?

badgerx16

badgerx16

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, egg said:

Eh? What does this have to do with lifeboat operators being willing to assist a boat where the lives of these on board are endangered?

I think he is referring to the people launching and crewing the dinghies.

  • Like 2
egg

egg

Posted
Posted
Just now, badgerx16 said:

I think he is referring to the people launching and crewing the dinghies.

Ah, gotcha, my point addressed the lifeboat/ops. 

Lord Duckhunter

Lord Duckhunter

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, JohnnyShearer2.0 said:

I'm assuming the organisation is telling its volunteers to help rescue people in the seas?

I know a lot of volunteers here in Poole, a lot. Most signed up to help & rescue local people & visitors who get into difficulties, particularly fisherman and other maritime trades vital to the local economy & well being. They did not sign up to escort economic migrants from one safe country to another. It’s the well paid woke bosses people should be criticising, not the poor blood infantry. 
 

That’s the thing with the RNLI there’s a lot of people making a lot of money out of it.  The blokes putting their lives on the line aren’t, but there’s a lot of bloody people who are. The hotel & HQ must be decorated every fucking year, the ordinary suits soliciting donations make good money. They’ve got good PR, people still believe they’re all volunteers shaking buckets outside supermarkets & giving up their spare time for the community. Load of old pony, they’re ruthless bastards constant HO redundancies whilst the top brass pocket more and more cash. I’ve seen it happen in the 35 years I’ve lived here. The chief executive is on nearly 200k, had the pay stayed in line, it would be about 70k now. You lefties moan about private companies, these are just as bad.

 

 

  • Like 3
Weston Super Saint

Weston Super Saint

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Osvaldorama said:

 

They are told what to do by the organisation. 
 

There even some RNLI staff that have voiced concerns about it….

Their taskings are given by HM Coastguard.

The RNLI does not decide what incidents it does or does not attend.

  • Like 4
egg

egg

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Weston Super Saint said:

Their taskings are given by HM Coastguard.

The RNLI does not decide what incidents it does or does not attend.

And neither should it, or will it. The suggestion that they'd be selective about who they'd help is ridiculous.

I'm staggered that it's even a discussion that the RNLI, or frankly anyone, should or shouldn't help certain people at sea. That they were escorted into our waters by the French is the disgrace, not that they were helped when they got there. 

  • Like 3
Sir Ralph

Sir Ralph

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, JohnnyShearer2.0 said:

Wow, everyone must work in the public sector or be unemployed on here. As most us are on here everyday all the time. 

Are you in local or national government?

When I was younger I worked there for a year that was enough for me

Sir Ralph

Sir Ralph

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Lord Duckhunter said:

I know a lot of volunteers here in Poole, a lot. Most signed up to help & rescue local people & visitors who get into difficulties, particularly fisherman and other maritime trades vital to the local economy & well being. They did not sign up to escort economic migrants from one safe country to another. It’s the well paid woke bosses people should be criticising, not the poor blood infantry. 
 

That’s the thing with the RNLI there’s a lot of people making a lot of money out of it.  The blokes putting their lives on the line aren’t, but there’s a lot of bloody people who are. The hotel & HQ must be decorated every fucking year, the ordinary suits soliciting donations make good money. They’ve got good PR, people still believe they’re all volunteers shaking buckets outside supermarkets & giving up their spare time for the community. Load of old pony, they’re ruthless bastards constant HO redundancies whilst the top brass pocket more and more cash. I’ve seen it happen in the 35 years I’ve lived here. The chief executive is on nearly 200k, had the pay stayed in line, it would be about 70k now. You lefties moan about private companies, these are just as bad.

 

 

I wonder whether the bad press will hit the donations. I’m not advocating that but I think it may

  • Haha 1
Holmes_and_Watson

Holmes_and_Watson

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, egg said:

And neither should it, or will it. The suggestion that they'd be selective about who they'd help is ridiculous.

I'm staggered that it's even a discussion that the RNLI, or frankly anyone, should or shouldn't help certain people at sea. That they were escorted into our waters by the French is the disgrace, not that they were helped when they got there. 

If they got to pick and chose who they'd bother rescuing, where would they stop?

They'd go out for ships in distress. That's tradition. 
But people on holiday inflatables?
Pedalos (no Portmouth, pedalos before you riot)?
Give in to pressure and not assist anyone coming form the direction of France (with other directions to be added)?
People with poor fashion choices?
The elderly? 
Just anyone if there's something good on the telly?

badgerx16

badgerx16

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Sir Ralph said:

You can’t get sacked there that the great thing

You certainly can. You can also be made redundant, as I have personally experienced.

  • Like 2
CB Fry

CB Fry

Posted
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said:


“Several officers were treated at the scene, but no one was hurt”
 

BBC propaganda is strong as usual. As no one was hurt what eere they treated for? 

Surely the BBC, as the states propaganda arm, wouldnt be trying to drum up support for their current regime? 

The quote in the linked article says this

"Seven officers were treated at the scene for injuries, but no-one in attendance was seriously hurt"

So well done on trying to be a clever cunt but guess what, you're full of shit.

Edited by CB Fry
  • Like 6
Sheaf Saint

Sheaf Saint

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said:


“Several officers were treated at the scene, but no one was hurt”
 

BBC propaganda is strong as usual. As no one was hurt what eere they treated for? 

Surely the BBC, as the states propaganda arm, wouldnt be trying to drum up support for their current regime? 

Screenshot_20260913-190542.thumb.png.e887f7a041fcb7d450b52ab764039e27.png

Still waiting for you to provide some evidence that the percentage of criminals in the groups arriving on boats is much higher than the average by the way. In your own time.

However, I would wager that the percentage of people involved in the protest at Eastney with criminal records is far greater than among the people they were trying to prevent entering the country.

  • Like 5
  • Confused 1
Farmer Saint

Farmer Saint

Posted
Posted
Just now, Sheaf Saint said:

Screenshot_20260913-190542.thumb.png.e887f7a041fcb7d450b52ab764039e27.png

Still waiting for you to provide some evidence that the percentage of criminals in the groups arriving on boats is much higher than the average by the way. In your own time.

However, I would wager that the percentage of people involved in the protest at Eastney with criminal records is far greater than among the people they were trying to prevent entering the country.

You'll be waiting a really long time...he never answers anything posed to him. It's a trait of the right.

egg

egg

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Osvaldorama said:


“Several officers were treated at the scene, but no one was hurt”
 

BBC propaganda is strong as usual. As no one was hurt what eere they treated for? 

Surely the BBC, as the states propaganda arm, wouldnt be trying to drum up support for their current regime? 

I'll ask again, were you there? If so, say so. If not, stop saying what you claim happened. 

Anyways, I reckon you're the fella top middle. 

Whitey Grandad

Whitey Grandad

Posted
Posted
16 hours ago, Sheaf Saint said:

Screenshot_20260913-190542.thumb.png.e887f7a041fcb7d450b52ab764039e27.png

Still waiting for you to provide some evidence that the percentage of criminals in the groups arriving on boats is much higher than the average by the way. In your own time.

However, I would wager that the percentage of people involved in the protest at Eastney with criminal records is far greater than among the people they were trying to prevent entering the country.

You've missed the point. We have no way of knowing the character or history of these arrivals. Maybe they're being persecuted back 'home' because they're criminals? 

egg

egg

Posted
Posted
39 minutes ago, Whitey Grandad said:

You've missed the point. We have no way of knowing the character or history of these arrivals. Maybe they're being persecuted back 'home' because they're criminals? 

I think the only answer to that is that we will never know the answer. It doesn't alter the fact, however, that we can't leave them to drown at sea just in case they're wrong uns. 

Whitey Grandad

Whitey Grandad

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, egg said:

I think the only answer to that is that we will never know the answer. It doesn't alter the fact, however, that we can't leave them to drown at sea just in case they're wrong uns. 

Hmm. Their choice. 

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Osvaldorama

Osvaldorama

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, egg said:

I think the only answer to that is that we will never know the answer. It doesn't alter the fact, however, that we can't leave them to drown at sea just in case they're wrong uns. 


True, better put them in town centres and next to schools. 
 

Who cares about the consequences to our cities 

  • Haha 1
egg

egg

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Whitey Grandad said:

Hmm. Their choice. 

Jeez Whitey, I didn't have you marked as a leave people to drown kind of guy. 

rallyboy

rallyboy

Posted
Posted

At least we know where people stand these days, all kinds of unpleasant views are being vocalised, some people I know, even relatives, have told me who they really are via their online posts. 

Twats like Robinson and Tommo have emboldened those who would have previously keep racist views to themselves, and given them a template to try and disguise their irrational hate as peaceful protest.

It's nice to be able to see people for what they really are.

 

 

  • Like 2
Sheaf Saint

Sheaf Saint

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Whitey Grandad said:

Hmm. Their choice. 

Is it though? What about children who don't choose to board those boats?

Mo Farah, for example, was trafficked to the UK against his will when he was 9. He's gone on to smash Olympic records and get a knighthood. Nobody could argue that he hasn't made an overwhelmingly positive contribution to this country.

If he had come by boat, would you have been happy to let him drown in the channel because the guy sitting next to him might have been a criminal?

 

Edited by Sheaf Saint
  • Haha 1
Osvaldorama

Osvaldorama

Posted
Posted
35 minutes ago, rallyboy said:

At least we know where people stand these days, all kinds of unpleasant views are being vocalised, some people I know, even relatives, have told me who they really are via their online posts. 

Twats like Robinson and Tommo have emboldened those who would have previously keep racist views to themselves, and given them a template to try and disguise their irrational hate as peaceful protest.

It's nice to be able to see people for what they really are.

 

 


You can blame social media figures if you like. 
 

Or you can walk around any town centre in the UK and see how they are all massively declining and turning into crime-addled shit holes.
 

Then look at your payslip and see how much more you’re paying for the privilege. 

The fact is anyone that thinks right wing views are popular because of “social media” are the ones living in a bubble. 

Right wing views are gaining popularity because left wing ideas have failed the country spectacularly. 

  • Haha 1
Whitey Grandad

Whitey Grandad

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Sheaf Saint said:

Is it though? What about children who don't choose to board those boats?

Mo Farah, for example, was trafficked to the UK against his will when he was 9. He's gone on to smash Olympic records and get a knighthood. Nobody could argue that he hasn't made an overwhelmingly positive contribution to this country.

If he had come by boat, would you have been happy to let him drown in the channel because the guy sitting next to him might have been a criminal?

 

They're not drowning.

For every Mo Farah how many others are there who make an overwhelmingly negative contribution? 

Children are being used as emotional blackmail.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...