Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
20 minutes ago, stknowle said:

I’m going to nail my negative colours to the mast and say this is going to turn out to be another massive mistake. And yes I really do hope I am wrong. Sorry!!

It may turn out to be a massive mistake, but with our history that could apply to any appointee. If there is a mistake it’s in making it permanent at this stage. 

Posted
3 hours ago, S-Clarke said:

It would be amazing if you had the ability to have a debate and articulate your points or views clearly with people, but I don't think you have the brain cells for it. 

You purposely miss the point with most posts, to justify throwing your voice around at the fans of the club you supposedly support.

You spend more time attacking the clubs fans than you actually do talking about 'football'.

Plus 1. Proper oddball.

Posted (edited)

His appointment at least brings much needed clarity for him, for Lallana and the U21's and for the fans. Our chances of recovering enough to challenge for promotion this season are low anyway so if this doesn't work out not that much has been lost.

Edited by Charlie Wayman
Posted
6 minutes ago, Charlie Wayman said:

His appointment at least brings much needed clarity for him, for Lallana and the U21's and for the fans. Our chances of recovering enough to challenge for promotion this season are low anyway so if this doesn't work out not that much has been lost.

Why? 🤔 28 games left, 84 points to play for and only 5 points from the playoffs!

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Sheaf Saint said:

OK so you clearly haven't actually read and understood my point then, and have resorted to a pathetic straw man argument instead.

I wouldn't have minded losing so much if we had put in a good performance and been unlucky. But that's not what happened is it. It was men v boys as we got schooled all over the pitch by a technically limited but well organised team.

The scoreline and the fact that we only lost in the dying moments don't tell the whole story. We were incredibly lucky to take the lead from that penalty because up until that point Millwall had completely nullified our attack and we had created nothing.

That's why I have my doubts that Eckert will bring us anything better than mid-table this season. With the resources we have, there is no way we should be settling for that.

Are Saints not allowed to have an off day? Even Man City has off days 🙄

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Charlie Wayman said:

Our chances of recovering enough to challenge for promotion this season are low 

 

2 hours ago, Matthew Le God said:

Why? 🤔 28 games left, 84 points to play for and only 5 points from the playoffs!

Only 3 points now

Edited by Matthew Le God
  • Like 2
Posted

Weren't Birmingham terrible?  If we'd played a decent side we'd have lost.

Tonda doesn't know what he's doing and we should have a proper manager in place.

  • Haha 4
Posted
12 minutes ago, washsaint said:

Weren't Birmingham terrible?  If we'd played a decent side we'd have lost.

Tonda doesn't know what he's doing and we should have a proper manager in place.

Birmingham are above us in the table and we should have scored 7/8. We also got to rest 2 key players for last 20 minutes, ahead of Tuesdays game.

  • Like 2
Posted

I was one that wanted a more experienced coach. 
 

But you can’t argue with the results or the improvements. We look like a different team. Long may it continue. 

  • Like 10
Posted

18 goals scored in 6 games is very impressive. Next job is to make us more secure defensively. If Tonda can do that we'll be a reaĺly decent team. 

  • Like 2
Posted

Kinda mixed feelings on him myself results are good so far so credit for that. But I think it also rewards sports republics stupidity and probably sets the tone for them to do stuff like this in the future wouldn’t be  at all surprised to see lallana as our next manager.

also feel like we actually have a fantastic for the level attack that is carrying us a lot more then his tactics . Let’s be honest scienza azaz Armstrong and fellows looks way better then the attack we got promoted with.  Which begs the question was will still really that shit or is eckhart a great manager ?

Posted
1 minute ago, pimpin4rizeal said:

Kinda mixed feelings on him myself results are good so far so credit for that. But I think it also rewards sports republics stupidity and probably sets the tone for them to do stuff like this in the future wouldn’t be  at all surprised to see lallana as our next manager.

also feel like we actually have a fantastic for the level attack that is carrying us a lot more then his tactics . Let’s be honest scienza azaz Armstrong and fellows looks way better then the attack we got promoted with.  Which begs the question was will still really that shit or is eckhart a great manager ?

What stupidity do you feel is being rewarded? They gave him the job because he won four out of five games and had us playing some of the best football we’ve played since Ralph. There are many valid criticisms of S.R. But this seems like a reasonably sensible decision based on solid evidence to me.

  • Like 10
Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, Charlie Wayman said:

Brighton's manager is 32 so a good benchmark for Eckert in a higher division.

9 hours ago, Badger said:

He had managed a promotion at his previous club. 

Correct, the previous club (St Pauli) took a risk on him at 29 years old, and it worked out well for them. Winning 10 games in a row and promotion to the Bundesliga... so you never know!

Edited by St Louis
Posted
4 minutes ago, Lighthouse said:

What stupidity do you feel is being rewarded? They gave him the job because he won four out of five games and had us playing some of the best football we’ve played since Ralph. There are many valid criticisms of S.R. But this seems like a reasonably sensible decision based on solid evidence to me.

If we go back to before he got chance as interim manager not one person on here would have wanted him to be giving the job . Every other time we have promoted youth coaches wigley gray selles etc they have all been terrible on paper he should have never have gotten the chance . 
 

imo sports republic have kinda lucked out on idea that’s gonna fail 9 out of ten times . They will now probably see this as their smart out of the box thinking is  ahead of the game . =rewarding stupidity 

  • Like 1
Posted
38 minutes ago, Lighthouse said:

What stupidity do you feel is being rewarded? They gave him the job because he won four out of five games and had us playing some of the best football we’ve played since Ralph. There are many valid criticisms of S.R. But this seems like a reasonably sensible decision based on solid evidence to me.

Don't often agree with you but I do here. I was a bit sceptical after the Millwall game and wasn't sure if we would bounce back but we did and the credit has to go to the manager. He's really turned us around so far. 

Posted
44 minutes ago, pimpin4rizeal said:

Kinda mixed feelings on him myself results are good so far so credit for that. But I think it also rewards sports republics stupidity and probably sets the tone for them to do stuff like this in the future wouldn’t be  at all surprised to see lallana as our next manager.

also feel like we actually have a fantastic for the level attack that is carrying us a lot more then his tactics . Let’s be honest scienza azaz Armstrong and fellows looks way better then the attack we got promoted with.  Which begs the question (i) was will still really that shit or (ii) is eckhart a great manager ?

(i) Yes.

(ii) Far too early to tell.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, pimpin4rizeal said:

If we go back to before he got chance as interim manager not one person on here would have wanted him to be giving the job . Every other time we have promoted youth coaches wigley gray selles etc they have all been terrible on paper he should have never have gotten the chance . 
 

imo sports republic have kinda lucked out on idea that’s gonna fail 9 out of ten times . They will now probably see this as their smart out of the box thinking is  ahead of the game . =rewarding stupidity 

In what way is it rewarding stupidity to have taken time to assess how someone does in a role you might give them, and then when they have clearly shown they are highly capable, giving them that role?

Rather than rewarding stupidity its actually rewarding recruiting strong people into the club in the first place and then rewarding not making a knee jerk decision, either to give him the role without seeing how he handled it or to just get in <insert generic manager who has been in the championship lots of times before> because thats what some fans thought they should do.

Posted

The Birmingham win was a big one for me, showing that he's been able to lift the squad after a defeat is something other managers have struggled with.

Now this is his gig, his team. I want to see how he handles January and what he does with the squad, I think we're still missing 1 or 2 - but you cannot argue with what he's done since he came in.

QPR - A really poor showing in terms of game management, but got the win

Wednesday - Decent, not amazing, but comfortable.

Charlton - totally blew them away. best we've played in many years.

Leicester - again - blew them away in a short burst. Game was done.

Millwall - We let it slip, poor game management in the second half. Similar to that QPR game in the end.

Birmingham - Our toughest test because they played well I thought and are a good team, but we still came out comfortable winners.

The two best teams, on paper, that we've played in this run have been Leicester and Birmingham - and we won both, scoring a combined 6 against them.

It's a pretty impressive 6 game repertoire, you have to say.

The biggest thing he's changed is by playing our best players. Getting the best out of our best players. Playing our best players to their natural strengths. Still was lost at the end and couldn't put an 11 together if it hit him in the face.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
29 minutes ago, Dusic said:

In what way is it rewarding stupidity to have taken time to assess how someone does in a role you might give them, and then when they have clearly shown they are highly capable, giving them that role?

Rather than rewarding stupidity its actually rewarding recruiting strong people into the club in the first place and then rewarding not making a knee jerk decision, either to give him the role without seeing how he handled it or to just get in <insert generic manager who has been in the championship lots of times before> because thats what some fans thought they should do.

The consensus on here was we all hoped that sports republic would have instantly gone out and got us an experienced manager by the end of that international break .. it’s extremely results based thinking by so many on here regarding ekhart .. if Doris the dinner lady was given four matches as interim and won all four it’s still a stupid idea that she got the chance in the first place right ? 
logic over results 

Edited by pimpin4rizeal
Posted
31 minutes ago, pimpin4rizeal said:

The consensus on here was we all hoped that sports republic would have instantly gone out and got us an experienced manager by the end of that international break .. it’s extremely results based thinking by so many on here regarding ekhart .. if Doris the dinner lady was given four matches as interim and won all four it’s still a stupid idea that she got the chance in the first place right ? 
logic over results 

At the end of the day the players are playing for him. If this set of players actually like someone who isn't Russell Martin then that counts for a lot. 

  • Like 2
Posted
10 hours ago, S-Clarke said:

It would be amazing if you had the ability to have a debate and articulate your points or views clearly with people, but I don't think you have the brain cells for it. 

You purposely miss the point with most posts, to justify throwing your voice around at the fans of the club you supposedly support.

You spend more time attacking the clubs fans than you actually do talking about 'football'.

None of this is true, I’ve debated many things, including this topic in this thread. Most of the time I get called a club plant, Corteses laundry man or Lucy Pinder though. 

That said, you’re right I’m very happy to call out fans on here when they post nonsense.

But when the tone of your post is we shouldn’t continue with the guy who has just lost 1 game, then I am going to respond by pointing out the simple fact that would be the 6th person in charge in a year and that doesn’t seem like normal logic or club behaviour. We can debate why if you like?

Posted

I thought we did well today. Bit of a telling moment after last week’s loss to see how they recovered. good result and so many good chances created. I have to say I was a bit worried before game as Bhm seemed to be building some momentum with their home form. 
 

must sort defence out and must sort game management out to become a successful team. 
 

im not sure the defence is training and tactics for us,  think we have a similar group of very average players incapable of making a solid base for defence. 
 

 

Posted
58 minutes ago, pimpin4rizeal said:

The consensus on here was we all hoped that sports republic would have instantly gone out and got us an experienced manager by the end of that international break .. it’s extremely results based thinking by so many on here regarding ekhart .. if Doris the dinner lady was given four matches as interim and won all four it’s still a stupid idea that she got the chance in the first place right ? 
logic over results 

They didn't get the unspecified bloke that you wanted, but they hired a bloke who's won 5 from 6, and who plainly has the players support.

It's a results business. That's it. 

Whining about someone who's delivering results isn't logical. 

  • Like 1
Posted
11 hours ago, S-Clarke said:

It would be amazing if you had the ability to have a debate and articulate your points or views clearly with people, but I don't think you have the brain cells for it. 

You purposely miss the point with most posts, to justify throwing your voice around at the fans of the club you supposedly support.

You spend more time attacking the clubs fans than you actually do talking about 'football'.

Wonder what dry cleaning requirements Tonda has?

Posted
1 hour ago, pimpin4rizeal said:

The consensus on here was we all hoped that sports republic would have instantly gone out and got us an experienced manager by the end of that international break .. it’s extremely results based thinking by so many on here regarding ekhart .. if Doris the dinner lady was given four matches as interim and won all four it’s still a stupid idea that she got the chance in the first place right ? 
logic over results 

Experience of winning games as manager for Southampton isn’t the experience you want basically? 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...