AlexLaw76 Posted July 11 Author Posted July 11 Just now, obelisk said: That's a joke. How, it was never a penalty 4 1
Stripey McStripe Shirt Posted July 11 Posted July 11 Why has Spence taken the jock strap off his chin?
benjii Posted July 11 Posted July 11 Just now, skintsaint said: getting in front of the defender isn't a thing then. Bizzare innit?! 1
Sheaf Saint Posted July 11 Posted July 11 Wasn't clear and obvious. Yeah he moved his leg over to protect the ball, but he's allowed to do that and he was still tripped. Should have stuck with the on-field decision. 7
BotleySaint Posted July 11 Posted July 11 Clear penalty. Spence is entitled to put his leg there. He can stop running altogether if he wants. If the other guy runs into him, how's that his fault? 7
SNSUN Posted July 11 Posted July 11 3 hours ago, SNSUN said: 1-1 final score, 2-2 aet. Norway win on penalties. That's my predo although I hope we do it. Praying this isn't correct but it will be backs to the wall now until the final whistle.
whelk Posted July 11 Posted July 11 (edited) 2 minutes ago, benjii said: This is a very different approach to refereeing. Whitey will no doubt disagree but they are all cunts Edited July 11 by whelk 1
SNSUN Posted July 11 Posted July 11 2 minutes ago, Stripey McStripe Shirt said: Why has Spence taken the jock strap off his chin? He was pulling at it earlier. Maybe hot. I guess he's just risking his jaw.
whelk Posted July 11 Posted July 11 Eze controls the ball well with clear space in front of him. Stops and goes backwards FFS
pingpong Posted July 11 Posted July 11 It was a clear foul (by Spence) - would have been outrageous not to overturn it. This feels like every other world cup, we make hard labour of beating our peers, but we will lose to the first proper team we play. Argentina probably. 1 3 1
egg Posted July 11 Posted July 11 I can't believe people thought that was a pen. We'd have gone batshit if that was given against us. 6 2 1
Whitey Grandad Posted July 11 Posted July 11 4 minutes ago, BotleySaint said: Clear penalty. Spence is entitled to put his leg there. He can stop running altogether if he wants. If the other guy runs into him, how's that his fault? Actually he isn't. 1
SNSUN Posted July 11 Posted July 11 (edited) 1 minute ago, pingpong said: It was a clear foul (by Spence) - would have been outrageous not to overturn it. This feels like every other world cup, we make hard labour of beating our peers, but we will lose to the first proper team we play. Argentina probably. But then we'll have lost a Semi against a better team and the media will hail us heroes. Edit - more so if we win the 3rd place play off. Edited July 11 by SNSUN
trousers Posted July 11 Posted July 11 1 minute ago, pingpong said: It was a clear foul (by Spence) - would have been outrageous not to overturn it. Pardon me if I ignore the Bazunu fan boy...
RedArmy Posted July 11 Posted July 11 1 minute ago, egg said: I can't believe people thought that was a pen. We'd have gone batshit if that was given against us. Which part of being ahead of his man and getting kicked wasn’t a penalty? 1
AlexLaw76 Posted July 11 Author Posted July 11 1 minute ago, egg said: I can't believe people thought that was a pen. We'd have gone batshit if that was given against us. Innit. Got to love football fam bias
AlexLaw76 Posted July 11 Author Posted July 11 Just now, RedArmy said: Which part of being ahead of his man and getting kicked wasn’t a penalty? Even the pros in the studio don’t believe it was a penalty
Teamsaint1 Posted July 11 Posted July 11 1 minute ago, RedArmy said: Which part of being ahead of his man and getting kicked wasn’t a penalty? The french referee bit.
Whitey Grandad Posted July 11 Posted July 11 1 minute ago, RedArmy said: Which part of being ahead of his man and getting kicked wasn’t a penalty? He stuck his leg across the defender and engineered the situation. 2 1
Gloucester Saint Posted July 11 Posted July 11 Just now, Turkish said: Wow Haaland off Had to be injury.
whelk Posted July 11 Posted July 11 1 minute ago, AlexLaw76 said: Even the pros in the studio don’t believe it was a penalty Dixon did
Stripey McStripe Shirt Posted July 11 Posted July 11 Just now, SNSUN said: Haaland off! Weird from Norway's perspective. Even if he only had one leg, surely it'd be worth keeping him on?
Saint In Cornwall Posted July 11 Posted July 11 2 minutes ago, RedArmy said: Which part of being ahead of his man and getting kicked wasn’t a penalty? All of it?
egg Posted July 11 Posted July 11 3 minutes ago, RedArmy said: Which part of being ahead of his man and getting kicked wasn’t a penalty? Spence initiated the contact for me by cutting across him. 2
SNSUN Posted July 11 Posted July 11 1 minute ago, Stripey McStripe Shirt said: Weird from Norway's perspective. Even if he only had one leg, surely it'd be worth keeping him on? More so if they get to pens. 1
egg Posted July 11 Posted July 11 5 minutes ago, Whitey Grandad said: Actually he isn't. Yep. He brake tested him. Anyways, it's academic. 2
Dr Who? Posted July 11 Posted July 11 It’s weird how people see the VAR decisions in different ways and ironically it was brought in to elevate the debate and it is just as bad! 😂 2
egg Posted July 11 Posted July 11 1 minute ago, SNSUN said: Burn coming on. I wouldn't. I'd bring on Rashford and give us an outlet up the pitch, and pace to stretch them. Burn on invites sitting deep and pressure. 1
RedArmy Posted July 11 Posted July 11 1 minute ago, egg said: Spence initiated the contact for me by cutting across him. Cutting across him to shield the ball he has got to first. 2
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now