Jump to content

Garyn Preen


spyinthesky
 Share

Recommended Posts

manage to find a negative in promising young player getting his first place on the bench -well done!;)

 

An interesting addition to the bench nevertheless. He doesn't even have a squad number. Be interested in AP's rationale into including him into yesterday's sub's bench. He must rate him I guess.

Anyone on here see him play? I don't think he has featured in our Reserves this season either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An interesting addition to the bench nevertheless. He doesn't even have a squad number. Be interested in AP's rationale into including him into yesterday's sub's bench. He must rate him I guess.

Anyone on here see him play? I don't think he has featured in our Reserves this season either.

 

Squad number 36.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An interesting addition to the bench nevertheless. He doesn't even have a squad number. Be interested in AP's rationale into including him into yesterday's sub's bench. He must rate him I guess.

Anyone on here see him play? I don't think he has featured in our Reserves this season either.

 

AP is certainly getting amongst his squad and experimenting. Impressed I have to say... I am very impressed with Pards so far. He has not panicked but observed and brought on his squad. He has secured some great players like Lambert and Hammond and will shortly have his first team decided upon. All within only a couple of months.

 

Fair play to him, he must be confident of achieving this years target - to stay up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An interesting addition to the bench nevertheless. He doesn't even have a squad number. Be interested in AP's rationale into including him into yesterday's sub's bench. He must rate him I guess.

Anyone on here see him play? I don't think he has featured in our Reserves this season either.

One of the very few advantages of having 7 subs (I can't think of any others) is that you can put nippers on the bench to get some experience of the "big" occassions without any pressure on them or the manager to actually play them. All part of the learning experience. I would take a guess that AP had no intention of playing the lad yesterday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the very few advantages of having 7 subs (I can't think of any others) is that you can put nippers on the bench to get some experience of the "big" occassions without any pressure on them or the manager to actually play them. All part of the learning experience. I would take a guess that AP had no intention of playing the lad yesterday.

 

Probably won a competition for having the best polished boots in the academy. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saw him come on as a sub for the reserves against Salisbury a few weeks ago. Did ok, either played right side of midfield and came inside a lot or right side of central midfield, he was on the far side of the pitch, can't remember much - but much better than Poo-lis anyway. Unlikely he'd get on given the senior players ahead of him, but a useful experience.

 

I'd like to see Doble get a look in as well, he'd have probably been more effective than Gillet in the hole for the last 10 minutes with us 4-1 ahead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the idea that pards might give a bench spot to some kids just so that they can be around 1st team squad to gain experience

 

I remember back in the day, they used to take one of the young players to away games as a non-playing member of the match-day squad. Remember Steve Baker getting in a tray of Whiskies for the likes of Channon, Ball and Keegan on the train home. No Idea how he managed to get served as he was only about 16 at the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember back in the day, they used to take one of the young players to away games as a non-playing member of the match-day squad. Remember Steve Baker getting in a tray of Whiskies for the likes of Channon, Ball and Keegan on the train home. No Idea how he managed to get served as he was only about 16 at the time.

 

Perhaps he should have continued being a waiter as he was one of the worst players I have seen for Saints in Div 1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When they changed it to 7 subs, a rule was brought in stating that the squad must contain "at least four players in the matchday squad that have been registered domestically, for a minimum of three seasons, prior to their 21st birthday"

 

Straight from the Football League site.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps he should have continued being a waiter as he was one of the worst players I have seen for Saints in Div 1

 

Blimey, that's a bit harsh. OK he was no Keegan or Channon it's true but he was involved in that memorable goal of the century against Liverpool in 82 - 83 if memory serves. Besides, have you forgotten the likes of Terry Hurlock, Paul Moody and just about any other player signed by the god-awful Branfoot and others that have left an indelible blank on my memory.:o:o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blimey' date=' that's a bit harsh. OK he was no Keegan or Channon it's true but he was involved in that memorable goal of the century against Liverpool in 82 - 83 if memory serves. Besides, have you forgotten the likes of Terry Hurlock, Paul Moody and just about any other player signed by the god-awful Branfoot and others that have left an indelible blank on my memory.:o:o[/quote']

 

Steve Baker. Not Graham. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Dark Sotonic Mills
One of the very few advantages of having 7 subs (I can't think of any others) is that you can put nippers on the bench to get some experience of the "big" occassions without any pressure on them or the manager to actually play them. All part of the learning experience. I would take a guess that AP had no intention of playing the lad yesterday.

 

You don't think that increasing the squad size by adding two extra substitutes might have anything to do with the UEFA rules that a certain percentage of a team's matchday squad must be home-grown?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the very few advantages of having 7 subs (I can't think of any others) is that you can put nippers on the bench to get some experience of the "big" occassions without any pressure on them or the manager to actually play them. All part of the learning experience. I would take a guess that AP had no intention of playing the lad yesterday.

 

One of the worst things about having 7 subs is you have to find youth players to fill the gaps when they should be getting experience playing academy football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the worst things about having 7 subs is you have to find youth players to fill the gaps when they should be getting experience playing academy football.

 

I'd say they get more out of being a first teamer for a day than missing out on any football match, if indeed they play at the same time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say they get more out of being a first teamer for a day than missing out on any football match, if indeed they play at the same time.

 

They don't get to play though, do they. They get to sit on the bench because we have to name 7 subs. It impacts a lot more at clubs without big first team squads, where young players are now suffering because they have to fill numbers on the first team bench. It is total idiocy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They get to sit on the bench because we have to name 7 subs.

 

Do you have to name seven subs, or can you name up to seven substitutes? Bournemouth only had three players on the bench on Saturday. That was due to injuries, but I'm sure if they had to name seven they could have drafted a few youth teamers in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the correction LBA - but please remind me who the fudge was Steve Baker ? He has obviously left an indelible blank on my memory - could you jog it for me ? Cheers.:confused:

 

Yes well!!! This doesn't exactly help. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Baker_(footballer_born_1961). Played mostly right-back in the eighties!! Understudy to Mick Mills and Ivan Golac mostly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It could be that Pards was acclimatising Preen to the first team squad by having him on the bench on Saturday and that the next step could be to give him some time on the pitch during tonight's match with Torquay.

Occasionally, young players do OK.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blimey' date=' that's a bit harsh. OK he was no Keegan or Channon it's true but he was involved in that memorable goal of the century against Liverpool in 82 - 83 if memory serves. Besides, have you forgotten the likes of Terry Hurlock, Paul Moody and just about any other player signed by the god-awful Branfoot and others that have left an indelible blank on my memory.:o:o[/quote']

 

Memory is fading, methinks

Liverpool 82/83 the man in question was Graham Baker

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Garyn could be another Wayne Rooney but better looking.

Sat behind Wayne Rooney at the cup game against Man U last season. Couldn't see much of the match because of Rooney's ears in the way. Preen's pic on the OS suggests the boy has more normal ears.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An interesting addition to the bench nevertheless. He doesn't even have a squad number. Be interested in AP's rationale into including him into yesterday's sub's bench. He must rate him I guess.

Anyone on here see him play? I don't think he has featured in our Reserves this season either.

 

Nothing unusual in football - a lot of managers give the more promising youngsters an early experience of match days. I think Sir Alex did the same with Beckham all those years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...