Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
23 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

We signed Juan initially...I wonder for what reason.

Because Juan day he might be an important player for us…

I’ll get my coat. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
40 minutes ago, Miltonaggro said:

image.thumb.png.1253245081d45de2f5a90d7fa3ce4f2f.pngMinge and Bracket are on the case…

When is that image from ?

Despite the comments from the club and assurances given (especially those in here in the summer by a few posters) it does seem Rasmus is still in a controlling role. Fans focus ought to be on that prick. 

  • Like 5
Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, Badger said:

When is that image from ?

Despite the comments from the club and assurances given (especially those in here in the summer by a few posters) it does seem Rasmus is still in a controlling role. Fans focus ought to be on that prick. 

Alfie said on the TSP last night that he's still actively involved, he's Dragan's main advisor on all football matters across all clubs and is involved in all major decisions across the group. He's a CEO for SR and still a CEO on our board.

He was at QPR on Wednesday and will be at St Mary's on Saturday.

Edited by S-Clarke
  • Sad 4
Posted
27 minutes ago, S-Clarke said:

Alfie said on the TSP last night that he's still actively involved, he's Dragan's main advisor on all football matters across all clubs and is involved in all major decisions across the group. He's a CEO for SR and still a CEO on our board.

He was at QPR on Wednesday and will be at St Mary's on Saturday.

Well everyone knows how to direct their protests on Saturday now, and the fact Dragan has continually allowed Rasmus to have such a say makes him just as responsible for disaster of SR's decisions 

  • Like 13
Posted
48 minutes ago, S-Clarke said:

Alfie said on the TSP last night that he's still actively involved, he's Dragan's main advisor on all football matters across all clubs and is involved in all major decisions across the group. He's a CEO for SR and still a CEO on our board.

He was at QPR on Wednesday and will be at St Mary's on Saturday.

SR need to fuck off. 

  • Like 7
Posted
53 minutes ago, S-Clarke said:

Alfie said on the TSP last night that he's still actively involved, he's Dragan's main advisor on all football matters across all clubs and is involved in all major decisions across the group. He's a CEO for SR and still a CEO on our board.

He was at QPR on Wednesday and will be at St Mary's on Saturday.

That’s handy to know in terms of Saturday. 

  • Like 3
Posted
3 hours ago, S-Clarke said:

Alfie said on the TSP last night that he's still actively involved, he's Dragan's main advisor on all football matters across all clubs and is involved in all major decisions across the group. He's a CEO for SR and still a CEO on our board.

He was at QPR on Wednesday and will be at St Mary's on Saturday.

So we now know the new coach/manager is going to be another shit show because the cretin is still up to his uselessness.

Dragan might be rich but as the saying goes "Fools and their money are easily parted"

  • Being easily tricked: 
    It also applies to people who are persuaded to give money away on false pretenses, such as through a scam. 
  • Lack of judgment: 
    A foolish person may not be able to discern a wise purchase from a silly one, spending money on whims. 
     
  • Reckless spending: 
    Someone who spends money thoughtlessly or without saving will quickly find themselves with nothing left. 
     

Solak has been duped by Rasmus that's for sure

  • Like 2
Posted

I once spent some time with Rasmus at Staplewood and he came across as a decent bloke, friendly and committed to the club. Yes he screwed up appointing Jones but more for the fact Jones was not right for us (obviously he is right for some clubs (Luton and Charlton), so maybe RA just hadn't been here long enough at that stage to understand our DNA? Just speaking as I find.

He might have a say or a veto on the next appointment but the person with the main responsibility is Spors

  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Fitzhugh Fella said:

I once spent some time with Rasmus at Staplewood and he came across as a decent bloke, friendly and committed to the club. Yes he screwed up appointing Jones but more for the fact Jones was not right for us (obviously he is right for some clubs (Luton and Charlton), so maybe RA just hadn't been here long enough at that stage to understand our DNA? Just speaking as I find.

He might have a say or a veto on the next appointment but the person with the main responsibility is Spors

I'd say he's messed up more than the Jones appointment.

I look at his horror transfer window of January 2023, he was confirmed as having full responsibility over that window as Joe Shields had left. He left us with Oric, Onuachu and Sullemana - and an outlay of almost £50m on 3 players who contributed zilch.

He has a lot to answer for beyond the Jones appointment.

  • Like 13
Posted
4 hours ago, S-Clarke said:

Alfie said on the TSP last night that he's still actively involved, he's Dragan's main advisor on all football matters across all clubs and is involved in all major decisions across the group. He's a CEO for SR and still a CEO on our board.

He was at QPR on Wednesday and will be at St Mary's on Saturday.

Why doesn't Dragan choose a main advisor who knows something about football. Just a thought.

  • Like 7
Posted
11 minutes ago, Fitzhugh Fella said:

I once spent some time with Rasmus at Staplewood and he came across as a decent bloke, friendly and committed to the club. Yes he screwed up appointing Jones but more for the fact Jones was not right for us (obviously he is right for some clubs (Luton and Charlton), so maybe RA just hadn't been here long enough at that stage to understand our DNA? Just speaking as I find.

He might have a say or a veto on the next appointment but the person with the main responsibility is Spors

He may be both of those things but neither qualifies him to make major decisions on football. He is a waste of space.

  • Like 6
Posted
1 minute ago, saintant said:

Why doesn't Dragan choose a main advisor who knows something about football. Just a thought.

Well exactly, that's a genuine question and it's why any 'rope' Dragan has is really losing length.

He can bring in another advisor if he wants.

  • Like 2
Posted
Just now, saintant said:

Why doesn't Dragan choose a main advisor who knows something about football. Just a thought.

Gullible, stupid, sucker for bullshit? *delete as appropriate or not it could be all 3

  • Like 1
Posted
Quote

There is a view from sources close to Southampton’s dressing room, speaking anonymously to protect relationships, that the summer’s recruitment did not suit the profile of player Still had been accustomed to coaching in France.

Sources close to Still, also speaking on the condition of anonymity for the same reasons, echoed that sentiment and suggested, in hindsight, that he could have been more vocal on the incomings and outgoings to ensure he had a suitable squad at his disposal.

There is also a sense that he could have pushed harder on the make-up of his coaching staff, with Adam Lallana and Carl Martin already at Southampton when he arrived. The only coach Still brought to St Mary’s was Ruben Martinez, the goalkeeper coach.

Clement Lemaitre, who also joined at the same time as Still, worked as a video analyst. Both Martinez and Lemaitre were dismissed, as was Martin, who had spent seven years at the club.

Even though Still was generally well-liked by the players and fundamentally viewed as a good person, a common criticism has emerged that centres on his personality not being the right one to drive through the change required to lift the mood — which was at rock bottom — and provide a sense of freshness.

An example of how he didn’t particularly help himself is when it came to training. He would religiously stick to only doing tactical work with the starting XI throughout the week, meaning there was a lack of focus on what the substitutes should be doing when they are brought on.

 

Quote

In recent months, clearly recognising something wasn’t quite adding up despite the vast sums of money being spent, Solak moved Henrik Kraft, one of Sport Republic’s co-founders and Southampton’s chairman, to one side. Rasmus Ankersen, also a co-founder of the ownership group, now plays a much less hands-on role.

One commonly held opinion from people with knowledge of the dynamics behind the scenes at board level is that there is a culture of blame as opposed to one of responsibility. So, when things go badly, as they have been doing in recent years, nobody steps forward and owns it. Instead, a blame game takes place.

Some comments from https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6786896/2025/11/07/southampton-will-still-sport-republic-analysis/

Regardless of who we appoint, Sports Republic have a bloody long way to bring back confidence in how our club is being run.

Another belter was that we wanted to bring back Danny Ings. For all the misgivings on here about data in scouting and analysis, it's a bit sad that our primary source of identifying talent to join us now seems to consist of browsing our alumni on saintsplayers.co.uk

 

  • Like 1
Posted
15 hours ago, S-Clarke said:

Alfie said on the TSP last night that he's still actively involved, he's Dragan's main advisor on all football matters across all clubs and is involved in all major decisions across the group. He's a CEO for SR and still a CEO on our board.

He was at QPR on Wednesday and will be at St Mary's on Saturday.

Shit. This is what I suspected (and feared) for a long time, while others have been saying Rasmus is not involved any more. Bullshit. So many appalling decisions have his fingerprints all over them.

And as for Dragan, when he said at the end of last season's disaster that people at the club had let him down I thought he included Ankersen in that group. But apparently not. He can't see that that wanker is the ringleader of the clowns, FFS.

Dragan's a f*cking idiot.

  • Like 4
Posted
15 hours ago, Fitzhugh Fella said:

I once spent some time with Rasmus at Staplewood and he came across as a decent bloke, friendly and committed to the club. Yes he screwed up appointing Jones but more for the fact Jones was not right for us (obviously he is right for some clubs (Luton and Charlton), so maybe RA just hadn't been here long enough at that stage to understand our DNA? Just speaking as I find.

He might have a say or a veto on the next appointment but the person with the main responsibility is Spors

You make him sound like Jack Stephens. He's been here for three years. We've been relegated twice and promoted once. We're somewhere around our 7th manager and 3rd DOF.

Before he joined we had fuck all money yet managed to comfortably beat relegation the previous two seasons.

It's unclear how much he is involved right now but he was front and centre during a number of disastrous transfer windows. As people have said he's still CEO and Dragan's right hand man in football matters. He also recruited Spors and, let's face it, his recruitment record stands out for all the wrong reasons.

We've gone from a side that briefly topped the Premier League under Ralph to 5th bottom of the Championship under his guidance.

We've got a huge squad with no functional striker, goalkeeper or defence and we've spent 100s of millions getting there.

He might help grannies across the road and be a nice bloke to have a chat with but he's clearly not up to running our football club in any capacity.

  • Like 14
Posted
19 hours ago, saintant said:

Why doesn't Dragan choose a main advisor who knows something about football. Just a thought.

He does know about football though - as in he has experience - he’s been a player, a DoF and a Chairman. 

Posted
3 hours ago, coalman said:

You make him sound like Jack Stephens. He's been here for three years. We've been relegated twice and promoted once. We're somewhere around our 7th manager and 3rd DOF.

Before he joined we had fuck all money yet managed to comfortably beat relegation the previous two seasons.

It's unclear how much he is involved right now but he was front and centre during a number of disastrous transfer windows. As people have said he's still CEO and Dragan's right hand man in football matters. He also recruited Spors and, let's face it, his recruitment record stands out for all the wrong reasons.

We've gone from a side that briefly topped the Premier League under Ralph to 5th bottom of the Championship under his guidance.

We've got a huge squad with no functional striker, goalkeeper or defence and we've spent 100s of millions getting there.

He might help grannies across the road and be a nice bloke to have a chat with but he's clearly not up to running our football club in any capacity.

He’s CEO of SR, not SFC - that’s Parsons. 

Posted

I find this quite worrying the influence of Ankersen on Solak. If you add what Alfie House said on the TSP podcast along with what the French reporter wrote (that Sports Republic is a mess and some are employed but have no real job) this spells disaster.

My take on this, I am not ITK, is that Ankersen likely tells Solak whats best for the club (players, coaches, strategy etc) and Solak tells the staff to do so. Like telling Spors to go hunting for young talent instead of more established players. It would explain the high turnover in staff and why loads who join the club suddenly don’t perform.

Ankersen strikes me as someone who thinks he’s smarter then everyone else and uses data and AI to make decisions over common sense and experience. 

Likely so the reason we don’t employ a more experienced manager. Can’t see a manager who’s been around and has achieved succes come in and be told how to play or who to play.

Best we can hope for is that Solak starts realizing the way the clubs going and makes some big decisions. 

As said above, this is pure speculation and I could be completely wrong. 

  • Like 7
Posted

As long as Ankerson is involved we will continue to be a utter shambles and there is now no doubt he is still all over it.

Solak is are an utter fool 

  • Like 3
Posted
5 hours ago, Dr. Kucho said:

I find this quite worrying the influence of Ankersen on Solak. If you add what Alfie House said on the TSP podcast along with what the French reporter wrote (that Sports Republic is a mess and some are employed but have no real job) this spells disaster.

My take on this, I am not ITK, is that Ankersen likely tells Solak whats best for the club (players, coaches, strategy etc) and Solak tells the staff to do so. Like telling Spors to go hunting for young talent instead of more established players. It would explain the high turnover in staff and why loads who join the club suddenly don’t perform.

Ankersen strikes me as someone who thinks he’s smarter then everyone else and uses data and AI to make decisions over common sense and experience. 

Likely so the reason we don’t employ a more experienced manager. Can’t see a manager who’s been around and has achieved succes come in and be told how to play or who to play.

Best we can hope for is that Solak starts realizing the way the clubs going and makes some big decisions. 

As said above, this is pure speculation and I could be completely wrong. 

I agree it's speculation, but all the evidence indicates that you are 100% correct.

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Dr. Kucho said:

data and AI to make decisions over common sense and experience

This is it for me.

Data does not replace wisdom.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...