bpsaint Posted Friday at 20:46 Posted Friday at 20:46 6 hours ago, Willo of Whiteley said: Ipswich’s team didn’t change much over the Christmas. Didn’t they win all their games? Just saying The rotation excuse is bollocks, dunno why he’s taking advice from the same people that gave Ross Stewart the thumbs up on his medical. Our promotion side under Adkins were fitter than this, and mostly featured the same players each match. 5
Harry_SFC Posted Friday at 21:30 Posted Friday at 21:30 42 minutes ago, bpsaint said: The rotation excuse is bollocks, dunno why he’s taking advice from the same people that gave Ross Stewart the thumbs up on his medical. Our promotion side under Adkins were fitter than this, and mostly featured the same players each match. Interesting that one of the main reasons Maresca left Chelsea is because he felt the Medical department were too instrumental in team selection.
Turkish Posted Friday at 21:49 Posted Friday at 21:49 18 minutes ago, Harry_SFC said: Interesting that one of the main reasons Maresca left Chelsea is because he felt the Medical department were too instrumental in team selection. Chelsea version of that is he was picking players against medical advise and they were getting more injuries
bugenhagen Posted Friday at 22:02 Posted Friday at 22:02 27 minutes ago, Harry_SFC said: Interesting that one of the main reasons Maresca left Chelsea is because he felt the Medical department were too instrumental in team selection. 8 minutes ago, Turkish said: Chelsea version of that is he was picking players against medical advise and they were getting more injuries There is to sides to this. If the medical team is concerned about a potential injury, then fair enough, but if it is to keep players fresh, then it should only be the managers decision if they play or not. Sadly, in our case we only have a head coach, so not really sure what he is allowed to do...
Turkish Posted Friday at 22:06 Posted Friday at 22:06 (edited) 4 minutes ago, bugenhagen said: There is to sides to this. If the medical team is concerned about a potential injury, then fair enough, but if it is to keep players fresh, then it should only be the managers decision if they play or not. Sadly, in our case we only have a head coach, so not really sure what he is allowed to do... Say yes Edited Friday at 22:07 by Turkish 4
Badger Posted Friday at 22:12 Posted Friday at 22:12 1 minute ago, bugenhagen said: There is to sides to this. If the medical team is concerned about a potential injury, then fair enough, but if it is to keep players fresh, then it should only be the managers decision if they play or not. Sadly, in our case we only have a head coach, so not really sure what he is allowed to do... Two sides certainly, but leaves me asking who is reporting to whom in these cases. In a traditional set up you’d expect the info to be passed to the manager (or head coach) to make the decision . Do the medics report directly to the DoF and they tell the manager who is available to him for selection ? If the manager looks to select someone the medics have concerns on do they go running to the DoF “ look Enzo/Tonda wants to play Ross Stewart or whoever …,”. Certainly grounds for internal friction if not all on board with it. Manager wants his best team, club want to protect asset value. Perhaps things are different at SFC. Downs brings a note from his Mum asking if he can be left out of training or games as he has a ‘poorly tummy’.
AlexLaw76 Posted Friday at 22:14 Posted Friday at 22:14 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Badger said: Two sides certainly, but leaves me asking who is reporting to whom in these cases. In a traditional set up you’d expect the info to be passed to the manager (or head coach) to make the decision . Do the medics report directly to the DoF and they tell the manager who is available to him for selection ? If the manager looks to select someone the medics have concerns on do they go running to the DoF “ look Enzo/Tonda wants to play Ross Stewart or whoever …,”. Certainly grounds for internal friction if not all on board with it. Manager wants his best team, club want to protect asset value. Perhaps things are different at SFC. Downs brings a note from his Mum asking if he can be left out of training or games as he has a ‘poorly tummy’. I should imagine the player has a say in this. id be stunned if a DoF is not all over this area of the club Edited Friday at 22:18 by AlexLaw76
Badger Posted Friday at 22:17 Posted Friday at 22:17 Just now, AlexLaw76 said: I should imagine the player has a say in this. Yes. And his agent and team of advisers. And at our level probably more cautious on playing as the transfer window gets closer.
Badger Posted Friday at 22:19 Posted Friday at 22:19 3 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said: I should imagine the player has a say in this. Didn’t Adkins once make reference to his time as a physio, and players asking him to ‘write them off’ ahead of some games at one point ?
benali-shorts Posted Friday at 22:19 Posted Friday at 22:19 12 minutes ago, Turkish said: Say yes Tonda Smithers to Johannes Burns
Willo of Whiteley Posted Friday at 23:18 Posted Friday at 23:18 Director of Football is just another way of saying Chief Football Meddler in charge of transfers, contracts and depending on where you are team sheet dictation.
Holmes_and_Watson Posted Saturday at 06:40 Posted Saturday at 06:40 It would be interesting to know if there was friction over picking Stewart for that third game. From Stoll's perspective, Stewart was his best option. He could say to SR that they were the ones that lumped him with Downs. Then left him with small strikers to get on the end of crosses. I'd have thought any medical team would have raised flags over the load on Stewart. If not in immediate fitness, then in consideration of his injury record and recent maximum playing time. From a club perspective their manager has possibly helped get one forward crocked again, while not wanting to play their new, keenly rated by someone in the club, asset.
Midfield_General Posted Saturday at 08:46 Posted Saturday at 08:46 16 hours ago, Scummer said: Also, it's not the height of our centre backs that's the issue. It's the rest of our team, which we are trying to compensate for by playing three centre backs. Even then, Millwall had a significant height advantage over us. Outside of those 3, I'm not sure we even have anyone else that's much taller than about five foot ten More genius recruitment work from ‘squad planning is an art’ Spors 2
SaintNewForest Posted Saturday at 09:05 Posted Saturday at 09:05 16 minutes ago, Midfield_General said: More genius recruitment work from ‘squad planning is an art’ Spors Hey hey, give him some slack; squad planning is an art that only becomes clear at the end. Quite how you get to the end, with so much shit in the middle, is questionable. Honestly, Spors is as much of a twat as the rest of them. 1
Harry_SFC Posted Saturday at 09:33 Posted Saturday at 09:33 2 hours ago, Holmes_and_Watson said: It would be interesting to know if there was friction over picking Stewart for that third game. From Stoll's perspective, Stewart was his best option. He could say to SR that they were the ones that lumped him with Downs. Then left him with small strikers to get on the end of crosses. I'd have thought any medical team would have raised flags over the load on Stewart. If not in immediate fitness, then in consideration of his injury record and recent maximum playing time. From a club perspective their manager has possibly helped get one forward crocked again, while not wanting to play their new, keenly rated by someone in the club, asset. Stewart shouldn't have started 3 games in a week due to his injury record. The issue I have with Scienza is they are saying he's not used to playing so many games over Christmas. Well neither is Jander yet he's been worked into the ground. He hasn't had an injury since he's been with us. He isn't playing 90 minutes every single game. He doesn't look knackered when he's being taken off. It's very odd.
Osvaldorama Posted Saturday at 09:52 Posted Saturday at 09:52 11 hours ago, Badger said: Two sides certainly, but leaves me asking who is reporting to whom in these cases. In a traditional set up you’d expect the info to be passed to the manager (or head coach) to make the decision . Do the medics report directly to the DoF and they tell the manager who is available to him for selection ? If the manager looks to select someone the medics have concerns on do they go running to the DoF “ look Enzo/Tonda wants to play Ross Stewart or whoever …,”. Certainly grounds for internal friction if not all on board with it. Manager wants his best team, club want to protect asset value. Perhaps things are different at SFC. Downs brings a note from his Mum asking if he can be left out of training or games as he has a ‘poorly tummy’. Quite smart in a way. It’s likely only way to increase Downs’ value - to not play him. Hopefully if no one sees him play football for a while we can build up an aura of mystique and trick someone into taking him off our hands. The less people see of him, the more they’ll believe that he’s a “promising US u21 striker”. 1
Bob60 Posted Sunday at 13:12 Posted Sunday at 13:12 (edited) Ben Garner appointed as new first team assistant coach Edited Sunday at 13:15 by Bob60 1
Gloucester Saint Posted Sunday at 13:17 Posted Sunday at 13:17 2 minutes ago, Bob60 said: Ben Garner as new first team assistant coach Perfect for SR - left Charlton because of ‘mentality’ issues amongst the playing squad. Even Nathan Jones managed to overcome those https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/63864853 The transition to a lower league club under SR gathers pace (the style of football certainly doesn’t!) 1 1
gammon cheeks Posted Sunday at 13:19 Posted Sunday at 13:19 6 minutes ago, Bob60 said: Ben Garner appointed as new first team assistant coach Who 😆 1
tdmickey3 Posted Sunday at 13:21 Posted Sunday at 13:21 7 minutes ago, Bob60 said: Ben Garner appointed as new first team assistant coach Brilliant appointment. Just the experience we need🙄 1
HarvSFC Posted Sunday at 13:21 Posted Sunday at 13:21 Poor CV, no top club experience, no playing career. Areas where Eckert is also lacking in, so doesn't make up in that area. Another one who won't inspire or motivate the players to listen. 2
Gloucester Saint Posted Sunday at 13:22 Posted Sunday at 13:22 2 minutes ago, gammon cheeks said: Who 😆 Head of the Right to Dream Academy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Garner Perfect for Rasmus, imagine the ‘strategy’ conversations they’ll have. 1 1
SW11_Saint Posted Sunday at 13:23 Posted Sunday at 13:23 Just now, Gloucester Saint said: Head of the Right to Dream Academy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Garner Perfect for Rasmus, imagine the ‘strategy’ conversations they’ll have. Apparently Brighton sourced a few of their players from there…
tdmickey3 Posted Sunday at 13:23 Posted Sunday at 13:23 When are we going to be told by the SR stooge on here that Tonda will manage a big team in Europe like he did about Lego 2
davefizzy14 Posted Sunday at 13:34 Posted Sunday at 13:34 (edited) 21 minutes ago, Bob60 said: Ben Garner appointed as new first team assistant coach Good luck to Ben Garner, hopefully he makes a good impact. Edited Sunday at 13:34 by davefizzy14 1
Greenridge Posted Sunday at 13:48 Posted Sunday at 13:48 35 minutes ago, Bob60 said: Ben Garner appointed as new first team assistant coach Being universally slaughtered by Charlton and Bristol supporters on the Clubs X announcement….. 2
S-Clarke Posted Sunday at 13:51 Posted Sunday at 13:51 1 minute ago, Greenridge said: Being universally slaughtered by Charlton and Bristol supporters on the Clubs X announcement….. I guess they couldn't dare appoint anyone decent, or with 'real' experience, as that would mean there'd be a risk at someone questioning the clubs approach. Have to keep filling it all with yes men who are just thankful to have a job at a level above them. 3
Badger Posted Sunday at 13:54 Posted Sunday at 13:54 31 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said: Head of the Right to Dream Academy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Garner Perfect for Rasmus, imagine the ‘strategy’ conversations they’ll have. Dream Academy - wasn’t that an 80’s pop group ?
saintant Posted Sunday at 13:55 Posted Sunday at 13:55 Will we notice any difference with Garner around? I'm confident that we won't. 2
Badger Posted Sunday at 13:56 Posted Sunday at 13:56 32 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said: Head of the Right to Dream Academy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Garner Perfect for Rasmus, imagine the ‘strategy’ conversations they’ll have. Otherwise known as the Jackanory School of Thought 1
Badger Posted Sunday at 13:58 Posted Sunday at 13:58 Just now, saintant said: Will we notice any difference with Garner around? I'm confident that we won't. How do you know how quickly he puts the cones out ? I’m sure Rasmus has researched it on a spreadsheet. Xcs factor * *Expected cone stacker ratio ~ for the uneducated 3
Wade Garrett Posted Sunday at 13:58 Posted Sunday at 13:58 No matter how shite it gets, at least this no-mark won’t be a threat to Tonda. 3
Osvaldorama Posted Sunday at 14:00 Posted Sunday at 14:00 Jesus Christ, every decision they make is fucking terrible , it really is. 9
Gloucester Saint Posted Sunday at 14:01 Posted Sunday at 14:01 6 minutes ago, Badger said: Dream Academy - wasn’t that an 80’s pop group ? Indeed it was https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dream_Academy Quite an appropriate tune for today’s match
LGTL Posted Sunday at 14:02 Posted Sunday at 14:02 Transformation to a fully fledged lower league team is basically complete. Cheers SR, you bunch of absolute cunts. 6
Willo of Whiteley Posted Sunday at 14:03 Posted Sunday at 14:03 49 minutes ago, Bob60 said: Ben Garner appointed as new first team assistant coach Reading through the comments from other clubs, this is a ridiculous appointment (as in poor). But very on par with Sport Republics current trajectory. ⬇️ 2 1
beatlesaint Posted Sunday at 14:04 Posted Sunday at 14:04 You think it couldn’t get any more amateur then they prove you wrong. ffs 5
saintant Posted Sunday at 14:06 Posted Sunday at 14:06 (edited) This guy must have thought all his Christmases had come at once when SR headhunted him from obscurity. Imagine doing fuck all and some large corporation offers you a top job out of the blue 🙂 Edited Sunday at 14:09 by saintant 1 1
tdmickey3 Posted Sunday at 14:23 Posted Sunday at 14:23 18 minutes ago, beatlesaint said: You think it couldn’t get any more amateur then they prove you wrong. ffs And still going 1
Saint86 Posted Sunday at 16:35 Posted Sunday at 16:35 On 17/12/2025 at 13:57, revolution saint said: I've read some bollocks on here but this takes the biscuit. Winning games is the only thing that counts. How's the results working out for you? I wonder, are you still standing by Eckert and attacking any saints fans who dared to raise any concerns with the standard of the performances? 🤔 1
AlexLaw76 Posted Sunday at 16:36 Posted Sunday at 16:36 The rookie is clearly in way over is head...Surely he wont be our manager next season.
tdmickey3 Posted Sunday at 16:37 Posted Sunday at 16:37 Should never have been given it but, yes out now
Willo of Whiteley Posted Sunday at 16:38 Posted Sunday at 16:38 Should never have been given it. He needs to go now. But I doubt they will. Unless Sports Republic’s next “cunning plan” is to appointment the guy that was named as assistant coach today as the new head coach tomorrow.
Lighthouse Posted Sunday at 16:51 Posted Sunday at 16:51 There’s a vacancy for president of Venezuela if he fancies it.
Willo of Whiteley Posted Sunday at 16:58 Posted Sunday at 16:58 Shameful. Waits until we are 4-0 down before changing to a back four. Has constantly rotated and rested players ahead of “the next game”. We’ve taken two points from fifteen in this winter period. An absolute clown, well out of his depth. But the real finger pointing needs to be at those above him.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now