JohnnyShearer2.0 Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 8 hours ago, Verbal said: A sports scientist I know quantified the advantage like this: England will start the game and within a few minutes will feel like they've already played an hour of football. There are probably a few things you can do to mitigate: early subs, oxygen during hydration breaks (?). But the advantage Mexican players already acclimatised will have will be huge. Tuchel has to be playing games when he's said they've not prepared for the high altitude. I.e. getting the England players to do specific exercises and using those fancy tents over the last few months. They would have known about this world cup route for months. Would be amateurish if they didnt prepare.....
Osvaldorama Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 54 minutes ago, JohnnyShearer2.0 said: Tuchel has to be playing games when he's said they've not prepared for the high altitude. I.e. getting the England players to do specific exercises and using those fancy tents over the last few months. They would have known about this world cup route for months. Would be amateurish if they didnt prepare..... Yep - sounds like England. The more you think about it, the more of a disgrace it is that Mexico are allowed to play every game there on a pitch that gives them a massive advantage. Oh well. If we go out, it’s been a fantastic World Cup. All the big players turned up, and every game has been filled with drama. We wouldn’t beat France anyway.
Wade Garrett Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 11 hours ago, Badger said: Yes but they wouldn’t have the same credibility as someone with a stellar management career at Birmingham and Plymouth And 120 caps and over 50 goals for his country. Still it’s trendy to slag him off. Wankers.
adrian lord Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago The African teams are getting there, challenging the old powers, but almost every game they run out of steam towards the late stages and succumb. Fitness and mental fatigue is clearly an issue when you are playing a defensive, drilled pressing strategy that requires total concentration and discipline for 96 or even 120+minutes. 1
Football Special Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 7 minutes ago, adrian lord said: The African teams are getting there, challenging the old powers, but almost every game they run out of steam towards the late stages and succumb. Fitness and mental fatigue is clearly an issue when you are playing a defensive, drilled pressing strategy that requires total concentration and discipline for 96 or even 120+minutes. Most of these African teams have core players who play in big European leagues so it shouldn't be surprising to see them competing, Congo were good 2
TheAlehouseBrawlers Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Mexico 1970 was the first World Cup I remember (I was nearly 4 when we won it in ‘66 but no memories) so looking forward to this but may need drugs to stay awake! 3
Sunglasses Ron Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 13 hours ago, egg said: Yep. Keeps dropping off. We need a CF who'll stretch their defence and pull their CB's out of shape to create space. 13 hours ago, egg said: When Gordon is the answer, christ knows what the question is. You had a shocker last night didn't you! 😅 🙌 4
EssEffCee Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 1 hour ago, JohnnyShearer2.0 said: Tuchel has to be playing games when he's said they've not prepared for the high altitude. I.e. getting the England players to do specific exercises and using those fancy tents over the last few months. They would have known about this world cup route for months. Would be amateurish if they didnt prepare..... I'm pretty sure the players had some devices installed at home months back which can help. Not sure how much difference it'll make though. 1
EssEffCee Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 49 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said: Yep - sounds like England. The more you think about it, the more of a disgrace it is that Mexico are allowed to play every game there on a pitch that gives them a massive advantage. Oh well. If we go out, it’s been a fantastic World Cup. All the big players turned up, and every game has been filled with drama. We wouldn’t beat France anyway. It's a disgrace that a host nation gets home advantage?
JohnnyShearer2.0 Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 16 minutes ago, EssEffCee said: I'm pretty sure the players had some devices installed at home months back which can help. Not sure how much difference it'll make though. I'm of the mind that every little bit helps. So if that's the case, then good.
Patrick Bateman Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 25 minutes ago, EssEffCee said: It's a disgrace that a host nation gets home advantage? In my opinion, I think it's stupid having so many nations as "host" anyway, plus there are what, 3 stadiums in Mexico being used, so no, I don't think Mexico should play all their matches with the same advantage. I'm pretty sure if it were in England, Scotland and Wales would no doubt tag on too, but England would probably open at Wembley and also play at somewhere like Old Trafford. I do think the Mexicans have TOO much of an advantage, but there we go, now watch England beat them. Right? 😂 1
Stripey McStripe Shirt Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 1 hour ago, Osvaldorama said: Yep - sounds like England. The more you think about it, the more of a disgrace it is that Mexico are allowed to play every game there on a pitch that gives them a massive advantage. Oh well. If we go out, it’s been a fantastic World Cup. All the big players turned up, and every game has been filled with drama. We wouldn’t beat France anyway. A disgrace? Geez, it's called home advantage. Should no world cups be allowed in hot countries too for that reason? Or cold countries? Or countries that play a different genre of music over the PA system? All seems highly unfair. Also worth pointing out that not every Mexican player is used to living at altitude (I assume). And after this game they wouldn't play any more games in Mexico anyway.
Football Special Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago I think anyone who has watched the games so far would make Mexico favourites, dont think i can be bothered to stay up all night for it , possibly avoid the score and watch on catch up first thing Monday morning
Polaroid Saint Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Anyone that's been watching the previous four England games can clearly see Tuchel has conditioned his team EXACTLY for Mexico in the Azteca. Start slow, stay slow for the fast half. Don't bust your lungs trying to beat the full backs, challenge in midfield or keep up with strikers. Pass it ponderously around. Don't do much = Conserve energy and keep oxygen levels stable. Then bring on fresher, better players and up the tempo. It's all been masterplan. 1
EssEffCee Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago (edited) 47 minutes ago, Patrick Bateman said: In my opinion, I think it's stupid having so many nations as "host" anyway, plus there are what, 3 stadiums in Mexico being used, so no, I don't think Mexico should play all their matches with the same advantage. I'm pretty sure if it were in England, Scotland and Wales would no doubt tag on too, but England would probably open at Wembley and also play at somewhere like Old Trafford. I do think the Mexicans have TOO much of an advantage, but there we go, now watch England beat them. Right? 😂 I agree with having too many hosts but I see nothing wrong with them playing KO matches at their main ground if they win their group. They did play one of their group games at a different ground too same as Canada did. The real disgrace is that this will be the last game played at the Azteca as far as I'm concerned. Btw England played every game in '66 and '96 at Wembley, also every game played in England in 2021. So we've never played a major tournament game in England which wasn't at Wembley. Edited 4 hours ago by EssEffCee 2
trousers Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago (edited) Please put me out of my misery if I ever get as sad and small minded as this.... (or start wearing a skirt) Edited 4 hours ago by trousers 2 1
Badger Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 2 hours ago, Wade Garrett said: And 120 caps and over 50 goals for his country. Still it’s trendy to slag him off. Wankers. Great player he might have been, although his managerial career doesn't support him being a 'deep thinker' or master tactician on the game to pass 'expert' opinion.
Verbal Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 3 hours ago, JohnnyShearer2.0 said: Tuchel has to be playing games when he's said they've not prepared for the high altitude. I.e. getting the England players to do specific exercises and using those fancy tents over the last few months. They would have known about this world cup route for months. Would be amateurish if they didnt prepare..... Yes I agree, it would be unusual if there were not plenty of mitigations being put in place, although it's possible that what Tuchel means is that high-altitude adaptation is not the best prep for sea-level games. I think an England win would be especially great in that environment, but It still is a hell of an ask physiologically. 1
Football Special Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Bad news for England fans hoping to stock up on some Duty Free in Mexico City https://www.reuters.com/world/mexico-cocaine-seizures-may-reflect-world-cup-demand-experts-say-2026-06-30/
Lighthouse Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 9 minutes ago, Football Special said: Bad news for England fans hoping to stock up on some Duty Free in Mexico City https://www.reuters.com/world/mexico-cocaine-seizures-may-reflect-world-cup-demand-experts-say-2026-06-30/ It’d take more than a bag of dust to make last nights performance exciting to watch.
Osvaldorama Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago (edited) 2 hours ago, Stripey McStripe Shirt said: A disgrace? Geez, it's called home advantage. Should no world cups be allowed in hot countries too for that reason? Or cold countries? Or countries that play a different genre of music over the PA system? All seems highly unfair. Also worth pointing out that not every Mexican player is used to living at altitude (I assume). And after this game they wouldn't play any more games in Mexico anyway. There’s home advantage and then there’s having a stadium that’s thousands of metres higher than the rest of the tournament It gives them a massive advantage. They’ll be acclimatised to it, and none of their opponents will be. (Takes 3-4 weeks and they’ve been there the whole time) But It’s not just an atmosphere advantage like Wembley. You could argue it’s bordering on cheating. Certainly it’s worse than spying from behind a tree 72hrs before a game Edited 3 hours ago by Osvaldorama 1 1
Doctoroncall Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 3 hours ago, EssEffCee said: I'm pretty sure the players had some devices installed at home months back which can help. Not sure how much difference it'll make though. There are no devices that can replicate altitude conditions at sea level or prepare athletes for low oxygen levels. There was a small study in 2016 (frontiers of Physiology) which found heat acclimation for at least 10 days can improve tolerance and exercise performance at altitude.
Saint86 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 10 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said: There’s home advantage and then there’s having a stadium that’s thousands of metres higher than the rest of the tournament It gives them a massive advantage. They’ll be acclimatised to it, and none of their opponents will be. (Takes 3-4 weeks and they’ve been there the whole time) But It’s not just an atmosphere advantage like Wembley. You could argue it’s bordering on cheating. Certainly it’s worse than spying from behind a tree 72hrs before a game I agree it gives them an extremely novel advantage in this world cup, simply because they are the only side that is fully acclimatized to it. Sadly though, it is what it is. England still have fitter and stronger players than Mexico with more ability, might help to not be massive favorites for it and set up to defend and counter as well. 1
EssEffCee Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 17 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said: There’s home advantage and then there’s having a stadium that’s thousands of metres higher than the rest of the tournament It gives them a massive advantage. They’ll be acclimatised to it, and none of their opponents will be. (Takes 3-4 weeks and they’ve been there the whole time) But It’s not just an atmosphere advantage like Wembley. You could argue it’s bordering on cheating. Certainly it’s worse than spying from behind a tree 72hrs before a game A host playing a game at their national stadium is cheating? You hysterical tart 😂 Maybe the South American aides should campaign to stop Bolivia being allowed to play at home in qualifiers. 1
CB Fry Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 21 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said: There’s home advantage and then there’s having a stadium that’s thousands of metres higher than the rest of the tournament It gives them a massive advantage. They’ll be acclimatised to it, and none of their opponents will be. (Takes 3-4 weeks and they’ve been there the whole time) But It’s not just an atmosphere advantage like Wembley. You could argue it’s bordering on cheating. Certainly it’s worse than spying from behind a tree 72hrs before a game You could argue that if you want to look like a twat. 1
Osvaldorama Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 14 minutes ago, EssEffCee said: A host playing a game at their national stadium is cheating? You hysterical tart 😂 Maybe the South American aides should campaign to stop Bolivia being allowed to play at home in qualifiers. Are you illiterate? I said “bordering on”. Of course it is what it is, but it is a huge advantage.
Doctoroncall Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 9 minutes ago, CB Fry said: You could argue that if you want to look like a twat. FIFA imposed a ban in 2007 which lasted a year. FIFA also promised to look into altitude on player health. But never did. So yes, FIFA are twats.
Nordic Saint Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago (edited) 5 hours ago, adrian lord said: The African teams are getting there, challenging the old powers, but almost every game they run out of steam towards the late stages and succumb. Fitness and mental fatigue is clearly an issue when you are playing a defensive, drilled pressing strategy that requires total concentration and discipline for 96 or even 120+minutes. France: Mbappé- father Cameroon + mother Algeria, born in Paris Olise - father Nigeria + mother Algeria, born in London Dembélé - father Mali + mother Mauritania/Senegal, born in Vernon Doué - father Ivory Coast + mother France, born in Angers Barcola - father Togo + mother France, born in Villeurbanne Cherki- father Italy/Algeria + mother Algeria, born in Lyon Upamecano - father Guinea-Bissau + mother Senegal, born in Évreux Tchouaméni- father Cameroon + mother Cameroon, born in Rouen Saliba - father Lebanon + mother Cameroon, born in Paris Mateta - father DR Congo + mother France, born in Paris Koné - father Ivory Coast + mother Ivory Coast, born in Colombes Edited 1 hour ago by Nordic Saint 3 1
CB Fry Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 31 minutes ago, Doctoroncall said: FIFA imposed a ban in 2007 which lasted a year. FIFA also promised to look into altitude on player health. But never did. So yes, FIFA are twats. The same FIFA that run the world cup with Mexico City as a host city you mean? Cheating, sure sure sure. Edited 1 hour ago by CB Fry
Osvaldorama Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Regardless, it will be a cracking game. One for the ages. Trying to decide whether to get up for it at 1am, or watch the highlights in the morning. I feel like I’ll be a wreck all week if I get up for it 🫠
Wurzel Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 26 minutes ago, Nordic Saint said: We could do what France do: Mbappé- father Cameroon + mother Algeria, born in Paris Olise - father Nigeria + mother Algeria, born in London Dembélé - father Mali + mother Mauritania/Senegal, born in Vernon Doué - father Ivory Coast + mother France, born in Angers Barcola - father Togo + mother France, born in Villeurbanne Cherki- father Italy/Algeria + mother Algeria, born in Lyon Upamecano - father Guinea-Bissau + mother Senegal, born in Évreux Tchouaméni- father Cameroon + mother Cameroon, born in Rouen Saliba - father Lebanon + mother Cameroon, born in Paris Mateta - father DR Congo + mother France, born in Paris Gusto - father Portugal + mother Martinique, born in Lyon Koné - father Ivory Coast + mother Ivory Coast, born in Colombes Errrr.... we do Saka - Father Nigerian + Mother Nigerian, born in Ealing not the only example 1
Gloucester Saint Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 3 hours ago, trousers said: Please put me out of my misery if I ever get as sad and small minded as this.... (or start wearing a skirt) That’s Portsmouth levels of sad.
Whitey Grandad Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 33 minutes ago, CB Fry said: The same FIFA that run the world cup with Mexico City as a host city you mean? Cheating, sure sure sure. FIFA innit. Cheats? No, never.
TheAlehouseBrawlers Posted 56 minutes ago Posted 56 minutes ago No doubt the Mexicans gain an advantage playing all their matches at the Azteca but I think a host nation should play games at their biggest venue. So got to spare a thought for Canada fans who had a minimum 2000 mile round trip (probably double that for many) having to play their last match in California. Tough going for a host nation.
Window Cleaner Posted 33 minutes ago Posted 33 minutes ago 2 hours ago, Doctoroncall said: There are no devices that can replicate altitude conditions at sea level or prepare athletes for low oxygen levels. There was a small study in 2016 (frontiers of Physiology) which found heat acclimation for at least 10 days can improve tolerance and exercise performance at altitude. So the Norwegian biathlète who set his altitude mask wrongly and died whilst preparing the winter Olympics was wasting his time then?
EssEffCee Posted 33 minutes ago Posted 33 minutes ago 22 minutes ago, TheAlehouseBrawlers said: No doubt the Mexicans gain an advantage playing all their matches at the Azteca but I think a host nation should play games at their biggest venue. So got to spare a thought for Canada fans who had a minimum 2000 mile round trip (probably double that for many) having to play their last match in California. Tough going for a host nation. Was only because they didn't win their group. Would have stayed at home if they did.
coalman Posted 32 minutes ago Posted 32 minutes ago 4 hours ago, trousers said: Please put me out of my misery if I ever get as sad and small minded as this.... (or start wearing a skirt) Every time I see a bitter Scot I remember that Cape Verde made it to the knockout stages. And they didn't. Also that our match against Panama was the one which made them mathematically unable to qualify. 1
TheAlehouseBrawlers Posted 24 minutes ago Posted 24 minutes ago 7 minutes ago, EssEffCee said: Was only because they didn't win their group. Would have stayed at home if they did. Yeah, saw that, still a bit harsh. Where would Mexico have had to play if they hadn’t won their group?
EssEffCee Posted 14 minutes ago Posted 14 minutes ago 8 minutes ago, TheAlehouseBrawlers said: Yeah, saw that, still a bit harsh. Where would Mexico have had to play if they hadn’t won their group? Last 32 in LA, last 16 in Houston.
rallyboy Posted just now Posted just now I was never entirely convinced by Harry Kane in the Premier League but his stats in Germany and his performance last night confirms that he deserves to be right up there with England greats. His second goal...what a moment. 😮 Even better than when he scored in front of the Northam, clutched his hamstring and then the flag went up.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now