Jump to content

breaking sky sports news - independent enquiry into accounts


shurlock

Recommended Posts

Guess others have seen this as well, but acccording to reporters, the football league is to commission an independent enquiry into our accounts to determine the exact relationship between the holding company and club before deciding whether to dock points. The hope is that this will be done as quickly as possible but could still take a number of weeks. A painful wait and not that the open and shut case that the club was hoping for - as SSN also reports, one of the league's committee members is also closely associated to norwich city.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm, I think they're hoping you go down of your own accord to buy them time to work out what to do. Trouble is your accounts will presumably show a very thin relationship with the other SLH offshoots, and a great big fat one with SFC.

 

Even the SLH official website according SLH's London Stock Exchange listing is: saintsfc.co.uk, which doesn't look too good if you're trying to say there's little or no connection between the two entities.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm, I think they're hoping you go down of your own accord to buy them time to work out what to do. Trouble is your accounts will presumably show a very thin relationship with the other SLH offshoots, and a great big fat one with SFC.

 

Even the SLH official website according SLH's London Stock Exchange listing is: saintsfc.co.uk, which doesn't look too good if you're trying to say there's little or no connection between the two entities.....

 

And it probably doesn't help our case that the OS have removed the links to the corporate information sections.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't see that a delay is a bad thing.

If we keep on losing it will be easier for them to let us off any misdemeanours thus avoiding any possible legal action from our switched on legal aid team.

 

And it also gives us time to get a buyer in place as Derby did.

Then it might just look like our masterplan of shifting the club ownership between businesses was in place all along and the failed holding company was nothing to do with anything.....

 

 

 

Also it saves us dropping 13 points in one day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like the Goverment coffers the league want to know where all the dosh has gone and by what route....Full and thorough accounts search coming up. Points off next season big time....Damn and blast....Then again we might find some money we thought we had lost.

 

I would personally like good old KIM accounted for soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone else thinking that we'll survive by the skin of our teeth this season and then get clobbered with the points deduction and go down anyway?

 

Spot on.

 

FL hope we get relegated (soon) then make a decision to hit us with 10 point deduction this season anyway due to the accounts showing that the only real income stream to the PLC was the football activities (?) of SFC.

 

That way all other clubs are, at least partially, satisfied with the decision and we start next season on 0 points.

 

In their eyes everyone's a winner:

- No legal action from other clubs

- We were down anyway so -10 this year is better than -10 next.

 

Personally I wish they had made a decision today one way or the other rather than the usual prevaricating - at least we would know where we stand instead of the continual guessing and ifs & buts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Suggests to me that they don't have a bloody thing on us at the moment, so now they're looking for a technicality to let them hit us with the penalty.

 

If that fails they'll probably remove the clause that stops parent companies from invoking the 10 point penalty...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

who exactly is on the football league board or are all parties totally independant? The last thing I want to see is a decision being made by the Forrest Chairman or suchlike.

 

who's who is here

http://www.football-league.co.uk/page/AboutUs/WhosWho/0,,10794,00.html

 

group of eight- one of the members, neil doncaster's bio is here:

 

Neil Doncaster joined Norwich City in 1997 as Company Secretary and Solicitor before being promoted to his current position as Chief Executive in 2001. He sits on the Club's main Board, where he leads the drive to position the Club at the very heart of the community as a consultative, accessible family club. He is a director of the Football Association, the Football League and FL Interactive and is a member of the Football Association's Professional Game Board, Football Regulatory Authority and Judicial Panel. Neil is a qualified solicitor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not me.

 

I'd take the 10 points now, start next season on a level footing.

 

too late for that. Unless we finish outside the bottom three the ten points will come off next season as we missed the deadline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Suggests to me that they don't have a bloody thing on us at the moment, so now they're looking for a technicality to let them hit us with the penalty.

 

If that fails they'll probably remove the clause that stops parent companies from invoking the 10 point penalty...

 

The situation summed up perfectly IMHO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

who's who is here

http://www.football-league.co.uk/page/AboutUs/WhosWho/0,,10794,00.html

 

group of eight- one of the members, neil doncaster's bio is here:

 

Neil Doncaster joined Norwich City in 1997 as Company Secretary and Solicitor before being promoted to his current position as Chief Executive in 2001. He sits on the Club's main Board, where he leads the drive to position the Club at the very heart of the community as a consultative, accessible family club. He is a director of the Football Association, the Football League and FL Interactive and is a member of the Football Association's Professional Game Board, Football Regulatory Authority and Judicial Panel. Neil is a qualified solicitor.

 

 

thanks. Mr Doncaster is a turkey voting for Xmas if he backs us. The Sheffield United Chairman is going to want proper justice after they were turned over on the Tevez affair, so I can see him voting against us as well. Sheepshanks is a mate of Lowe's ain't he?

 

In the end there is precident (with Derby) so if our accounts show that there were two distinct entities then we should be alright. If not we are going to have serious problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sensible approach by the FL, in my opinion.

 

Sensible but slow, IMO.

 

Typical quango approach...take nearly a week to convene a meeting (conference call anyone?).....then kick off an "urgent" inquiry...

 

Your sub-par rocket scientist could have worked out that the financial circumstances would need 'further investigation' last week and they could have the "urgent" report in their hands by now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Echo-

http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/sport/saints/news/4273401.Saints_made_to_sweat_by_the_Football_League/

 

[admin: please don't copy Echo articles word-for-word, I get lots of hassle from them :)]

 

Sky

 

The Football League has launched a full inquiry into Southampton's finances to decide whether to punish the Championship club over the collapse of their holding company.

 

The league deducts 10 points when clubs go into administration due to financial problems.

 

Relegation-threatened Southampton had hoped to avoid such a penalty because its parent company and not the club went into administration last week.

 

But the league is now looking into the relationship between the club and Southampton Leisure Holdings.

 

Football League chairman Lord Mawhinney confirmed to Sky Sports News that he hopes for a conclusion "as soon as possible".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

who's who is here

http://www.football-league.co.uk/page/AboutUs/WhosWho/0,,10794,00.html

 

group of eight- one of the members, neil doncaster's bio is here:

 

Neil Doncaster joined Norwich City in 1997 as Company Secretary and Solicitor before being promoted to his current position as Chief Executive in 2001. He sits on the Club's main Board, where he leads the drive to position the Club at the very heart of the community as a consultative, accessible family club. He is a director of the Football Association, the Football League and FL Interactive and is a member of the Football Association's Professional Game Board, Football Regulatory Authority and Judicial Panel. Neil is a qualified solicitor.

 

Neil Doncaster is an old collegue of mine, we did our MBA together. should i offer to buy him lunch, then cuts the legs of his chair?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surprise, surprise, they've bottled making a decision.

 

They're clearly hoping we go down anyway so they can just brush it all under the carpet.

 

It'll be very very interesting to see what happens if we manage to stay up...

 

One thing's for sure....it'll make a farcical last day of the season if they still haven't decided by then and we get a result against Forest that keeps us up.

 

What on Earth do we do at full time in those circumstances?

 

We couldn't celebrate with any degree of confidence, that's for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FL site statement

 

http://www.football-league.co.uk/...wsDetail/0,,10794~1615729,00.html

 

It had to be this way. If they made a decision and were challenged by us or any other interested club it could have ended in court. By commissioning a forensic accountants report they will at least cover their backs.

 

I wonder if the Administrator will arrange a similar report in case of a challenge or will both sides agree to a joint independent expert.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We will be deducted points, they are just figuring out a loophole so that they can do it. Had it been a "big club" they would find a way not to. A bit like all the ****e we had to go through to get pahars and then they grant work permits for loan players to Chelsea and Arsenal and Liverpool even though at the time it was against the rules. They make their own rules to suit their agenda...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm, I think they're hoping you go down of your own accord to buy them time to work out what to do. Trouble is your accounts will presumably show a very thin relationship with the other SLH offshoots, and a great big fat one with SFC.

 

Even the SLH official website according SLH's London Stock Exchange listing is: saintsfc.co.uk, which doesn't look too good if you're trying to say there's little or no connection between the two entities.....

 

I understand that your chairman is hoping that you also go down before the investigation begins into your links with gunrunning!

 

;)

Edited by PaulSaint
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there should be an investigation into our accounts anyway, I think there is some dodgy goings on at the club as it has been bled dry of finances!

Christ :smt017

 

We could play hard-ball and simply refuse to give their accountants access.

 

"Your rule says, 'x', make a decision".

I'm not sure they'll necessarily need "full" access - they'll be able to get copies of the various accounts from Companies House for £1 each, which may be sufficient. Quite why the FL couldn't do that in the first place is a bit baffling really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Christ :smt017

 

 

I'm not sure they'll necessarily need "full" access - they'll be able to get copies of the various accounts from Companies House for £1 each, which may be sufficient. Quite why the FL couldn't do that in the first place is a bit baffling really.

 

Well, yes! They could just download the annual report pdf off the SFC site! As for the relationship between SFC and the debt, that can easily be ascertained by a look at SFC Limited's charges register on Companies House.

 

You don't need "Forensic Accountants" to do that. If the League wants to **** money up the wall though, let's let them!

 

I doubt any forensic accountants are doing anything as a matter of urgency.

 

As others have said, this is just a delaying tactic.

 

We have three matches between now and this time next week.

 

They will be hoping we are virtually down by then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mr Doncaster will not be involved in the decision process if Norwich are an interested party. He will remove himself from the decision making.

 

Arguably, anyone with a connection to a Football League club could be classed an 'interested party', couldn't they?

 

A big 'IF'....but if we stumble across an investor with a decent amount of money in the next couple of weeks, name a club in the CCC who wouldn't rather see us get relegated or a club in League 1 who wouldn't want to see us stay up.

 

Bit of a grey area IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Christ :smt017

 

 

I'm not sure they'll necessarily need "full" access - they'll be able to get copies of the various accounts from Companies House for £1 each, which may be sufficient. Quite why the FL couldn't do that in the first place is a bit baffling really.

 

If they have been misled or even lied to..surely they will look very closely at much more than Companies House records....Never the answer when trying to get to the truth.

 

They at the League want satisfactory closure alround...But if a complaint has been made surely they will cover their backs before The Police are called in.

 

Maybe we will just end up -10 points and a promotion from league 1 next year.

 

Then again something does not ring quite right in my opinion.:rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they have been misled or even lied to..surely they will look very closely at much more than Companies House records....Never the answer when trying to get to the truth.

 

They at the League want satisfactory closure alround...But if a complaint has been made surely they will cover their backs before The Police are called in.

 

Maybe we will just end up -10 points and a promotion from league 1 next year.

 

Then again something does not ring quite right in my opinion.:rolleyes:

 

?

 

Sting.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neil Doncaster is an old collegue of mine, we did our MBA together. should i offer to buy him lunch, then cuts the legs of his chair?

Yes. If he complains, say that we bought the saw in a shop that was simply the parent company of the restaurant. No other connection. Honest.

Chaps, we're in League One, let's just face it. I think the League is also kind of hoping they won't have to make a decision because there won't be a club. It certainly must hamper the sale proceedings, no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Suggests to me that they don't have a bloody thing on us at the moment, so now they're looking for a technicality to let them hit us with the penalty.

 

If that fails they'll probably remove the clause that stops parent companies from invoking the 10 point penalty...

 

Personally I think it suggests the opposite.

 

They are fairly sure that the club and the PLC are one and the same in all but name (which in my opinion they effectively are!) and are looking to see if the club can provide any evidence to the contrary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they have been misled or even lied to..surely they will look very closely at much more than Companies House records....Never the answer when trying to get to the truth.

 

They at the League want satisfactory closure alround...But if a complaint has been made surely they will cover their backs before The Police are called in.

There hasn't been a single suggestion of anything illegal, or even that the club has misled or lied to the Football League, so I'd watch the libel line if I were you.

 

When we were relegated, the Football League were clearly satisfied with the structure we had in place at the time, otherwise we wouldn't have been issued with the "golden share" that every club gets as a member of the league. They knew the score then so you can be sure they know the score now.

 

They even had the opportunity to close the loophole when Derby went into administration a few years ago but chose not to - perhaps they didn't expect to be in that situation again, who knows, but they missed a trick there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...