Jump to content

Hooray Great News


dubai_phil

Recommended Posts

Slightly worried now as whilst I was reading the link my two year old daughter asked if the picture of Ricado Fuller was me!!!! Hmmm although if she had been at SMS she would have seen how dominate in the air I truly was!!!!

 

.... BWP and Euell... on less money obviousily!!!!

 

At least they are keen to stay i guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Strange. I thought it was impossible to offer new contracts while in administration.

 

Fortunately for us the football club are not in administration. Which, if you are correect, beggars the question as to why they have been deducted 10 points. Either SFC is in admin and has a 10 point deduction and can't offer new contracts, or it isn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The good thing is that they want to be here, despite playing in League 1. Also when their contracts are actually finalised, we will be able to command a fee should they leave.

 

The fact that they want to stay perhaps also means that there is not going to be a mass exodus deserting a half sunk ship. Good or bad?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Euell and BWP would be awesome in the league with a proper manager who will demand effort and more commitment to football and not the outside world etc....

 

I think you right. They could have been pretty good in the CCC with the right manager too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The good thing is that they want to be here, despite playing in League 1. Also when their contracts are actually finalised, we will be able to command a fee should they leave.

 

The fact that they want to stay perhaps also means that there is not going to be a mass exodus deserting a half sunk ship. Good or bad?

 

Based on their performances this season, my question would simply be - could we find a BETTER player in League 1 for the same or less money?

 

Then I would ask would anyone else out there feel they would be worth the same (reduced) or more money?

 

Euell with effort and no touch/goals or if they were the same cost or less a Ricky Lambert, Simon Cox, type with a proved goal scoring record at this level? Or someone near the top of the L2 scoring charts or even a proven lower level goal scorer from overseas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Strange. I thought it was impossible to offer new contracts while in administration.

 

We're not in administration are we? SLH is administration though.

 

We're not (ahem) even though certain people may think that we are 'inextricably linked' to SLH. However, how can we offer contracts while we are for sale and not knowing, should someone buy us, what their plans might be?

 

All part of this strange & wonderful world of SFC!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on their performances this season, my question would simply be - could we find a BETTER player in League 1 for the same or less money?

 

Then I would ask would anyone else out there feel they would be worth the same (reduced) or more money?

 

Euell with effort and no touch/goals or if they were the same cost or less a Ricky Lambert, Simon Cox, type with a proved goal scoring record at this level? Or someone near the top of the L2 scoring charts or even a proven lower level goal scorer from overseas.

 

would cost us alot more for either of those, plus their clubs would not be willing to sell to a rival team. I should imagine the new contracts offered are very less than previously on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

would cost us alot more for either of those, plus their clubs would not be willing to sell to a rival team. I should imagine the new contracts offered are very less than previously on.

 

Of course, just trying to use them as examples being at the top of the scoring charts for this season.

 

And it does say "offered them less money of course" on the OS.

 

Just trying to use it as a benchmark, would The9 actually be a better investment? :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But isn't this just old news rehashed?

 

I really don't see the point of any of it, Wotte probably won't be the manager next season and we might not even be in existence. This sort of yarn from the OS is just put out to fill the vaccuum because in fact f-all is happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fortunately for us the football club are not in administration. Which, if you are correect, beggars the question as to why they have been deducted 10 points. Either SFC is in admin and has a 10 point deduction and can't offer new contracts, or it isn't.

 

 

A) If SFC is in Admin, then no contracts can be offerred

B) If SFC is NOT in Admin, then they can

C) If the League do not object or block such conttact activity, then they will deem it to be OK

D) If they deem it OK, then they are acknowledging the fact that SFC is NOT in Admin

E) If SFC is not ( as per "D" ) in Admin, . WHY are they docking us 10 points ???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A) If SFC is in Admin, then no contracts can be offerred

B) If SFC is NOT in Admin, then they can

C) If the League do not object or block such conttact activity, then they will deem it to be OK

D) If they deem it OK, then they are acknowledging the fact that SFC is NOT in Admin

E) If SFC is not ( as per "D" ) in Admin, . WHY are they docking us 10 points ???

Because they can. They can make up the rules to suit their agenda, and there is no legal comeback. When you join a club you agree to abide by their rules. We all know that politicians are corrupt, those involved in football seem to be doubly so...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as I can tell from reading various media snippets nobody has been offered a new contract. Discussions have taken place and potential contractural terms worked out and agreed in principle.

 

Of course Wotte is going to assume he will stay in charge and will want to demonstrate to any new owner that he is pro active in his approach and that the team can hit the ground running at the start of next season. Good on him but decisions cannot be firmed up until we know who has the money, how much is available and the desires of the new owners.

 

Wotte's contract was only until the end of the season with an option to renew for another year although relegation may have changed that. Looks like he wants to stay and is sending out that message. Time will tell but personally I do not feel he has the tactical knowledge to manage us going forward but that is for another thread already in existence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Slightly worried now as whilst I was reading the link my two year old daughter asked if the picture of Ricado Fuller was me!!!!
She has obviously inherited your (in)ability to recognise and name any footballer whatsoever.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course, just trying to use them as examples being at the top of the scoring charts for this season.

 

And it does say "offered them less money of course" on the OS.

 

Just trying to use it as a benchmark, would The9 actually be a better investment? :-)

 

I'm a knee surgery away from us walking this league, LOL!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone who heard BWP's interview on Radio Hants after the Forest game will not be too surprised.

 

He genuinely declared his desire to stay & get us promoted back

 

IMO, he's equally as good, if not better than Simon Cox or Ricky Lambert or Matty Fryatt

 

Bradley would be awesome in L1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on their performances this season, my question would simply be - could we find a BETTER player in League 1 for the same or less money?

 

Then I would ask would anyone else out there feel they would be worth the same (reduced) or more money?

 

Euell with effort and no touch/goals or if they were the same cost or less a Ricky Lambert, Simon Cox, type with a proved goal scoring record at this level? Or someone near the top of the L2 scoring charts or even a proven lower level goal scorer from overseas.

 

when comparing Euell and BWP to other players out there commanding similar wages then you have to be talking about free transfers as Cox is worth £2m (apparently) which effectively adds £10k a week over four years even before you add his wages on top.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, this is a relief then

 

http://www.saintsfc.co.uk/news/?page_id=11774

 

BWP & Euell have been offered new contracts.

 

Bet that's gonna scare the pants off the rest of League 1

 

I'd love it if they stayed. A couple of men who need to prove themselves in a red and white shirt. All those two need is a manager to get the best out of them who does not advocate playing youth to his appallingly gullible chairman and keping them sidelined before then taking over himself and failing to provide any inspiration.

 

BWP and Euell in League 1 would be a statement of intent by the club - simply, we are unlikely to get any better.

 

Now lets watch BWP and Euell on their test of loyalty....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BWP will be pretty decent in League One, he does play well now and again and with the right manager as someone pointed out, he could score goals.

 

Euell, another I'm pleased to see stay, he can hold the ball up if we do want to play ugly and I think he could score a few too. If Davis stays then I'm going to start feeling hopeful, few new faces here and there and we could do alright.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think they can have been offered new contracts (the article doesn't actually say that does it?). More likely the subject of a new contract on less money has been discussed in principle.

 

All seems a bit odd to me. Isn't there a few variables to consider?

 

1. We are not sure if there will be a sfc next season.

 

2. If we do get a buyer they might not want Wotte to stay in charge.

 

3. If a new manager is brought in, shouldn't it be up to him who goes and who stays?

 

4. Surely contracts can only be finalised once it is known how much funding is available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually I think they'd be a good strike force for league 1. It's the level BWP needs. Fryatt struggled in the CCC too. Who knows what they'll do. But Euell is the big striker we need so if he accepts less money then why not. Could be a lot worse.

 

 

I'd think they'd be the self same pair of tossers that they were in the CCC

on less money and therefore even less motivated. I just don't understand why we're talking about these 2 blokes. they day their contracts run out should be in letters of fire with hallelujah written under it on the SFC wall calendar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Euell's experience and BWPs pace could be a big plus in this league. DEcisions have to made quickly though and plans put in place. The longer this situation drags on the worse it is for the club.

 

Fair play for Wotte for getting on with the job in hand - can't be easiy knowing you could be out of the door in a week or two...but he is saying and doing the right things right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Euell and BWP should be good for us in League One and I hope they stay. Obviously these contracts will be on much reduced terms, and rightly so, but I hope that they both agree to them and make the effort to get us back into The Championship. After all, they do owe us for this season.

 

Whilst Euell has divided the fan base ever since he's been here, I feel that we could do with someone like him in the heart of our midfield. He's committed, industrious and isn't afraid to get stuck in. He's experienced too and this season has proved that we need a few older heads around the first-team.

 

As for BWP, I believe he has the potential to score plenty of goals in League One. If he is playing regularly in attack, and we get a manager who can get the best out of him, then he could play a pivotal role for us next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm actually quite impressed with the attitude of the players, especially the ones out of contract, how few are actively seeking to get away after relegation. Obviously the foreign players don't want to play League 1 and wouldn't entertain playing for League 1 wages. It seems that only Dyer, of the homegrown and British contingent is actively seeking a move and he wasn't at the club for the vast majority of last season any way!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Euell and BWP would be awesome in the league with a proper manager who will demand effort and more commitment to football and not the outside world etc....

 

It wasn't effort and commitment that was Euell's problem - it was ability. And BWP could double Gillett's effort and still be sh1te if you don't understand the rules of football.

They are most definitely both part of the problem, not part of the solution imo.

Wotte has gone down in my estimation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Properly managed and motivated, Euell is an asset. If you've got a manager that can show Euell he's wanted, he'll run all day and night for you and that is what you need in League 1.

 

BWP I'm less convinced about. At least though he can make up the difference in his wages by nicking stuff.

 

There's also an expression some of you seem to be struggling for. It starts, "Beggars can't..."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Euell.. For F*** Sake! What do we want to sign that useless p***k for?

 

Because beggars cant be choosers?

 

However I think he could be an asset next season, just needs to up his game because if he wants to he can play fairly well, although on the flip side he can be mistaken for a brick on some days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Euell.. For F*** Sake! What do we want to sign that useless p***k for?

 

IMO Jason Euell brought the best out of a lazy player like McGoldrick.

 

He holds the ball up well and is an experienced head to have.

 

He could be a good player to retain in League One.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think they can have been offered new contracts (the article doesn't actually say that does it?). More likely the subject of a new contract on less money has been discussed in principle.

 

I wouuld have thought that this is the case. Signing them up to new contracts that sfc limited has no current means of paying could result in grounds for wrongful trading resulting in the directors being potentially at risk of legal action.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...