Jump to content

Idiotic posts on Coventry forum


1976_Child

Recommended Posts

"Saothampton are not riding high because of loyal fans or the manager............ it is for one reason only ............... it is because who bought the club on the cheap when they were in big **** , so maybe the same could happen to us and admin and being relegated might just be a blessing in disguise"

 

Seriously, how bitter and twisted and moronic are some people?

 

http://www.skybluestalk.co.uk/threads/12382-Article-on-SISU-and-Cov-from-a-Southampton-view

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is the first half of the quote which just idiotic and bitter.

 

Our success this season has nothing, according to the poster, to do with our loyal fanbase (which turns out 32,000 on a Tuesday night and routinely sells all away tickets) or our manager. What a nob-head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What screws Coventry getting a rich owner is a small fanbase compared to Saints, not owning their stadium/training ground and not having an academy anywhere near as good in terms of setup or reputation.

 

Saints averaged 22k in League One and will probably average 25k+ this season in the Championship, Coventry currently average 14k in the Championship. If they get relegated this season their attendances in the League One next season won't be anywhere near the 22k average Saints had.

 

For their fans to compare the two clubs is a nonsense.

Edited by Matthew Le God
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What screws Coventry getting a rich owner is a small fanbase compared to Saints, not owning their stadium/training ground and not having an academy anywhere near as good in terms of setup or reputation.

 

TBF they could have a much larger fanbase given some success. Years of dross has pretty much eroded theirs much like it did with our's, prior to administration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He has a point in some ways. Of course our fanbase and management has had an effect on our position, but also none of this would have happened had we not had relegation and administration.

 

I thought he was trying to make the point that it is ML's dosh what has got us to the top and nothing to do with NA etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In fairness, I was waiting for us to go into admin in 2009 so we could start again. Until that was to happen there appeared no future for us. Whilst others hung their heads I was quietly feeling very positive.

 

For a long time there it felt like there was no future, until the old administration finally left and we were given a virtual clean slate. Sounds like that's where Coventry are now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tbf some Cov fan does put him right mentioning we could get 30,000 in League One and they'd struggle for half of that.

 

And...1976_Child...in reference to your post on another thread, where exactly is the capital of 'Britain'? ;)

 

Incidently, tomorrow we're going to Britains capital of...http://www.metro.co.uk/lifestyle/30686-britains-vibrator-capital-revealed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair I think there right we had five years where our support and manager didn't help us stop the slide into league one with the debts we had our revenue would not have allowed us to invest in the squad and without that Adkins wouldn't get us to the top of the championship

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Cov lad had a point, this club wasn't turned around by a great manager or through the actions of its fan but because it was bought by a capable person. NA and us fans have assisted in the rise but the turning point was ML. So you can see why admin may be attractive to Cov fans, however it wasn't admin that was the turning point it was getting a decent buyer, something thats not guarenteed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too simplistic statement by far.

 

But he does nail one point.

 

ML DID get us on the cheap. The club was touted around by many people (of widely differing levels of experience 8) ) The price being asked was in the region of the Shareholder Equity value which was resolutely around the 32mil mark.

 

He also DID get the debts "significantly reduced". Prior to admin adding those debts onto the Share Value made the deal to buy Saints much more expensive.

 

However it has been the decision making SINCE that period that has determined our path.

 

It was a hell of a stroke of luck for us, and if you look at other clubs that have gone into admin only a small few have been so lucky or have got back to a competitive level.

 

Go pop get relegated and get a muppet in. Yeah that's really working for poopey isn't it.

 

Stupid & risky

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having experienced two relegations in recent times, it's not the death of a club I used to think it was. Yes, relegation from the Premiership did eventually bring on our administration, but you look at Charlton, Forest, Leeds, Us, Norwich etc etc and you see that sometimes it's just the kick up the backside a club needs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

agree fully, although you do have to spend the money wisely of course

 

And have a decent manager to get the most out of the investment.

 

So they are right. They are also wrong for saying it was the one and only reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Coventry fan is right, the only reason we could attract the manager and players we have is because of Leibherr's wonga.

 

I had a day out with a Pompey fan at Fontwell today (he's alright though, thankfully) and he reminded me that we are about the fifth/sixth richest club in the land. We shouldn't forget that when we're riding high. Because if we do, we will attract the same sort of jealousy as Chelsea and Man Citeh. And while I don't like 'buying' anything that hasn't been earned, it's not a fault of long-suffering fans like yours truly that we happen to have been blessed by Markus - god bless him. I feel for Coventry because but for a bit of luck THAT could have been us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a day out with a Pompey fan at Fontwell today (he's alright though, thankfully) and he reminded me that we are about the fifth/sixth richest club in the land. We shouldn't forget that when we're riding high. Because if we do, we will attract the same sort of jealousy as Chelsea and Man Citeh. And while I don't like 'buying' anything that hasn't been earned, it's not a fault of long-suffering fans like yours truly that we happen to have been blessed by Markus - god bless him. I feel for Coventry because but for a bit of luck THAT could have been us.
Not necessarily 'luck' though is it? Why did ML & NC decide to invest in Saints as opposed to Coventry for example?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a day out with a Pompey fan at Fontwell today (he's alright though, thankfully) and he reminded me that we are about the fifth/sixth richest club in the land. We shouldn't forget that when we're riding high. Because if we do, we will attract the same sort of jealousy as Chelsea and Man Citeh. And while I don't like 'buying' anything that hasn't been earned, it's not a fault of long-suffering fans like yours truly that we happen to have been blessed by Markus - god bless him. I feel for Coventry because but for a bit of luck THAT could have been us.

 

It's a good point, but I think it's slightly misguided:

 

We have one of the top 10 wealthiest owners in English football. That's different than being a top 10 wealthiest club, isn't it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a good point, but I think it's slightly misguided:

 

We have one of the top 10 wealthiest owners in English football. That's different than being a top 10 wealthiest club, isn't it?

 

That's no different to any of the others, though. Mittal hasn't given his money to QPR, Abramovic hasn't given it to Chelsea. I think on that basis we're talking about wealth of the owners in each case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is irrelevant. Had Liebherr decided Coventry were a more attractive investment he could have made them an offer they couldn't refuse. They don't own the Ricoh Areana, so aren't exactly laded with big money assets.

 

Are you soft?

 

He could afford Southampton because we were in the shyte and therefore attractive and available at a cheap price with a potential resale at a profit.

 

Coventry were/are owned by SISU who are looking for a return on their investment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Saothampton are not riding high because of loyal fans or the manager............ it is for one reason only ............... it is because who bought the club on the cheap when they were in big **** , so maybe the same could happen to us and admin and being relegated might just be a blessing in disguise"

 

Seriously, how bitter and twisted and moronic are some people?

 

http://www.skybluestalk.co.uk/threads/12382-Article-on-SISU-and-Cov-from-a-Southampton-view

 

I'm not sure making a fairly valid point is bitter, twisted or moronic. It's not the ONLY reason we've turned around, but Liebherr's money got us out of League 1 and the fact we had to go into administration to get a buyer is precisely what got us out of Lowes control.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Always hated this lot. Nothing place in the middle of bloody nowhere with no atmosphere and nothing going on around it. I hope we **** them tomorrow.

 

To differ on details, coventry had the c**p bombed out of it in the second world war, because of its role as britains most important industrial and armaments centre, and I think its population were renowned for their stoicism. I would say Milton Keynes is a nothing place in the middle of nowhere. I hope we **** them tomorrow too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In fairness, I was waiting for us to go into admin in 2009 so we could start again. Until that was to happen there appeared no future for us. Whilst others hung their heads I was quietly feeling very positive.

 

Hard to believe now that those of us advocating administration got so much abuse...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is irrelevant. Had Liebherr decided Coventry were a more attractive investment he could have made them an offer they couldn't refuse. They don't own the Ricoh Areana, so aren't exactly laded with big money assets.

 

 

Obviously not "irrelevant". If we weren't in administration, the Liebherr's would not have bought us. We were available with stadium at an absolute steal of a price. Leibherr wasn't making anyone "offers they couldn't refuse" he bought us at the lowest price the administrators/Aviva had to take. Completely different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...