Coronavirus

[Whitey Grandad]

1 hour ago, Holmes_and_Watson said:

I dropped down dead...

... I got better, but it shows MLT was completely right. 🙂

They will. You just have to wait a bit longer.

[The Left Back]

3 hours ago, Toadhall Saint said:

I’m still waiting for half the population who were vaccinated to drop down dead. 

80% according to salmonsi. My 2 years is up, I’m living on borrowed time. Sadly the salmon is no longer with us (on the forum I mean)

[CB Fry]

4 hours ago, Toadhall Saint said:

I’m still waiting for half the population who were vaccinated to drop down dead. 

 

1 hour ago, The Left Back said:

80% according to salmonsi. My 2 years is up, I’m living on borrowed time. Sadly the salmon is no longer with us (on the forum I mean)

Any day now we should "all see" exactly what he knew about and the rest of us idiots didn't.

Any day now, you'll see.

[Turkish]

12 minutes ago, CB Fry said:

 

Any day now we should "all see" exactly what he knew about and the rest of us idiots didn't.

Any day now, you'll see.

Yes Mr Gates.

[Lighthouse]

I just love the idea of Bill Gates playing The Sims with real people.

[Turkish]

34 minutes ago, Lighthouse said:

I just love the idea of Bill Gates playing The Sims with real people.

Office 365 is by far the greatest invention in history.

[badgerx16]

6 minutes ago, Turkish said:

Office 365 is by far the greatest invention in history.

Windows VISTA surely ?

[Whitey Grandad]

2 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

Windows VISTA surely ?

That’s when it all began.

[Turkish]

17 minutes ago, Whitey Grandad said:

That’s when it all began.

Indeed life as know it

in the beginning bill created windows vista. And there was lightness above the surface of the internet deep and bills active force went to and fro above the www

i ❤️ Microsoft 

Edited 31 March, 2023 by Turkish

[whelk]

9 hours ago, Turkish said:

Office 365 is by far the greatest invention in history.

Wait til you see Copilot

[Dark Munster]

On 31/03/2023 at 06:59, Toadhall Saint said:

I’m still waiting for half the population who were vaccinated to drop down dead. 

And don't forget the other half who'll suffer from Long Vaccine.

[AlexLaw76]

Lock the thread please, the big boys have said it is over.

Yet, probably have to wear a hazmat suit to get into the doctors surgery...

[Lighthouse]

I guess the collective world leaders have just decided they’re a bit bored with total global obedience and given up, just like that. I reckon it’ll be pogs back in fashion next.

[Jimmy_D]

27 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

Lock the thread please, the big boys have said it is over.

Yet, probably have to wear a hazmat suit to get into the doctors surgery...

They’ve said it’s a less severe problem than ‘Global Health Emergency,’ but it’s not like it’s suddenly gone away completely. It’s still causing around 3500 deaths a day worldwide.

There will likely always need to be some measures against what can still be a deadly disease for some, similar to measures taken against severe flu or MRSA or any number of other diseases that are carried out every day in hospitals.

[whelk]

45 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

Lock the thread please, the big boys have said it is over.

Yet, probably have to wear a hazmat suit to get into the doctors surgery...

I thought you would want it to stay open so you can gloat and reference being right every step of the way?

[badgerx16]

5 minutes ago, Jimmy_D said:

 

There will likely always need to be some measures against what can still be a deadly disease for some, similar to measures taken against severe flu or MRSA or any number of other diseases that are carried out every day in hospitals.

At least until the vaccine starts the culling it is designed for.

[Turkish]

4 hours ago, Jimmy_D said:

They’ve said it’s a less severe problem than ‘Global Health Emergency,’ but it’s not like it’s suddenly gone away completely. It’s still causing around 3500 deaths a day worldwide.

There will likely always need to be some measures against what can still be a deadly disease for some, similar to measures taken against severe flu or MRSA or any number of other diseases that are carried out every day in hospitals.

Still hopeful of more lockdowns Jimmy?

[sadoldgit]

On 05/05/2023 at 17:20, AlexLaw76 said:

Lock the thread please, the big boys have said it is over.

Yet, probably have to wear a hazmat suit to get into the doctors surgery...

If anyone was ever in doubt that this person is Delldays/Batman, just read this post.

[AlexLaw76]

12 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

If anyone was ever in doubt that this person is Delldays/Batman, just read this post.

Be quiet you daft racist

[whelk]

Absolute cunts

 

[east-stand-nic]

19 hours ago, whelk said:

Absolute cunts

 

Now, lets use some logic here. Put aside tin foil hats etc., and just use logic. IF the government KNEW this virus was deadly, do you believe they would have acted like this?

[aintforever]

44 minutes ago, east-stand-nic said:

Now, lets use some logic here. Put aside tin foil hats etc., and just use logic. IF the government KNEW this virus was deadly, do you believe they would have acted like this?

Of course they would. We knew right from the start it was only the elderly or vulnerable people who were at seriously risk. Have you spent he last 4 years in a coma or something?

[badgerx16]

1 hour ago, east-stand-nic said:

Now, lets use some logic here. Put aside tin foil hats etc., and just use logic. IF the government KNEW this virus was deadly, do you believe they would have acted like this?

They did and they did.

However, in a theoretical World, how would your 'logic' explain the thinking behind the lockdowns ?

Edited 16 June, 2023 by badgerx16

[AlexLaw76]

2 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

They did and they did.

However, in a theoretical World, how would your 'logic' explain the thinking behind the lockdowns ?

All parts of the establishment who said we must lockdown to save granny, were ignoring it.

Even professor pants down himself. 

 

Edited 16 June, 2023 by AlexLaw76

[badgerx16]

2 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

All parts of the establishment who said we must lockdown to save granny, were ignoring it.

Even professor pants down himself. 

 

Which, even if true, does not answer the question asked.

[east-stand-nic]

3 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

They did and they did.

However, in a theoretical World, how would your 'logic' explain the thinking behind the lockdowns ?

This is the point I am making. If it was so deadly and serious as to lock everyone inside, why did they act like it was not serious and carry on as normal?

[badgerx16]

4 hours ago, east-stand-nic said:

This is the point I am making. If it was so deadly and serious as to lock everyone inside, why did they act like it was not serious and carry on as normal?

Because they are self-centered twats who think rules are for everybody else, to the extent that even in the HoC truth is a vague and hazy entity.

Edited 16 June, 2023 by badgerx16

[east-stand-nic]

2 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

Because they are self-centered twats who think rules are for everybody else, to the extent the even in the HoC truth is a vague and hazy entity.

So, self centered twats would risk their lives like this amidst a deadly virus outbreak, yes? There is a huge difference between being self centered and taking your life into your own hands. People like Boris are cowards, no way he would risk his own life for anyone. So, amidst the most deadly virus in 100 years, why would a self serving coward like Boris take his life in to his own hands in such a reckless way. The answer is very simple. he wouldn't, ever!

[Lighthouse]

14 minutes ago, east-stand-nic said:

So, self centered twats would risk their lives like this amidst a deadly virus outbreak, yes? There is a huge difference between being self centered and taking your life into your own hands. People like Boris are cowards, no way he would risk his own life for anyone. So, amidst the most deadly virus in 100 years, why would a self serving coward like Boris take his life in to his own hands in such a reckless way. The answer is very simple. he wouldn't, ever!

You could write that about anyone who’s ever taken drugs, driven whilst drunk, without a seatbelt, done 130 on a motorway, had a fag in a petrol station, run a level crossing before the barriers came down or a million other daft things people have done with a much higher fatality rate than COVID.

For someone who started off by saying, “let’s all just be logical for a moment,” you’ve posted an absolutely nonsense argument.

[badgerx16]

21 minutes ago, east-stand-nic said:

So, self centered twats would risk their lives like this amidst a deadly virus outbreak, yes? There is a huge difference between being self centered and taking your life into your own hands. People like Boris are cowards, no way he would risk his own life for anyone. So, amidst the most deadly virus in 100 years, why would a self serving coward like Boris take his life in to his own hands in such a reckless way. The answer is very simple. he wouldn't, ever!

In which case we come back round to the question ; If they knew that Covid wasn't as virulent as they were telling us, why did they say it, and what did they expect to gain by the lockdowns ? Surely they didn't want to intentionally tank the Global economy ?

Edited 16 June, 2023 by badgerx16

[aintforever]

57 minutes ago, east-stand-nic said:

So, self centered twats would risk their lives like this amidst a deadly virus outbreak, yes? There is a huge difference between being self centered and taking your life into your own hands. People like Boris are cowards, no way he would risk his own life for anyone. So, amidst the most deadly virus in 100 years, why would a self serving coward like Boris take his life in to his own hands in such a reckless way. The answer is very simple. he wouldn't, ever!

Jesus wept, why don't you get a piece of paper and write out one hundred times:

'Only the elderly or people with underlying health conditions are at serious risk from Covid.'

Maybe then it might sink in.

Edited 16 June, 2023 by aintforever

[Weston Super Saint]

10 minutes ago, aintforever said:

Jesus wept, why don't you get a piece of paper and white out one hundred times:

'Only the elderly or people with underlying health conditions are at serious risk from Covid.'

Maybe then it might sink in.

🤣🤣🤣

[aintforever]

11 minutes ago, Weston Super Saint said:

🤣🤣🤣

Cheers, Mr Spellcheck.

Great contribution as usual. 👏

[Weston Super Saint]

3 minutes ago, aintforever said:

Cheers, Mr Spellcheck.

Great contribution as usual. 👏

You're welcome.  Not rocket science though is it?

[badgerx16]

1 hour ago, Weston Super Saint said:

Not rocket science though is it?

One of the physics teachers at Lancaster Grammar used to work at NASA. His coffee cup says "It's not rocket science.....Oh, actually it is".

[aintforever]

1 hour ago, Weston Super Saint said:

You're welcome.  Not rocket science though is it?

No, it's being too busy to check what I write.

You not got any floors to sweep?

[Weston Super Saint]

45 minutes ago, aintforever said:

No, it's being too busy to check what I write.

You not got any floors to sweep?

That's the excuse all thickos use.

[Whitey Grandad]

9 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

They did and they did.

However, in a theoretical World, how would your 'logic' explain the thinking behind the lockdowns ?

I heard one train of thought today, common amongst accountants, that it’s all been part of a combined effort by larger companies to put smaller companies out of business. The same could be said about Brexit. 
 

All just speculation of course but the effect of all these setbacks has been to make smaller businesses unviable.

[badgerx16]

14 minutes ago, Whitey Grandad said:

I heard one train of thought today, common amongst accountants, that it’s all been part of a combined effort by larger companies to put smaller companies out of business. The same could be said about Brexit. 
 

All just speculation of course but the effect of all these setbacks has been to make smaller businesses unviable.

Bilderberg, the unelected World Government.

[AlexLaw76]

On 16/06/2023 at 12:57, badgerx16 said:

In which case we come back round to the question ; If they knew that Covid wasn't as virulent as they were telling us, why did they say it, and what did they expect to gain by the lockdowns ? Surely they didn't want to intentionally tank the Global economy ?

This is how scared they were at the time

 

[badgerx16]

1 hour ago, AlexLaw76 said:

This is how scared they were at the time

 

You have not answered the question, merely posted up something that confirms what we all know.

What did they expect to gain from imposing the lockdowns ? ( Remember, this was not just the UK, but practically every nation on the planet ),

[AlexLaw76]

12 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

You have not answered the question, merely posted up something that confirms what we all know.

What did they expect to gain from imposing the lockdowns ? ( Remember, this was not just the UK, but practically every nation on the planet ),

The PM at the time did not want to lockdown. The 500k deaths prediction made its way to the public forum (and professor pants down could not believe his luck, despite not being the slightest bit worried himself).

All other governments were locking down, we had the pictures in Italy and the the clips (clearly bullshit) of people collapsing in the street in Wuhan. Johnson had to do it, or he would have been 'removed', with the fallout and carnage that came with it. Thankfully, before the xmas 20 lockdown came about, enough MPs could see through it (omicron was going to kill us all, remember?)

Those at the centre were not the slightest bit scared whatsoever.......evidently

I am sure more of this will come out, and more people will realise that it all went way over the top in the end. 

Edited 17 June, 2023 by AlexLaw76

[aintforever]

47 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

The PM at the time did not want to lockdown. The 500k deaths prediction made its way to the public forum (and professor pants down could not believe his luck, despite not being the slightest bit worried himself).

All other governments were locking down, we had the pictures in Italy and the the clips (clearly bullshit) of people collapsing in the street in Wuhan. Johnson had to do it, or he would have been 'removed', with the fallout and carnage that came with it. Thankfully, before the xmas 20 lockdown came about, enough MPs could see through it (omicron was going to kill us all, remember?)

Those at the centre were not the slightest bit scared whatsoever.......evidently

I am sure more of this will come out, and more people will realise that it all went way over the top in the end. 

You still haven’t answered the question. What would any government have to gain from enforcing lockdowns that they knew were not necessary?

[badgerx16]

21 minutes ago, aintforever said:

You still haven’t answered the question. What would any government have to gain from enforcing lockdowns that they knew were not necessary?

His Twatter feed doesn't cover rational consideration of the issue.

[badgerx16]

1 hour ago, AlexLaw76 said:

The PM at the time did not want to lockdown. The 500k deaths prediction made its way to the public forum (and professor pants down could not believe his luck, despite not being the slightest bit worried himself).

All other governments were locking down, we had the pictures in Italy and the the clips (clearly bullshit) of people collapsing in the street in Wuhan. Johnson had to do it, or he would have been 'removed', with the fallout and carnage that came with it. Thankfully, before the xmas 20 lockdown came about, enough MPs could see through it (omicron was going to kill us all, remember?)

Those at the centre were not the slightest bit scared whatsoever.......evidently

I am sure more of this will come out, and more people will realise that it all went way over the top in the end. 

Come on, try to answer the questions ; Who planned, initiated, and controlled the Global imposition of lockdowns ? Who had the necessary influence over so many disparate political regimes ? What did they expect to gain from doing this ?

[Picard]

3 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

Come on, try to answer the questions ; Who planned, initiated, and controlled the Global imposition of lockdowns ? Who had the necessary influence over so many disparate political regimes ? What did they expect to gain from doing this ?

WHO planned, initiated, and controlled the Global imposition of lockdowns. WHO had the necessary influence over so many disparate political regimes.

[east-stand-nic]

10 hours ago, AlexLaw76 said:

This is how scared they were at the time

 

This is the point I have been trying to make but it seems to have had the wooosh effect on most asking me irrelevant questions back. The fact of the matter is very clear. The governments and elite took risks with their own health which they would NOT have done had this have been a really deadly virus. They knew it was not, hence the risks they took. This was simply an exercise/test to see how much control they can hold over the populations.

Of course, only time will tell when they do it again, which they will in some sort of guise. And once again, the people in the main will happily give up their freedoms in the name of protection. Search for the video from the US senate meetings where a Chief exec of twitter admitted they were being run by the CIA and FBI etc., during covid. They admitted they were ordered to censor anything that went against the narative. That is a fact. Proven and admitted. Then ask yourself, why did they feel the need to do this?

[aintforever]

An exercise of control. 😂

[AlexLaw76]

8 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

Come on, try to answer the questions ; Who planned, initiated, and controlled the Global imposition of lockdowns ? Who had the necessary influence over so many disparate political regimes ? What did they expect to gain from doing this ?

Was there some sort of global conspiracy? Nope. Just governments/leaders who did not know what to do...and as 2020 moved on, different nations moved in different directions.

This country, people seem to want to be locked down. Remember the fury from the media at the daily prezzers because you could maybe have a scotch egg if you have a drink...Labour wanted more, harder, longer, deeper lockdown at every instance. People claimed we were plague island and those with deeper lockdowns were faring better. 

The whole thing became a mess, and thankfully many MPs had enough and stopped another lockdown late 2020 when we were told omicron was going to destroy us all. It was hilarious bollox, but people lapped it up...At the same time those at the centre were not worried in the slightest. Even Doctors and Nurses were not worried, whilst they made another TikTok....

It became a complete and total farce..but hey, Eat out to help out killed granny, right?

Edited 18 June, 2023 by AlexLaw76

[aintforever]

32 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

Was there some sort of global conspiracy? Nope. Just governments/leaders who did not know what to do...and as 2020 moved on, different nations moved in different directions.

This country, people seem to want to be locked down. Remember the fury from the media at the daily prezzers because you could maybe have a scotch egg if you have a drink...Labour wanted more, harder, longer, deeper lockdown at every instance. People claimed we were plague island and those with deeper lockdowns were faring better. 

The whole thing became a mess, and thankfully many MPs had enough and stopped another lockdown late 2020 when we were told omicron was going to destroy us all. It was hilarious bollox, but people lapped it up...At the same time those at the centre were not worried in the slightest. Even Doctors and Nurses were not worried, whilst they made another TikTok....

It became a complete and total farce..but hey, Eat out to help out killed granny, right?

That still doesn’t answer the question. If the government knew there was no risk why lockdown?