Jump to content

Is it okay for Saints players to dive and cheat?


the stain

Recommended Posts

A) I don't condone diving but accept that it is a regular occurrence !

B) Nigel said in his after match interview that he expects good behaviour from his players in this respect, seems a reasonable assumption that it will be discussed in the routine analysis !

C) Please note the word 'maybe' and be aware that flowery language is often used to emphasise a point.

If you seriously think that I expect anyone to self harm then I honestly believe that you are the daft one, not me !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So it's not ok for JR to look to avoid injury, which he plainly did? And people would rather he was injured and perhaps never the same player again just so we got a clean penalty rather than one given by a referee for either: a mistake on behalf of the referee or a mistake on the part of the referee (I'll leave the smart people to get that straight away and the rest of you to have an aneurysm over it). The decision was made by the referee. JR didn't appeal for it.

 

JR did say that he didn't dive. I believe the only dive was evasive, not one aimed to gain an unfair advantage.

 

Is it ok for a Saints player to dive? No.

 

But there was less furore over Suarez' s handling of a ball that put Macclesfield (?) out of the FA Cup when it was deemed that it was up to the referee to make the decision than there has been by the BBC with this particular case when surely the same principle applies.

 

BBC pundits with the exception of a very few are useless (vnts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looked like a dive on TV. To me the only question is whether he dived to gain a penalty or dived to avoid the lunge from the Villa player. The difference being the first is cheating and the 2nd is self-preservation.

If it is the latter, what was he meant to do let the guy just hack into his ankle/leg and then join the list of other Saints players on the injury list? It looks to me like his right leg was the weight-bearing leg and if you move that out of the way to avoid injury then you are going to fall over!

Being a glass half-full type of person I'll give him the benefit of the doubt this time. The ref is the one who has to make the call. There have been loads of bad calls in our games this year and this is one of the first that have actually gone in our favour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So it's not ok for JR to look to avoid injury, which he plainly did? And people would rather he was injured and perhaps never the same player again just so we got a clean penalty rather than one given by a referee for either: a mistake on behalf of the referee or a mistake on the part of the referee (I'll leave the smart people to get that straight away and the rest of you to have an aneurysm over it). The decision was made by the referee. JR didn't appeal for it.

 

JR did say that he didn't dive. I believe the only dive was evasive, not one aimed to gain an unfair advantage.

 

Is it ok for a Saints player to dive? No.

 

But there was less furore over Suarez' s handling of a ball that put Macclesfield (?) out of the FA Cup when it was deemed that it was up to the referee to make the decision than there has been by the BBC with this particular case when surely the same principle applies.

 

BBC pundits with the exception of a very few are useless (vnts.

 

Where did he avoid injury? The defenders leg was fully extended.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sorry that was not marginal, that was falling to the ground, do you avoid injury like that?

 

Stand on one leg. Now imagine someone is going to kick you in the shins on your standing leg and try and move it out of the way.

 

Let me know the result. :)

 

Now bear in mind that Rodriguez was running at the time and wouldn't have time to put his other leg down and this all happens in a split second.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're assuming Rodriguez had time to assess how close the defender was going to get to him. When someone lunges at you you react instinctively rather than with hindsight.

 

By falling over like you have been shot? Opportunistic and also cheating, deception I think its called, he was seen stating he didn't dive, so he avoided possible injury? Is that normal behaviour for someone trying to evade injury?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By falling over like you have been shot? Opportunistic and also cheating, deception I think its called, he was seen stating he didn't dive, so he avoided possible injury? Is that normal behaviour for someone trying to evade injury?

 

No idea. I'm not as expert as some on here so will stick with my hunch that Rodriguez didn't try and con the ref into giving a penalty.

Edited by trousers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No idea. I'm not as expert as some on here so will stick with my hunch that Rodriguez didn't try and con the rev into giving a penalty.

 

So you are sticking to the theory of he avoided a possible injury by diving to the floor which mirrors/looks like he has been fouled/tripped in the penalty area, good hunch that, I wonder if you use that hunch for all players and all situations...........................

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you are sticking to the theory of he avoided a possible injury by diving to the floor which mirrors/looks like he has been fouled/tripped in the penalty area, good hunch that, I wonder if you use that hunch for all players and all situations...........................

 

Yep

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont dont see the point in apologising etc.in a season S**t happens!

 

You get some good decisons and you get some bad ones! JR had what looked like a perfectly good goal disallowed for a dubuios offside recently as did Puncheon for a very innocuous push by Yoshida on the keeper. We have had countless good calls for a penalty turned down. We have even had players booked for diving when there was obvious contact because the ref's bottled the penalty call!

 

So yesterday we got one that on reflection wasnt right? why do we have to apologise?

 

Will Wenger apologise for Wilishire encouraging the ref to send of Kompany yesterday when replays showed it to be a perfectly god tackle? I think not!

 

The FA should introduce television replays like rugby and tennis to help referees until that happens it is what it is and generally poor decisons balance out over time!

 

This diving saga is taking away credit for a damn good performance by Saints. When all that matters is we got the 3 points we deserved for a change

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe Rodriguez learned his technique from Paul Lambert?

 

At 2:30 minutes in

Seems a bit hypocritical for him to complain. ;o)

 

 

a good look at that convinces me that PL was a master of that particular "art". Talk about " the pot calling the kettle black "......

 

The third " slow motion replay "after the incident shows him clearly going down...... before he comes into contact with the defender, and then claims a penalty..... Fooled the ref. totally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember reading some professors study into diving a few years back, apparently there is no natural way of falling that causes the limps to rise into the air after the fall. I'd like to think the best of Jay, but watching the video again, i think he has (at minimum) decided to milk the situation, by flailing his legs about.

Sent from my Lumia 800 using Board Express

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The FA should introduce television replays like rugby and tennis to help referees until that happens it is what it is and generally poor decisons balance out over time!

 

This diving saga is taking away credit for a damn good performance by Saints. When all that matters is we got the 3 points we deserved for a change

 

 

 

a valid point I have highlighted many times in the past, but Mr.Blatter doesn't see it that way and he thinks it takes away the credibility from referees.

 

The opposite is true - when the ref. makes a genuine mistake, or "bottles" the decision.......it only brings him and the game into more disrepute, when all TV fans can see what really happened.

 

Goal-line cameras are a small step forward, but that sort of incident happens only a few times each season.......penalty shouts, off the ball fouling and the like are a regular occurance in every match, thats where the attention should be paid. If I can watch a game on TV ....with replays.....and see what really happened.....then so too could a fourth official sat in front of a TV monitor.

 

NO, Mr.Blatter..it doesn't delay the progress of the game ....it's a 10 second delay to see the incident.

Much more time is " lost / wasted " in taking corners, free-kicks, goal-kicks and throw-ins, whereas "penalty incidents " ....often change the course of a match. If a penalty is " legit ", everyone should see it is.

 

So....why do we still play games in the " high.tech " 21st century ..... with out-dated 19th century ethical values., when most other sports have accepted the principle.

Edited by david in sweden
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe Rodriguez learned his technique from Paul Lambert?

 

At 2:30 minutes in

 

Seems a bit hypocritical for him to complain. ;o)

 

What a great find. Did Lambert admit that he had dived, or did he go down to avoid injury from the tackle that was coming in? It's just a simple rule in life's rich tapestry; what goes around comes around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adkins came under some serious and quite unfair pressure from the press. He handled it fairly well and considered his words which were quite clear - we don't condone diving at the club, the player did not intentionally dive but went down instinctively when presented with a lunging defender, JRod did not claim a pen - the Ref awarded it.

 

The context of course in all of this is that the incident happened in a split second - everything would have been instinctive - the game is played at a brutal pace. So all those who are slamming JRod from their armchairs should try to imagine those circumstances. Harsh decisions are seen in EVERY Prem game - it's the nature of things and until there is a sea change in the manner in which games are managed (i.e. TV replays etc), then controversy will stay with the game. I just hope pundits from the press make such a song and dance over one of the top 3 teams players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So then wes, the next time we lose to cheating you will just say. "Ah well, what goes around comes around"

 

No one will, and we will all be going mental. Like we have every single time before

 

I will take the view that I have expressed before. That we are often victims of other teams' players diving and rolling around theatrically as if they've been shot, so why don't we get a bit more savvy ourselves to even things up a bit? On the one hand I despise these cheats and feel certain that some managers encourage it to gain an advantage, so on the other hand I'm inclined to think that justice has been done when a decision like this goes our way.

 

In this case, as I've already said, I feel that Ramirez's goal at Arsenal should not have been disallowed and therefore the referee's decision at Villa is just such a case of what goes around comes around. To put it another way that is more prevalent as a similar opinion, these things even themselves up during the course of a season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definite dive and I wish it wasn't part of the game, but if its a choice between 0-0 draw without the dive and 1-0 win with it - I'll take the win every time. We will be on the receiving end of it plenty of times, and there have been a couple of stonewallers we haven't been given this year, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've looked at this several times and I'm still not sure, his reaction was odd as he claimed nothing but then I can't really see why he went down. I also agree a bit with Lambert, the challenge was awful and was stupid to do in the box. If you challenge like that you are asking for trouble.

 

Thought the ref gave it for the challenge by the keeper on Puncheon though?

 

Also it's swings and roundabouts for me, Lowton should have been sent off for his challenge on Ramirez but the ref didn't see it. We get a bit off the luck and they got a bit of luck. Still think we deserved the win as Villa didn't play until the last 15 minutes.

 

If the same had happened to us I'd be annoyed but at the same time I'd be annoyed as to why we played so crap at home against another relegation team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fellow fans deflect with other instances that bare no relevance to what happened on Saturday, who cares that Lambert did it, this is a case of Rodriguez being opportunistic and successfully cheating the ref, getting out of the way of a tackle in these circumstances is the new phenomemon/excuse when people have been awarded penalties in these situations, no fan of football can condone this as its cheating and ****ing sly to be honest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fellow fans deflect with other instances that bare no relevance to what happened on Saturday, who cares that Lambert did it, this is a case of Rodriguez being opportunistic and successfully cheating the ref, getting out of the way of a tackle in these circumstances is the new phenomemon/excuse when people have been awarded penalties in these situations, no fan of football can condone this as its cheating and ****ing sly to be honest.

 

I disagree

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fellow fans deflect with other instances that bare no relevance to what happened on Saturday, who cares that Lambert did it, this is a case of Rodriguez being opportunistic and successfully cheating the ref, getting out of the way of a tackle in these circumstances is the new phenomemon/excuse when people have been awarded penalties in these situations, no fan of football can condone this as its cheating and ****ing sly to be honest.

 

3 points. Thank you very much. Nothing more to say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Over 300 posts on this. Blimey, have we nothing better to worry about, like the fact we NEEDED a dive to win the Villa game ?

 

How do we know for sure that the game would've taken the same course had Saints not been awarded a penalty at that stage of the game?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adkins came under some serious and quite unfair pressure from the press. He handled it fairly well and considered his words which were quite clear - we don't condone diving at the club, the player did not intentionally dive but went down instinctively when presented with a lunging defender, JRod did not claim a pen - the Ref awarded it.

 

The context of course in all of this is that the incident happened in a split second - everything would have been instinctive - the game is played at a brutal pace. So all those who are slamming JRod from their armchairs should try to imagine those circumstances. Harsh decisions are seen in EVERY Prem game - it's the nature of things and until there is a sea change in the manner in which games are managed (i.e. TV replays etc), then controversy will stay with the game. I just hope pundits from the press make such a song and dance over one of the top 3 teams players.

 

This is it in a nutshell. Also J-Rod didn't do the rolling around appealing for a pen thing, so he gets the benefit of the doubt for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my opinion he dived. The avoiding injury line doesnt add up for me as his other leg goes to jelly to send him to the turf.

 

I dont like diving and dont want to see players at my club do it. On the other hand, we talk of all this learning that we need to do and adapting to the Premier League. Every other club seems to do it, just another lesson we have learnt perhaps.

 

I think its funny also how literally everyone (MOTD, Goals on Sunday etc) ignore the fact Halsey has said the penalty was for the Guzan challenge on Puncheon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fellow fans deflect with other instances that bare no relevance to what happened on Saturday, who cares that Lambert did it, this is a case of Rodriguez being opportunistic and successfully cheating the ref, getting out of the way of a tackle in these circumstances is the new phenomemon/excuse when people have been awarded penalties in these situations, no fan of football can condone this as its cheating and ****ing sly to be honest.

 

I think you need to accept that some people have a different opinion on this.

 

I have seen a few dives from Lallana and other Saints players in recent seasons which have been quite frankly embarrassing but this for me was different. IMO uppermost in JRod's mind was to nick the ball away from the defender and avoid the oncoming challenge. By doing this (and you need to look at the position of his left leg), then he could do nothing but go down. It was not a penalty, quite clearly, but I don't think you can blame the ref as from his position it looked like one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think its funny also how literally everyone (MOTD, Goals on Sunday etc) ignore the fact Halsey has said the penalty was for the Guzan challenge on Puncheon.

 

 

As I said yesterday the OS gallery images 9 through 12 clearly show Guzan bringing down Puncheon, that's a foul, it's in the box therefore it's a penalty. I presume those very detailed and clear sequential frames are on the gallery for that purpose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...