Dig Dig Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 Well..... does he? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westmidlandsaint Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 No..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dig Dig Posted 1 April, 2013 Author Share Posted 1 April, 2013 Thanks..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulwantsapint Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 To be honest if the team keep performing like they have recently I don't care if the car park attendants/burger van workers pick the team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lloydie Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 Sh*t thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Le God Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 Does Cortese Still Pick the Team? Well..... does he? Do you have even the slightest shred of evidence he ever has? Thread ends. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dig Dig Posted 1 April, 2013 Author Share Posted 1 April, 2013 Listen Lloyd, it was all the range a few months ago to suggest that Cortese was picking the team, interesting to hear if anyone still believes this. So keep your stinky registered user comments to yourself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dig Dig Posted 1 April, 2013 Author Share Posted 1 April, 2013 Do you have even the slightest shred of evidence he ever has? Thread ends. Matthew Le Tissier and Francis Benali on Soccer Saturday were both saying that they have heard that there is 'interference from above' re team selection when we were under Adkins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Garrett Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 On a side note, I was watching Goals on Sunday yesterday and Brian Mcdermott was on it. He said that he wasn't expecting to be sacked when he was asked to go in at 3pm on the monday for a meeting and was expecting it just to be a discussion about who was going to be in the team for the Man Utd game. Thought it was a bit odd... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crab Lungs Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 Matthew Le Tissier and Francis Benali on Soccer Saturday were both saying that they have heard that there is 'interference from above' re team selection when we were under Adkins. I'd imagine that was Cortese gently reminding him that we have Artur Boruc kicking his heels in reserve... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saints_is_the_south Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 On a side note, I was watching Goals on Sunday yesterday and Brian Mcdermott was on it. He said that he wasn't expecting to be sacked when he was asked to go in at 3pm on the monday for a meeting and was expecting it just to be a discussion about who was going to be in the team for the Man Utd game. Thought it was a bit odd... Yeah I found that a bit weird too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captainchris Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 **** thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VectisSaint Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 Well..... does he? No, he has evidently delegated the task to the committee members of the Cult of Cortese. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shurlock Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 Maybe our ITKers can tell us.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kpturner Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 Matthew Le Tissier and Francis Benali on Soccer Saturday were both saying that they have heard that there is 'interference from above' re team selection when we were under Adkins. I have a lot of time for both guys but I would take their negative comments about the chairman with a pinch of salt. They are not exactly objective. ...and in answer to to the OP - no! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry Sanchez Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 Has less of an influence but still has some I would say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
niceandfriendly Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 He picks the team when we're losing and it's all his fault, but when we're doing well oooh no he doesn't pick the team. But you just wait until we lose!! Then we know nasty nic will have been at work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry Sanchez Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 I have a lot of time for both guys but I would take their negative comments about the chairman with a pinch of salt. They are not exactly objective. ...and in answer to to the OP - no! You take their comments with a pinch of salt as they are not objective? What about an element of truth? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kpturner Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 You take their comments with a pinch of salt as they are not objective? What about an element of truth? What about it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearsy Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 On a side note, I was watching Goals on Sunday yesterday and Brian Mcdermott was on it. He said that he wasn't expecting to be sacked when he was asked to go in at 3pm on the monday for a meeting and was expecting it just to be a discussion about who was going to be in the team for the Man Utd game. Thought it was a bit odd... Why is that odd G? I i was football chairman I'd be wanting to know bout managers plans in advance so i could decide if he was bell end needing the ole sack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry Sanchez Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 What about it? So in short you only take on board what you class as objective regardless of truth? So in theory someone could say to you "The invaders are over there and are about to break through our defences!" "I dont need to know that, give me something to work with?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Charlie Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 Valid question, and overdue comeback post for the OP. Where had you been? Banned? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kpturner Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 So in short you only take on board what you class as objective regardless of truth? So in theory someone could say to you "The invaders are over there and are about to break through our defences!" "I dont need to know that, give me something to work with?" Yes of course. Fantastic (over) analysis and a wonderfully illustrative example to boot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swannymere Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 If he is picking the team i hope he's deducting some of the managers wages. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miltonroader07 Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 Do you have even the slightest shred of evidence he ever has? Thread ends. Yeah got to agree, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
70's Mike Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 and the point of this thread is ??????????????????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dig Dig Posted 1 April, 2013 Author Share Posted 1 April, 2013 and the point of this thread is ??????????????????? Does Cortese pick the team? Clue is in the thread title Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
70's Mike Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 Does Cortese pick the team? Clue is in the thread title which imo is a stupid question that no one on here can answer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wopper Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 Who cares ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dibden Purlieu Saint Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 Listen Lloyd, it was all the range a few months ago to suggest that Cortese was picking the team, interesting to hear if anyone still believes this. So keep your stinky registered user comments to yourself. Who ever said he did? Be interesting to know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ottery st mary Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 (edited) Just spoken to Uncle Nic and he states that NA will continue picking the side until the end of the season... Should be interesting selection for the Reading game. He also said..... you can believe that as much as you believe the shiiite, that some of the AAARRRRSOLES on this forum or the other tosssers who want to cause trouble at Saints. COYS Now Rupert...that was a different storeeee:p...Tracksuit , Clip board ,chalk board, abacus to keep score of the goals.. Edited 1 April, 2013 by ottery st mary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glasgow_Saint Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 Remember the "Guly must play 15 minutes" rumour Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ottery st mary Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 Or the instructions he gave NA.....that King Artur plays every game unless he feels dizzy at any time.... Or he would send him out to Reading:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToreSF Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 Has less of an influence but still has some I would say. You are priceless! Based on what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richardc Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 if you have ever watched that documentary about QPR then nutter chairman definitely influence team selections including ringing the manager during games to influence substitutions. The manager was summoned pretty much after every defeat to justify team selections. Not that I'm suggesting our chairman is a nutter;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Without a Halo Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 if he does he is doing a good job then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Kraken Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 I've heard that Cortese does still pick the team, but only for midweek games and Sunday kick-offs. The Chelsea game was all Pochettino's work. The plan is to integrate MP into the job gradually, so that by next November or December Cortese will only pick the team for one-off games of his choosing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry Sanchez Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 You are priceless! Based on what? Based on the fact he signed Ramirez, based on the fact he purchased Mayuka, based on the fact he bought Guly, I would say its a safe bet to say he has some influence on the first team, not so much now but when Adkins was in charge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CB Saint Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 Matthew Le Tissier and Francis Benali on Soccer Saturday were both saying that they have heard that there is 'interference from above' re team selection when we were under Adkins. That was probably when adkins was insisting on selecting gazza over boruc. I'd bloody interfere too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Kraken Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 When we played Sunderland, and Mayuka suddenly was chosen to play up front. Now THAT was a completely bizarre selection that raises the odd question or two for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Charlie Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 When we played Sunderland, and Mayuka suddenly was chosen to play up front. Now THAT was a completely bizarre selection that raises the odd question or two for me. NA said he had been on fire in training and Sunderlands CB pairing was very slow. He didnt do a bad job either, no service in that game to him or RL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Without a Halo Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 (edited) Based on the fact he signed Ramirez, based on the fact he purchased Mayuka, based on the fact he bought Guly, I would say its a safe bet to say he has some influence on the first team, not so much now but when Adkins was in charge. So why has he formed a Transfer committee if he intended to go about buying players on a whim? surely he wouldn't need to given he effectively has the owning families power of attorney to do what he feels is right for them! The fact he formed one tells me he recognises he is not qualified himself and needs good advice! Edited 1 April, 2013 by Saint Without a Halo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Kraken Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 NA said he had been on fire in training and Sunderlands CB pairing was very slow. He didnt do a bad job either, no service in that game to him or RL. I must have watched a different game, he was absolutely appalling and achieved nothing, leading to him getting subbed for Steve de Ridder after less than an hour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Kraken Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 So why has he formed a Transfer committee if he intended to go about buying players on a whim? surely he wouldn't need to given he effectively has the Owning families power of attorney to do what we feels is right for them! The fact he formed one tells me he recognises he is not qualified himself and needs good advice! Adkins said at the time that he knew very little about Ramirez and the deal that was being done to get him, indicating he'd had no input in the selection of the player. So its not exactly unknown for the committee to have made player choices over the manager's head. Nor with the previous regime either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eurosaint Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 Listen Lloyd, it was all the range a few months ago to suggest that Cortese was picking the team, interesting to hear if anyone still believes this. So keep your stinky registered user comments to yourself. Was that the kitchen range or the driving range ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VectisSaint Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 Adkins said at the time that he knew very little about Ramirez and the deal that was being done to get him, indicating he'd had no input in the selection of the player. So its not exactly unknown for the committee to have made player choices over the manager's head. Nor with the previous regime either. There is a world of difference between going and finding a player of the type that the manager in discussions with the transfer committee has indicated would be good, and choosing the team on a weekly basis. All clubs do the former. I don't think you can draw the conclusion you have from the comments Adkins made, just that he knew little about the specific player, whether he knew anything about the deal itself is irrelevant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Kraken Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 There is a world of difference between going and finding a player of the type that the manager in discussions with the transfer committee has indicated would be good, and choosing the team on a weekly basis. All clubs do the former. I don't think you can draw the conclusion you have from the comments Adkins made, just that he knew little about the specific player, whether he knew anything about the deal itself is irrelevant. Actually I think I can draw that conclusion. Cortese/Reed were in negotitations for Ramirez and Adkins plainly knew nothing about the player early on, or about the state of the transfer. His comments were something like "from the sounds of it he's a good player"; he'd quite obviously not been party to any detailed analysis whatsoever. I don't know why some people think that's an attack on the club that they have to defend. Lowe brought in Crouch and Niemi over his managers' heads, so it can work. Strachan didn't want Niemi (think he wanted Craig Gordon) but Lowe refused and got his man. It happens, sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. But its fair game to criticise when it doesn't work, just as one would citicise a manager for a poor signing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greenridge Posted 1 April, 2013 Share Posted 1 April, 2013 As Guly has been conspicuous by his absence around the 75 minute mark I think we can safely assume he's no longer picking the team. Or may be he is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david in sweden Posted 2 April, 2013 Share Posted 2 April, 2013 Historically.....there are many cases of Chairman .." buying a player " without consulting his manager.... I recall Gordon Strachan arriving at the same time as Agustin Delgado..and when asked about the signing said (politely)....." it was a done deal when I'd arrived ". The yoghurt quote came later. Although, there are disputes about exactly who we are speaking about?.....it seems that several of our summer signings were made by " the Committee " and without reference to NA. If we assume that we "sourced " players who would" fit our formation," then I'm sure NC would have asked NA why he wasn't using player A, B or C. ...whilst NA persisted with his " own favourites". The "enforced " signing of Boruc was long overdue, and I still cannot understand why NA persisted with Gazzaniga when it was obvious to many that he was nowhere near the "real thing ". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sour Mash Posted 2 April, 2013 Share Posted 2 April, 2013 I'd suggest that there is still influence from above, the inclusion of JWP as an inapropriate sub at times suggests there is pressure to get as many academy products into the first team as possible. There is probably more harmony now though, as MP has been picked to specifically play a certain way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now