Jump to content

Things That are Racist


Turkish
 Share

Recommended Posts

34 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

My point is that it is all just story telling and humans character playing. I can’t recall but did we all kick off about this production three years ago? I am sure you are aware that various Shakespearean productions have been staged in more modern dress so your Kappa things falls flat by the way.

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/anne-boleyn-jodie-turner-smith-motherhood-193329705.html#:~:text=And that starts with the,Anne%3A Jodie Turner-Smith.
 

Also whilst on the subject, a black actress playing Juliet is causing distress amongst some…

https://amp.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/national/article287419930.html

 

 

Out of interest, where do you stand on the cultural appropriation argument?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sadoldgit said:

And talking “logically” Ducky, surely it is down to the production team to present their material artistically in any way they chose?

“Logically” why would you keep asking a bloke you’ve got on ignore questions? 
 

For all your woke signalling I bet you’d have kicked up a fuss if they’d cast a black man in your life story.


 

 

F86882DE-C9A8-4D6B-95D7-709B4E23F465.jpeg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Lord Duckhunter said:

“Logically” why would you keep asking a bloke you’ve got on ignore questions? 
 

For all your woke signalling I bet you’d have kicked up a fuss if they’d cast a black man in your life story.


 

 

F86882DE-C9A8-4D6B-95D7-709B4E23F465.jpeg

Imagine he’d be up in arms if Steven Spielberg was director too. Although might be hard to sell as a blockbuster movie

Edited by whelk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AlexLaw76 said:

image.thumb.png.222a43022fc265da1cde93092cc05ecc.png

And here is what the report actually says:

"(iv) The Working Group acknowledge there are potential risks for employers, service delivery and workers. **However, the Working Group express their confidence those risks can be managed and mitigated, if a 4-Day Week is properly planned for, and if it is designed and implemented in full consultation with workers and their trade union representatives.**

(v) The Working Group considers the risks to manage and mitigate include:

>Equality risks: The risk of widening existing inequalities between groups of workers i.e. office workers versus those on the frontline, particularly in 24/7 operations. Given the different gender, race and other characteristics of different workforces in the public sector, there is potential for negative and differential impacts on particular protected characteristics. In some circumstances, worker entitlements to welfare benefits may also be put at risk."

So this is just some shitty paper headline. Probably mail or telegraph. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, pingpong said:

And here is what the report actually says:

"(iv) The Working Group acknowledge there are potential risks for employers, service delivery and workers. **However, the Working Group express their confidence those risks can be managed and mitigated, if a 4-Day Week is properly planned for, and if it is designed and implemented in full consultation with workers and their trade union representatives.**

(v) The Working Group considers the risks to manage and mitigate include:

>Equality risks: The risk of widening existing inequalities between groups of workers i.e. office workers versus those on the frontline, particularly in 24/7 operations. Given the different gender, race and other characteristics of different workforces in the public sector, there is potential for negative and differential impacts on particular protected characteristics. In some circumstances, worker entitlements to welfare benefits may also be put at risk."

So this is just some shitty paper headline. Probably mail or telegraph. 

 

Noah Eastwood writes for the Torygraph.

Edited by badgerx16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Weston Super Saint said:

Not banning pupils from praying in school, apparently...

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-68731366

 

As the report says, the school is a "free"' school and not under Local Authority control, as such it can make it's own rules and does not allow any religious observance on the premises. The pupil in this case, and her parents, knew this before enrolling, as did the rest of the large proportion of Muslim students attending.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 07/04/2024 at 09:57, revolution saint said:

Out of interest, where do you stand on the cultural appropriation argument?

It’s nonsense. Cultural appropriation has been going on as long as migration. I enjoy eating and making curries, so what? We are all human beings and we all interact and share experiences. 
When I was a kid everyone wanted a Mop Top cut to look like The Beatles and no mention the cultural appropriation from the Merseybeat scene. If you were white and supported a ‘fro because you liked black music why is that any different?

If you are running a drama department in an inner London school, what do you do if you want to put on a production of Henry 1V part 1? Exclude half of your team because they do have not  have the culturally appropriate skin colour?

I just hope that any future actors who want a roll in a Tudor production take their family trees going back to the Middle Ages along to the auditions so that us viewers can rest easy in the knowledge that the cast is culturally authentic. 😉

It was mentioned earlier about Daniel Craig playing Nelson Mandela. His ethnicity was a central part of who and what he was as a character and shaped his life so no, I don’t think a white person should be playing that roll. A few black actors playing supporting roles in a dramatisation of an historical event from the Tudor era isn’t really comparable but if it upsets people, they don’t need to watch it.

Where do you draw the line? You can’t play Shylock if you are not Jewish?

One of the actors made a very valid point. She said it is not about her skin colour but what she could bring to the roll as an actor. I look forward to the day when we stop talking about what divides (some of) us and focus on what we share in common. Basic  humanity.
 

 

 

Edited by sadoldgit
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, sadoldgit said:

 A few black actors playing supporting roles in a dramatisation of an historical event from the Tudor era .......

Anne Boleyn and Jane Seymour were Queens of England, hardly "supporting roles".

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to make sure I have this correct:

Black 16th century European queens - Not a problem.

White voice actor who you can’t even see on screen affects a regional Indian accent in the Simpsons - Disgusting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, sadoldgit said:

When I was a kid everyone wanted a Mop Top cut to look like The Beatles and no mention the cultural appropriation from the Merseybeat scene.

They were German hair cuts. Im surprised you didn’t know that given your incredible knowledge of German fashion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, sadoldgit said:

 I don’t think a white person should be playing that roll. 


 

One of the actors made a very valid point. She said it is not about her skin colour but what she could bring to the roll as an actor. 

So the bird made a “valid point”, that totally contradicts your point? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 16/04/2024 at 14:15, sadoldgit said:

It’s nonsense. Cultural appropriation has been going on as long as migration. I enjoy eating and making curries, so what? We are all human beings and we all interact and share experiences. 
When I was a kid everyone wanted a Mop Top cut to look like The Beatles and no mention the cultural appropriation from the Merseybeat scene. If you were white and supported a ‘fro because you liked black music why is that any different?

If you are running a drama department in an inner London school, what do you do if you want to put on a production of Henry 1V part 1? Exclude half of your team because they do have not  have the culturally appropriate skin colour?

I just hope that any future actors who want a roll in a Tudor production take their family trees going back to the Middle Ages along to the auditions so that us viewers can rest easy in the knowledge that the cast is culturally authentic. 😉

It was mentioned earlier about Daniel Craig playing Nelson Mandela. His ethnicity was a central part of who and what he was as a character and shaped his life so no, I don’t think a white person should be playing that roll. A few black actors playing supporting roles in a dramatisation of an historical event from the Tudor era isn’t really comparable but if it upsets people, they don’t need to watch it.

Where do you draw the line? You can’t play Shylock if you are not Jewish?

One of the actors made a very valid point. She said it is not about her skin colour but what she could bring to the roll as an actor. I look forward to the day when we stop talking about what divides (some of) us and focus on what we share in common. Basic  humanity.
 

 

 

Seems like you’re very much in favour of it not being acceptable for actors to portray people of a different race in some circumstances and able to draw your own line whilst also arguing that it shouldn’t be an issue at all or we’d end up needing to debate where the line is drawn…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, ChrisPY said:

Seems like you’re very much in favour of it not being acceptable for actors to portray people of a different race in some circumstances and able to draw your own line whilst also arguing that it shouldn’t be an issue at all or we’d end up needing to debate where the line is drawn…

I bet you like Katie Hopkins and hate Muslims

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ChrisPY said:

Seems like you’re very much in favour of it not being acceptable for actors to portray people of a different race in some circumstances and able to draw your own line whilst also arguing that it shouldn’t be an issue at all or we’d end up needing to debate where the line is drawn…

Hardly my own line is it. It is the production team from Wolf Hall who are responsible for the casting isn’t it?

Look, it is just an opinion but I can see that it wouldn’t work in certain cases for what are clearly obvious reasons. Would it be better if the actors played it in white face? It wasn’t a big deal when Olivier played Othello in blackface was it? Of course it would happen now but haven’t we grown up a bit and can make the distinction where it would be inappropriate and when it isn’t for certain actors with certain skin tones to play certain parts? 

Maybe not, but Jodie Turner-Smith (a black actor) played Anne Boleyn in a miniseries and there were no riots in the streets. She said that the aim wasn’t historical accuracy but the telling of an emotional human story. 

 

Edited by sadoldgit
Added text
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ChrisPY said:

Seems like you’re very much in favour of it not being acceptable for actors to portray people of a different race in some circumstances and able to draw your own line whilst also arguing that it shouldn’t be an issue at all or we’d end up needing to debate where the line is drawn…

If there is one thing we know about @sadoldgit is there is the right view, his view, and the wrong view, which is everyone that doesn't agree with him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sadoldgit said:

Hardly my own line is it. It is the production team from Wolf Hall who are responsible for the casting isn’t it?

Look, it is just an opinion but I can see that it wouldn’t work in certain cases for what are clearly obvious reasons.

 

What 'certain cases' ? If a black actor can play a Queen of England, why can't a white actor play MLK ? After all, Ben Kingsley played Ghandi. You either have 'colour blind' casting or you don't, it cuts both way.

Edited by badgerx16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, badgerx16 said:

What 'certain cases' ? If a black actor can play a Queen of England, why can't a white actor play MLK ? After all, Ben Kingsley played Ghandi.

Not exactly the best example to use. Ben Kingsley was born Krishna Pandit Bhanji, born in England to an English mother and ann Indian father. He has also openly admitted that he suntanned himself heavily to more “look the part” for filming Gandhi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, The Kraken said:

Not exactly the best example to use. Ben Kingsley was born Krishna Pandit Bhanji, born in England to an English mother and ann Indian father. He has also openly admitted that he suntanned himself heavily to more “look the part” for filming Gandhi.

Fair enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

What 'certain cases' ? If a black actor can play a Queen of England, why can't a white actor play MLK ? After all, Ben Kingsley played Ghandi. You either have 'colour blind' casting or you don't, it cuts both way.

Ben Kingsley has an Indian father. His birth name is Krishna Pandit Bhanji.

As I said about Nelson Mandela, there are some historical characters whose lives are shaped totally by their ethnicity. I think you would agree that Martin Luther King would be in the same bracket as Nelson Mandela. A white person playing the part of a black activist is ridiculous. A black person playing a white English Queen is just an actor playing a role. There is a big difference isn’t there?

We have had decades of white actors playing the roles of black people and using make up. I am not going to get my knickers in a twist about a few black actors playing white roles and not using make up. 

 

Edited by sadoldgit
Added text
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

A white person playing the part of a black activist is ridiculous. A black person playing a white English Queen is just an actor playing a role. There is a big difference isn’t there?

 

If, today, a white actor played a black historical character there would be uproar, but the other way around you are not allowed to even question it ? You either have 'colour blind' casting or you don't.

Edited by badgerx16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

Ben Kingsley has an Indian father. His birth name is Krishna Pandit Bhanji.

As I said about Nelson Mandela, there are some historical characters whose lives are shaped totally by their ethnicity. I think you would agree that Martin Luther King would be in the same bracket as Nelson Mandela. A white person playing the part of a black activist is ridiculous. A black person playing a white English Queen is just an actor playing a role. There is a big difference isn’t there?

We have had decades of white actors playing the roles of black people and using make up. I am not going to get my knickers in a twist about a few black actors playing white roles and not using make up. 

 

So pretty much double standards is what you're suggesting.

White British queen, one of the most famous white queens in history: just an actor playing a role.

Black human rights activist, one of the most famous black rights activist in history: not just an actor playing a role, it would be ridiculous for a white person to do so.

Seems a very blurred and very confused line there of what is and isn't acceptable.  

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Kraken said:

So pretty much double standards is what you're suggesting.

White British queen, one of the most famous white queens in history: just an actor playing a role.

Black human rights activist, one of the most famous black rights activist in history: not just an actor playing a role, it would be ridiculous for a white person to do so.

Seems a very blurred and very confused line there of what is and isn't acceptable.  

I understand colour/religion/sexuality blind casting and also protected roles. But I can't see how you can have both. It's certainly a challenge to argue a case for both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, The Kraken said:

So pretty much double standards is what you're suggesting.

White British queen, one of the most famous white queens in history: just an actor playing a role.

Black human rights activist, one of the most famous black rights activist in history: not just an actor playing a role, it would be ridiculous for a white person to do so.

Seems a very blurred and very confused line there of what is and isn't acceptable.  

An actor playing a role would for example be a black person playing James Bond. Has historically been a white male, but there is no reason on earth why it couldn't be played by a black male. 

What SOG is suggesting is, as usual, complete bollocks and double standards, as he desperately tries to keep up this facade.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

View Terms of service (Terms of Use) and Privacy Policy (Privacy Policy) and Forum Guidelines ({Guidelines})