Sheaf Saint Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 3 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said: We will win. They have ran out of players Tonda will then religiously stick to this formation for the rest of the season as a result He'll do that even if/when we lose. 1
RedArmy Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago We are in need of a massive confidence boost before next Sunday. On the front foot from the word go or they can all fuck off. 1
Sheaf Saint Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago How the holy fuck does Manning get himself picked at LWB every week FFS? How shit must Welington be in training to not manage to displace him? 5
bpsaint Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Eckert out. Even with their apparent injury crisis I expect Hull to win. 3
Mboto Gorge Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago This guy knows no other way to play, cowardly and out of his depth. Pathetic actually having someone like this in charge of a club our size. Embarrassing 7
RedArmy Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 2 minutes ago, bpsaint said: Eckert out. Even with their apparent injury crisis I expect Hull to win. They’ve still got 7 of the 11 starting that beat us earlier in the season. 4/1 could be printing money today if we play like we have been. 2
Mboto Gorge Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago We all know we don’t score in the final 30 minutes of a game and barely in the final 45. So if we are losing or drawing by 60 mins, that’ll be our lot
Turkish Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago (edited) back to 3 CBbs then 🙄 Fellows is absolutely wasted as a wing back Edited 2 hours ago by Turkish 5
saintant Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 14 minutes ago, Saint NL said: Back 5 yawnfest incoming As predictable to us as it would be for their manager. He'll have planned to play against this type of line up all week. Maybe surprise us and the opposition for once Tonda 🙂 1
AlexLaw76 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Chris Wilder is going to take Tonda to the cleaners on Weds. Such a terrible fucking manager 3
hypochondriac Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Fuck off five at the back. I fucking hate this manager. 5
pingpong Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Too adventurous again. It gets lots of chances for us, I get that, but 3 at the back leaves us too exposed, time and time again. Would rather we go 451 and control midfield, it's basics, protect the back first, especially now that we have a complete nutcase in goal.
badgerx16 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago (edited) Rasmusball again. Posession% and completed passes are way more important than goals. Edited 2 hours ago by badgerx16 2
SaintNewForest Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Tonda in his press conference "it's not my choice to play 5 at the back" All eyes on Sport Republic dictating it then. As many of us suspected. 7
saintant Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Just now, pingpong said: Too adventurous again. It gets lots of chances for us, I get that, but 3 at the back leaves us too exposed, time and time again. Would rather we go 451 and control midfield, it's basics, protect the back first, especially now that we have a complete nutcase in goal. Did you miss that he went out on loan to Stoke? He's their problem for the rest of the season.
AlexLaw76 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Just now, SaintNewForest said: Tonda in his press conference "it's not my choice to play 5 at the back" All eyes on Sport Republic dictating it then. As many of us suspected. He never said that, did he?
saintant Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Just now, SaintNewForest said: Tonda in his press conference "it's not my choice to play 5 at the back" All eyes on Sport Republic dictating it then. As many of us suspected. Actually he alluded to it being the case because of injuries. 1
Charlie Wayman Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 7 minutes ago, Sheaf Saint said: How the holy fuck does Manning get himself picked at LWB every week FFS? How shit must Welington be in training to not manage to displace him? Be patient, it's taken them only ten years to work out that Stephens was crap. 3
saintant Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Just now, AlexLaw76 said: He never said that, did he? No.
Badger Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 4 minutes ago, hypochondriac said: Fuck off five at the back. I fucking hate this manager. It seems to be a missive from those at a higher level and club policy. I don’t think blame lies with the ‘head coach’. But agree, fuck off to 5 at the back, Ankersen and his cronies.
Charlie Wayman Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 4 minutes ago, SaintNewForest said: Tonda in his press conference "it's not my choice to play 5 at the back" All eyes on Sport Republic dictating it then. As many of us suspected. He wasn't saying that.
LGTL Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago The season is all about next Sunday in my eyes (as it should be for any proper sotonian) so it’s all about a confidence boost for then. I just can’t see it with this wanker of a manager though. And up against Wilder midweek could be simply embarrassing.
hypochondriac Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Just now, Badger said: It seems to be a missive from those at a higher level and club policy. I don’t think blame lies with the ‘head coach’. But agree, fuck off to 5 at the back, Ankersen and his cronies. I don't care who is doing it quite frankly. If the manager doesn't have the balls to tell them to shove it or if he's doing it because he thinks it's the best way to play he's wrong either way. Playing the exact same team that has got us on this winless run is mad as well. We will inevitably concede a goal and probably more than one which makes it mad to be playing this formation. So sick of shite football and about five of the players on the pitch stealing a living. I'd genuinely rather have some youth or fringe players in than these bunch of cunts. Sick of it play fellows in his proper position you bunch of bellends. Luckily I'm unable to catch up with the first half so won't have to suffer through it. 2
NewYorkSaint Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Remind me what our formation was when we blew away every team in the first half on four different occasions? Oh... that's right... five at the back. It's weird that once the fan-base gets locked into a single explanation for our woes, any appeal to actual evidence goes out the window. The first 20 comments on X on the team announcement are all winging about that one thing. As opposed to saying... this is about the best line-up we can field right now. To me the main thing that's needed is a real commitment to moving the ball fast, even if that sometimes goes wrong. When it goes right, confidence builds and we become unstoppable. I think it's 50/50 that we return today to a thrilling first half and a minimum of two goals. 2 1
AlexLaw76 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Just now, NewYorkSaint said: Remind me what our formation was when we blew away every team in the first half on four different occasions? Oh... that's right... five at the back. It's weird that once the fan-base gets locked into a single explanation for our woes, any appeal to actual evidence goes out the window. The first 20 comments on X on the team announcement are all winging about that one thing. As opposed to saying... this is about the best line-up we can field right now. To me the main thing that's needed is a real commitment to moving the ball fast, even if that sometimes goes wrong. When it goes right, confidence builds and we become unstoppable. I think it's 50/50 that we return today to a thrilling first half and a minimum of two goals. It has been discussed at length.
Saint NL Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 minute ago, hypochondriac said: Luckily I'm unable to catch up with the first half so won't have to suffer through it. Whatever you think of the first half, we all know the second half is always worse 😂 1
hypochondriac Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 minute ago, NewYorkSaint said: Remind me what our formation was when we blew away every team in the first half on four different occasions? Oh... that's right... five at the back. It's weird that once the fan-base gets locked into a single explanation for our woes, any appeal to actual evidence goes out the window. The first 20 comments on X on the team announcement are all winging about that one thing. As opposed to saying... this is about the best line-up we can field right now. To me the main thing that's needed is a real commitment to moving the ball fast, even if that sometimes goes wrong. When it goes right, confidence builds and we become unstoppable. I think it's 50/50 that we return today to a thrilling first half and a minimum of two goals. Peretz Jelert THB Wood Wellington Downes Jander Fellows Azaz Scienza Armstrong Is a better formation than this one. 4 1
hypochondriac Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 minute ago, Saint NL said: Whatever you think of the first half, we all know the second half is always worse 😂 Yeah good point. I'm fucked either way then!
Willo of Whiteley Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 33 minutes ago, Saint NL said: Back 5 yawnfest incoming BACK FIVE LADS! FUCK YEAH! 1
Toadhall Saint Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 minute ago, hypochondriac said: Peretz Jelert THB Wood Wellington Downes Jander Fellows Azaz Scienza Armstrong Is a better formation than this one. And all in positions that they would normally play in.
egg Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 minute ago, NewYorkSaint said: Remind me what our formation was when we blew away every team in the first half on four different occasions? Oh... that's right... five at the back. It's weird that once the fan-base gets locked into a single explanation for our woes, any appeal to actual evidence goes out the window. The first 20 comments on X on the team announcement are all winging about that one thing. As opposed to saying... this is about the best line-up we can field right now. To me the main thing that's needed is a real commitment to moving the ball fast, even if that sometimes goes wrong. When it goes right, confidence builds and we become unstoppable. I think it's 50/50 that we return today to a thrilling first half and a minimum of two goals. I largely agree with that. The issue for me is more about how we play, not the shape. We need to play with more urgency, and get the ball into the midfielders or the channels. I also don't think we have a decent full back on either side, so don't have the personnel for a solid back 4. 1
egg Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 4 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said: It has been discussed at length. It has, but it doesn't stop the same comments being made every single time.
Willo of Whiteley Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 23 minutes ago, die Mannyschaft said: No protest yet 2pm There was never going to be one
hypochondriac Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 minute ago, Toadhall Saint said: And all in positions that they would normally play in. Indeed. Even if they played poorly I that formation I'd still be advocating for it-particularly at home-on the basis that we haven't tried it for an extended period and it lacks the obvious flaws that 3 at the back has. 1
suewhistle Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 'Moving the ball fast'.. aye, there's the rub. If Fellows actually spends most of his time attacking then it might work.. 1
AlexLaw76 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 minute ago, egg said: It has, but it doesn't stop the same comments being made every single time. it is a message board, right?
SaintNewForest Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 7 minutes ago, NewYorkSaint said: Remind me what our formation was when we blew away every team in the first half on four different occasions? Oh... that's right... five at the back. It's weird that once the fan-base gets locked into a single explanation for our woes, any appeal to actual evidence goes out the window. The first 20 comments on X on the team announcement are all winging about that one thing. As opposed to saying... this is about the best line-up we can field right now. To me the main thing that's needed is a real commitment to moving the ball fast, even if that sometimes goes wrong. When it goes right, confidence builds and we become unstoppable. I think it's 50/50 that we return today to a thrilling first half and a minimum of two goals. Because we are now in a situation where we've not won in 6. Yet we're still persisting with a formation and way of playing thay clearly isn't working. It's irrelevant what we did 3 months ago. The current run is terrible, and he's just sticking to the same old same old. Change it up, try something new. 2
Lone ranger Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Maybe sports republic and the Magee are watching United take city apart and realise finally that possession based football such as we have played since Martin came is NOT the answer and is generally very boring to watch. Give me fastcattacking play any day.
RedArmy Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 9 minutes ago, NewYorkSaint said: Remind me what our formation was when we blew away every team in the first half on four different occasions It was a hybrid
Willo of Whiteley Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago It’ll get toxic very quickly when, not if, we concede. 1
Holmes_and_Watson Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 2 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said: it is a message board, right? Nope 3 minutes ago, suewhistle said: 'Moving the ball fast'.. aye, there's the rub. If Fellows actually spends most of his time attacking then it might work.. massage board 🙂 5
egg Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 3 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said: it is a message board, right? Indeed. Which makes your comment a bit odd - the message doesn't have to be the one you agree with.
captainchris Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago What ever team is that!!! Let’s press the repeat button shall we!!! How does Manning get a game!!! 1
Mboto Gorge Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 24 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said: Chris Wilder is going to take Tonda to the cleaners on Weds. Such a terrible fucking manager The stupid thing is, he isn’t even a manager, he is some puppet to the owners, promoted out of his depth to a level he’s never coached at before, because of some vanity project of Spors. Absolute joke the entire situation 2
StrangelyBrown Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Back to the obligatory Sports Republic 3 at the back. Ekhart really isnt up to it is he???
egg Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 minute ago, captainchris said: What ever team is that!!! Let’s press the repeat button shall we!!! How does Manning get a game!!! Because he's the best we've got. Sadly. Charlie Taylor shouldn't have left. Crazy decision. 1
Mboto Gorge Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 8 minutes ago, egg said: It has, but it doesn't stop the same comments being made every single time. Maybe if we stop losing games continuously in the same manner, and actually start winning again and playing even half decently using this formation, then the comments might stop? Just a thought. It’s completely credible to share frustrations at a way of playing being continuously repeated despite zero recent success whilst playing it. 2
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now