um pahars Posted 14 February, 2009 Share Posted 14 February, 2009 "We have to score a goal, that's our problem" "We have a scoring problem" No sht sherlock, so how about explaining why you took off the only player who has looked like scoring regularly recently? When questioned, he said Saga came off because, "he has not been productive in recent games" What the fck is he on. He may not have scored against Sheff Utd, but he got 4 in the prior 3 games. If that isn't productive then I'd like to know what th fck is????? Absolutely shocking, and I'm beginning to wish we had kept Poortvliet on:smt048:smt048:rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadaSaint Posted 14 February, 2009 Share Posted 14 February, 2009 When questioned, he said Saga came off because, "he has not been productive in recent games" Did he really say that? Unbe-fricking-lievable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glasgow_Saint Posted 14 February, 2009 Share Posted 14 February, 2009 Wotte OUT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beatlesaint Posted 14 February, 2009 Share Posted 14 February, 2009 Did he really say that? Unbe-fricking-lievable. He says that when the guy fails to score in a game and two thirds. Mc Goldrick scores once in a blue moon and plays week after week after week ? ****ing loony dutchman !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lordswoodsaints Posted 14 February, 2009 Share Posted 14 February, 2009 it seems that McG is untouchable..........apart from friday nights. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadaSaint Posted 14 February, 2009 Share Posted 14 February, 2009 Based on that 'rationale' MLT would never have kicked a ball if Wotte was the manager. It really would be funny if it wasn't so heartbreaking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpine_saint Posted 14 February, 2009 Share Posted 14 February, 2009 When questioned, he said Saga came off because, "he has not been productive in recent games" And McGoaldrought has been how productive in recent games, exactly ? We've replaced one twaat with another. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lordswoodsaints Posted 14 February, 2009 Share Posted 14 February, 2009 we also have a defending problem, a discipline problem, a manager problem, a chairman problem,etc etc ...........in fact if causing a problem was an olympic sport we would have a problem turning up for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintRobbie Posted 14 February, 2009 Share Posted 14 February, 2009 Wotte's comment on Sagga makes me very worried. a. For Wotte's sanity. b. For Sagga's effort for the rest of the season. For me he was our last glimmer of hope. I am very very worried about Wotte/Saggas relationship. Coffin is nailed shut and in the hole with the first shovels of dirt being placed upon it... there's still time to wake up and get Wotte and Lowe out of the Club for the fight. But it needs to happen this week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beatlesaint Posted 14 February, 2009 Share Posted 14 February, 2009 we also have a defending problem, a discipline problem, a manager problem, a chairman problem,etc etc ...........in fact if causing a problem was an olympic sport we would have a problem turning up for it. thanks for making me laugh.................sadly its all too true !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toomer Posted 14 February, 2009 Share Posted 14 February, 2009 This Dutch cant has not got a clue he wants to feck off like his mate, the trouble the damage has been done we are sinking quicker than the Titanic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
um pahars Posted 14 February, 2009 Author Share Posted 14 February, 2009 Did he really say that? Unbe-fricking-lievable. I'm convinced he said he has not been productive recently. It was a part of the Solent interview which normally goes up on the BBC/Saints section after matches, so easy to verify. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunrise Posted 14 February, 2009 Share Posted 14 February, 2009 To right we have a scoring problem, we can't score any and the opposition are scoring 2 a game. Why the hell Saga was subbed instead of McGoalshy? We've sacked one dutch clown and put another dutch clown in his place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lordswoodsaints Posted 14 February, 2009 Share Posted 14 February, 2009 thanks for making me laugh.................sadly its all too true !! no problem :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glasgow_Saint Posted 14 February, 2009 Share Posted 14 February, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintjay77 Posted 14 February, 2009 Share Posted 14 February, 2009 I know Saga was banging them in before the Shef game but did he really play that bad against Shef? and did McG really play that much better today? I can understand McG being sucured a place in the team if he was making space for others to score or getting assists but it seems like he is doing none of those. Only thing that keeps him slightly ahead of BWP is he doesnt get caught offside! But right now I would rather applaud BWP for at least trying to go forwards than applaud McG for doing abso-fookin-lutly nothing every game! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.comsaint Posted 14 February, 2009 Share Posted 14 February, 2009 it seems that McG is untouchable..........apart from friday nights. As I said earlier on another post; I'm sure McG must be "bottoming" for Wotte or Rupert or both of them. I can't think of any other reason why both Jan & now Wotte persist with him week in - week out - game in - game out. I have no dislike of the lad whatsoever as a person (I don't even know him) - and I know we don't exactly have an abundance of strikers at the club - but surely surely he's not the answer?!?! We desperately need a partner for Saga up front - a proven goalscorer - from someone somewhere...and quick. Easier said than done I realise - but more goals is our only (exceedingly) slim chance of getting out of trouble & avoiding relegation. And McG - week in - week out - is NOT the answer ffs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Duckhunter Posted 14 February, 2009 Share Posted 14 February, 2009 I'm convinced he said he has not been productive recently. It was a part of the Solent interview which normally goes up on the BBC/Saints section after matches, so easy to verify. I heard it as well. Our only slim chance of staying up is if Saga goes on the type of scoring run he had 2 years ago, he's not going to be able to do that from the bench. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lordswoodsaints Posted 14 February, 2009 Share Posted 14 February, 2009 I know Saga was banging them in before the Shef game but did he really play that bad against Shef? and did McG really play that much better today? I can understand McG being sucured a place in the team if he was making space for others to score or getting assists but it seems like he is doing none of those. Only thing that keeps him slightly ahead of BWP is he doesnt get caught offside! But right now I would rather applaud BWP for at least trying to go forwards than applaud McG for doing abso-fookin-lutly nothing every game! if he is not banging them in then the least he could do is a 'hesky' battling hard,holding the ball up and using some muscle to create chances for the other forwards..........he doesnt even do that!........but he has obviously been told he is the first name on the team sheet every week.jeez i could do a better job than him and im 42 next month. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheff Saint Posted 14 February, 2009 Share Posted 14 February, 2009 What makes this season so so so frustrating is how unavoidable this is / was. Sure, we're broke but you don't have to be very good to stay up. We're so **** it's unbeliveable. Still, i suspect Wotte will tell us on the website how he's not seen a better team than us this season... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint_stevo Posted 14 February, 2009 Share Posted 14 February, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1976_Child Posted 14 February, 2009 Share Posted 14 February, 2009 A scoring problem? So that's it! Silly me for thinking we were banging them in left, right and center... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fitzhugh Fella Posted 14 February, 2009 Share Posted 14 February, 2009 it seems that McG is untouchable..........apart from friday nights. No it was a Lowe decision made at the start of the season that DMcG would be our main first choice striker throughout. Lowe can never admit to being wrong so we are where we are. One reason he should keep out of dressing room decisions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintRobbie Posted 14 February, 2009 Share Posted 14 February, 2009 No it was a Lowe decision made at the start of the season that DMcG would be our main first choice striker throughout. Lowe can never admit to being wrong so we are where we are. One reason he should keep out of dressing room decisions. Exactly - it is CLUB POLICY. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greenridge Posted 14 February, 2009 Share Posted 14 February, 2009 Wotte's continual references to being unlucky are getting somewhat tiresome. You make your own luck Wotte, simple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintjay77 Posted 14 February, 2009 Share Posted 14 February, 2009 if he is not banging them in then the least he could do is a 'hesky' battling hard,holding the ball up and using some muscle to create chances for the other forwards..........he doesnt even do that!........but he has obviously been told he is the first name on the team sheet every week.jeez i could do a better job than him and im 42 next month. thats what I am saying, he doesnt seem to do any of the above. I have lost count of the ammount of times match reports said he had the ball in good positions yet still managed to miss the target, yet i never read he made space or battled or played a killer ball. I dont doubt that someone has spotted potential in him and maybe 1 day he will become a good striker but he seems to be learning nothing as long as he is automatically picked when he doesnt deserve to own a footy shirt. a spell on the bench getting some desire to prove a few people wrong might give him the kick start needed but there is no sign of it. feck me I am 35, cant jump, cant run and never played footy at any level and im sure I could do more in a game than McG can right now! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lordswoodsaints Posted 14 February, 2009 Share Posted 14 February, 2009 lets weigh it up shall we..... an international striker who has recently played in the champions league Vs a lazy little sh1t.................let me think:rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SFC Forever Posted 14 February, 2009 Share Posted 14 February, 2009 It looks more and more likely that Lowe wants us to fail. Hidden agenda must surely become public knowledge sooner rather than later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint_stevo Posted 14 February, 2009 Share Posted 14 February, 2009 Rasiak awful for watford so far. so bound to score Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arizona Posted 14 February, 2009 Share Posted 14 February, 2009 Rasiak awful for watford so far. so bound to score Nope. Priskin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huffton Posted 14 February, 2009 Share Posted 14 February, 2009 When questioned, he said Saga came off because, "he has not been productive in recent games" Fcking idiotic c unt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Graffito Posted 14 February, 2009 Share Posted 14 February, 2009 blinding fcking insight...and here's me all this time thinking it's all because we keep letting them in. thanks Mark, my penny's finally dropped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VectisSaint Posted 14 February, 2009 Share Posted 14 February, 2009 When questioned, he said Saga came off because, "he has not been productive in recent games" If the dumb****er really believes this then why did he pick him in the first place? Wotte is the point of replacing JP with a total asshole? The guy is a fecking joke, at least JP was likeable, whereas this **** is just plain stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derry Posted 14 February, 2009 Share Posted 14 February, 2009 I've just recognised the error of my ways. Wotte is absolutely brilliant. Play every body in the centre of the pitch, then belt the ball up to two midgets, bugger me why didn't I see it. Bloody hell Man Utd, Barcelona and Spain must surely adopt this super system if they are going to win anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aintforever Posted 14 February, 2009 Share Posted 14 February, 2009 With a manager who talks complete ****** like this our players have no chance. Imagine coming in at half time after being dicked all first half and all the clueless Dutchman can say is "We have to score a goal, that's our problem". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Bones Posted 14 February, 2009 Share Posted 14 February, 2009 .... I'm truly lost for words. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
damers Posted 14 February, 2009 Share Posted 14 February, 2009 Maybe he is trying to get Lowe to let him have a PL striker?! Damn this wine is strong! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EFM Posted 14 February, 2009 Share Posted 14 February, 2009 "We have to score a goal, that's our problem" "We have a scoring problem" No sht sherlock, so how about explaining why you took off the only player who has looked like scoring regularly recently? When questioned, he said Saga came off because, "he has not been productive in recent games" What the fck is he on. He may not have scored against Sheff Utd, but he got 4 in the prior 3 games. If that isn't productive then I'd like to know what th fck is????? Absolutely shocking, and I'm beginning to wish we had kept Poortvliet on:smt048:smt048:rolleyes: UP - I rarely reply to anything without reading the whole thread but after those quotes from our manager I honestly cannot bare to read any further on this one without puking or smashing my computer up. I trust my fellow Saints fans have meantime covered the stunning imbecility of Wotte's comments. Beyond belief. I'm beyond despair infact if that is the retarded conclusion of the man supposedly picking the side and tactics. I tell you that there is only one thing I can possibly conclude about our f'ing Dutch experiment and that is that are making skunk even stronger these days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
um pahars Posted 14 February, 2009 Author Share Posted 14 February, 2009 The Solent interview is on line and the guy is clearly fcking bonkers: "Marek Saganowski was a couple of matches on fire, scored four goals and the last couple of matches he's a little bit less productive and less sharp". So he gets four in three after coming in from the wilderness and then because he doesn't score in a couple of games (I'm presuming Sheff Utd and today) then he's written off. But then of course We have a scoring problem. Fck off home you useless cnt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Under Weststand Posted 14 February, 2009 Share Posted 14 February, 2009 Oh my god just in from the Pub & seeing this sh**e, well you just couldn't make it up. Carry on Football Club staring Sid James as Uncle Rupert ect ect! Who the f**k is writing Wotte's script for him, It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realise the basic Idea in football is to score more goals than the other team. This is a good concept. Not scoring a conceding a lot of goals this is a bad concept. WAKE THE F**K UP SHERLOCK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint lard Posted 15 February, 2009 Share Posted 15 February, 2009 Wotte = tosser. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyNorthernSaints Posted 15 February, 2009 Share Posted 15 February, 2009 Saga was not playing well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EFM Posted 15 February, 2009 Share Posted 15 February, 2009 Saga was not playing well. Andy, it sounds like you were there so I as I wasn't I'm happy to accept your point of view as more valid than mine and I'm not being sarcastic with these questions. But was David M playing well? Did he look like suddenly hitting a vein of form that he doesn't seem to have ever achieved in "first class" football (sorry that phrase was a bit sarcastic but not at your expense)? Did you think that at 0-1 down it was a good idea to swap our most prolific striker of late for a young forward-playing 17 year old lad or would it not have been better to add MORE attacking options as the game possibly drifted away to another defeat rather than taking off the one man who seems able to create and score at the moment? From a distance it seemed like total madness to me but as someone who presumably attended did it make sense to you at the time? I'm honestly not being sarcastic as I only heard the horror unfold via radio/tv. What did you think about the substitution and overall? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eelpie Posted 15 February, 2009 Share Posted 15 February, 2009 Wotte is not the man to save Southampton Football Club. He, like his boss, is not a winner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
um pahars Posted 15 February, 2009 Author Share Posted 15 February, 2009 Saga was not playing well. He may not have been playing well, but surely when you're one down and in need of a goal, you keep on the only player who has shown he knows where the goal is in recent games. Saga has shown in recent games that he knows where the goal is, so I just find it madness that we take off the only player who has scored regularly in recent matches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leslie Charteris Posted 15 February, 2009 Share Posted 15 February, 2009 I don't think Wotte would know how to score in an Amsterdam brothel! ...but then he'd have the excuse "We have no money!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 15 February, 2009 Share Posted 15 February, 2009 Wotte's logic is the same as Branfoots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintBobby Posted 15 February, 2009 Share Posted 15 February, 2009 "We have to score a goal, that's our problem" "We have a scoring problem" No sht sherlock, so how about explaining why you took off the only player who has looked like scoring regularly recently? When questioned, he said Saga came off because, "he has not been productive in recent games" What the fck is he on. He may not have scored against Sheff Utd, but he got 4 in the prior 3 games. If that isn't productive then I'd like to know what th fck is????? Absolutely shocking, and I'm beginning to wish we had kept Poortvliet on:smt048:smt048:rolleyes: Just amazing. These quotes seem basically accurate. The "head coach" really has lost it. We genuinely are at the stage where you might as well let any random poster on here have a go at managing the team for a laugh. Truly, they could do no worse. Pathetic and shameful. I have - reluctantly - reached the conclusion that the whole board and senior staff need to be removed. The basic footballing incompetence is just staggering. Mark Wotte doesn't even deserve to sniff the steam off Saga's p i s s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
offix Posted 15 February, 2009 Share Posted 15 February, 2009 Boy, what a sharp observation by the chocolate man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyNorthernSaints Posted 15 February, 2009 Share Posted 15 February, 2009 Andy, it sounds like you were there so I as I wasn't I'm happy to accept your point of view as more valid than mine and I'm not being sarcastic with these questions. But was David M playing well? Did he look like suddenly hitting a vein of form that he doesn't seem to have ever achieved in "first class" football (sorry that phrase was a bit sarcastic but not at your expense)? Did you think that at 0-1 down it was a good idea to swap our most prolific striker of late for a young forward-playing 17 year old lad or would it not have been better to add MORE attacking options as the game possibly drifted away to another defeat rather than taking off the one man who seems able to create and score at the moment? From a distance it seemed like total madness to me but as someone who presumably attended did it make sense to you at the time? I'm honestly not being sarcastic as I only heard the horror unfold via radio/tv. What did you think about the substitution and overall? Firstly i'm not fan of McGoalrought, he did not score at lower league on loan and does look like scoring enouh goals in the championship. my point was Saga was like the team not playing well. Personally i feel we need a big centre forward as we tended to hoof the ball towards Saga and McG who either made no effort or were not big enough to get on end of balls etc. Playing Morgan right wing was silly as well as playing the donkey Wotton.. At least McLagonn had a shot and tested their keeper unlike the rest of the useless tossers. I agree Wotte does not seem to have a clue but at the end of the day we hav a **** poor side who cannot beat teams who are not much better than us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now