tony13579 Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 Does that mean he's heard all he wants / needs to hear already ? What source?
Saint_clark Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 CVA should be fine then. If Judge agees to £30m its not enough to get a % enough to veto CVA 25% of debts?
pedg Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 Looks like the latter of my options From the News: "The case has been adjourned for lunch. There will be more this afternoon and the case will continue tomorrow and the judgement will be on Thursday."
tony13579 Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 (edited) dan king news of the world wrote: pompey image rights payments due last season 3.6m. Estimated profit on retail sales £337,00. so players paid 10x what right worth tweeting from court @DanKing_NOTW Edited 3 August, 2010 by tony13579
Saint Lindford Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 [Comment From Rickymale88 Rickymale88 : ] I believe we will be safe because they will give us some more time to come up with the funds.. Deluded fool..... Just where are the funds going to come from??
Joey-deacons-left-nut Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 dan king news of the world wrote: pompey image rights payments due last season 3.6m. Estimated profit on retail sales £337,00. so players paid 10x what right worth You'd think they'd have them bang to rights there on tax avoidance then...
stevegrant Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 25% of debts? £30m would, according to the figures on the official administrators report of the vote, represent only 22% of the total eligible to vote - somewhere in the region of £137m. Which raises more interesting questions about the debt "bottoming out at £78m", and even the £124m including secured creditors from the original creditors report...
tony13579 Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 (edited) the news: David: The case has been adjourned for lunch. There will be more this afternoon and the case will continue tomorrow and the judgement will be on Thursday. Matthew: We'll break for lunch as well. The case should resume at 2pm. Edited 3 August, 2010 by tony13579
pedg Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 I see they have already started a memorial a the likely site of the clubs death http://twitpic.com/2b8aje
Saint_clark Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 £30m would, according to the figures on the official administrators report of the vote, represent only 22% of the total eligible to vote - somewhere in the region of £137m. Which raises more interesting questions about the debt "bottoming out at £78m", and even the £124m including secured creditors from the original creditors report... Well surely the "precise figures" is a huge factor in this court case then? Don't understand how HMRC can dismiss it like that.
anothersaintinsouthsea Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 You'd think they'd have them bang to rights there on tax avoidance then... Tax evasion Avoidance is the legal method of minimising your tax payable, evasion is illegal
Jimmy_D Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 Well surely the "precise figures" is a huge factor in this court case then? Don't understand how HMRC can dismiss it like that. They're probably going to go after football debt being treated as unsecured debt to get themselves over the 75% mark.
thefunkygibbons Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 I see they have already started a memorial a the likely site of the clubs death http://twitpic.com/2b8aje A morrison's bag Nah Must belong to someone else
pedg Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 If it gets down to a few fractions of a percent how much of the total owed is overdue image right's payments to players such as Sol Campbell as surely they should all go down to 60% of their current level on the grounds that 40% should be going in tax? i.e. rather than the club owing someone £1M in image right payments if HMRC win the point it would then be 600K owed to player and 400K to hmrc?
Whitey Grandad Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 If it gets down to a few fractions of a percent how much of the total owed is overdue image right's payments to players such as Sol Campbell as surely they should all go down to 60% of their current level on the grounds that 40% should be going in tax? i.e. rather than the club owing someone £1M in image right payments if HMRC win the point it would then be 600K owed to player and 400K to hmrc? Plus NI
bridge too far Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 *begins clearing diary for thursday* Bu$$er! It's the one day I don't have access to the interweb
fish fingers Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 Bu$$er! It's the one day I don't have access to the interweb It could be the best day of interwebbing since it began.
stevegrant Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 *begins clearing diary for thursday* It wasn't you who fell asleep in the courtroom earlier, was it?
St Marco Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 I see they have already started a memorial a the likely site of the clubs death http://twitpic.com/2b8aje I see David James has been by to drop off his kit then...
pedg Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 Are they dead yet? Not yet but we do know Thursday is now the new Friday (or something like that).
pedg Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 News write up of this mornings events in court: http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/newshome/Pompey-operated-a-tax-sham.6453877.jp
Joey-deacons-left-nut Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 News write up of this mornings events in court: http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/newshome/Pompey-operated-a-tax-sham.6453877.jp Reading that, this £30m owed, seems to be what they think they have cheated HMRC out of via the image rights con since 2006, so is this in ADDITION to what they are already owed?
pedg Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 Reading that, this £30m owed, seems to be what they think they have cheated HMRC out of via the image rights con since 2006, so is this in ADDITION to what they are already owed? I don't think so as this refers to 2006 to date so only 4 years which, if all the 30M was image rights tax mean that the total image rights bill in that time would have been £75M.
Appy Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 So without reading through the last few pages, What are the likely outcomes for Thursday?
pedg Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 What's confusing me here a bit is how the 30M figure from HMRC fits in with the total they claimed at the CVA meeting, which was higher (was it about 35?).
pedg Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 So without reading through the last few pages, What are the likely outcomes for Thursday? Still got 1.5 days of court action to get through yet.
Bobbyboy Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 According to Dan Roan, Andy Android has now shown up. Wouldn't be the same without him, would it?
pedg Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 AA is there!!.. From Dan Roan twitter "Afternoon session starts. Andronikou arrives at High Court - Gregory Mitchell QC says he'll finish argument for HMRC by 1530."
tony13579 Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 The news wrote: Chris: Club administrator Andrew Andronikou has now taken his place among Pompey's legal team as the afternoon session kicks off with more legal arguments.
Shrek Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 AA is there!!.. From Dan Roan twitter "Afternoon session starts. Andronikou arrives at High Court - Gregory Mitchell QC says he'll finish argument for HMRC by 1530." So AA's in the house. Looks like he was holidaying in London all along
anothersaintinsouthsea Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 Are they dead yet? Not sure, things will be clearer in the next 48 hours.......
anothersaintinsouthsea Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 Anyone else got a bad feeling that HMRC are going to blow this one?
View From The Top Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 Anyone else got a bad feeling that HMRC are going to blow this one? Not after less that 2hrs of opening statements, no.
Draino76 Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 I cant believe my impression of Tony Adams and what a loser he is compares to AA did not get through.
Saint Keith Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 Anyone else got a bad feeling that HMRC are going to blow this one? ooooooohhhhh yes
saint lard Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 So AA's in the house. Looks like he was holidaying in London all along Tying up the Tal Ben Haim deal with West Ham .
OldNick Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 So AA's in the house. Looks like he was holidaying in London all along apparently he was on Talksport yesterday crowing how that the HMRC had little to go on and he was confident that Pompey would win
pedg Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 Tying up the Tal Ben Haim deal with West Ham . I assume that though that may get a high earner off the payroll it does mean another player leaving with no money coming in for them.
pedg Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 Anyone have an idea who mr hatt is: http://twitter.com/DanKing_NOTW Witness statement from Mr Hat(t) in Pompey case. Isn't he in South Park? Look forward to Mr Hanky's appearance.
gaz Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 Nothing of mine is getting through on the News site. I'm Hayling Jerry.
anothersaintinsouthsea Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 I didn't get through posting as "iloveHMRC"......
gaz Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 ''Chris: Mr Mitchell went on to criticise another 'sham' he alleged Pompey used to avoid paying tax. This concerned money paid into players' employment benefit trusts in what he described as 'tax havens'. He said: 'The Revenue says these are disguised payments of salaries on which PAYE should have been paid.' ''
Matthew Le God Posted 3 August, 2010 Posted 3 August, 2010 Here is a new one... Mr Mitchell went on to criticise another 'sham' he alleged Pompey used to avoid paying tax. This concerned money paid into players' employment benefit trusts in what he described as 'tax havens'. He said: 'The Revenue says these are disguised payments of salaries on which PAYE should have been paid.'
Recommended Posts