John B Posted 7 April, 2010 Share Posted 7 April, 2010 (edited) http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/sport/saints/news/7987502.No_Celtic_move_for_Adam/?ref=rss What a difference a day makes Mind you nothing much in the article as the info was on the Forum yesterday Edited 7 April, 2010 by John B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paris Posted 7 April, 2010 Share Posted 7 April, 2010 Barcelona more like Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glasgow_Saint Posted 7 April, 2010 Share Posted 7 April, 2010 “100 per cent” going to be at St Mary’s for the start of the 2010/11 campaign. Thats all we need Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david in sweden Posted 7 April, 2010 Share Posted 7 April, 2010 http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/sport/saints/news/7987502.No_Celtic_move_for_Adam/?ref=rss What a difference a day makes Mind you nothing much in the article as the info was on the Forum yesterday ...so if that was the headline of the week we can all go home happy. It's total nonsense to think that such a move was even being considered let alone... about to be agreed. Media sites / newspapers have to print something to fill the space and this is typical of a " space-filler ". Every punter knows ..if you were to back every horse in the race - you're bound to win sometime..but you'd be out of pocket. Journalists who've got nothing to write about... are soon out of a job ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sidney Fudpucker the 3rd Posted 7 April, 2010 Share Posted 7 April, 2010 Like I said yesterday. Celtic are managerless at the moment. Why would they be looking at buying players that a potential new manager may not be interested in? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Micky Posted 7 April, 2010 Share Posted 7 April, 2010 This is critical stuff, absolutely critical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thesaint sfc Posted 7 April, 2010 Share Posted 7 April, 2010 I love adam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
torsaint Posted 7 April, 2010 Share Posted 7 April, 2010 So that fine organ "The Sun" and their esteemed reader Alpine got it wrong. Why am I not surprised? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thesaint sfc Posted 7 April, 2010 Share Posted 7 April, 2010 So that fine organ "The Sun" and their esteemed reader Alpine got it wrong. Why am I not surprised? I don't know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint_clark Posted 7 April, 2010 Share Posted 7 April, 2010 We get the message FFS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gingeletiss Posted 7 April, 2010 Share Posted 7 April, 2010 http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/sport/saints/news/7987502.No_Celtic_move_for_Adam/?ref=rss What a difference a day makes Mind you nothing much in the article as the info was on the Forum yesterday Damn!...Alps will be upset, but hey ho, onto the next thing he can have a moan about;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angelman Posted 7 April, 2010 Share Posted 7 April, 2010 From what he said earlier, he seems to have his head screwed on. He mentioned Theo and Bale making big moves and then warming the bench. He realises that he is still young and that another year at Saints will make a big difference to his footballing career. To be honest, if he was to move at the end of the season, then he should go to the CCC rather than jump up to PL. If that was the case, then he might as well stay in L1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sadoldgit Posted 7 April, 2010 Share Posted 7 April, 2010 Isn't he the same age as Messi? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpine_saint Posted 7 April, 2010 Share Posted 7 April, 2010 Very good news, next years promotion challenge has received a boost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The9 Posted 7 April, 2010 Share Posted 7 April, 2010 Isn't he the same age as Messi? Messi's a year older, and more importantly for his chances of getting in a Champions League side, a lot better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergei Gotsmanov Posted 7 April, 2010 Share Posted 7 April, 2010 We have more finacial muscle than Celtiv nowadays Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mirra Posted 7 April, 2010 Share Posted 7 April, 2010 We have more finacial muscle than Celtiv nowadays Yeah that's why Saints are paying Robbie Keane's wages for 6 months..............and spent more than 5 million in Jan......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stmusicdude Posted 7 April, 2010 Share Posted 7 April, 2010 So that fine organ "The Sun" and their esteemed reader Alpine got it wrong. Why am I not surprised? To be fair to Alps I don't think this actually means he was wrong, the point he made was valid. It wouldn't supprise me at all if the echo got the he said he is staying from SWF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Saints Posted 7 April, 2010 Share Posted 7 April, 2010 Even if they were interested, why the hell would he want to play in Scotland? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hypochondriac Posted 7 April, 2010 Share Posted 7 April, 2010 We get the message FFS. Lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Appy Posted 7 April, 2010 Share Posted 7 April, 2010 Yeah that's why Saints are paying Robbie Keane's wages for 6 months..............and spent more than 5 million in Jan......... I heard Spurs are still paying Keane's wages. The same with Kamara with Fulham. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thedelldays Posted 7 April, 2010 Share Posted 7 April, 2010 I heard Spurs are still paying Keane's wages. The same with Kamara with Fulham. doubt that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doctoroncall Posted 7 April, 2010 Share Posted 7 April, 2010 Yeah that's why Saints are paying Robbie Keane's wages for 6 months..............and spent more than 5 million in Jan......... Celtic are skint so they didn't spend anything. They signed an 18yr old from Motherwell for an undisclosed fee and a dutch defender for £1.8m. They probably recouped £5m+ with the sale of MacDonald, Fox, Caldwell and Robson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thedelldays Posted 7 April, 2010 Share Posted 7 April, 2010 Celtic are skint so they didn't spend anything. They signed an 18yr old from Motherwell for an undisclosed fee and a dutch defender for £1.8m. They probably recouped £5m+ with the sale of MacDonald, Fox, Caldwell and Robson. yes...celtic who usually qualify for the CL group stages are so skint they wont be able to afford a league 1 player and pay his wages.. ffs (I know he wont leave) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alain Perrin Posted 7 April, 2010 Share Posted 7 April, 2010 I think it's a disgrace. I won't be satisfied with 100%, he needs to be 110% committed at least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
niceandfriendly Posted 7 April, 2010 Share Posted 7 April, 2010 I think it's a disgrace. I won't be satisfied with 100%, he needs to be 110% committed at least. Yep, totally agree. Just another sign that Pardew is losing the dressing room. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doctoroncall Posted 7 April, 2010 Share Posted 7 April, 2010 yes...celtic who usually qualify for the CL group stages are so skint they wont be able to afford a league 1 player and pay his wages.. ffs (I know he wont leave) Doesn't that paint a picture, Celtic, a major force in scottish football, who usually qualify for the CL group stages had to recoup millions rather than spend them. Who would have thought they would chance a multimillion bid to prise away a league one player for a chance at getting to the CL group stages. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thedelldays Posted 7 April, 2010 Share Posted 7 April, 2010 Doesn't that paint a picture, Celtic, a major force in scottish football, who usually qualify for the CL group stages had to recoup millions rather than spend them. Who would have thought they would chance a multimillion bid to prise away a league one player for a chance at getting to the CL group stages. is the story even true..? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy_Porter Posted 7 April, 2010 Share Posted 7 April, 2010 yes...celtic who usually qualify for the CL group stages are so skint they wont be able to afford a league 1 player and pay his wages.. ffs (I know he wont leave) Celtic are quite whealthy, it's Rangers who are in massive financial problems, they haven't spent a penny on transfer fees in 18 months now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mirra Posted 7 April, 2010 Share Posted 7 April, 2010 There's no chance Lallana would go to Celtic. There's no reserve league up there any more & he's too old for the under 19 squad... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Godfather Posted 7 April, 2010 Share Posted 7 April, 2010 Their is no money in Scotland, both Rangers and the team from the dark side of glasgow have massive debts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RonManager Posted 7 April, 2010 Share Posted 7 April, 2010 Their is no money in Scotland, both Rangers and the team from the dark side of glasgow have massive debts. I'll have you know Queens Park are an amateur side and debt-free! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Godfather Posted 7 April, 2010 Share Posted 7 April, 2010 I'll have you know Queens Park are an amateur side and debt-free! Lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now