tdmickey3 Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 4 minutes ago, LGTL said: Didn’t take him long to start gaslighting, did it? He's a club puppet, nothing more. He has zero tactical know-how. Never changes the only way he has been instructed to use Might as well have Ankerson as head coach 7
HKsaint Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago Everything starts from he getting the permanent job. Is this just a coincidence? 1
Mboto Gorge Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 2 hours ago, Crab Lungs said: We have another fucking Selles on our hands. Yep, exactly what I said a few days ago. The similarities are becoming more apparent with each game. The rigid unadaptable style, clueless in game management, refusal to change style or shape, or formation, and bland like for like substitutions that do little to help us improve during the match. Add to this his seemingly being content with performances way below what this squad should be giving, and he’s really no better than Selles. 3
Fabrice29 Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 1 minute ago, Mboto Gorge said: Yep, exactly what I said a few days ago. The similarities are becoming more apparent with each game. The rigid unadaptable style, clueless in game management, refusal to change style or shape, or formation, and bland like for like substitutions that do little to help us improve during the match. Add to this his seemingly being content with performances way below what this squad should be giving, and he’s really no better than Selles. Apart from tonight obviously. 1
Osvaldorama Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 8 hours ago, Fabrice29 said: Apart from tonight obviously. Yeah credit tonight, his changes made a difference for once. But that’s probably because he left our best player on the bench for no reason
Willo of Whiteley Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago I think the problem is we could do so much better but there is a reluctance either from him or the club to change. I’d rather we played four at the back in a 4-2-3-1 and lost having played well, then limped to a defeat. Last night he was very fortunate. 4
benali-shorts Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 28 minutes ago, Willo of Whiteley said: I think the problem is we could do so much better but there is a reluctance either from him or the club to change. I’d rather we played four at the back in a 4-2-3-1 and lost having played well, then limped to a defeat. Last night he was very fortunate. we won't play well with 4 at the back with this squad and keeper. Terrible footballers and weak personalities. 1
Fabrice29 Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 45 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said: Yeah credit tonight, his changes made a difference for once. But that’s probably because he left our best player on the bench for no reason He was the least effective sub to be fair and it’s obviously not for no reason.
tdmickey3 Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 3 minutes ago, benali-shorts said: we won't play well with 4 at the back with this squad and keeper. Terrible footballers and weak personalities. We don’t play well with 3 at the back, so what is the answer?
Osvaldorama Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 1 hour ago, tdmickey3 said: We don’t play well with 3 at the back, so what is the answer? Pray for a miraculous January window 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now