sfc1971 Posted 15 November, 2010 Share Posted 15 November, 2010 Wotton Pulis Spiderman Lambert Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colinjb Posted 15 November, 2010 Share Posted 15 November, 2010 Wotton Pulis Forecast And maybe even Jaidi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beatlesaint Posted 15 November, 2010 Share Posted 15 November, 2010 Pulis Forecast Gobern Mills Wotton Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazza82 Posted 15 November, 2010 Share Posted 15 November, 2010 Schneiderlin and Lambert out!! You having a laugh mate? Out: Pulis Wotton Forecast Holmes Loan out: McNish Doble Gobern That should clear up some space for some new blood Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Boy Saint Posted 15 November, 2010 Share Posted 15 November, 2010 I would hazard to say Hammond is on the edge of the outs, as he seems to have lost his bite this season. But the question is who do we back him up with. With Ferguson flirting with the heave-ho at Preston, Chaplow could be flavour of the month back there again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Le God Posted 15 November, 2010 Share Posted 15 November, 2010 Schneiderlin Lambert Good thing you aren't the manger then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lighthouse Posted 15 November, 2010 Share Posted 15 November, 2010 Wotton Pulis Forecast Holmes either needs to deliver something or go because we've seen feck all of him in over 2 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leftback Posted 15 November, 2010 Share Posted 15 November, 2010 guly, but we cant. why cant he get a game? i still think weve signed him. if na doesnt play him he cant fancy him,if he doesnt fancy him hes gotta go back. if he doesnt go back,then we must have signed him. he is on big big dough for us,top earner at club we will struggle to get rid of the rest as wed have to pay them up,as nobody wants them, except for wotts. money being at a premium Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Le God Posted 15 November, 2010 Share Posted 15 November, 2010 i still think weve signed him. If he had signed on a permanent deal the Football League would know. They however don't and it is a loan deal. It was announced as a loan with "view to buy", should it go well and all parties are happy. That means the fee has been pre-arranged, but at the moment he is not a Saints player. Clubs can't just make these things up, the football governing bodies register loans and transfers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guan 2.0 Posted 15 November, 2010 Share Posted 15 November, 2010 Pulis Forecast Gobern (loan) Mills (loan) Wotton Hammond Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott_saints Posted 15 November, 2010 Share Posted 15 November, 2010 ffs some of you lot are mongs. That is all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkSFC Posted 16 November, 2010 Share Posted 16 November, 2010 Why not all of them and start again.... After all most on here think were **** cos we're a couple or four points off top two with only 30 games to go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 16 November, 2010 Share Posted 16 November, 2010 Skacel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthlondonSaint Posted 16 November, 2010 Share Posted 16 November, 2010 lambert and spiderman, you're having a laugh! Pulis, Wotton, Forecast, Gobern Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lambertsrightleg Posted 16 November, 2010 Share Posted 16 November, 2010 hammond? schniederlin, lambert? are you retarded, or just having a laugh!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
corky morris Posted 16 November, 2010 Share Posted 16 November, 2010 Pulis, Wotton, Forecast., Jaidi. I would let, Holmes, Mills, Gobern, Doble go out on loan. Chaplow & Guly could go back to their own clubs. More important is who we should get in........Madine, Cansdell-Sherriff, & I noticed Wes Hoolahan is not starting for Norwich so I would make a cheeky bid for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rolosfc Posted 16 November, 2010 Share Posted 16 November, 2010 I would hazard to say Hammond is on the edge of the outs, as he seems to have lost his bite this season. But the question is who do we back him up with. With Ferguson flirting with the heave-ho at Preston, Chaplow could be flavour of the month back there again. Hammond is our captian and is an almost ever present, I don't understand why so many fans think he will be dropped or sold soon. I would be more inclined to agree with SFC1971, Morgan has looked half the player he was last season, he does not seem that up for it and may be looking for a move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viking Warrior Posted 16 November, 2010 Share Posted 16 November, 2010 What a ridiculous thread, get a grip boys and get behind the team A for you leftback is guly your bed mate by any chance. does he moan to you everynight when he gets back from the training game that NA dosent like him as a player? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpine_saint Posted 16 November, 2010 Share Posted 16 November, 2010 hammond? schniederlin, lambert? are you retarded, or just having a laugh!!!! To all those scoffing at the prospect of off-loading Lambert and Schneiderlin, ask yourself honestly - WHY ? From what I can tell, Chaplow makes a better contribution (if we can make a deal for him), and something really has gone wrong with Lambert. Maybe it is in player and clubs best interest if there were a parting of the ways for decent money, allowing a fresh player with similar impact to come in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
landford.saint Posted 16 November, 2010 Share Posted 16 November, 2010 Hammond is our captian and is an almost ever present, I don't understand why so many fans think he will be dropped or sold soon. I would be more inclined to agree with SFC1971, Morgan has looked half the player he was last season, he does not seem that up for it and may be looking for a move. The first few games Morgan was more up for it than last season, but he just seems to have faded. Lambert has not yet got going. But sell them? You must be having a laugh surely. Or is this a whooosh moment. Chaplow, what he lacks in skill he makes up for in enthusiasm. He's like my collie, run him all day and he'll keep wanting to run some more. He chases down more lost balls and wins back more play than most of the rest of the team put together. You cant have 11 silky smooth prima-donna's in a team, look at Man City, (poor example but you know what I mean) you also need your work horse who will give you 100% every time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rolosfc Posted 16 November, 2010 Share Posted 16 November, 2010 The first few games Morgan was more up for it than last season, but he just seems to have faded. Lambert has not yet got going. But sell them? You must be having a laugh surely. Or is this a whooosh moment. Chaplow, what he lacks in skill he makes up for in enthusiasm. He's like my collie, run him all day and he'll keep wanting to run some more. He chases down more lost balls and wins back more play than most of the rest of the team put together. You cant have 11 silky smooth prima-donna's in a team, look at Man City, (poor example but you know what I mean) you also need your work horse who will give you 100% every time. I wasn't saying we should sell Lambert or Morgan, I am just shocked at how many people don't rate Hammond. I don't think we should sell any of our first choice 14/15 players. Chaplow has been a breath of fresh air since he has come in and since then I believe that the best partnership has been Chaplow and Hammond. I was just stating that Morgan has not performed yet this season, but thats just my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alanh Posted 16 November, 2010 Share Posted 16 November, 2010 To all those scoffing at the prospect of off-loading Lambert and Schneiderlin, ask yourself honestly - WHY ? From what I can tell, Chaplow makes a better contribution (if we can make a deal for him), and something really has gone wrong with Lambert. Maybe it is in player and clubs best interest if there were a parting of the ways for decent money, allowing a fresh player with similar impact to come in. Why? For me because it's a squad game and Schneiderlin and Lambert have both done more than enough this season and last to warrant their place in the Saints squad. They may not be on top form now but I am sure that they will be able to contribute something to the rest of the season, even if it's not as significant as it was last season. Agreed that Chaplow looks more effective at the moment but it's up to the management to get MS to respond to the competition for places and raise his game. All the talk about Lambert is speculation as far as I can see. It seems to me that it's a combination of his fitness, him missing the link with Lallana in the early games, and defences paying him a bit more attention. He's got to find a way round this if he is going to have a decent season and play a part next year becasue at the moment he's not going to offer us enough for a challenge in the Championship. If we are looking to free up spaces in the squad so that Adkins can bring in some new faces I would put Holmes and Wotton ahead of MS and RL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 16 November, 2010 Share Posted 16 November, 2010 guly, but we cant. why cant he get a game? i still think weve signed him. if na doesnt play him he cant fancy him,if he doesnt fancy him hes gotta go back. if he doesnt go back,then we must have signed him. he is on big big dough for us,top earner at club we will struggle to get rid of the rest as wed have to pay them up,as nobody wants them, except for wotts. money being at a premium http://www.informatics.sussex.ac.uk/department/docs/punctuation/node27.html Capital Letters Capital letters are not really an aspect of punctuation, but it is convenient to deal with them here. The rules for using them are mostly very simple. (a) The first word of a sentence, or of a fragment, begins with a capital letter: The bumbling wizard Rincewind is Pratchett's most popular character. Will anyone now alive live to see a colony on the moon? Probably not. Distressingly few pupils can locate Iraq or Japan on a map of the world. (b) The names of the days of the week, and of the months of the year, are written with a capital letter: Next Sunday France will hold a general election. Mozart was born on 27 January, 1756. Football practice takes place on Wednesdays and Fridays. However, the names of seasons are not written with a capital: Like cricket, baseball is played in the summer. Do not write *"... in the Summer". © The names of languages are always written with a capital letter. Be careful about this; it's a very common mistake. Juliet speaks English, French, Italian and Portuguese. I need to work on my Spanish irregular verbs. Among the major languages of India are Hindi, Gujarati and Tamil. These days, few students study Latin and Greek. Note, however, that names of disciplines and school subjects are not capitalized unless they happen to be the names of languages: I'm doing A-levels in history, geography and English. Newton made important contributions to physics and mathematics. She is studying French literature. (d) Words that express a connection with a particular place must be capitalized when they have their literal meanings. So, for example, French must be capitalized when it means `having to do with France': The result of the French election is still in doubt. The American and Russian negotiators are close to agreement. There are no mountains in the Dutch landscape. She has a dry Mancunian sense of humour. (The word Mancunian means `from Manchester'.) However, it is not necessary to capitalize these words when they occur as parts of fixed phrases and don't express any direct connection with the relevant places: Please buy some danish pastries. In warm weather, we keep our french windows open. I prefer russian dressing on my salad. Why the difference? Well, a danish pastry is merely a particular sort of pastry; it doesn't have to come from Denmark. Likewise, french windows are merely a particular kind of window, and russian dressing is just a particular variety of salad dressing. Even in these cases, you can capitalize these words if you want to, as long as you are consistent about it. But notice how convenient it can be to make the difference: In warm weather, we keep our french windows open. After nightfall, French windows are always shuttered. In the first example, french windows just refers to a kind of window; in the second, French windows refers specifically to windows in France. (e) In the same vein, words that identify nationalities or ethnic groups must be capitalized: The Basques and the Catalans spent decades struggling for autonomy. The Serbs and the Croats have become bitter enemies. Norway's most popular singer is a Sami from Lapland. (An aside: some ethnic labels which were formerly widely used are now regarded by many people as offensive and have been replaced by other labels. Thus, careful writers use Black, not Negro; native American, not Indian or red Indian; native Australian, not Aborigine. You are advised to follow suit.) (f) Formerly, the words black and white, when applied to human beings, were never capitalized. Nowadays, however, many people prefer to capitalize them because they regard these words as ethnic labels comparable to Chinese or Indian: The Rodney King case infuriated many Black Americans. You may capitalize these words or not, as you prefer, but be consistent. (g) Proper names are always capitalized. A proper name is a name or a title that refers to an individual person, an individual place, an individual institution or an individual event. Here are some examples: The study of language was revolutionized by Noam Chomsky. The Golden Gate Bridge towers above San Francisco Bay. There will be a debate between Professor Lacey and Doctor Davis. The Queen will address the House of Commons today. Many people mistakenly believe that Mexico is in South America. My friend Julie is training for the Winter Olympics. Next week President Clinton will be meeting Chancellor Kohl. Observe the difference between the next two examples: We have asked for a meeting with the President. I would like to be the president of a big company. In the first, the title the President is capitalized because it is a title referring to a specific person; in the second, there is no capital, because the word president does not refer to anyone in particular. (Compare We have asked for a meeting with President Wilson and *I would like to be President Wilson of a big company.) The same difference is made with some other words: we write the Government and Parliament when we are referring to a particular government or a particular parliament, but we write government and parliament when we are using the words generically. And note also the following example: The patron saint of carpenters is Saint Joseph.Here Saint Joseph is a name, but patron saint is not and gets no capital. A few people eccentrically prefer to write their names with no capital letters at all, such as the poet e. e. cummings and the singer k. d. lang. These strange usages should be respected. (h) The names of distinctive historical periods are capitalized: London was a prosperous city during the Middle Ages. Britain was the first country to profit from the Industrial Revolution. The Greeks were already in Greece during the Bronze Age. (i) The names of festivals and holy days are capitalized: We have long breaks at Christmas and Easter. During Ramadan, one may not eat before sundown. The feast of Purim is an occasion for merrymaking. Our church observes the Sabbath very strictly. The children greatly enjoy Hallowe'en. (j) Many religious terms are capitalized, including the names of religions and of their followers, the names or titles of divine beings, the titles of certain important figures, the names of important events and the names of sacred books: An atheist is a person who does not believe in God. The principal religions of Japan are Shinto and Buddhism. The Indian cricket team includes Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs and Parsees. The Lord is my shepherd. The Prophet was born in Mecca. The Last Supper took place on the night before the Crucifixion. The Old Testament begins with Genesis. Note, however, that the word god is not capitalized when it refers to a pagan deity: Poseidon was the Greek god of the sea. (k) In the title or name of a book, a play, a poem, a film, a magazine, a newspaper or a piece of music, a capital letter is used for the first word and for every significant word (that is, a little word like the, of, and or in is not capitalized unless it is the first word): I was terrified by The Silence of the Lambs. The Round Tower was written by Catherine Cookson. Bach's most famous organ piece is the Toccata and Fugue in D Minor. I don't usually like Cher, but I do enjoy The Shoop Shoop Song. (l) The first word of a direct quotation, repeating someone else's exact words, is always capitalized if the quotation is a complete sentence: Thomas Edison famously observed "Genius is one per cent inspiration and ninety-nine per cent perspiration." But there is no capital letter if the quotation is not a complete sentence: The Minister described the latest unemployment figures as "disappointing". (m) The brand names of manufacturers and their products are capitalized: Maxine has bought a second-hand Ford Escort. Almost everybody owns a Sony Walkman. (n) Roman numerals are usually capitalized: It is no easy task to multiply LIX by XXIV using Roman numerals. King Alfonso XIII handed over power to General Primo de Rivera. The only common exception is that small Roman numerals are used to number the pages of the front matter in books; look at almost any book. (o) The pronoun I is always capitalized: She thought I'd borrowed her keys, but I hadn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkSFC Posted 16 November, 2010 Share Posted 16 November, 2010 You're a funny man trousers!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Bones Posted 16 November, 2010 Share Posted 16 November, 2010 Maybe we have got rid of Pulis already - Buggered if I can find him on the team list. Not sure we really need to unload anyone to bring in fresh faces. Granted no point carrying deadwood - but id like to think ( and hope ) we are in a financial situation where we didnt need to sell to bring anyone in. Squad list on the official site - http://www.saintsfc.co.uk/page/ProfilesDetail/0,,10280,00.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thesaint sfc Posted 16 November, 2010 Share Posted 16 November, 2010 He's gone to Stockport on loan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thesaint sfc Posted 16 November, 2010 Share Posted 16 November, 2010 Why did I think Pulis was about 34-35? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Bad Bob Posted 16 November, 2010 Share Posted 16 November, 2010 Why did I think Pulis was about 34-35? That's the number of professional games (including sub appearances) that he's played in his career!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustMike Posted 16 November, 2010 Share Posted 16 November, 2010 Wotton Pulis Spiderman Lambert oh dear god!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustMike Posted 16 November, 2010 Share Posted 16 November, 2010 guly, but we cant. why cant he get a game? i still think weve signed him. if na doesnt play him he cant fancy him,if he doesnt fancy him hes gotta go back. if he doesnt go back,then we must have signed him. he is on big big dough for us,top earner at club we will struggle to get rid of the rest as wed have to pay them up,as nobody wants them, except for wotts. money being at a premium Guly is on loan until January. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The9 Posted 16 November, 2010 Share Posted 16 November, 2010 Current Squad 1 Kelvin Davis (G) 2 Frazer Richardson (D) 3 Dan Harding (D) 4 Morgan Schneiderlin (M) 5 Ryan Dickson (M) 6 Jose Fonte (D) 7 Rickie Lambert (F) 9 Lee Barnard (F) 10 Jason Puncheon (M) 11 Guilherme Do Prado (F) 12 Danny Butterfield (D) 14 Dean Hammond (M) 15 Radhi Jaidi (D) 17 Aaron Martin (D) 19 Danny Seaborne (D) 20 Adam Lallana (F) 21 Lee Holmes (M) 22 David Connolly (F) 23 Tommy Forecast (G) 24 Bartosz Bialkowski (G) 26 Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain (M) 27 Oscar Gobern (M) 28 Callum McNish (M) 29 Ryan Doble (M) 37 Jack Saville (D) 40 Tony Garrod (F) Harlee Dean Loaned players Anthony Pulis (M) to Stockport Joseph Mills (D) to Doncaster Paul Wotton (D) to Oxford I don't think we'll miss Pulis, I couldn't care less if Forecast leaves either, and we might get a couple of quid for Wotton if he goes in January rather than when his contract expires. Provided we sign Chaplow we wouldn't even lose out on cover for the Jan-July period. Everyone else has a role or potential, and I'm very hopeful we don't end up having to flog Lallana due to impending contract expiry as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingsbridge Saint Posted 16 November, 2010 Share Posted 16 November, 2010 Puncheon out on loan to regain some confidence in front of goal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super_Uwe Posted 16 November, 2010 Share Posted 16 November, 2010 I think most people agree that Pulis and Forecast should go, but I just can't see it. They are here to stay IMO, I just can't see us being able to ship them out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Bad Bob Posted 16 November, 2010 Share Posted 16 November, 2010 It's nice to chew the fat about who you would get rid BUT there are two big problems :- a) A club has got to want the player b) The player/agent has got to want to move. If neither a and b happen then the player is going to stay here.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VectisSaint Posted 16 November, 2010 Share Posted 16 November, 2010 I'm not going to give any players names. But what will happen, I am sure, is that NA will try to offload players who are not buying-in to his methods. That could be anyone, from Pulis to Davis, whether they are fans favourites or not, but only NA will make the decision. He will also try to bring in some of his own players to put his mark on the squad, and get the team playing his way. I cannot believe that NA will not have any funds in January, I am sure he just would not have joined us if he had been told no funds available for the jan Transfer window. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chez Posted 16 November, 2010 Share Posted 16 November, 2010 I'm not going to give any players names. But what will happen, I am sure, is that NA will try to offload players who are not buying-in to his methods. That could be anyone, from Pulis to Davis, whether they are fans favourites or not, but only NA will make the decision. He will also try to bring in some of his own players to put his mark on the squad, and get the team playing his way. I cannot believe that NA will not have any funds in January, I am sure he just would not have joined us if he had been told no funds available for the jan Transfer window. he might have looked at the squad and thought he wouldn't need to spend anything. Hasn't quite worked out that way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Appy Posted 16 November, 2010 Share Posted 16 November, 2010 Anyone who thinks Lambert should be offloaded just because he is off form in front of goal is deluded. He will come good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guan 2.0 Posted 16 November, 2010 Share Posted 16 November, 2010 Hammond is our captian and is an almost ever present, I don't understand why so many fans think he will be dropped or sold soon. I would be more inclined to agree with SFC1971, Morgan has looked half the player he was last season, he does not seem that up for it and may be looking for a move. Hammond is a joke of a captain, doesn't lead by word or by deed. He has been almost ever present, and almost always average or worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sfc1971 Posted 16 November, 2010 Author Share Posted 16 November, 2010 (edited) Good thing you aren't the manger then. Fed up with Spidermans constant sideways/backward passing and shooting from 25yds plus when he obviously can`t do it. Brought in as a attacking mid 1 goal 2yrs Enough said on him. Lambert does not want to be here is lazy and reportedly our top earner. Edited 16 November, 2010 by sfc1971 oh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Window Cleaner Posted 16 November, 2010 Share Posted 16 November, 2010 Fed up with Spidermans constant sideways/backward passing and shooting from 25yds plus when he obviously can`t do it. Brought in as a attacking mid 1 goal 2yrs Enough said on him. Lambert does not want to be here is lazy and reportedly our top earner. I really don't know where you get the idea that he was brought in as an attacking midfielder from. MS is and always has been a defensive midfielder a 6 if you like.He has the technical ability to get forward when asked but it's not his primary role. Lallana, Puncheon,Antonio on the other hand are all attacking midfielders with skill and guile, AOC well not so much yet but he has pace. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ottery st mary Posted 16 November, 2010 Share Posted 16 November, 2010 MS a defensive mid fielder who is not capable of heading , tackling correctly or marking.. Has gone downhill and has to show a lot more effort , desire and determination.. Very surprised if he plays .... keeps the bench warm on saturday...pity he has no reserve side to learn his trade.. Fancy dan who should be playing in the sunshine elsewhere.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
corky morris Posted 16 November, 2010 Share Posted 16 November, 2010 MS a defensive mid fielder who is not capable of heading , tackling correctly or marking.. Has gone downhill and has to show a lot more effort , desire and determination.. Very surprised if he plays .... keeps the bench warm on saturday...pity he has no reserve side to learn his trade.. Fancy dan who should be playing in the sunshine elsewhere.. What a load of ******** that is. He is the best central midfielder we have. He should play just in front of the back 4. He does not just pass sideways. The best passes we see from Saints nearly always orginate from him. NA was a muppet to play him as the front of the 3 on Saturday. Did you see Chaplow & Hammond on Saturday? Hammond was terrible. Did you see his tackle for the corner that lead to the 3rd goal? Chaplow missed the goal 1 on 1 & often won the ball really well only to pass between 2 players. I would drop Hammond on Saturday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ottery st mary Posted 16 November, 2010 Share Posted 16 November, 2010 What a load of ******** that is. He is the best central midfielder we have. He should play just in front of the back 4. He does not just pass sideways. The best passes we see from Saints nearly always orginate from him. NA was a muppet to play him as the front of the 3 on Saturday. Did you see Chaplow & Hammond on Saturday? Hammond was terrible. Did you see his tackle for the corner that lead to the 3rd goal? Chaplow missed the goal 1 on 1 & often won the ball really well only to pass between 2 players. I would drop Hammond on Saturday. Have just checked my facts and taken a second opinion.......What I said about Spiderman is very accurate.. Not a defensive midfielder......Tackles..few and far between and invariably illegal when he happens to connect. Heading the ball is alien within his armoury. Defence splitting passes/forward passes...few and far between. Motivation/effort/tenacity...lost out there in France on his last Under/21 visit..if not before. I will never be a coach /expert like you..but would rather have Chappers and Hammond in this side before Spiderman any day. Opinions who would have them... I will leave it to our Nigel ..he knows what he is doing....... For your benefit.....Spiderman gets a big kick up the arse...plays again in the two home games....turns his game around and we get a lot more from him and goals from Rikke would help... I will be the first to say corky you are the man...until then let us leave our handbags on the side of the training ground.. Two wins to get us going.. Come on you Saints. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Faz Posted 16 November, 2010 Share Posted 16 November, 2010 i like chaplow in that he makes good runs and gets into dangerous positions - more so than either hammond or Shcneiderlin - but his finnishing to date has been poor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Window Cleaner Posted 16 November, 2010 Share Posted 16 November, 2010 What a load of ******** that is. He is the best central midfielder we have. He should play just in front of the back 4. He does not just pass sideways. The best passes we see from Saints nearly always orginate from him. NA was a muppet to play him as the front of the 3 on Saturday. Did you see Chaplow & Hammond on Saturday? Hammond was terrible. Did you see his tackle for the corner that lead to the 3rd goal? Chaplow missed the goal 1 on 1 & often won the ball really well only to pass between 2 players. I would drop Hammond on Saturday. Don't take what OSM says to heart, he hasn't got a clue about modern football ,Cliff Huxford is his hero:lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ottery st mary Posted 16 November, 2010 Share Posted 16 November, 2010 Don't take what OSM says to heart, he hasn't got a clue about modern football ,Cliff Huxford is his hero:lol: And Jimmy Gabriel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Window Cleaner Posted 16 November, 2010 Share Posted 16 November, 2010 And Jimmy Gabriel Ah yes I forget wur Jimmy,sent off on a stretcher,don't get so many of those. Bet you thought Jimmy Melia was crap though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ottery st mary Posted 16 November, 2010 Share Posted 16 November, 2010 Windows if you must know I have got a six a side winners medal for under 7s at the sports centre.. PS I wrote to both dubai phil and old nickh about getting Spiderman into one of The saints web forum teams.. because neither replied ..I take it they didn't rate him either. PS As I said I hope he proves me wrong ..if selected for the the next two home games..for starters.. I would buy you pints at home games for the rest of the season......maybe not...........I will just send you a picture of me at the sports centre with my medal aged 6 years.....I was a class act and played very similar game to Spiderman.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperMikey Posted 16 November, 2010 Share Posted 16 November, 2010 1 Kelvin Davis (G) 2 Frazer Richardson (D) 3 Dan Harding (D) 4 Morgan Schneiderlin (M) 5 Ryan Dickson (M) 6 Jose Fonte (D) 7 Rickie Lambert (F) 9 Lee Barnard (F) 10 Jason Puncheon (M) 11 Guilherme Do Prado (F) 12 Danny Butterfield (D) 14 Dean Hammond (M) 15 Radhi Jaidi (D) 17 Aaron Martin (D) 19 Danny Seaborne (D) 20 Adam Lallana (F) 21 Lee Holmes (M) 22 David Connolly (F) 23 Tommy Forecast (G) 24 Bartosz Bialkowski (G) 26 Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain (M) 27 Oscar Gobern (M) 28 Callum McNish (M) 29 Ryan Doble (M) 37 Jack Saville (D) 40 Tony Garrod (F) Harlee Dean Paul Wotton Joseph Mills Anthony Pulis Gobern hasn't made the impact required for a long-term future at the club and hasn't impressed on loan at lower L1 teams either, which doesn't suggest that he'd be any better than what we have. Connolly and Holmes both still have quality, but have really struggled with injuries and we need fit players who aren't injured for 3 weeks in every month. Wotton's role in the team is important, but Adkins doesn't favour him given his very limited first-team action and loan spell, so we'll see him off and bring in a new 'anchor' type midfielder. Mills is a good player, but finds himself 3rd choice behind Harding and Dickson, so he needs to move on for the sake of his career. Forecast and Pulis for obvious reasons, as they're both sh!t. Puncheon has been dropped from the squad and is rumoured to be in talks with Millwall, so we'll probably see him go as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ottery st mary Posted 16 November, 2010 Share Posted 16 November, 2010 Jimmy Melia on his day a craftsman and passing defence splitting passes..link up play was top class.. More often than not I would have off loaded him in January when the pitches got damp... Thats when the likes of Huxford, Gabriel and O'Neil would be in my side.... The three musketeers always had the stock answer.. for the referee, when warned about kicking an opponent into touch.."Don't worry ref he won't be coming back on..problem solved." Played with Cliff Huxford at Basingstoke 75/76 season...Still going great then at the age of 96. Met Cliff at Yeovil last season....Still very fit...Good man and a nice bloke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now