Jump to content

Calum Chambers - Done Deal - Official


washsaint

Recommended Posts

also, further to my last

 

there has been little/no communication withe cork and fonte regarding a new contract

Fonte has instructed his agent to see what interest there is out there

Cork is keeping his options open but more discreetly. His dad is another matter :lol:

and these players want to stay but the club are keen to use the academy more.

 

 

again, have no idea if true just passing on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we got £75million for 8th place even before all these sales, how can we have debt?

 

I guess having a wage bill of over £1m per week for your playing staff and the cost of developing the training ground would have incurred a bit of debt. Depends on what other costs the club has, the academy has a pretty large budget IIRC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we flog Chambers we know it is asset stripping IMO.

 

Asset Stripping appears to be one of those phrases that people have now adopted in their vocabulary without actually knowing what it means.

 

When they sell the training ground, stadium and Jackson's Farm or Kat starts taking Directors Loans / dividends I'll join the party.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

From the original link: -

 

The combined cash at bank value for all businesses where Katharina holds a current appointment equals £28,101,912, with a combined assets value of £51,931,150 and liabilities of £168,241,610.

 

 

 

It's the £168M figure that seems at odds with previous reports. Nevertheless, sure it's incorrect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Asset Stipping appears to be one of those phrases that people have now adopted in their vocabulary without actually knowing what it means.

 

When they sell the training ground, stadium and Jackson's Farm I'll join the party.

I think they mean (when it comes to football clubs)

is selling most players of high value, replacing them with FAR cheaper (which will mean in most cases, inferior) replacements and pocketing the rest

 

that my take when football fans say "asset stripping'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://companycheck.co.uk/director/918435092/MS-KATHARINA-MARIA-MATHILDE-LIEBHERR

 

Not sure of the accuracy but does suggest that we do have significant liabilities.

 

Agree to the 2013 audited figures yep.

 

12.5m of the current liabilities is amounts owed to KL which were supposed to be repaid in 2014, 11mill represents outstanding transfer fees to be paid in 2014, 9 mill owed to the holding co, 16 mill of accrued liabilities and the remainder trade debtors, tax and the 5mill advance we took out. It is worth noting however that our assets are massively understated if you look at fair values as Lallana, Shaw, Chambers and all other academy players will not be recorded in the books so the real picture is quite a bit rosier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Asset Stipping appears to be one of those phrases that people have now adopted in their vocabulary without actually knowing what it means.

 

When they sell the training ground, stadium and Jackson's Farm I'll join the party.

 

If one more player leaves we know its a fire sale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they mean (when it comes to football clubs)

is selling most players of high value, replacing them with FAR cheaper (which will mean in most cases, inferior) replacements and pocketing the rest

 

that my take when football fans say "asset stripping'

 

Ŵe sold lambert for £4m and his replacement cost £7m.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Asset Stripping appears to be one of those phrases that people have now adopted in their vocabulary without actually knowing what it means.

 

When they sell the training ground, stadium and Jackson's Farm or Kat starts taking Directors Loans / dividends I'll join the party.

 

OK, we will know KL wants to flog players and pull a **** load of money out of the club. I think it's obvious what is meant by it in this context.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the original link: -

 

The combined cash at bank value for all businesses where Katharina holds a current appointment equals £28,101,912, with a combined assets value of £51,931,150 and liabilities of £168,241,610.

 

 

It's the £168M figure that seems at odds with previous reports. Nevertheless, sure it's incorrect.

 

Are you an accountant? If not, suggest you try and not overinterpret shoestring figures any tom, **** and harry can pull off google.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, we will know KL wants to flog players and pull a **** load of money out of the club. I think it's obvious what is meant by it in this context.

 

She's sanctioned £90m worth of spending in the last three years on players, with more to come, plus £30m on the training ground. Please explain what you mean.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the original link: -

 

The combined cash at bank value for all businesses where Katharina holds a current appointment equals £28,101,912, with a combined assets value of £51,931,150 and liabilities of £168,241,610.

 

 

 

It's the £168M figure that seems at odds with previous reports. Nevertheless, sure it's incorrect.

 

Just making a guess but liabilities may include the p/w wages of all players at the full contract length. Someone getting paid 20k-30k/week for 4 or 5 years is a liability the company probably reports.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree to the 2013 audited figures yep.

 

12.5m of the current liabilities is amounts owed to KL which were supposed to be repaid in 2014, 11mill represents outstanding transfer fees to be paid in 2014, 9 mill owed to the holding co, 16 mill of accrued liabilities and the remainder trade debtors, tax and the 5mill advance we took out. It is worth noting however that our assets are massively understated if you look at fair values as Lallana, Shaw, Chambers and all other academy players will not be recorded in the books so the real picture is quite a bit rosier.

 

Plus Premier League guaranteed income one way or another, even if it's parachute payments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is where business ruins football and I'm developing a huge dislike for the board.

 

Calum Chambers will be first choice England CB in three years time.

 

That'll be an odd choice if Arsenal are playing him as a holding midfieldfer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is where business ruins football and I'm developing a huge dislike for the board.

 

Calum Chambers will be first choice England CB in three years time.

 

Still in shock we are only getting £11m for him up-front. Makes absolutely no sense given how much money we are likely to have in the bank from sales already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

She's sanctioned £90m worth of spending in the last three years on players, with more to come, plus £30m on the training ground. Please explain what you mean.

 

Maybe, and this is a novel idea, she wants to make some money out of her investment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe, and this is a novel idea, she wants to make some money out of her investment.

 

Pretty strange to spend millions on replacing departed players then. Surely her investment would be worth more by keeping the players and selling 'champions league ready saints' with their plush new training ground and top 5 academy in Europe churning out international after international?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty strange to spend millions on replacing departed players then. Surely her investment would be worth more by keeping the players and selling 'champions league ready saints' with their plush new training ground and top 5 academy in Europe churning out international after international?

 

no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm very disappointed at the apparent decision to sell chambers. However, if our policy is that we will only sell players who want to leave and get the chance to go to a champions league club, then this would fit with that.

 

My main question though is, if we're having a firesale, why did we release such a snide statement when Lallana left? Wouldn't we be fine with him leaving?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if we're having a firesale, why did we release such a snide statement when Lallana left? Wouldn't we be fine with him leaving?

 

Broken assurances; refusing to give up loyalty bonuses despite agitating to leave; spreading discontent in dressing room despite being captain?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ignoring the high fee for Shaw, £16m for someone who has played 22 league games is to me fairly extraordinary. I know that this is based on potential, but to me that is somewhat of a risk. I think Wenger must have been very very impressed during the 2-2 at SMS, where he did have a storming game. But £16m having played 22 games??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

View Terms of service (Terms of Use) and Privacy Policy (Privacy Policy) and Forum Guidelines ({Guidelines})