Jump to content

EU referendum


Wade Garrett

Recommended Posts

We may be a bit worse off, we may be better off, we won't know unless we leave.

 

To be honest I made up my mind after watching my wife go through agonising pain waiting ages for a qualified doctor in an overstretched hospital full of Polish and Romanians - in Southampton. My best mate is a builder who is having to compete with Polish guys willing to work for peanuts and a friend of mine had to wait for 2 hours for an ambulance whilst in agony because they were too busy. The housing crisis is a simple supply and demand problem, where is next year's extra 300,000 going to live? And the 300,000 or more that will turn up in 2017?

 

Hard to argue with any of that. It doesn't tend to affect the Westminster elite and the Notting Hill set as much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think you can underestimate how much the need to for Britain to pay off massive war debts affected levels of investment in new models and modernised production. There was also a feeling that we were owed something after six years of hardship and having won WW2. which of coursed the Germans and Japanese didn't have. The wealth of the Americans during the 1950s and 1960s was largely due to a lack of manufacturing competition and it took 50 years for that to fully unwind.

 

What is often not realised is that Britain also received it share of the Marshall Plan money but it was not used to rebuild our industry,

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/modern/marshall_01.shtml

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is often not realised is that Britain also received it share of the Marshall Plan money but it was not used to rebuild our industry,

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/modern/marshall_01.shtml

 

That's a good article Whitey, but it ignores the debt forgiveness Germany received that Britain and others didn't. http://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/jul/06/germany-1953-greece-2015-economic-marshall-plan-debt-relief (its primarily about Greece but has useful side info).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a good article Whitey, but it ignores the debt forgiveness Germany received that Britain and others didn't. http://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/jul/06/germany-1953-greece-2015-economic-marshall-plan-debt-relief (its primarily about Greece but has useful side info).

 

You are quite right. We often say that we 'won' the war but it bankrupted the country in the process and cost us an empire whilst it was the making of the USA as an industrial giant and a superpower. It all feels like smoke and mirrors to me. Coincidentally I was watching one of the last episodes of 'The World at War' the other evening discussing the economic and social outcome of it all with a very interesting appraisal by a young Stephen E Ambrose (Band of Brothers etc.). We are still living with the consequences of the cataclysmic upheavals of the struggles amongst nations of the last century.

 

http://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/dec/03/britains-first-world-war-debts-repaid-what-does-it-mean

http://qz.com/290183/in-2014-countries-are-still-paying-off-debt-from-world-war-one/

I particularly like this paragraph:

 

So the solution to this was brokered by the future US vice-president Charles Dawes, who in 1924 proposed that the US lend money to Germany to fund its reparation payments to France and the UK, who in turn would use the money to repay their war debts. The solution was so good that Dawes won the Nobel Peace Prize the next year in recognition. And the plan worked.

 

I guess that means that the Americans leant money to Germany so that it could pay back France and Britain who could then pay the money back to America. In effect Germany took on the burden of the allied debts added to its own reparations as dictated to it at Versailles. No wonder Hitler rose to power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure any sovereign government with elections to win would impose that. Europe, with no elections or accountability yes.

How about the US, they've got elections to win, or is that not sovereign enough for you?

 

If we go out of Europe we'd be utterly helpless in negotiations with the US and we'd be signing up deeper and quicker than the EU ever will.

 

Also, Europe does have elections.

Edited by CB Fry
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about the US, they've got elections to win, or is that not sovereign enough for you?

 

If we go out of Europe we'd be utterly helpless in negotiations with the US and we'd be signing up deeper and quicker than the EU ever will.

 

Also, Europe does have elections.

 

I don't see it that way CB. Also I don't think the actual decision making in the EU is done by the democratically elected.

 

Just the way I see it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New_Compass_2015.jpg

 

Johnny, Johnnny, Johnny. That survey was fun and interesting but the results were whack. Hypo and Unbelievable Jeff as left leaning and liberal? Ukipper Wes as political centre? Not really.

 

I'd say there is a reasonable balance of left and right of the people who post in the lounge.

Edited by buctootim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Johnny, Johnnny, Johnny. That survey was fun and interesting but the results were whack. Hypo and Unbelievable Jeff as left leaning and liberal? Ukipper Wes as political centre? Not really.

 

I'd say there is a reasonable balance of left and right of the people who post in the lounge.

 

I think it is reflective, but the current cross hairs need to move left and down 4 blocks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 with ease, 5-6 at a push.

 

 

 

I expected no less from this righty Tory/UKIP loving circle-w@nk of a forum.

 

Dont be fooled into thinking anti Euro feeling is confined to the right. There are plenty of lefties who feel the same way. Lots of working class union members are having wages and conditions eroded by the euro influx. Would be churlish to deny otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dont be fooled into thinking anti Euro feeling is confined to the right. There are plenty of lefties who feel the same way. Lots of working class union members are having wages and conditions eroded by the euro influx. Would be churlish to deny otherwise.

 

Ah, but it's fun bashing those tory ****s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Johnny, Johnnny, Johnny. That survey was fun and interesting but the results were whack. Hypo and Unbelievable Jeff as left leaning and liberal? Ukipper Wes as political centre? Not really.

 

I'd say there is a reasonable balance of left and right of the people who post in the lounge.

 

The trouble with somebody applying labels to others, is that when others wish to believe them, they stick. Despite saying on more than one occasion that I am a Conservative, you label me as a UKIP voter. Well, I did vote for them in the European Elections, as did many others whose traditional allegiance is with other parties, but that is one single incidence against dozens upon dozens of votes for the Conservative candidate in various elections since I was 21.

 

The trouble is that some have difficulty in differentiating between parties when some important issues overlap party boundaries. Believe it or not, concerns about immigration and membership of the EU is not the exclusive preserve of UKIP. There are factions of the other major parties who also share those concerns. Wade Garrett recognises this, but it seems beyond you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Having previously been pro-Europe with varying enthusiasm, I am rather surprised that one thing has changed my mind.

That is the Eastern European leaders saying they will not allow us to make our own policy regarding benefits.

I was prepared to accept free movement as I believed that our economy needed an influx of younger workers to pay the pensions of my generation.

However while being prepared to accept the original terms with a veto, I cannot accept that British policy can be made in Poland, hungary etc.

I will therefore now vote to leave, unless we get very significant progress.

Albeit with considerable regret and trepidation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is an effective riposte to these Eastern European leaders who will not allow us to impose a four year ban on benefit claims for their countries' nationals. Offer them the alternative; that we will pay the benefits for their unemployed nationals, but bill them so that we are reimbursed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having previously been pro-Europe with varying enthusiasm, I am rather surprised that one thing has changed my mind.

That is the Eastern European leaders saying they will not allow us to make our own policy regarding benefits.

I was prepared to accept free movement as I believed that our economy needed an influx of younger workers to pay the pensions of my generation.

However while being prepared to accept the original terms with a veto, I cannot accept that British policy can be made in Poland, hungary etc.

I will therefore now vote to leave, unless we get very significant progress.

Albeit with considerable regret and trepidation.

 

Has it finally sunk in ? We've been on this journey since day one .

 

The EU want the relationship between nations to be the same as England is with Scotland . It is unthinkable that a Scotsman could work in London and not claim inwork benefits or send his child benefit home to Jockland . That's how the EU view a Polish worker in the UK . He is a citizen of the EUSSR & is therefore entitled to the same treatment as you or I .Our VAT rates are subject to European laws , now it's sinking in that our benefit system is as well. If a country can't set its own tax rates, can't decide who receives benefits and can't decide who is allowed in, can it call its self an independent nation?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm voting in, solely to protect my own future. I'm currently studying Wildlife Conservation and many of the jobs tied in with this sector of work rely on EU Directives. Without the EU influence the UK has little to no protection for wildlife and their habitats, so will be a great loss in that aspect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm voting in, solely to protect my own future. I'm currently studying Wildlife Conservation and many of the jobs tied in with this sector of work rely on EU Directives. Without the EU influence the UK has little to no protection for wildlife and their habitats, so will be a great loss in that aspect.

 

We are considerably better qualified to regulate on our own wildlife than somebody from the EU. If there was ever an example of one size does not fit all it is conservation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm voting in, solely to protect my own future. I'm currently studying Wildlife Conservation and many of the jobs tied in with this sector of work rely on EU Directives. Without the EU influence the UK has little to no protection for wildlife and their habitats, so will be a great loss in that aspect.

 

Fair enough. But isn't that like saying a fisherman would vote in as well because there are directives on fishing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm voting in, solely to protect my own future. I'm currently studying Wildlife Conservation and many of the jobs tied in with this sector of work rely on EU Directives. Without the EU influence the UK has little to no protection for wildlife and their habitats, so will be a great loss in that aspect.

 

couldnt we protect wildlife outside of the EU

Link to comment
Share on other sites

couldnt we protect wildlife outside of the EU

 

The Australians , Canadaians , Swiss, Norweigans , and all other non eussr countries , don't give a flying **** about wildlife . Spainish Bulls are particularly grateful to the wonderful EU and the protection it brings them .

 

**** the poor whose wages are kept low , we need to stay in the EU so that lefties can get jobs conserving wildlife.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd vote to leave just so the Scots have an excuse for a second referendum and hopefully vote to leave.. I am fed up with their constant moaning,the government has helped them too much giving them shipbuilding etc and they can't even get that right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Thats not an EU issue though. All industrialised countries have mass immigration, exactly because it drives the wages cost down. Its the interests of big companies which drives government policy - not the interests of existing citizens. We had mass immigration in the 1950s and 60s before the EU and we have it now. Regardless of what you're told by the politicians before an election it wont change whether in or out.

 

camerons-immigration-promise.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats not an EU issue though. All industrialised countries have mass immigration, exactly because it drives the wages cost down. Its the interests of big companies which drives government policy - not the interests of existing citizens. We had mass immigration in the 1950s and 60s before the EU and we have it now. Regardless of what you're told by the politicians before an election it wont change whether in or out.

 

camerons-immigration-promise.png

 

Not sure of the relevance of historic migration - we have never experienced immigration on this level before. At least leaving the EU will mean our government can control it if they want to (which they probably will).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

leaving the EU will mean our government can control it if they want to (which they probably will).

 

Thats the point. They wont. How do we know? because they haven't significantly reduced non EU immigration, which they have the power to do. The majority of immigration comes from outside the EU. Kicking the EU is just an easy target which makes people feel good but deflects from the real issue - the government could reduce immigration but they dont want to, despite all the rhetoric and promises. Nett migration from the EU is relatively minor (the difference between UK citizens living in the EU and EU ciiitzens living here). People are angry about the wrong target, just as intended.

 

_79366472_world_migration_624_v6.gif

 

Non-Brit-net-immigration3.jpg

Edited by buctootim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats the point. They wont. How do we know? because they haven't significantly reduced non EU immigration, which they have the power to do. The majority of immigration comes from outside the EU. Kicking the EU is just an easy target which makes people feel good but deflects from the real issue - the government could reduce immigration but they dont want to, despite all the rhetoric and promises. Nett migration from the EU is relatively minor (the difference between UK citizens living in the EU and EU ciiitzens living here). People are angry about the wrong target, just as intended.

 

_79366472_world_migration_624_v6.gif

 

Non-Brit-net-immigration3.jpg

 

You're working on the basis that all immigration is the same, when clearly it isn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats right. We import mostly working age, tax paying people and export to France and Spain millions of retired people who need lots of healthcare. Its not fair, I agree.

 

So you think all our immigration is the same? Same industries, skills, language?

 

And do we not block significant numbers of people from migrating to the UK from outside the EU?

 

If France and Spain have a problem with Brits migrating to their countries, I'd fully support them. Can't he's too much of a campaign from them on that, from them on the Brits spending their substantial pensions in restaurants, shops, golf courses, not diluting and depressing wages, unfair indeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you think all our immigration is the same? Same industries, skills, language?

 

You seem to be implying migrants from outside the EU are specialist skilled workers the UK needs but migrants from the EU are basic education unskilled workers who depress wages. Interesting idea, you might change my mind if you can prove it rather than just assert it. Go on then post up some stats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You seem to be implying migrants from outside the EU are specialist skilled workers the UK needs but migrants from the EU are basic education unskilled workers who depress wages. Interesting idea, you might change my mind if you can prove it rather than just assert it. Go on then post up some stats.

 

The point is why should we discriminate on what continent someone was born on? Why should we commit to unlimited/unrestricted immigration from Eastern and Southern Europe, and then make it so difficult for someone outside the EU to gain residence even if they have much better reasons/are more qualified to move here? Makes no sense to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You seem to be implying migrants from outside the EU are specialist skilled workers the UK needs but migrants from the EU are basic education unskilled workers who depress wages. Interesting idea, you might change my mind if you can prove it rather than just assert it. Go on then post up some stats.
I'm not "implying" all are one way or another, but this might help you understand a little easier https://www.gov.uk/check-uk-visa/y/afghanistan/work/longer_than_six_months
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The point is why should we discriminate on what continent someone was born on? Why should we commit to unlimited/unrestricted immigration from Eastern and Southern Europe, and then make it so difficult for someone outside the EU to gain residence even if they have much better reasons/are more qualified to move here? Makes no sense to me.

 

Because of reciprocity - the equal right of UK citizens to move to the EU countries - something which doesn't exist for the other countries you refer to.

Edited by buctootim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The point is why should we discriminate on what continent someone was born on? Why should we commit to unlimited/unrestricted immigration from Eastern and Southern Europe, and then make it so difficult for someone outside the EU to gain residence even if they have much better reasons/are more qualified to move here? Makes no sense to me.
All immigration is the same to him. A skilled, in demand professional from Australia is the same as an unskilled labourer from Romania in his eyes it seems.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you're back tracking on the "not all immigration is the same" schtick? Probably wise, as Im sure you know the large majority of non EU immigration is students, followed by family dependants joining people here followed by a long distant third by labour visas.
You're getting more and more confused.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

View Terms of service (Terms of Use) and Privacy Policy (Privacy Policy) and Forum Guidelines ({Guidelines})