Nolan Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 1 hour ago, Andrew Watson said: Go on the premier league wage site MLG and you might just retract your statement. Says Aribo on 70k before you nit pick. Remember they are cut in half for the championship. Allegedly. If you're talking about Capology, they have the clearest of clear disclaimers. "All salary figures are estimates and do not represent official figures" 1
The Kraken Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago Probably needs to say which “premier league wage site” is being used for the info, then we can judge how accurate it is (or not).
BILLYDO Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago Question for those with more insight than me( that might be most of you). Should we be unable to shift those players we would like to see gone and we get promoted, do their wages go automatically back up?
woodsaint1 Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 4 hours ago, chiknsmack said: That's Josh McNamara, who was behind Adli in the U21 pecking order (despite being a couple of years older). His contract is due to expire; don't know if it's been extended or anything. We'll trade Dibling for three might-be-Fernandeses. They even have their own M. Fernandes (19yo RB, Europa League experience, YHGTI, if Sugawara goes then - competent as Bree is - replacing him would be nice) who would be an obvious pick for one of the three. Released last week
Holmes_and_Watson Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 17 minutes ago, BILLYDO said: Question for those with more insight than me( that might be most of you). Should we be unable to shift those players we would like to see gone and we get promoted, do their wages go automatically back up? I'd have thought It won't be automatic, as in the club are obligated to do it out of the goodness of their hearts. But contractually, where there are relegation clauses impacting wages, there will be promotion related clauses too, impacting wages to come at a higher level. Not to mention promotion bonuses etc. Whether they go up to exactly the same level is for the club and agent to fight out. Realistically, clubs keeping players on much lower contracts than the others, due to not having such clauses, or through things like multiple promotions, are going to lose those players, unless there's a renegotiation. 1
Andrew Watson Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago No it is not Themotherfunky,never been on twitter and do not have controversial opinions,just my own opinions. I do not see others with iffy opinions having them pulled apart,but each to their own I suppose.
Andrew Watson Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago The site was capology Nolan,so I hold my hands up and apologise to MLG and others. For what it is worth do those figures really seem that unrealistic for the premier league,the season just gone.
The Kraken Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago google AI overview of capology. Capology's Premier League salary data is generally considered to be quite accurate, with over 90% of salaries verified, especially after major transfer windows. While the figures are estimates and not official, the site employs a verification process, and the data is updated regularly. Here's a more detailed look: Verification Process: Capology has a verification system where they check and confirm the accuracy of the salary information they gather. High Verification Rate: For the Premier League, a significant portion, over 90%, of the salary data is verified, meaning it's been confirmed as accurate. Updates: Capology's data is updated, especially after major transfer periods like the summer and January windows, to reflect the latest deals and changes. Estimates: It's important to remember that while Capology strives for accuracy, the figures are estimates and not official contract details. No Distinction for Bonuses: Signing bonuses and other performance-based bonuses are not always clearly differentiated in the data, and may be presented as part of the overall salary.
Andrew Watson Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Thank you The Kraken,still not enough for MLG and others on here though.😀
Saint86 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago On 13/06/2025 at 19:34, Chez said: Your figures are not quite right. Total club wages for 2023 were £122m, and in 2024 they were £81m (93.5% of turnover). Wages for 2025 will have risen a fair amount, but you would imagine not to the 2023 level. However, we offloaded a lot of players and wages when we were relegated. If we don't do that again, the reduction won't be as high. Losing KWP, Ramsdale and maybe someone like Bednarek would save a lot. If capology is accurate, our wages (playing squad) this season is "only" £50M per year: Pretty interesting take away figures. Doesn't take much to imagine us getting Aribo's, Bednarek's, Lallana's, Ugochukwu's, Macca's, Sulemana's, Onuachu's, KWP's, Gronbaek's, ABK's, and Taylor's wages etc. all off the books this summer. Which would free up circa £21M in wages.
sockeye Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 38 minutes ago, Saint86 said: If capology is accurate, our wages (playing squad) this season is "only" £50M per year: Pretty interesting take away figures. Doesn't take much to imagine us getting Aribo's, Bednarek's, Lallana's, Ugochukwu's, Macca's, Sulemana's, Onuachu's, KWP's, Gronbaek's, ABK's, and Taylor's wages etc. all off the books this summer. Which would free up circa £21M in wages. Fraser on 40k. Jesus that is appalling. £2m lost for sentimentality on just one player. Some of these guys really need to go this summer to free up the wage bill and quite a few can go this summer on a free as well
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now