Saint_clark Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago Can see the attacking threat but don't see where the width is coming from. 1
goodymatt Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago Away to top of the league without our best LB, CF and LW (best player). Where is the width to get crosses into Larin? Where is the pace to counter? These injuries and Fellows low confidence have not come at a good time! Does seem like Tonda is playing this one not to lose, let’s see.
BARCELONASAINT Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago I think it was obvious to most on here that as soon as Scienza and Stewart went off we wouldn't see either for this game and in the case of Scienza unlikely to see him for quite some time. I have no idea where the spark is coming from. Matsuki was poor midweek and Edozie has only shown brief glimpses of the player he was. Given we have gone with Larin then we absolutely need to play to his strengths so that means when he's in the box putting crosses into the box for his head.
Willo of Whiteley Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago (edited) No width and no pace. This could be interesting. Edited 15 hours ago by Willo of Whiteley
goodymatt Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago Welcome to the 100 club Flynn. To be celebrated with a yellow and 2 match ban? 2 3
Turkish Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago Assume it’ll be a low block with Azaz as a 10 Jander as the 8 with a double pivot to allow the hybrid full backs to overlap getting balls into the red zone. Should help us to win lots of turnovers be solid against the ball with quick transitions wide . 2 3 1
sadoldgit Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago (edited) 2 hours ago, egg said: True, but they're just made up descriptions to make people sound impressive. Teams have been sitting deep, or parking the bus, for ages. A new phrase isn't needed. To be fair, low block makes more sense than parking the bus, although sitting deep does what it says on the tin. Overload is the one that winds me up. Still, if things didn’t change they would still be wearing boots with massive toe caps and nailed in studs and shin pads made of pieces of cane. 😉 Edited 14 hours ago by sadoldgit
Saint NL Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago Just now, Turkish said: Assume it’ll be a low block with Azaz as a 10 Jander as the 8 with a double pivot to allow the hybrid full backs to overlap getting balls into the red zone. Should help us to win lots of turnovers be solid against the ball with quick transitions wide . Mods - can we get the poop emoji added in the reactions? 😉 1 1
macca155 Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 1 minute ago, Turkish said: Assume it’ll be a low block with Azaz as a 10 Jander as the 8 with a double pivot to allow the hybrid full backs to overlap getting balls into the red zone. Should help us to win lots of turnovers be solid against the ball with quick transitions wide . Don't understand a word but sounds impressive 1 3
Winnersaint Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago Hard to disagree with a defeat. Largely on the grounds of gaining only 7 points out of possible 27 so far against the current top 6 1
obelisk Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago Injuries starting to take their toll. Not very confident that the squad can handle the run-in pressure given their flaky form over the season. Hope they can prove me wrong.
sfc4prem Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago I've not watched Coventry this season. How do they play? With width? High back line? Attacking wingbacks?
BARCELONASAINT Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 1 minute ago, sfc4prem said: I've not watched Coventry this season. How do they play? With width? High back line? Attacking wingbacks? I will make this simple.....they just play good football with good players and have a lethal attack force. 1
sfc4prem Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago Just now, BARCELONASAINT said: I will make this simple.....they just play good football with good players and have a lethal attack force. This should be fun.
sfc4prem Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago I'm fearing there might be a lot of sideways and backwards passing, as we struggle to break them down due to lack of forward movement and creativity. 1
swedish dave Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 2 minutes ago, BARCELONASAINT said: I think it was obvious to most on here that as soon as Scienza and Stewart went off we wouldn't see either for this game and in the case of Scienza unlikely to see him for quite some time. I have no idea where the spark is coming from. Matsuki was poor midweek and Edozie has only shown brief glimpses of the player he was. Given we have gone with Larin then we absolutely need to play to his strengths so that means when he's in the box putting crosses into the box for his head. to be fair, the whole team put in a shift to beat Fulham on Sunday (and kept a clean sheet) then to go into a game 3 days later against a West Brom. side fighting for survival was a big challenge. We had two (or was it 3) players just one yellow card away from a suspension meant they were a little more careful with some tackles. Not everyone is capable of playing upto his best level in every game, but I expect the likes of Matsuki and Edozie to perform a bit better v. Coventry. Larin is a real threat and experienced at dealing with defenders and holding the ball up, and has an amazing turn of pace when attacking. Scienza takes a lot of punishment in every game, and is not protected by referees either. Both he and Stewart may make good contributions for the remainder of the season ..if not forced to play 90+ minutes in every game.
trousers Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 18 minutes ago, LGTL said: That’s a lineup not to lose if ever I’ve seen one. Yep... Primary mission: don't concede... And see if we can sneak a winner near the end. Might work.... 3
Willo of Whiteley Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago We look very light in the centre of midfield…
BARCELONASAINT Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 1 minute ago, sfc4prem said: I'm fearing there might be a lot of sideways and backwards passing, as we struggle to break them down due to lack of forward movement and creativity. Only Borough have a better defensive record than Coventry which doesn't bode well for our attacking players and when it comes to scoring goals they have done it for fun, scored 30 more than we have! 1
benjii Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 12 minutes ago, Turkish said: Assume it’ll be a low block with Azaz as a 10 Jander as the 8 with a double pivot to allow the hybrid full backs to overlap getting balls into the red zone. Should help us to win lots of turnovers be solid against the ball with quick transitions wide . I think transitions will be fast latitudinals to a forward brigadier. 1
benjii Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Willo of Whiteley said: We look very light in the centre of midfield… How do you work that out with an extra CM on the pitch? 1
trousers Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago (edited) 14 minutes ago, Winnersaint said: Hard to disagree with a defeat. Largely on the grounds of gaining only 7 points out of possible 27 so far against the current top 6 Yeah, this is what I've been attempting to highlight the last couple of weeks... As good as the current 'unbeaten run' (TM) has been, it's largely been against teams you'd expect us to get a result from. Today will tell us more about what level Tonda has got us to, more so than the last 10 games. (edit: that said, with two of our most pivotal players out of action, it could be argued that a poor result today isn't as indicative of our level as it might otherwise be...) Edited 14 hours ago by trousers
Saint NL Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 3 minutes ago, benjii said: How do you work that out with an extra CM on the pitch? Well if Jander plays like he did against Leicester....
Turkish Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 23 minutes ago, macca155 said: Don't understand a word but sounds impressive That is all that matters
Baird of the land Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago lack of pace in that lineup is a definite concern 1
Zorba Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago Need to be on the front foot today. If we’re slow and dick around at the back, we’ll get pumped!
Toussaint Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 36 minutes ago, Turkish said: Assume it’ll be a low block with Azaz as a 10 Jander as the 8 with a double pivot to allow the hybrid full backs to overlap getting balls into the red zone. Should help us to win lots of turnovers be solid against the ball with quick transitions wide . Sounds like a barn dance routine? 1 1
Zorba Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 1 minute ago, Toussaint said: Sounds like a barn dance routine? Or a porno 2
Toussaint Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 24 minutes ago, benjii said: I think transitions will be fast latitudinals to a forward brigadier. I think we need to be prepared to call in fast air. 1
Nordic Saint Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 31 minutes ago, sfc4prem said: I'm fearing there might be a lot of sideways and backwards passing, as we struggle to break them down due to lack of forward movement and creativity. I think it will be more a case of struggling to stop them. With the players Coventry have, you'd expect them to steamroller us. 1
die Mannyschaft Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago Just seen line up. Its a very slow non attacking line up. I doubt if we will get over the half way line more than 5 times. Coventry 6-0 Saints based on line up. I could be wrong but there is no players who can score, run or take on players. Latin maybe isolated or end up in back 4. Can't win with no wingers. 1 3
Jack Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago That’s clever from Tonda I think, set us up to shithouse a 1-0 win from a set piece or own goal from our only foray into Coventry’s half. Great to see how adaptable he’s becoming to different types of challenge 1
Turkish Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 1 minute ago, benjii said: Is Downes front sweeper? Made for that role
Winnersaint Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 4 minutes ago, die Mannyschaft said: Just seen line up. Its a very slow non attacking line up. I doubt if we will get over the half way line more than 5 times. Coventry 6-0 Saints based on line up. I could be wrong but there is no players who can score, run or take on players. Latin maybe isolated or end up in back 4. Can't win with no wingers. Glad to see you are your normal happy self. 2
Zorba Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 1 minute ago, Jack said: That’s clever from Tonda I think, set us up to shithouse a 1-0 win from a set piece or own goal from our only foray into Coventry’s half. Great to see how adaptable he’s becoming to different types of challenge Yep, keeping them out for 89 minutes in our own half and nicking a goal at the end, great plan. It will certainly take a tactical masterclass to beat Cov today. If Tonda pulls it off, he’ll have earned his stripes. COYS!
macca155 Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago (edited) Considering our form against the top 8, and what a horror show that is, we've no right to expect anything more than a draw today. That team is set up for exactly that. Aiming to control the midfield, frustrate them, and then unleash Edozie and/or Fellows to grab a winner. Be interesting to see all three CMs playing. Guess Jander will push forward a bit You never know, a Manning free kick on 87 minutes might make the weekend. Nb 'unleash' is doing a lot of work there Edited 14 hours ago by macca155 1
Willo of Whiteley Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago (edited) 8 minutes ago, trousers said: Says it all But I remember going to that Middlesbrough home game and I thought they were pretty ineffective. They got a very fortunate goal through the ghost of Alex McCarthy. Edited 14 hours ago by Willo of Whiteley
BarberSaint Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 53 minutes ago, sadoldgit said: To be fair, low block makes more sense than parking the bus, although sitting deep does what it says on the tin. Overload is the one that winds me up. Still, if things didn’t change they would still be wearing boots with massive toe caps and nailed in studs and shin pads made of pieces of cane. 😉 And we'd have a decent kit. But anyway. I don't see us getting out much so we'll lose. We really need to try to keep the play away from our area with the personnel they have who are good at scoring. If Larin can keep it and hold it up who's to support him - none of those are going to do much and I don't see Larin as someone (quite) who will run onto a threaded pass from Azaz (who likely as not will be anonymous). 4-0 to them.
Toussaint Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Willo of Whiteley said: Says it all To be fair we were a different side for most of those games, Baz in goal, 3 at the back and DD as the target man.
BarberSaint Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago 53 minutes ago, sfc4prem said: I've not watched Coventry this season. How do they play? With width? High back line? Attacking wingbacks? At the home game, 1st half they were good. Then they defended and we weren't very good. They just passed and moved and didn't play in a particular style. If they're on form, based on the first half at SMS they were the best team in this league I've seen this season.
obelisk Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago The plan seems to be to keep 'em out. That'll work until Coventry score from the first corner. I'm expecting a heavyish defeat today.
Saint_clark Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago Christ, jobs worth ref it seems. Orders the throw retaken because he was two feet far forward.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now