Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Have on good authority he’s banned. Club exploring options for appeal before anything goes public 

Posted
1 minute ago, MB said:

Have on good authority he’s banned. Club exploring options for appeal before anything goes public 

How long for pal?

Posted (edited)
28 minutes ago, MB said:

Have on good authority he’s banned. Club exploring options for appeal before anything goes public 

Do the club control the narrative on when news is released? Surely the FA would/could announce it first?

Edited by Stripey McStripe Shirt
Posted
My understanding is the club are aware of said punishment but are considering options for appeal. Its not as harsh though as people fear. All I really know.
  • MB - above is your post from 1 August. I’ll take your post a few minutes ago with a very large pinch of salt
  • Like 2
Posted
8 minutes ago, MB said:

Have on good authority he’s banned. Club exploring options for appeal before anything goes public 

We all know he's getting banned. We're waiting to see how long for.

Posted
2 minutes ago, LegalEagle said:
My understanding is the club are aware of said punishment but are considering options for appeal. Its not as harsh though as people fear. All I really know.
  • MB - above is your post from 1 August. I’ll take your post a few minutes ago with a very large pinch of salt

Yeah he doesn't know any more than you or I.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, LegalEagle said:
My understanding is the club are aware of said punishment but are considering options for appeal. Its not as harsh though as people fear. All I really know.
  • MB - above is your post from 1 August. I’ll take your post a few minutes ago with a very large pinch of salt

No point appealing it's not going to make any difference as we know from EFL judgement. Its not a real panel or court or official magistrate just a few blokes at a desk. Spygate is the biggest and highest profile issue the FA will ever deal with. 

Posted
15 minutes ago, MB said:

Have on good authority he’s banned. Club exploring options for appeal before anything goes public 

Hahahahahaha he’s back 

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Sevvy said:

They are on the phone to Steve Gibson to ask what the punishment should be 

On the phone to Gibson say is that good enough for you or do you want to appeal for 18 months.

Posted
16 minutes ago, MB said:

Have on good authority he’s banned. Club exploring options for appeal before anything goes public 

Have it on good authority that you are utterly full of shit.

I could have told you he's being banned three months ago.

  • Haha 5
Posted
20 minutes ago, MB said:

Have on good authority he’s banned. Club exploring options for appeal before anything goes public 

I actually hope you’re right just so you get to know what that feels like for once. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, hypochondriac said:

No idea what the result is but you'd think if it was something we thought was ok then we likely would have heard by now you would have thought.

Why?

Posted
1 hour ago, Jack said:

I don’t think that’s correct at all, the Premier league and EFL have handed down loads of points deductions and fines in recent times. Those fall under the governance of the FA. Everton, Forest, West Brom recently had points deductions, scandalous that Chelsea then get off with just a minuscule fine for breaking rules that gave them years worth of competitive advantage, shown by their uptick in terms of winning titles and trophies 

It must be a case of power and influence for City and Chelsea. If FA are scared of Chelsea then City case will be dropped. Otherwise points would have been deducted years ago.

Posted
4 minutes ago, CB Fry said:

Have it on good authority that you are utterly full of shit.

I could have told you he's being banned three months ago.

I also have it on bad authority that he’s full of shit! QED

  • Haha 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, MB said:

Have on good authority he’s banned. Club exploring options for appeal before anything goes public 

I thought someone mentioned that an appeal had already been made hence why it took so long to get to here?

Posted
Just now, hypochondriac said:

Because there would be no reason for it not to be released.

I mean, I don't have a clue either way. Not sure if there is any correlation between severity and delays of timings for announcements

Posted
1 minute ago, sfc4prem said:

I mean, I don't have a clue either way. Not sure if there is any correlation between severity and delays of timings for announcements

It may be that he wasn't told today and they were just asking more questions as suggested by Alfie tbf

Posted
1 minute ago, Master Bates said:

I thought someone mentioned that an appeal had already been made hence why it took so long to get to here?

Perhaps the FA have appealed their own decision? They were happy with a 3 game ban and then they saw Parson’s video and are now seeking a 33 game ban.

  • Haha 3
Posted
Just now, hypochondriac said:

It may be that he wasn't told today and they were just asking more questions as suggested by Alfie tbf

Yeah, could be fucking anything with the mongrels in charge of our country's football.

Posted
4 minutes ago, sockeye said:

 

Not looking good.

Fuck, hadn’t seen that Rupert Lowe was chairing the panel. Charlie Austin has just volunteered for the Pierrenport role. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Turkish said:

It’s at times like this I bet you lot wish certain people hadn’t bullied the CoT off here. Our WhatsApp group has NEVER been more interesting. Make of that what you will….

Thanks for the DM mate, very interesting 

  • Like 1
Posted
31 minutes ago, Master Bates said:

I thought someone mentioned that an appeal had already been made hence why it took so long to get to here?

Now, I'm no legal eagle, but I'm pretty sure you can't appeal against a decision BEFORE that decision has even been made....

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Turkish said:

The image of @CB Fry and the chapatis OMG 😫😫

They were Peshwari Naans if I remember rightly. It had been a few years since I've done the old Tarzan impression so it wasn't as polished as it once was. I did apologise to that woman I poked in the eye though.

  • Haha 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Holmes_and_Watson said:

To think that they weren't going to punish him, until Parsons spoke up. Hard to argue against capital punishment after that happens.

I thought his comments would have more suction. Seems like Parsons was shouting in a vacuum, so to speak.

Posted
9 minutes ago, WinglessWonder said:

I knew he would get off lightly FFS... 

Not to worry. All living members of his family will be included on appeal by order of Gib Jong Un

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, MB said:

Have on good authority he’s banned. Club exploring options for appeal before anything goes public 

Have it on good authority , the Echo believes, just crap . I’m convinced most people don’t get how news/ social media working . This forum pages and pages of nonsense . Every post provides Steve Grant money . Not a dig a Steve Grant but you are getting any uptodate news on here

Posted

Say they do throw the book at Tonda with a lengthy ban as in the rest of this season... Out of interest  Do most on here still think it was the right decision to stick with him after all the turmoil. He has brought to the club? Which could lead to even more uncertainty 

Posted
1 minute ago, Paul Chuckle said:

What time is Football Martin on tonight to tell us nothing has happened?

I read the first few words of this post and immediately thought of the second half before finishing reading. 😂

Says it all.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...