Jump to content

I wanted a British Manager - Wilde


Master Bates

Recommended Posts

So we can only assume that he was OK with the appointment of Poortvliet which IMHO was the decision that took us over the edge.

 

Saying you wanted a British manager to take over from the imbecile you first appointed is somewhat shutting the stable door. A fact made worse by having to boot out an incumbent who appears to tick most of the boxes you want.

 

It also goes to sow who was making the decisions (i.e. Lowe) with Wilde being a mere patsy to him, but you also have to remember that Lowe only got that position and power through Wilde's support, so he has to accept his share of responsiblity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wilde - you make me sick. The fact you played a huge part in the dismissal of Pearson thanks to backing Lowe just goes to show what a complete liar you are. IMO you have no right whatsoever to use the media to try to re-write history to save your own tarnished reputation. You and Lowe will go down in history as the most reviled men in SFC's past - complete and abject failures who almost killed the club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Crouch has the back page with I could have saved Saints which goes on about investing the 2 million and he had british managers lined up to take over, questions why portvliet had so long and praises NP.

 

I don't like the picture though.

 

The pic is Leon Crouch standing by the Ted Bates statue with his hands on his hips trying to look like a maverick.

 

There was one similar about a week ago, but this time Crouch was looking towards the sky with his hands on his hips next to the Ted Bates statue trying to look like superman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So much hot air. Say what you like about Lowe (I know I do), at least he's shut the **** up of late. These two need to back off and crawl back into their respective holes.

 

Lowe has shut up recently because he vented his spleen immediately after his resignation when we went into administration. He has already said all he wanted to say, which was that he was totally blameless and it was all the fault of those who took over after he had gone the first time. If he continued to make comments now, he would invite further vitriol onto his shoulders and just sound like a broken record.

 

As for Wilde, the guy has absolutely no redeeming features at all. For a start, it is totally useless him claiming that he wanted a British manager after Poortvliet's departure. Firstly, the useless JP had already had too long and therefore it was almost too late for anybody to save us, but secondly Wilde held the whiphand. It was only with his support that Lowe held power. If the Quisling had any balls at all, he would have told Lowe that the Dutch experiment had not worked and it was time to ditch it. If Lowe did not concur, then Wilde would withdraw his support. But the fact that Wilde did not use his clout to get what he said he wanted, proves that he had no balls and it is therefore useless him bleating about it now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lowe has shut up recently because he vented his spleen immediately after his resignation when we went into administration. He has already said all he wanted to say, which was that he was totally blameless and it was all the fault of those who took over after he had gone the first time. If he continued to make comments now, he would invite further vitriol onto his shoulders and just sound like a broken record.

 

As for Wilde, the guy has absolutely no redeeming features at all. For a start, it is totally useless him claiming that he wanted a British manager after Poortvliet's departure. Firstly, the useless JP had already had too long and therefore it was almost too late for anybody to save us, but secondly Wilde held the whiphand. It was only with his support that Lowe held power. If the Quisling had any balls at all, he would have told Lowe that the Dutch experiment had not worked and it was time to ditch it. If Lowe did not concur, then Wilde would withdraw his support. But the fact that Wilde did not use his clout to get what he said he wanted, proves that he had no balls and it is therefore useless him bleating about it now.

 

Absolutely, with 17% of the shares if he was any sort of a man at all he would have imposed his will by calling an EGM the second Lowe disagreed with him. He was complicit in everything that happened.

 

He is a weak prat, so much so, he lost millions. It was his inability to organise the composition of the board, and walking out that caused all this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wilde - you make me sick. The fact you played a huge part in the dismissal of Pearson thanks to backing Lowe just goes to show what a complete liar you are. IMO you have no right whatsoever to use the media to try to re-write history to save your own tarnished reputation. You and Lowe will go down in history as the most reviled men in SFC's past - complete and abject failures who almost killed the club.

 

Couldnt agree more spot on, you cannot believe anything Wilde says, he told the board on several occasions that he had 2 million investment coming in next week, eventually the board had enough of his lies about investment !!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely, with 17% of the shares if he was any sort of a man at all he would have imposed his will by calling an EGM the second Lowe disagreed with him. He was complicit in everything that happened.

 

He is a weak prat, so much so, he lost millions. It was his inability to organise the composition of the board, and walking out that caused all this.

 

 

I think it was by his sheer naivety and lack of any business acumen that saw him being thrown off the board by the very men he appointed !

 

As you say - Weak Prat !

 

And a dreamer......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whichever way you look at it this is an outrageous admission by Wilde although clearly not intended to be so.

 

He was complicit in clearing out a manager who had previously worked with young players at the U21 level and had experience of our league.The replacements were brought in to ' work with young players' but had no experience of our league.

 

When it was obvious such a revolutionary coaching set up was a dismal failure he wanted to bring in a "British mananager" rather than appoint one of 'his' original choices.Surely this amounts to him recognising the original actions and appointment was an error ?

 

Nowhere does the article contain an admission of getting it wrong nor apology.

 

It seems to rank in the 'Kurt Waldheim league' of don't blame me, perhaps Wilde should add the rest saying he didn't really know what was going on. And perhaps he didn't,as he probably was not involved in the real decision making.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah Mike we know !

 

Pearson was just as adept in developing younger players - He was part of the England youth set up after all ! :rolleyes:

 

 

For the attention of Mr Wilde ...a

 

SO, pertinent questions are :-

 

You were supposed to have a BOARD ...... so how come the "wishes" of Lowe, overule the whole Board ???

 

You had an Allegience with Lowe Mr Wilde, you held the most Shares

 

How could you sit back and say absolutely NOTHING about such matters as

 

Sacking Pearson

The Dutch Duo

Total Football concept

Selling/Loaning ALL our proven Goalscorers

Going with Youth

 

Bit late now to let us know your thoughts

 

Tell you what ... let us know when you will be in the University Bar again .... then you can hear OUR thoughts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So much hot air. Say what you like about Lowe (I know I do), at least he's shut the **** up of late. These two need to back off and crawl back into their respective holes.

 

yes Ponty - I'm sure that lowe was quiet at the city ground (like F*** he was) telling everyone who would listen about how none of this was his fault - 90+ minutes of bull**** from the pompous arse - guaranteed!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So much hot air. Say what you like about Lowe (I know I do), at least he's shut the **** up of late. These two need to back off and crawl back into their respective holes.

 

Absolutely. And isn't it funny that Wilde wanted a British manager, is a majority shareholder and still Lowe got his way over him. What a pathetic man.

 

It's a desperate attempt at getting back on side with the fans who Wilde has desperately let down and lied to over the last few years.

 

Mr.Wilde and Mr.Crouch too, please stay out of the press, keep your opinions to yourselves and stop damaging the little reputation we have left by continuously dragging up history and old arguments and leave this 'I told you so' crap well alone. The club and it's fans have suffered enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So much hot air. Say what you like about Lowe (I know I do), at least he's shut the **** up of late. These two need to back off and crawl back into their respective holes.

 

 

 

Yeah ... Strange that .... ever stopped to wonder WHY ???

 

 

 

 

Alla Python ...... " No, he's not dead ...... he's just sleeping ..... "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Michael Wilde : Last Activity: Yesterday 06:08 PM

 

He'll be on again today to see how his Echo interview was received.

 

 

Is Saintmarc still lurking then ?

 

Or does he have another alter-ego.... Saint twerp for example !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the attention of Mr Wilde ...a

 

SO, pertinent questions are :-

 

You were supposed to have a BOARD ...... so how come the "wishes" of Lowe, overule the whole Board ???

 

You had an Allegience with Lowe Mr Wilde, you held the most Shares

 

How could you sit back and say absolutely NOTHING about such matters as

 

Sacking Pearson

The Dutch Duo

Total Football concept

Selling/Loaning ALL our proven Goalscorers

Going with Youth

 

Bit late now to let us know your thoughts

 

Tell you what ... let us know when you will be in the University Bar again .... then you can hear OUR thoughts

And wasn`t Wilde supposed to be Chairman of the Football Club? Did he have no say in who was manager? (rhetorical question!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL what reaction is Wilde expecting by surfacing to put this pathetic tuppence ha'penny worth in the mix? How can we take him seriously when we ended up getting rid of a promising young English boss who kept us in the Championship, and we ended up with a Kwik Save approximation of Total Football? arrrrrrgggh *esplodes*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I think nationality has very little to do with it.

 

I would have thought someone with knowledge of the english game and system, good contacts and someone whom the players (both experienced and young) would respect would have been most important. It's so easy to say with hindsight that NP had those things as well as the respect and a synergy with most fans.

 

History will judge your decisions and sadly both Wilde and Lowe failed. I just wish they would both admit it. Perhaps then I would have more respect for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...