Jump to content

Russia


whelk
 Share

Referendum on Moscow to officially become territory of Wales  

35 members have voted

  1. 1. Referendum on Moscow to officially become territory of Wales

    • Da!
      32
    • Net!
      3


Recommended Posts

59 minutes ago, whelk said:

Putin can’t even speak even speak English. Thick bald midget cunt.

Carlson is a cunt too. Have no interest in watching anything that fucker does.

I don’t know. Watching him get pulled through a combine harvester could be a laugh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Sheaf Saint said:

Alexei Navalny has died of completely natural causes after feeling unwell and collapsing in prison. 

Very brave guy. Contrast with that bald little cunt who is scared of germs. RIP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Challenger said:

On the plus side the EU want to embrace their British friends into the military fold as they're shit scared of Russia, Trump's giving bad vibes and we have nukes.

Fuck off, you've shown your true colours.

So do the French, in fact they have more warheads than we do.

Edited by badgerx16
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Challenger said:

On the plus side the EU want to embrace their British friends into the military fold as they're shit scared of Russia, Trump's giving bad vibes and we have nukes.

Fuck off, you've shown your true colours.

I agree, it’d be great to see Putin’s army of conscripted, alcoholic thugs committing war crimes across Eastern Europe, if it means we get to make snide remarks about Brexit.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Challenger said:

On the plus side the EU want to embrace their British friends into the military fold as they're shit scared of Russia, Trump's giving bad vibes and we have nukes.

Fuck off, you've shown your true colours.

So NATO members want to embrace other NATO “friends” into NATO???  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently, Navalny's body was covered in bruises, suggesting convulsion before death.  The FSB had visited the prison site two days before he died to dismantle CCTV and listening devices, a 'prepared' statement was issued within 2 minutes of him dying and within 4 minutes, state controlled social media claimed he died due to a blood clot.

You can't knock those Russians, when it comes to autopsies, they don't hang around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 16/02/2024 at 19:34, Challenger said:

On the plus side the EU want to embrace their British friends into the military fold as they're shit scared of Russia, Trump's giving bad vibes and we have nukes.

Lot of use they are;

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-68355395

"The test firing of a Trident missile from a Royal Navy submarine has failed, for the second time in a row"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, egg said:

Absolutely hopeless. We have aircraft carriers that can't be used, and subs that can't fire missiles. You couldn't make it up. 

But Sunak has a plan. Keep the faith!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hardly a surprise. This is another example of disjointed priorities with the MOD.

We have nowhere near enough people (let alone fit people) to staff the very small footprint of the armed forces we have today. People are not joining up and so many are leaving. 

Guess what, the majority of the general public just do not care. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-68364924

Looks like things are coming to a head in Ukraine.

Quote

Russia is struggling to provide ammunition and weapons for its war in Ukraine, according to Western officials.

It is facing "extreme challenges" in obtaining sufficient equipment and materiel, an official said.

It comes as concerns over the provision of Western weapons to Ukraine are mounting.

With both sides struggling for weapons, will this turn into a more 'traditional' war?  Will we see trebuchet flinging giant rocks across the river and sword fights on open fields?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, skintsaint said:

Apparently two now...

Indeed. Appears this may have been an A-50U too, one of the A-50s that’s been upgraded.

All of the apparent explanations seem unlikely, especially with it going down in the same area. Anti-air having that range, Ukraine having F16s operational already, Russian anti-air being that incompetent, Russian anti-air being compromised somehow by Ukraine or Russian rebels?

Assuming Ukraine actually have a repeatable ability to take them down… if another one goes down things start to become extremely tricky for Russia, especially once F16s start appearing for Ukraine. Between Russia’s ability to maintain them, losing two full crews, as well as three A-50s being destroyed now, including the one that was destroyed on the ground, their AEW capability is likely already severely compromised.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jimmy_D said:

Indeed. Appears this may have been an A-50U too, one of the A-50s that’s been upgraded.

All of the apparent explanations seem unlikely, especially with it going down in the same area. Anti-air having that range, Ukraine having F16s operational already, Russian anti-air being that incompetent, Russian anti-air being compromised somehow by Ukraine or Russian rebels?

Assuming Ukraine actually have a repeatable ability to take them down… if another one goes down things start to become extremely tricky for Russia, especially once F16s start appearing for Ukraine. Between Russia’s ability to maintain them, losing two full crews, as well as three A-50s being destroyed now, including the one that was destroyed on the ground, their AEW capability is likely already severely compromised.

Reckon its likely to be MBNA's meteor air to air missile. It has a declared range of 200km (which would have been enough anyhow) but is rumoured to be even more than that in reality.  

Edited by buctootim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, buctootim said:

Reckon its likely to be MBNA's meteor air to air missile. It has a declared range of 200km (which would have been enough anyhow) but is rumoured to be even more than that in reality.  

Probably not a bad shout. While I’ve no doubt they could figure a way to retrofit meteors to Soviet jets, might explain why Ukraine were so keen to get hold of Gripen jets. It’s possible they’ve quietly got hold of some. Something has been causing a lot of losses for Russian aviation recently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like it’s anti-air having that range then, or at least that’s what Ukraine are claiming.

Seems they used AA missiles from an S200 system, that have longer range than the missiles from the Patriot system, and integrated them with a Patriot system for launch, targeting and control to bring it down from 700km away.

That’s an extremely significant capability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Jimmy_D said:

Looks like it’s anti-air having that range then, or at least that’s what Ukraine are claiming.

Seems they used AA missiles from an S200 system, that have longer range than the missiles from the Patriot system, and integrated them with a Patriot system for launch, targeting and control to bring it down from 700km away.

That’s an extremely significant capability.

Ukraine was always the brains of the Russian arms indutry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Jimmy_D said:

Looks like it’s anti-air having that range then, or at least that’s what Ukraine are claiming.

Seems they used AA missiles from an S200 system, that have longer range than the missiles from the Patriot system, and integrated them with a Patriot system for launch, targeting and control to bring it down from 700km away.

That’s an extremely significant capability.

Maybe. Just a likely to be maskirovka imo. A lot of countries donate gear anonymously or simply dont announce what they sending to maintain surprise. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Baird of the land said:

Glad to see some pushback to macron's escalatory warmongering

So sending troops to Ukraine would constitute escalatory warmongering? Is there anyone else you think that perhaps might apply to?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Lighthouse said:

So sending troops to Ukraine would constitute escalatory warmongering? Is there anyone else you think that perhaps might apply to?

you don’t think a direct attack by troops of a nato member is escalatory warmongering ?

and yes the decision to attack Ukraine by Russia was.

Edited by Baird of the land
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Baird of the land said:

you don’t think a direct attack by troops of a nato member is escalatory warmongering ?

and yes the decision to attack Ukraine by Russia was.

Who said anything about attacking anyone? I'd be more than happy for NATO troops to go and hang out in the none-occupied part of Ukraine. Russia is perfectly free to leave them alone, which they obviously would.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Russia's A-50 fleet reportedly grounded due to needing time to figure out how to prevent them being shot down. (Probably they're still trying to figure out how they were shot down.)

With the loss of AEW&C capability and at least 14 aircraft reported downed in the last two weeks, seems there have been long stretches of a few hours with no Russian aircraft seen in Eastern Ukraine at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, skintsaint said:

Sea drones strike again, not sure Russia intended for the cost of repairing/replacing so many ships and planes when starting this special operation...

 

 

The Sergei Kotov is one that Ukraine have been after for a while, it’s been able to survive a couple of previous attacks.

Apparently it’s been used as part of what Russia have assigned to try and protect Kerch Bridge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very long video but quite interesting:-

We are diving into the heart of Eurasian geopolitics with Curtis L. Fox, author of the groundbreaking book Hybrid Warfare: The Russian Approach to Strategic Competition and Conventional Military Conflict. Launching into a deep exploration of Russia's historical military strategies and its contemporary geopolitical maneuvers, Fox offers unparalleled insights into the Kremlin's objectives, its relentless pursuit in Ukraine, and the inner mechanics of its formidable military and intelligence apparatus. With Russia's economic tenacity and military prowess on full display, we dissect the nation's will to press on in the conflict, assess its strategic goals, and the potential ramifications on global stability. Curtis, a former Green Beret who mastered the Russian language and studied Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech before venturing into Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, provides a unique perspective on what Russia hopes to achieve and the lengths it may go to secure victory. This episode not only charts the course of Russia's military evolution from the Napoleonic era to its current engagement in Ukraine but also forecasts the possible outcomes of this conflict. Questions such as the impact of NATO's involvement, the financial sustainability of Russia's war machine, and the conditions for Ukrainian success are explored in depth.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Significant Ukrainian counterattacks today. Widespread drone strikes on Russian oil infrastructure, and there are reports that (likely Ukraine backed) Russian separatists have occupied/liberated large parts of Bilhorod and Kursk in Russia.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...