S-Clarke Posted Thursday at 19:54 Posted Thursday at 19:54 7 minutes ago, SambaMaverick said: Four year deal, why? He's not good enough for the Prem, that's unlikely to change. Yeah, I'm really frustrated we didn't sign Aaron Wan-Bisakka, Dallot, James, Rico Lewis or Ben White. Everyone out. 1 5
Matthew Le God Posted Thursday at 19:55 Posted Thursday at 19:55 4 minutes ago, Saint_clark said: Even more reason to keep Sugawara, surely? Who is backup if Mads gets injured, THB? Great. Bree would be... as he is back in training next week
Mustang Saint Posted Thursday at 19:56 Posted Thursday at 19:56 Mads Roedslev signed from Brentford according to official site 1
SuperSAINT Posted Thursday at 19:56 Posted Thursday at 19:56 18 minutes ago, skintsaint said: https://www.brentfordfc.com/en/news/article/first-team-mads-roerslev-transfer-southampton-brentford Solid signing it seems. https://www.brentfordfc.com/en/news/article/the-long-read-mads-roerslev-brentford-interview-feature-thomas-frank Cheers for posting these.
maysie Posted Thursday at 19:57 Posted Thursday at 19:57 6 minutes ago, trousers said: Marvelous 🤦🏻 #fouryeardeal Stop being a bandwagon idiot, you’re better than that. 1 1
SambaMaverick Posted Thursday at 19:57 Posted Thursday at 19:57 1 minute ago, S-Clarke said: Yeah, I'm really frustrated we didn't sign Aaron Wan-Bisakka, Dallot, James, Rico Lewis or Ben White. Everyone out. Happy to be sat on my own with this one. He's shite. 1 3
EBS1980 Posted Thursday at 19:57 Posted Thursday at 19:57 1 minute ago, Mustang Saint said: Mads Roedslev signed from Brentford according to official site Pretty good source I’d say. 4
hypochondriac Posted Thursday at 19:57 Posted Thursday at 19:57 6 minutes ago, chownie20 said: James Bree mk2 How many games did Bree play successfully in the premier league?
sockeye Posted Thursday at 19:58 Posted Thursday at 19:58 (edited) Fifth choice target after Spertsyan Rudoni Azaz and Scienza FFS Sport Republic out! Edited Thursday at 19:58 by sockeye forgot one ;) 1
hypochondriac Posted Thursday at 19:58 Posted Thursday at 19:58 (edited) Just now, SambaMaverick said: Happy to be sat on my own with this one. He's shite. Based on what? Who were you expecting us to sign? Edited Thursday at 19:58 by hypochondriac
AlexLaw76 Posted Thursday at 19:58 Posted Thursday at 19:58 so much for having to shift people before signing anyone else....
Thripp87 Posted Thursday at 19:58 Posted Thursday at 19:58 Best thing about this is Sugawara won’t be used anymore. One of the worse I’ve seen in years. 94 games for Brentford in the Prem, looks a good option to me. 4
trousers Posted Thursday at 19:58 Posted Thursday at 19:58 Just now, maysie said: Stop being a bandwagon idiot, you’re better than that. Yay, my stalker returns P.s. it was tongue in cheek (like 99% of my posts) you pilchard (no offence)
AlexLaw76 Posted Thursday at 19:58 Posted Thursday at 19:58 They like him at Brentford.. Quote 146 games, 94 in the PL. Joined as a kid, became an international footballer. Fantastic servant for the club, gave his everything. One of the good guys. Thank you Mads. 4
hypochondriac Posted Thursday at 19:58 Posted Thursday at 19:58 3 minutes ago, Matthew Le God said: Bree would be... as he is back in training next week Or Fraser.
S-Clarke Posted Thursday at 19:59 Posted Thursday at 19:59 1 minute ago, SambaMaverick said: Happy to be sat on my own with this one. He's shite. How have you come to that conclusion out of interest? I'd take the Brentford fans views, who have watched him every week, over other club fans views if I'm honest.
SambaMaverick Posted Thursday at 19:59 Posted Thursday at 19:59 Just now, hypochondriac said: Based on what? Who were you expecting us to sign? He'll be fine for this level, but to give him a four year deal and presumably pay money for him is just so poor 2 1
AlexLaw76 Posted Thursday at 19:59 Posted Thursday at 19:59 Just now, Thripp87 said: Best thing about this is Sugawara won’t be used anymore. One of the worse I’ve seen in years. Sugawara is f-ing terrible...people actually rate him, bizarrely 3
maysie Posted Thursday at 19:59 Posted Thursday at 19:59 (edited) 1 minute ago, trousers said: Yay, my stalker returns P.s. it was tongue in cheek (like 99% of my posts) you pilchard (no offence) Do I stalk you? Sorry didn’t realise. Sorry didn’t catch the winky face hard to see on mobile some times. I was only being half serious to be honest Edited Thursday at 20:01 by maysie
Crouchie's Lawyer Posted Thursday at 19:59 Posted Thursday at 19:59 (edited) Mads Roerslev been with Brentford for the last 6 years playing 121 times for them between 2019 and 2025. Plays as a right wing back or right winger. Played for Brentford when they got promoted and has played for them at times in the prem too. More recently (last season) been on loan at Wolfsburg in the Bundesliga. Looks like he only made 7 appearances for them last season though. They had an option to buy but did not take this up. 26 years old, made his senior debut for Denmark last November. Signed a 4 year deal, no mention of fee. Looks like he has played on average around 20 times for Brentford over the last few years, mainly due to injuries to their preferred right backs but has seemingly done well enough to be offered contract extensions along the way. I believe they probably deem him surplus to requirements with the players they now have playing there hence the loan to Wolfsburg. Imagine this is an upgrade on Bree/Sugawara which will likely see one of those moved out. My guess would be Sugawara given the earlier post about him possibly being one of those to leave. Stands at 6 foot tall so a fairly decent height although not a beast, certainly not an Arma or Weeman Edited Thursday at 20:06 by Crouchie's Lawyer
Turkish Posted Thursday at 19:59 Posted Thursday at 19:59 12 minutes ago, Farmer Saint said: Suga is off, that's why perm signing, apparently. Good he’s shit 7
SambaMaverick Posted Thursday at 20:00 Posted Thursday at 20:00 Just now, S-Clarke said: How have you come to that conclusion out of interest? I'd take the Brentford fans views, who have watched him every week, over other club fans views if I'm honest. Brentford will be in a relegation scrap this year and they're all happy to let him go, says a lot I think. I've seen him play lots of times, he's the same profile as Bree. Pointless signing
hypochondriac Posted Thursday at 20:00 Posted Thursday at 20:00 Just now, SambaMaverick said: He'll be fine for this level, but to give him a four year deal and presumably pay money for him is just so poor Why? Sounds like a really decent championship signing and only 26. If we get promotion I'd presume he becomes backup which is a role he's done successfully for Brentford as they survived in the prem. I can't see what there is not to like. 4
Lighthouse Posted Thursday at 20:01 Posted Thursday at 20:01 7 minutes ago, Saint_clark said: Even more reason to keep Sugawara, surely? Who is backup if Mads gets injured, THB? Great. What? Having two solid players in every position is pretty much the cornerstone of building any decent squad. If Bree and Mads both get injured, we’ll just have to fill in with someone else, same as we did if Richardson and Butterfield or Cedric and Martina both got injured simultaneously.
Matthew Le God Posted Thursday at 20:01 Posted Thursday at 20:01 Just now, SambaMaverick said: He'll be fine for this level, but to give him a four year deal and presumably pay money for him is just so poor Why are you objecting to him having a transfer fee if you accept he is fine for this level?
HarvSFC Posted Thursday at 20:02 Posted Thursday at 20:02 (edited) Love a signing out of the blue. Can't say I had heard too much about him despite all his Brentford appearances, but he is thought of highly there, which is a good sign: https://griffinpark.org/forums/threads/mads-roerslev-southampton.143061/#post-4838469 Sounds like a good character and attitude, which Still has highlighted all summer. Also has two years Championship experience, something else Still highlighted as wanting. After signing Quarshie and Downs I did fear SR were reverting back to signing a team of untried youngsters having also moved away from the possession based ethos, but this sounds on paper exactly like the type of signing we need and the type of signing that has given us success in the past. A highly thought of squad player from a higher placed club. Also, the right-back spot was a problem position in the team. Neither Sugawara or Bree are promotion winning right-backs, so it's good that we've looked to strengthen, rather than plodding along with them. A sense of the ruthless streak we've all been asking for, as Sugawara was fairly open about wanting to stay earlier in the summer. Edited Thursday at 20:02 by HarvSFC
trousers Posted Thursday at 20:02 Posted Thursday at 20:02 Just now, maysie said: Do I stalk you? Sorry didn’t realise You possibly don't to be fair.... My memory often plays tricks on me. For the record (serious mode for a second), this fella looks very good for this level and a decent option to have in the premier league 1
sockeye Posted Thursday at 20:02 Posted Thursday at 20:02 1 minute ago, SambaMaverick said: I've seen him play lots of times, he's the same profile as Bree. Pointless signing Bree is OOC next summer, so if we're promoted, Roerslev can drop to back-up and we get a new RB in. 6
hypochondriac Posted Thursday at 20:03 Posted Thursday at 20:03 2 minutes ago, SambaMaverick said: Brentford will be in a relegation scrap this year and they're all happy to let him go, says a lot I think. I've seen him play lots of times, he's the same profile as Bree. Pointless signing He played 20 times for them the season they finished 9th in the prem. 4
S-Clarke Posted Thursday at 20:03 Posted Thursday at 20:03 1 minute ago, hypochondriac said: Why? Sounds like a really decent championship signing and only 26. If we get promotion I'd presume he becomes backup which is a role he's done successfully for Brentford as they survived in the prem. I can't see what there is not to like. Yeah I'm with you, and everyone else by the looks of it. I don't see anything wrong with the deal. We needed a RB, one of our key positions, and we've got a PL right back in the door who has played and performed at the top level of this very division. Looking at all the comments, the Brentford fans love him so he seems a good egg. And that's often just as important as being good in your position. 8
Harry_SFC Posted Thursday at 20:04 Posted Thursday at 20:04 1 minute ago, sockeye said: Bree is OOC next summer, so if we're promoted, Roerslev can drop to back-up and we get a new RB in. Yep, just what I was thinking.
SambaMaverick Posted Thursday at 20:04 Posted Thursday at 20:04 Just now, hypochondriac said: He played 20 times for them the season they finished 9th in the prem. What does that have to do with what I've just said? He's 26, if he was any good then they would want him... Brentford are bang in trouble this season.
Lighthouse Posted Thursday at 20:04 Posted Thursday at 20:04 1 minute ago, SambaMaverick said: Brentford will be in a relegation scrap this year and they're all happy to let him go, says a lot I think. I've seen him play lots of times, he's the same profile as Bree. Pointless signing We were in a relegation scrap last year and let Shea Charles go out on loan, is he sh*te? I know little about this guy but on the face of it, he looks a solid RB for this level with just the right balance of youth versus experience. I’m not sure I quite get this negativity. 1
davefizzy14 Posted Thursday at 20:04 Posted Thursday at 20:04 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Mustang Saint said: Mads Roedslev signed from Brentford according to official site Very good signing this. Got bags of experience. Welcome onboard Mads 😊 Edited Thursday at 20:05 by davefizzy14 1
hypochondriac Posted Thursday at 20:05 Posted Thursday at 20:05 Just now, S-Clarke said: Yeah I'm with you, and everyone else by the looks of it. I don't see anything wrong with the deal. We needed a RB, one of our key positions, and we've got a PL right back in the door who has played and performed at the top level of this very division. Looking at all the comments, the Brentford fans love him so he seems a good egg. And that's often just as important as being good in your position. The only issues I had with Stephens and his contract was that he was old and already proven not to be good enough in the prem. Neither of these things apply to this signing. 1
Dusic Posted Thursday at 20:05 Posted Thursday at 20:05 (edited) Solid if not spectacular which is probably what we need for this league. Also slightly suprised its a 4yr deal but seems like a good character and is known for versatility too - decent signing likely for a minimal outlay and should solve a problem posirion with Bree as backup til his deal ends. Edited Thursday at 20:06 by Dusic 1
SambaMaverick Posted Thursday at 20:06 Posted Thursday at 20:06 Just now, Lighthouse said: We were in a relegation scrap last year and let Shea Charles go out on loan, is he sh*te? I know little about this guy but on the face of it, he looks a solid RB for this level with just the right balance of youth versus experience. I’m not sure I quite get this negativity. Yes mate, Shea Charles would be eaten alive in the Premier League. Just don't get the point of giving him a four-year deal at all. But maybe he's on 10k a week and gets paid the rest in Legos.
Give it to Ron Posted Thursday at 20:06 Posted Thursday at 20:06 6 minutes ago, SambaMaverick said: He'll be fine for this level, but to give him a four year deal and presumably pay money for him is just so poor So he isn’t shite then! My Brentford mate who watched him loads reckons he is decent I’ll take his view more than yours 3
SNSUN Posted Thursday at 20:06 Posted Thursday at 20:06 Ha Saints.... we saw other clubs dismantling Brentford - Mbuemo, Wissa, Norgaard, Flekken- and felt like we'd have a pop too! Welcome Mads. And yes... huge surprise done on the quiet and a solid player.
S-Clarke Posted Thursday at 20:07 Posted Thursday at 20:07 Just now, SambaMaverick said: What does that have to do with what I've just said? He's 26, if he was any good then they would want him... Brentford are bang in trouble this season. Brentford have Kayode and Hickey as their full back options, they are better than Roreslev, yes, but both of their 'starters' are out of our league and thus irrelevant options for us. We are shopping in the market of PL reserve players, I don't understand why you're so upset about it. Who were you expecting exactly? We're not signing a starting PL player, they're always going to be a squad PL player. 8
hypochondriac Posted Thursday at 20:07 Posted Thursday at 20:07 Just now, SambaMaverick said: What does that have to do with what I've just said? He's 26, if he was any good then they would want him... Brentford are bang in trouble this season. He's not good enough for an established Premier league side who finished mid table last season. Even if we got promoted that wouldn't be where we were aiming anyway. What player were you thinking we would get? I would say a player with many Premier league games under his belt who has played a substantial amount of games for a Premier league mid table side is about the best we could get at the moment. 4
UpweySaint Posted Thursday at 20:07 Posted Thursday at 20:07 Seems like a sensible bit of business. Not the most exciting signing we’ll ever make but it feels like a small upgrade in a problem position for us. Very much under the radar too. Welcome aboard Mads. 2
Harry_SFC Posted Thursday at 20:07 Posted Thursday at 20:07 I do think people expect a bit too much. It's always going to be hard to recruit Premier League quality players in this division. We've just finished as the second worst premier league side ever ffs. Sign the best Championship players, get promoted again but then improve upon them once promoted. That's what we didn't do last time. 2
Football Special Posted Thursday at 20:09 Posted Thursday at 20:09 27 minutes ago, macca155 said: Err where did that signing come from. Bit blindsided by that one. https://www.southamptonfc.com/en/news/article/saints-secure-roerslev-signing?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=organic&utm_campaign=signing-mads-roerslev&utm_term=news&utm_content=link&fbclid=IwQ0xDSwMUVQ5jbGNrAxRUQGV4dG4DYWVtAjExAAEeFpMkgdah8kYYv-sLeQdfPpt0LTFzdo38xuDMmLfJX-9mePYeGanEzLvr6Js_aem_szC5QbJeyVfGOCHlhPdPmg 94 Premier league games, clearly experienced. Functional signing I guess with KWP gone. Reminds me a bit of the Charlie Taylor signing , lots of appearances but a player I've never actually noticed before 2
hypochondriac Posted Thursday at 20:09 Posted Thursday at 20:09 2 minutes ago, Dusic said: Solid if not spectacular which is probably what we need for this league. Also slightly suprised its a 4yr deal but seems like a good character and is known for versatility too - decent signing likely for a minimal outlay and should solve a problem posirion with Bree as backup til his deal ends. If we've got money and wages to spend who wants to spaff it all on a right back? Keep our powder dry for a couple of top signings at the other end of the pitch. Solid and unspectacular is exactly what we need in this league for the rb position. 1
Lighthouse Posted Thursday at 20:09 Posted Thursday at 20:09 Merchandise idea; a T-shirt featuring Roerslev dressed up like one of the Gallagher brothers and the caption, ‘Mads for it!’ 3
LGTL Posted Thursday at 20:10 Posted Thursday at 20:10 I’d question the length of contract, 4 years seems unnecessary. But a solid signing I guess, if not spectacular.
egg Posted Thursday at 20:10 Posted Thursday at 20:10 Splendid bit of business, he's a decent player. And great that it came out of nowhere. Motto of the story - don't flap, remember that people X/twitter don't know everything (or anything), and that the window is still wide open. 3
hypochondriac Posted Thursday at 20:11 Posted Thursday at 20:11 (edited) 1 minute ago, LGTL said: I’d question the length of contract, 4 years seems unnecessary. But a solid signing I guess, if not spectacular. Why unnecessary? If we fail to go up we have a really decent championship right back for a number of years. If we do go up we have reasonable prem backup. It's not like he's 32. Edited Thursday at 20:11 by hypochondriac 7
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now