Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 21/01/2026 at 22:04, Weston Super Saint said:

Not at all.

Solak is sole shareholder of the company at the top of the pyramid.  That company has voting rights over ALL the other companies.  Ergo, Solak has the ability to do whatever he wants, whenever he wants, if he wants.

The shareholding is very transparent and easy to follow.

I don't think this is correct. 

Posted
4 hours ago, benjii said:

I don't think this is correct. 

Southampton Football club limited - Person with significant control (75% or more of the shares) = St Mary's football group limited : https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/00053301/persons-with-significant-control

St Mary's football group limited - Person with significant control (75% or more of the shares) = Sport Republic limited : https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/06951765/persons-with-significant-control

Sport Republic limited - Person with significant control (75% or more of the shares) = Sport Republic holding limited : https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/13790702/persons-with-significant-control

Sport Republic holding limited - Person with significant control (75% or more of the shares, 75% or more of the voting rights) = Dragan Solak : https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/13789278/persons-with-significant-control

 

Dragan has control over everything.  He controls Sport Republic holding limited which has control over all the other companies in the pyramid.  The trail stops at him on company's house and the buck stops with him for SFC.  Ankerson is listed as an 'officer' on all those companies but Dragan has the voting rights, no one else (if he chooses to implement all policies from the top down).

Posted

Yes, he has a big majority of the shares but that doesn't necessarily mean he can do what he wants. There will be agreements in place between him and the other Sport Republic investors (Wankerson, Kraft etc) that deal with sale of shares and which probably give those guys more rights than a typical minority shareholder.

 

Posted

Worrying quote from Anker's son:

 

‘We redesigned the club based on a question: what would a football club look like if it had no human eye and ear?

 

He must have ignored the fact that the fans have eyes and ears and the former are quite integral to watching the footy.

  • Haha 2
Posted
43 minutes ago, BarberSaint said:

Worrying quote from Anker's son:

 

‘We redesigned the club based on a question: what would a football club look like if it had no human eye and ear?

 

He must have ignored the fact that the fans have eyes and ears and the former are quite integral to watching the footy.

We are so relegated forever under these poisonous clowns 

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, BarberSaint said:

Worrying quote from Anker's son:

 

‘We redesigned the club based on a question: what would a football club look like if it had no human eye and ear?

 

He must have ignored the fact that the fans have eyes and ears and the former are quite integral to watching the footy.

As close to confirmation as possible that they're using this football club a guinea pig for their warped philosophies and 'research'. How this level of self-indulgent risk taking is allowable under the football authorities 'fit and proper' ownership criteria is baffling....

Surely, at best, this is utter contempt for us HUMANS that support the club and, at worst, it's gross negligence....?

 

dads-were-doomed.gif

Posted
1 minute ago, trousers said:

As close to confirmation as possible that they're using this football club a guinea pig for their warped philosophies and 'research'. How this level of self-indulgent risk taking is allowable under the football authorities 'fit and proper' ownership criteria is baffling....

Surely, at best, this is utter contempt for us HUMANS that support the club and, at worst, it's gross negligence....?

 

dads-were-doomed.gif

In the interest of fairness, it's worth pointing out that this quote was actually in reference to his time at Midtjilland.

But I don't think it's an unreasonable stretch to assume that the same philosophy applies to his interest in Saints. 

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, Sheaf Saint said:

In the interest of fairness, it's worth pointing out that this quote was actually in reference to his time at Midtjilland.

But I don't think it's an unreasonable stretch to assume that the same philosophy applies to his interest in Saints. 

Ah, ok... I took BarberSaint's post at face value and naturally assumed it was a recent quote. 

But, yes, I agree, it still resonates with other snippets of info about how the club is being run (e.g. scouts not needing to actually watch players play).

Maybe the hierarchy could enlighten us on their ownership philosophy if they're not still using this Midtjilland model... But I guess that's unlikely given it would entail communicating with the fans openly on a regular basis...

Edited by trousers
  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, BarberSaint said:

Worrying quote from Anker's son:

 

‘We redesigned the club based on a question: what would a football club look like if it had no human eye and ear?

 

He must have ignored the fact that the fans have eyes and ears and the former are quite integral to watching the footy.

Where is this quote from? Cheers.

Posted
1 hour ago, benjii said:

Where is this quote from? Cheers.

It's from the correspondent article Frannies tache posted about 2 wks ago. It was about Mityjland not us but a good insight to RA 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, BarberSaint said:

We redesigned the club based on a question: what would a football club look like if it had no human eye and ear?

The answer to that question being ‘fucking shit’

Cretin

Edit: Rasmus, not BarberSaint

Edited by Midfield_General
  • Haha 4
Posted
40 minutes ago, Willo of Whiteley said:

Jack Stephens quotes this evening saying they’re still eyeing the play offs.

If they lose the next couple pressure is going to ramp up again.


Im still eyeing Sydney Sweeney 

 

Similar chances of success 

  • Haha 3
Posted
11 hours ago, Willo of Whiteley said:

Jack Stephens quotes this evening saying they’re still eyeing the play offs.

If they lose the next couple pressure is going to ramp up again.

L1 next year?

Posted
12 hours ago, Willo of Whiteley said:

Jack Stephens quotes this evening saying they’re still eyeing the play offs.

If they lose the next couple pressure is going to ramp up again.

Proper captain's performance. Representing the team in a positive light to the press. I can see why Spors was so keen to extend his contract.

Posted

I mean, in fairness to Stephens; he can't win here. 

 

He says we're still targeting the play-offs, and he gets criticized for being unrealistic. 

If he come out and said they're no longer targeting the play-offs, he'd get criticized for giving up and having no ambition. 

  • Like 2
Posted
36 minutes ago, SaintNewForest said:

I mean, in fairness to Stephens; he can't win here. 

 

He says we're still targeting the play-offs, and he gets criticized for being unrealistic. 

If he come out and said they're no longer targeting the play-offs, he'd get criticized for giving up and having no ambition. 

All of them should STFU and let the action on the pitch do the talking, nothing else matters

  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, tdmickey3 said:

All of them should STFU and let the action on the pitch do the talking, nothing else matters

On that I agree, but unfortunately, they are obliged to do these media soundbites. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, SaintNewForest said:

On that I agree, but unfortunately, they are obliged to do these media soundbites. 

Only the managers I think

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...