Jump to content

#Spygate

St Chalet

By St Chalet
in The Saints

 Share

Recommended Posts

Recommended

Posted by Miltonaggro,

Apologies for the war and peace post chaps – bear with or scroll past.  For the last week I have been trying to provide a steer on here as to why I think this silly episode will be concluded with a fine (in the region of £200k) and / or a possible future points deduction (though if I were advising Saints I would appeal this).  Simply that talk of forfeit and bans opens a legal can of worms that is well beyond the remit and scope of both the EFL and / or Middlesbrough FC. The best way to get

What a well thought out post. Thank you

Recommended by St Chalet

  • Like

110 reactions

Go to this post
Pamplemousse

Pamplemousse

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, Lord Duckhunter said:

It’s unusual because……. We’re in an unusual situation. People can read what they like into it, but anyone who reads anything into it, is a plank…

Let's put it like this. The absence of that information would be more concerning than otherwise.

Dr Who?

Dr Who?

Posted
Posted

I take it the appeal is on hold for the weekend? This is why we are looking at Tuesday (as a matter of urgency 🙄) for a conclusion. 3 day hearing sounds about right. Bit silly though as it is urgent but they cannot meet at the weekend! 

  • Like 1
beatlesaint

beatlesaint

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Dr Who? said:

I take it the appeal is on hold for the weekend? This is why we are looking at Tuesday (as a matter of urgency 🙄) for a conclusion. 3 day hearing sounds about right. Bit silly though as it is urgent but they cannot meet at the weekend! 

Might be wrong but I doubt the legal eagles of the level this would take don’t work on a Saturday or Sunday. 

  • Like 1
Dr Who?

Dr Who?

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, beatlesaint said:

Might be wrong but I doubt the legal eagles of the level this would take don’t work on a Saturday or Sunday. 

You would be surprised. 

Secret Site Agent

Secret Site Agent

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, RedArmy said:

Probably because most people with a brain know that there is practically zero chance this amateur has ever managed to avoid being caught. 
 

image.thumb.jpeg.f4a199039002d6e888669b583d9b8ea4.jpeg

Looks like we've started something now.

 

 

copyImage.webp

  • Haha 2
egg

egg

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, Dr Who? said:

I take it the appeal is on hold for the weekend? This is why we are looking at Tuesday (as a matter of urgency 🙄) for a conclusion. 3 day hearing sounds about right. Bit silly though as it is urgent but they cannot meet at the weekend! 

I'd imagine it's proceeding over the weekend. 3 day hearing Friday to Sunday, Monday for deliberations/decision writing, and deliver that either later on Monday or Tuesday. 

  • Like 1
stknowle

stknowle

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, Football Special said:

Lock this thread for a couple of days, its just going round in circles of guesswork and assumptions 

Amen to that. I still can’t stop fucking reading it though! 

  • Like 3
bpsaint

bpsaint

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, beatlesaint said:

Might be wrong but I doubt the legal eagles of the level this would take don’t work on a Saturday or Sunday. 

Indeed, and most certainly charging weekend hours for the privilege!

sockeye

sockeye

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, obelisk said:

Half time during the FA Cup final wouldn't be a bad time to release the verdict.

“The EFL have docked Middlesbrough 6 points for the 2026/27 season for making the independent commission work on a weekend”

* Zombie nation goal song plays *

  • Haha 2
St. Ciervo

St. Ciervo

Posted
Posted

If we get caught for spying on EVERY team, then expulsion from the playoffs would not help the aggrieved teams either. Massive fine, touchline ban for Tonda, Saints March On. 

Nolan

Nolan

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, St. Ciervo said:

If we get caught for spying on EVERY team, then expulsion from the playoffs would not help the aggrieved teams either. Massive fine, touchline ban for Tonda, Saints March On. 

there currently is not any public evidence that Tonda was involved here.

Unless there is why on earth should he have a touchline ban?

Edited by Nolan
St. Ciervo

St. Ciervo

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, Nolan said:

there currently is not any public evidence that Tonda was involved here.

Unless there is why on earth should he have a touchline ban?

In the event of us spying on more than one team, our heads would surely know. 

Nolan

Nolan

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, St. Ciervo said:

In the event of us spying on more than one team, our heads would surely know. 

Why? I would expect analysts to simply provide a dossier on the opposition to the manager, and the analysts to simply get on with sorting that dossier for each opponent.

  • Like 1
sadoldgit

sadoldgit

Posted
Posted

Have I missed something? I can’t find anywhere where the club have officially admitted guilt. I see that the club have accepted that something has happened which they need to respond to but that is not admitting guilt is it?

  • Like 3
EssEffCee

EssEffCee

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

Have I missed something? I can’t find anywhere where the club have officially admitted guilt. I see that the club have accepted that something has happened which they need to respond to but that is not admitting guilt is it?

Alfie House has said that the club won't be contesting the charge and will offer mitigation instead. He only would have got that info from the club.

You honestly would have to be a complete simpleton to believe we might not be guilty at this point.

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
westmidlandsaint

westmidlandsaint

Posted
Posted

I know it's different leagues but I wonder what will be deemed worse in case of punishments handed out. Someone with an iPhone allegedly taking a picture of a teams training or fans invading the pitch and allegedly assaulting the opposition players. 

 

  • Confused 1
Winnersaint

Winnersaint

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

"Could", "might", "believe".........how to make out you know something when in fact you know fuck all.

One thing this whole episode has shown me is how irritating the grifting social media class is, from this clown and others reposting speculative crap for clicks to Benjamin Bloom and his stupid hair and even Football Martin, who seems like a good guy but perhaps might have sat on this a bit. 

AlexLaw76

AlexLaw76

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, sadoldgit said:

Have I missed something? I can’t find anywhere where the club have officially admitted guilt. I see that the club have accepted that something has happened which they need to respond to but that is not admitting guilt is it?

Alfie house has stated the club will not be contesting the charge.

Jimmy_D

Jimmy_D

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

Alfie house has stated the club will not be contesting the charge.

He tweeted something about that I think, but quickly deleted it after.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...