Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Baird of the land said:

Seems to be the new whipping boy for some.

Are you suggesting he was really good and people are just pretending he wasn't great because they want a whipping boy?

  • Like 2
Posted
Just now, hypochondriac said:

Are you suggesting he was really good and people are just pretending he wasn't great because they want a whipping boy?

I thought was ok, not great but equally not terrible. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

He's keen, got a bit of a headless chicken look about him at the mo though. Ball seems to bounce off him, rather than sticking. He has pace/power though, so we just need to get him in behind rather than throwing long balls up at him. 

He's obviously very raw, be interesting to see how he develops.

Edited by S-Clarke
Posted
Just now, Sidney Fudpucker the 3rd said:

The problem is that he's inexperienced and that's not what's needed. We haven't got time to 'hope that he develops'. We need a proven goalscorer and somehow we've got less up front that we had a month ago. 

Honestly, this club.

Have you asked your Man City supporting friend what he thinks of him?

Posted
1 minute ago, Osvaldorama said:

He didn’t really get any decent service or anything to work with tonight, in a difficult game. 
 

Think it’s quite harsh to judge him on that. 

Yeah, we kept hitting it long to him - I don't think that's his game. I think he's a spin in behind type of player, get the ball on the ground and let him turn a CB. He's the quickest forward we have, lots of upper body strength too.

I think he can be a good attribute to us, as he's shown he can score goals at this level with Stoke. We just need to play him correctly.

  • Like 2
Posted
49 minutes ago, hypochondriac said:

I don't think he's someone who can lead the line on his own. When Larin is tired or injured I'm not sure we will be scoring many. He's the type of player who would have been fine to bring in if we still had Stewart as well. Now we have to rely on him.

You are correct, we are so dependent on Larin its scary 

Posted
48 minutes ago, Football Special said:

You are correct, we are so dependent on Larin its scary 

Only if we don’t change the way we attack. It’s perfectly possible we supply the strikers differently. We don’t have to keep smashing the ball up to Mubama if we don’t want to. 

We also don’t have to do that to Larin either but that’s a whole different debate.

Posted

I think he’s got something. But we do need to stop just whacking the ball at him above hip height and expecting him to make something of it. He’s not Larin, who can do that at times. Mubama is more agile and lively and we need to harness that with more passes off the shoulder of the last defender for him to stretch teams late in games when they’re tiring 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...