hypochondriac Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 1 minute ago, Baird of the land said: Seems to be the new whipping boy for some. Are you suggesting he was really good and people are just pretending he wasn't great because they want a whipping boy? 3
Baird of the land Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago Just now, hypochondriac said: Are you suggesting he was really good and people are just pretending he wasn't great because they want a whipping boy? I thought was ok, not great but equally not terrible. 1
hypochondriac Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 1 minute ago, Baird of the land said: I thought was ok, not great but equally not terrible. I'm not sure anyone called him terrible? 1
S-Clarke Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago (edited) He's keen, got a bit of a headless chicken look about him at the mo though. Ball seems to bounce off him, rather than sticking. He has pace/power though, so we just need to get him in behind rather than throwing long balls up at him. He's obviously very raw, be interesting to see how he develops. Edited 18 hours ago by S-Clarke
Disco Stu Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago Does Princewill Ehibhatiomhan know how to hold a ball up?
Sidney Fudpucker the 3rd Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago The problem is that he's inexperienced and that's not what's needed. We haven't got time to 'hope that he develops'. We need a proven goalscorer and somehow we've got less up front that we had a month ago. Honestly, this club. 3
S-Clarke Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago Just now, Sidney Fudpucker the 3rd said: The problem is that he's inexperienced and that's not what's needed. We haven't got time to 'hope that he develops'. We need a proven goalscorer and somehow we've got less up front that we had a month ago. Honestly, this club. Have you asked your Man City supporting friend what he thinks of him?
Osvaldorama Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago He didn’t really get any decent service or anything to work with tonight, in a difficult game. Think it’s quite harsh to judge him on that. 7
S-Clarke Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 1 minute ago, Osvaldorama said: He didn’t really get any decent service or anything to work with tonight, in a difficult game. Think it’s quite harsh to judge him on that. Yeah, we kept hitting it long to him - I don't think that's his game. I think he's a spin in behind type of player, get the ball on the ground and let him turn a CB. He's the quickest forward we have, lots of upper body strength too. I think he can be a good attribute to us, as he's shown he can score goals at this level with Stoke. We just need to play him correctly. 4
Football Special Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 49 minutes ago, hypochondriac said: I don't think he's someone who can lead the line on his own. When Larin is tired or injured I'm not sure we will be scoring many. He's the type of player who would have been fine to bring in if we still had Stewart as well. Now we have to rely on him. You are correct, we are so dependent on Larin its scary
Fabrice29 Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 48 minutes ago, Football Special said: You are correct, we are so dependent on Larin its scary Only if we don’t change the way we attack. It’s perfectly possible we supply the strikers differently. We don’t have to keep smashing the ball up to Mubama if we don’t want to. We also don’t have to do that to Larin either but that’s a whole different debate.
CSA96 Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago I think he’s got something. But we do need to stop just whacking the ball at him above hip height and expecting him to make something of it. He’s not Larin, who can do that at times. Mubama is more agile and lively and we need to harness that with more passes off the shoulder of the last defender for him to stretch teams late in games when they’re tiring
Maggie May Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 8 hours ago, Sidney Fudpucker the 3rd said: The problem is that he's inexperienced and that's not what's needed. We haven't got time to 'hope that he develops'. We need a proven goalscorer and somehow we've got less up front that we had a month ago. Honestly, this club. He’s played more Championship games than Larin… 1
revolution saint Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Get the impression Mubama is probably a decent finisher and will score goals if he's given chances but getting involved in the build up or holding the ball up isn't really his thing.
CSA96 Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 4 minutes ago, revolution saint said: Get the impression Mubama is probably a decent finisher and will score goals if he's given chances but getting involved in the build up or holding the ball up isn't really his thing. Agree. Although he does look okay when the ball goes into feet. But when it's hit up to him at chest height or head height he looks uncomfortable, it's not his game 1
saintant Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 14 hours ago, S-Clarke said: Yeah, we kept hitting it long to him - I don't think that's his game. I think he's a spin in behind type of player, get the ball on the ground and let him turn a CB. He's the quickest forward we have, lots of upper body strength too. I think he can be a good attribute to us, as he's shown he can score goals at this level with Stoke. We just need to play him correctly. Agree. We need to get him latching on to cute passes from Azaz like he did against Stoke. He's not a target man but if we hit it into the channels or down the wings accurately he'll probably have more chance of holding the ball up in those situations than a big lump to him from the back.
sadoldgit Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago We have a long history of bringing attacking players in and not playing to their strengths. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now