Tonda Eckert

[Lord Duckhunter]

3 hours ago, Convict Colony said:

My main complaint was that this entire forum knew we should be playing 4 at the back and fellows isnt a wing back yet it took a long fucking time until it got to him as well.

 

Who would he have played as right back in 4  then Einstein? Bree was at Charlton, & the other 2 were mostly injured. Stephen’s?, that bloke who we just stuck 5 past?

If only we’d listened to you, we’d be in the play off places now…

The fact is, as soon as he had a decent right back on the books, he reverted to a 4. 
 

 

[RedArmy]

2 hours ago, AlexLaw76 said:

Wait till we ‘reset’ in the summer and ‘pivot’ to 3 at the back 

It’ll be far sooner than the summer if we have a wobble during our playoff chase. 
Ramsus will make his demands again. 

[trousers]

25 minutes ago, Lord Duckhunter said:

Who would he have played as right back in 4  then Einstein? Bree was at Charlton, & the other 2 were mostly injured. Stephen’s?, that bloke who we just stuck 5 past?

If only we’d listened to you, we’d be in the play off places now…

The fact is, as soon as he had a decent right back on the books, he reverted to a 4. 
 

 

If only the "Einsteins" at the club hadn't loaned out Bree in the first place... 

Edited 4 hours ago by trousers

[AlexLaw76]

Edwards could have played RB

[StrangelyBrown]

5 hours ago, Fabrice29 said:

You’re right but claims like ‘let’s see what the next 7 games are like’ seem a bit wild to me. What if Eckert passes trousers test over the next 7 games with flying colours but never wins a game again. Good or bad? 

There’s obvious differences a manager can make, you’ve named some and Eckert has done well in some but I do think this fan base can take a step back from wild conclusions on managers, good or bad, based on small samples of results especially when 11 players on the pitch have stopped giving stupid goals away which immediately makes us more competitive.

Goody here is Fabrice to tell everyone that they are wrong.

Well done you!

Please tell me what evidence you gave to dispute these "wild conclusions". Other than you being a massiv bellend