St Chalet Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/articles/cqx1wqr3yjno This on top of their massive 6 point deduction. In the article it suggested we were considering a legal claim along with Forrest.
coalman Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 10 minutes ago, St Chalet said: https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/articles/cqx1wqr3yjno This on top of their massive 6 point deduction. In the article it suggested we were considering a legal claim along with Forrest. Meanwhile in Middlesborough as the news was being received. 2
Saint86 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago That's a bugger for us. Goes a long way to wiping out the first year reduction in parachute payments.
Football Special Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Opens a can of worms, we'll end up with clubs taking out lawsuits against each other , lawyers will be delighted but the game is so far removed from the every day fan with all this nonsense Expect the appeal will take a while to be heard 1
obelisk Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago It's getting to the stage where there'll be no point playing actual games of football. Get in a decent defence of highly paid lawyers and promotion will be available without even having to kick a ball soon. I have to ask whether standing behind a tree with a camera watching events going on in public view is a better or worse offence than this though.
pingpong Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Forget getting a new striker, who is going to be in the legal team next year? Can we get that lord panic guy involved?
JohnnyShearer2.0 Posted 58 minutes ago Posted 58 minutes ago (edited) Think Everton are appealing. Also is this worse cheating than Spying ? Funny if they say to Burnley, they can have Dibling instead. Edited 56 minutes ago by JohnnyShearer2.0
badgerx16 Posted 54 minutes ago Posted 54 minutes ago (edited) 3 minutes ago, JohnnyShearer2.0 said: Think Everton are appealing. Not my type. Edited 54 minutes ago by badgerx16 4
Gloucester Saint Posted 32 minutes ago Posted 32 minutes ago Absolute mess. Pace may well use that money to pay down some of the debts accrued from their leveraged takeover.
West Dean FC Legend Posted 23 minutes ago Posted 23 minutes ago Interesting response from Everton, ummm not saying they didn't do it, just saying it wasn't fair. Errrrr....the rules were there, it is your job to know them, you can't make excuses afterwards. So you are guilty of doing what you were charged with: The club said in a statement they were "clear in the belief the ruling is fundamentally flawed in both law and fact". "This ruling sets a dangerous and unworkable precedent for English football, given it is constructed on a principle that a club can be in breach of financial rules at any point in a financial year," the statement said.
Soton7 Posted 20 minutes ago Posted 20 minutes ago It sounds like the Premier League, EFL, FA and FIFA are a bunch of corrupt wankers who couldn’t run a bath. Absolutely useless.
DellBlockH Posted 18 minutes ago Posted 18 minutes ago It makes you wonder how any football club can plan for the future. Everton were punished at the time and, presumably, thought that was it. Any claim by Burnley (or any other club) should have been dealt with then. The same goes for our recent transgression. Deal with it summarily and move on. Having several goes at the same offence helps no-one. Moving on to any claim against us that Middlesbrough might contemplate, I think it would be difficult for them to show that our spying denied them Premier League football. They rather managed that on their own.
DellBlockH Posted 17 minutes ago Posted 17 minutes ago 5 minutes ago, West Dean FC Legend said: Interesting response from Everton, ummm not saying they didn't do it, just saying it wasn't fair. Errrrr....the rules were there, it is your job to know them, you can't make excuses afterwards. So you are guilty of doing what you were charged with: The club said in a statement they were "clear in the belief the ruling is fundamentally flawed in both law and fact". "This ruling sets a dangerous and unworkable precedent for English football, given it is constructed on a principle that a club can be in breach of financial rules at any point in a financial year," the statement said. They are not saying that they didn’t commit the offence or that they shouldn't be punished (they were). They are saying that they cannot be held financially liable for Burnley's relegation.
Turkish Posted 17 minutes ago Posted 17 minutes ago 2 minutes ago, Soton7 said: It sounds like the Premier League, EFL, FA and FIFA are a bunch of corrupt wankers who couldn’t run a bath. Absolutely useless. didnt you know already?
saintant Posted 14 minutes ago Posted 14 minutes ago It's getting to the stage where your team of lawyers is more important than your team of players.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now