Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Not matching up today formation wise. Always worries me a little as players get caught in no mans land at times.

Armstrong working hard...and then when you need him to make the run for Robinson he stands still. Grrr

Posted
Just now, AlexLaw76 said:

our 2 main signings, Quarshie and Downs look very bad, so far

Downs needs more time but Calamity Quarshie is almost comically bad. Has he actually passed to a Saints player in any game so far?

Posted
15 hours ago, Vancouver Saint said:

0-2 win for the Saints. Yes, I realise that means a clean sheet and I am being ridiculously optimistic! I feel this could be one of those games where they throw everything at us, we score one against the run of play in the first half then cling on until the 85th minute when we break away and do it again!

 

12 minutes ago, Thereisonlyonemickychannon said:

what a fing ballsup!

Why pass back, can't players kick the out for a throw or anywhere but towards our goal. Coaches obsessed with stupid back pass to keep ball.

Posted
1 minute ago, miserableoldgit said:

Downs needs more time but Calamity Quarshie is almost comically bad. Has he actually passed to a Saints player in any game so far?

He's made one mistake mate. Not sure he deserves the calamity tag. 

  • Like 2
Posted

THB is definitely one of the better CB’s in this league but without the ball in a back 3/5 he just looks so awkward and lost most of the time. 
 

I don’t know why successive managers just can’t see it. He needs a back 4. 

  • Like 2
Posted
11 minutes ago, Saint86 said:

I am beginning to wonder how still had the defensive record he did in France. Do we just have really shit defenders? 🫣

Video game tactics, or so any French fan would tell you. He didn't have the necessary coaching certificates so Reims were fined 25000 euros for each match he was in charge. Also had Etikite and two Japanese wingers.

Posted
1 minute ago, RedArmy said:

THB is definitely one of the better CB’s in this league but without the ball in a back 3/5 he just looks so awkward and lost most of the time. 
 

I don’t know why successive managers just can’t see it. He needs a back 4. 

I agree, the ball inside him causes all sorts of issues. 

Posted
1 minute ago, obelisk said:

Saints looking blunt in attack still.

Not surprising with Armstrong through the middle tbh. Any good work elsewhere on the pitch just runs face first into a brick wall when it gets to him.

Posted
Just now, hypochondriac said:

If we lose Fernandes we better get some bloody good replacements because the rest of these players other than maybe Robinson really don't have much about them. 

German Division 2 players, inbound

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Disco Stu said:

Why are we putting crosses in the box for Armstrong?

Because he's too f*cking short of course 🤣

Edited by Bakovnetski
Posted
4 minutes ago, Harry_SFC said:

Whilst some of his defending is a bit suspect Welington does look handy going forwards. 

 

2 minutes ago, Disco Stu said:

Why are we putting crosses in the box for Armstrong?

Tactics wrong,  same as Wrexham either put ball in low the natural goal scorer or high to a tall player to nod in. Its basic football coaching. I fear we have RM v2 its all odd football. Who ever holds the budget has made a huge mistake by not getting a goal scorer, natural forward with experience. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...