Tonda Eckert

[Gloucester Saint]

3 minutes ago, Whitey Grandad said:

I have come to the conclusion that these owners are treating our club as one big experiment. Some people with weird ideas have persuaded someone with money to burn/launder/offset/dispose/throw away to have a big of fun. 

We are a rich man's toy.

He won’t be rich for much longer letting Rasmus run riot. Kicked off his own company board seemingly as well.

[MarkSFC]

Analyse this you SR Managerial twats....

Appointed Interim Manger

W W W W L... 12/15 pts (80% win ratio)

Appointed FT Manager

W W L D L D L L...8/24 (25% win ratio over more games. 

Last 6 win ratio (0%) versus first 6 win ratio (83.33%)

Xg means sweet f.a.. 

Goals and points are the ONLY stats that matter.

 

[badgerx16]

15 minutes ago, MarkSFC said:

Analyse this you SR Managerial twats....

Appointed Interim Manger

W W W W L... 12/15 pts (80% win ratio)

Appointed FT Manager

W W L D L D L L...8/24 (25% win ratio over more games. 

Last 6 win ratio (0%) versus first 6 win ratio (83.33%)

Xg means sweet f.a.. 

Goals and points are the ONLY stats that matter.

 

It's slightly worse than that - FT manager has another draw in the list: WWLDLDDLL, 9/27,  win ratio 22%. Last 7 win ratio 0%.

Edited 1 hour ago by badgerx16

[BotleySaint]

42 minutes ago, MarkSFC said:

Analyse this you SR Managerial twats....

Appointed Interim Manger

W W W W L... 12/15 pts (80% win ratio)

 

It remains an oddity to me how he managed these wins. 

Was it just blind luck?

[saintant]

2 minutes ago, BotleySaint said:

It remains an oddity to me how he managed these wins. 

Was it just blind luck?

It's not just the wins though it's also the standard of football we served up which was almost unplayable for our opponents. You surely can't fluke 6 wins from 8 or whatever the actual figures were. Hard to make sense of it and I get that people claim he's a one trick pony and teams found a way to stop us but surely the fall in levels and results shouldn't have been so extreme. 

[coalman]

10 minutes ago, BotleySaint said:

It remains an oddity to me how he managed these wins. 

Was it just blind luck?

The first win was luck. We were dreadful. The next few were down to other teams not pressing us and allowing us to play and we won it in the first half before they adapted. Since then anyone playing Saints knows exactly how to set up.

The latest defeat was could be considered a bit unlucky on the balance of chances created. Except we committed suicide with our defending to convert what should have been a win into a narrow defeat.

[coalman]

https://www.southamptonfc.com/en/video/eckert-on-first-home-defeat

Wow. That body language is shocking. More bollocks about there being two different games. Didn't have much to say at half time because we created so many chances. The interviewer sounds like someone talking to someone on suicide watch that desperately wants not to be the one that pushes their interviewee over the edge.

[Willo of Whiteley]

3 hours ago, DT said:

I'll save that new analyst some time.

We're shit, with terrible players, a manager who has no experience, and with a toxic underbelly of cliqueyness and no grounding in the basics of playing football or team spirit. But it's okay because Rasmus Ankersen.

That is pretty damning and accurate, cannot fault that.

I wonder if the fan advisory panel have been as direct?

[Willo of Whiteley]

It is the classic “if you don’t laugh, you’ll cry”, so I’ve decided to find this continuously and endlessly hilarious from now on.

It takes me back to the old Pompey Takeover Saga days, where every day was a news day and a funny one.

Sport Republic are shambolic. 😂