Colinjb Posted yesterday at 13:00 Posted yesterday at 13:00 That was a penalty. Catches his knees clearly. 3
obelisk Posted yesterday at 13:00 Posted yesterday at 13:00 Ref makes a big mistake. That was a penalty.
Saint Fan CaM Posted yesterday at 13:01 Posted yesterday at 13:01 Ref absolutely bottling a pen there.
BotleySaint Posted yesterday at 13:01 Posted yesterday at 13:01 There was contact but he made too much of it. 2
Sheaf Saint Posted yesterday at 13:01 Posted yesterday at 13:01 Oh ref. That's a fucking penalty all day long. 1
Willo of Whiteley Posted yesterday at 13:02 Posted yesterday at 13:02 2 minutes ago, Maggie May said: azaz is having a blinder. That’ll stop now he’s been booked.
BotleySaint Posted yesterday at 13:02 Posted yesterday at 13:02 Just now, AlexLaw76 said: VAR gives that... VAR disallows it because of the handball in the build up. 2
Saint NL Posted yesterday at 13:02 Posted yesterday at 13:02 He definitely touched him, so it wasn't a dive. Enough for a penalty? Maybe
macca155 Posted yesterday at 13:02 Posted yesterday at 13:02 (edited) Dive from Azaz , defender pulled his leg away Edit Just seen the replay from a different angle , blatant contact should be a Pen Edited yesterday at 13:04 by macca155
benjii Posted yesterday at 13:02 Posted yesterday at 13:02 Need the second goal. This lot are shite but surely they'll change something at half time.
pingpong Posted yesterday at 13:02 Posted yesterday at 13:02 Missing baz, regardless of the stick he gets, he's way more reliable on the ball and prevents the panic that peretz causes. Also, that's two stonewall penalties now, Stephens dragged and Azaz tripped. 1 7 1
Stripey McStripe Shirt Posted yesterday at 13:02 Posted yesterday at 13:02 Feel like the ref realised he missed a massive handball before the pen shout, so giving Azaz a yellow was the easiest way to minimise controversy. Blatant one otherwise.
Maggie May Posted yesterday at 13:02 Posted yesterday at 13:02 1 minute ago, Saint NL said: Azaz dives 🤦 What else is he supposed to do? There was clear contact. Fellows stayed on his feet the other week and should’ve gone down. No penalty for that either.
Willo of Whiteley Posted yesterday at 13:02 Posted yesterday at 13:02 He was tapped on his ankle but that is one hell of a belly flop from Finn Azaz. Shame really. He’s done ok until now but I’m sure he’ll regress back down the pitch as the game goes on.
Hopper Posted yesterday at 13:02 Posted yesterday at 13:02 Bit more honesty that would’ve been a pen. Went down too easily trying to anticipate. 1
Turkish Posted yesterday at 13:03 Posted yesterday at 13:03 That’s not a penalty if that goes against us people would be going mad 3 1
obelisk Posted yesterday at 13:03 Posted yesterday at 13:03 Ref has decided he wants Stoke to win this.
Turkish Posted yesterday at 13:03 Posted yesterday at 13:03 Just now, davefizzy14 said: Was a blatant penalty Was it fuck 😂😂😂 2
Chez Posted yesterday at 13:03 Posted yesterday at 13:03 a tiny touch that doesn't upend him and then a dive. No complaints from me. Nice trick by Azaz to beat him though. 2
Osvaldorama Posted yesterday at 13:03 Posted yesterday at 13:03 He made a meal of it but that’s a pen all day 6
SNSUN Posted yesterday at 13:04 Posted yesterday at 13:04 Just now, pingpong said: Missing baz, regardless of the stick he gets, he's way more reliable on the ball and prevents the panic that peretz causes. Also, that's two stonewall penalties now, Stephens dragged and Azaz tripped. Not me. Slip earlier aside I feel more confident with Peretz in goal. 3
AlexLaw76 Posted yesterday at 13:04 Posted yesterday at 13:04 barely touched....no way does the warrant flying like he did You can see (clearly) why the ref never gave it. 2
Ken Tone Posted yesterday at 13:04 Posted yesterday at 13:04 Might be an argument that he went down easily but there was definitely contact... No way a booking for diving 3
Sheaf Saint Posted yesterday at 13:04 Posted yesterday at 13:04 1 minute ago, pingpong said: Missing baz, regardless of the stick he gets, he's way more reliable on the ball and prevents the panic that peretz causes. OK you're clearly just trolling now. 2
bangkoksaint Posted yesterday at 13:05 Posted yesterday at 13:05 Well it’s a split on here as to whether it’s a pen or not. Ref gets one look and needs to make a decision. Prefer that to VAR 4
coalman Posted yesterday at 13:05 Posted yesterday at 13:05 I think if he doesn't give a penalty he has to book him. Have seen those given but Azaz was already on the way down before contact was made.
Chez Posted yesterday at 13:05 Posted yesterday at 13:05 Just now, obelisk said: Ref has decided he wants Stoke to win this. he seems to spot every foul we make and has missed a couple of theirs. it will even up.
Turkish Posted yesterday at 13:06 Posted yesterday at 13:06 1 minute ago, AlexLaw76 said: barely touched....no way does the warrant flying like he did You can see (clearly) why the ref never gave it. Precisely. People forget with all this “there was contact” bollocks these days foot isn’t a no contact sport. Bit of a touch on his knee but not enough to make him go down like that. Clear why ref didn’t give it.
Chez Posted yesterday at 13:06 Posted yesterday at 13:06 3 minutes ago, pingpong said: Missing baz, regardless of the stick he gets, he's way more reliable on the ball and prevents the panic that peretz causes. Were you missing Baz when Peretz tipped that strike over the bar? 5
Saint NL Posted yesterday at 13:07 Posted yesterday at 13:07 Jander is playing well, but Stoke are giving him so much space they're making it easy for him
whelk Posted yesterday at 13:07 Posted yesterday at 13:07 Just now, Turkish said: Precisely. People forget with all this “there was contact” bollocks these days foot isn’t a no contact sport. Bit of a touch on his knee but not enough to make him go down like that. Clear why ref didn’t give it. You don’t need much contact when at pace. Slow motion always makes it look like less impact. Pen for me Clive 2
West end Saints Posted yesterday at 13:07 Posted yesterday at 13:07 100% pen in PREM with var, contact as he turned, knee to knee is foul, But he went down easily and prefer no VAR. 1
Saint Scott Posted yesterday at 13:09 Posted yesterday at 13:09 Their RB looks fucking hopeless. We need to constantly give the ball to Leo to run at him 1
obelisk Posted yesterday at 13:09 Posted yesterday at 13:09 Stewart probably needed to hit that first time. 1
Chez Posted yesterday at 13:10 Posted yesterday at 13:10 4 minutes ago, Ken Tone said: Might be an argument that he went down easily but there was definitely contact... No way a booking for diving he dived.
Jack Posted yesterday at 13:10 Posted yesterday at 13:10 Feel like we could be a bit more adventurous and play forward quicker here. Had some really good moments but still playing very safe a big % of the time. Ref giving us nothing. Stoke look there for the taking unless we gift them one
Jack Posted yesterday at 13:11 Posted yesterday at 13:11 Stewart has been learning from Arma it seems, always offside
Sheaf Saint Posted yesterday at 13:11 Posted yesterday at 13:11 As good as he's been overall so far, that was a very slack and dangerous header from Stephens.
Saint NL Posted yesterday at 13:11 Posted yesterday at 13:11 Stewart has been offside more than onside so far 😂
Chez Posted yesterday at 13:12 Posted yesterday at 13:12 Just now, Saint Scott said: Their RB looks fucking hopeless. We need to constantly give the ball to Leo to run at him big style We are much the better side. Got to take advantage.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now